Bill Clinton

Cross Posted to Clintonistas for Obama

These are apparently the words that many purity trolls and Obama supporters would have wanted the Big Dog to say in his GMA interview.

At the risk of restarting the "primary war", there was an interesting diary on MyDD about the Big Dog's interview on GMA.

Apparently, Bill is now aligning with McCain, because of his response about accusations of racism:

When asked, "Do you personally have any regrets about what you did, campaigning for your wife?" Clinton, at first, answered, "Yes, but not the ones you think. And it would be counterproductive for me to talk about."

But then he added, "There are things that I wish I'd urged her to do. Things I wish I'd said. Things I wish I hadn't said.

"But I am not a racist," he continued. "I've never made a racist comment and I never attacked him [Obama] personally."

Of course, the games that the Obama campaign (especally pre-South Carolina primary) played with race are fairly well known and documented, which are not limited too:

-Releasing a memo just days before the primary painting one the greatest Presidential champions for African Americans as a filthy racist.

-Obama campaign co chair going on national television and telling us how "Hillary Clinton did not cry for Katrina"

Even outside the campaign, not so undeclared Obama supporters trashed Bill and Hillary, like James Clyburn, accusing the Clintons of nothing less than racism, an entire effort that was in ways, at least aided by some mid level players in the Obama campaign, with the full knowledge that Senator Obama would not have been able to win the Democratic primary carrying only 60% of the African American vote, which was around the percentage he was carrying pre Super Tuesday.

But I digress. The main point of this diary is to note, albiet extremely shockingly, that some people are amazed that Bill Clinton would have the NERVE to defend himself against scurrious attacks about his feelings over race!

Let's take a look:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/8/4/14336 /72291


[new] Bill is doing his part to help (1.00 / 1)

get McCain elected, so he can go to hell.

The timing of him talking about how unfairly Obama supporters painted him as a racist is NOT a coincidence, coming right after McCain made the same charge about Obama.

Hillary is trying to get Barack elected, but Bill is John's BFF.

by Geekesque on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 11:36:13 AM PST

Oh, and this one is hilarious:

new] Well, if Bill wants to be a party leader (none / 0)

he needs to weigh what effect his words will have.

This seems to me to indicate that Bill no longer considers himself an active Democrat.

by Geekesque on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 12:14:04 PM PST
[ Parent | Reply to This |  none0- hide1- troll2- mojo  

Indeed. After all, what "active Democrat" would actively try to disspell notions of racism?

He's certainly not a racist, but he is acting like a petulant child.  Politics is a contact sport.  The primary got overheated on both sides.  Senator Clinton and Bill lost.  

And instead of being graceful in defeat, as Senator Clinton has been, Bill pops off in a way that reinforces the McCain camps talking points.  Pitiful and absolutely indefensible for anyone that actually gives a damn about the course of this country, which cannot afford four more years of the Bush/McCain camps policies.  

by HSTruman on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 11:43:45 AM PST
[ Parent | Reply to This |  none0- hide1- troll2- mojo

Very petulant, indeed. Because if I was accused of being a filthy racist, I totally wouldn't ever want to dissaude that notion. That'd be childish and wrong.

Here's the deal folks: alot of the parts of the interview were taken out of context. But on these messages, I'm standing behind the Big Dog. There's alot of kveching about how these comments seemed to back up McCain's talking points on the race card.

You want to know what?

I guess maybe people shouldn't have called Bill Clinton racist, or insinuated that Bill was a racist back then. Then we wouldn't be having this situation. Instead, the netroots, MSM, and even some parts of the Obama campaign embraced this meme as a chance to get Barack nominated, and it worked. Well, now you have to deal with the consequences. Bill Clinton, a great Democratic President and a great person in general, has every right to defend himself.

And if you don't like that, maybe you should bitch at the other half of the party, because they went there in the first place.

Tags: Bill Clinton, primary wars, purity trolls (all tags)

Comments

243 Comments

Sorry guys...

All good Democrats should stand with the Big Dog on this one.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 12:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Sorry guys...

I never really thought Bill said anything above and beyond normal campaign stuff, now ferraro jumped over the line on a few occasions

by Dog Chains 2008-08-04 01:01PM | 0 recs
surrogates did a lot of creepy shit

but all's fair, except for some of the crap that Hillary's campaign pulled... on someone who was NOT Obama (or his family)

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:18PM | 0 recs
I am a fucking racist.

now, kindly go to fucking hell, and chew on a pogostick.

or just enjoy my diary.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1 0/31/92331/990/129/404631

angsty angst angst angst.

I wish everyone would sit up and be honest about how they feel -- and what they are doing to change it.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:17PM | 0 recs
Wonderful diary on Dkos, BlogSurrogate.

From the top of it:

Just Because You're Racist, Doesn't Mean You Have To Like It Hotlist
by RisingTide [Subscribe]
Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 06:39:05 AM PDT

Now, I won't stand up here and say I'm not racist. This ain't a soapbox, for one thing. But I will say that anyone here, reading this, probably harbors some thoughts about being racist.  I'm all in favor of NOT taking the knee-jerk attitude, "I can't be racist!" [...]

And that's about right.  But to read the diaries here by bitter post-Hillary holdouts (and can anybody dispute that description for this diary and its author?), it's unfair to speak out about any forms of racial bias and/or exploitation because it's unfair to certain white people, i.e., them.

YOU ARE NOT ALL RACISTS.  And if you are, you are not the ONLY racists.  Nor is racist an absolute term, like pregnant or unique.  I'd like to be sympathetic to your complaints about this, but you, ZCflint and your recommenders, are once again dragging us back into the primary season.  And once again, you put this crap at the top of the rec list.

At the top of the rec list thanks to these people, who should be ashamed of themselves.  Some of these people I was starting to regain respect for.

The Following Users Have Recommended This Diary:

David Kowalski
bsavage
bobswern
psychodrew
easyE
sricki
BlueDoggyDogg
louisprandtl
feelfree
catfish2

I have a whole bunch of complaints about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro and Mark Penn and Begala and Carville and Shaheen, and I am trying as best I can not to air them because THE PRIMARY SEASON IS OVER..  I try to restrain myself as you infantile pricks keep throwing bait out there, daring us to fight back in turn.  Do you honestly think that you guys are the only ones that are bent out of shape by something that happened during the primary?  Do you think that if you keep airing your petrified grievances and the rest of us don't, that that means you are right?  

GET THE FUCK OVER IT.

I am really ashamed of some people here right now.

You know, I wouldn't even have read this diary if the title had said, "Bill Clinton is NOT a racist!"  I would have said, fine, skipped over it, and read something else.

I'll let the LOLCATS express it better:

by Dumbo 2008-08-04 02:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Wonderful diary on Dkos, BlogSurrogate.

Dude,

After reading your post i decided to rec this thread too.  Will you be posting my name to?  Calling my boss?  Will you be telling on me?

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 03:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Wonderful diary on Dkos, BlogSurrogate.

Will you be posting my name to?  Calling my boss?  Will you be telling on me?

It is very courageous of you to rec this thread in spite of the gestapo like tactics of some around here. I myself have had my house firebombed for saying something someone didn't like.

But we need brave people like you who will be willing to make their point in spite of the overwhelming tactics of intimidation....

Uh? What was your point again?

by Mystylplx 2008-08-04 03:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Wonderful diary on Dkos, BlogSurrogate.

Don't be so bitter Davy, jealousy is an unattractive trait.

by hocuspocus 2008-08-04 04:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Wonderful diary on Dkos, BlogSurrogate.

Dumbo's home page

Another tortured cat.  Tsk tsk.

by LIsoundview 2008-08-04 03:45PM | 0 recs
It is possible that many of us are able to

hold more than one thought in our heads at any given time, and your comment is extremely offensive. The former Hillary supporters on this site. myself included, who have whole-heartedly embraced Obama, still believe that Bill Clinton was unfairly characterized as racist during the primary. That does nothing to dimish our support for Obama. And Bill Clinton has every right to defend himself against what he percieved as unfair characterizations of racism. People lecturing us from beneath their tin-foil hats doesn't help, and it really pisses me off. When we pledged our support for Obama, we meant it. And it wasn't a conditional pledge, so talking to us as if we have broken some kind of post-primary cardinal rule for not throwing Bill under the bus doesn't help. Sheeesh...

by Rumarhazzit 2008-08-04 04:04PM | 0 recs
Well, here is what we are all dancing around.

Some of us think that Obama WAS unfairly attacked by certain unnamed people in the Clinton campaign orbit.  And many people on MyDD.  If we really want to relitigate this, we could ALL start posting those items as well and arguing against each other.

Do you want to revisit these old issues without us revisiting them, too?  I don't want to do it.  Not because I'm not just as angry as you are, (but about different issues), but because THE CAMPAIGN IS OVER AND IT SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE FOR US TO BASH EACH OTHER'S CANDIDATES, other than to give you an opportunity for self-indulgent therapeutic venting.

by Dumbo 2008-08-04 05:27PM | 0 recs
What is it with this time warp you seem to

be stuck in? I am not "bashing each other's candidate," because such a thing no longer exists. I support our nominee, Barack Obama. I also feel Bill Clinton was unfairly characterized as racist during the primary. If that offends you, that is your problem. You are entitled to your belief that Obama was unfairly attacked. It was a long, heated primary - feelings got hurt. However, my contention is that Bill Clinton has every right to defend himself, now, later, or whenever. Barack may do the same. And btw, my "venting" is not for purposes of "therapy." And it is not "self-indulgent," so  please just stop it with that crap. I am simply saying that Bill Clinton has the right to stand up for himself. Period. Now, let's go kick some McCain ass.

by Rumarhazzit 2008-08-04 07:05PM | 0 recs
damn fine comment

Yeah, they both gots the right to be hurt. But why we gotta be hurt too? Let them have their fight in the papers. Not in this new 'lectronic media.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-05 06:09AM | 0 recs
Read my fucking diary

or kiss my fucking ass.

What, I'm not allowed to say that someone growing up in Jim Crow probably absorbed something bad?

A shvartz is a shvartz -- even blacks who don't know the n-word know that. (err. this is a specific reference to someone growing up black in a Jewish neighborhood. not general)

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-05 06:05AM | 0 recs
Re: Sorry guys...

Simply put and in terms of the country's standing and the lives of its people during most of the 90's, Bill Clinton was a very good President. The racial "castigations" during the primary, also simply put, were clearly unfounded. Any look at our and his history would tell you that. What I particulary noticed today was both the timing and the location of President Clinton's interview. Good for him.

by christinep 2008-08-04 03:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Yawn, this subject has been diaried about at least 3 times today that I've seen, yet your tag calls others "troll", hahahahaha

by Dog Chains 2008-08-04 12:59PM | 0 recs
z - this is such a touchy issue...

with many - including myself.  what i have done is to try and forget what actually occurred so that i may continue to not pull my hair out.

that said - to address the content in your diary - clyburn's worst comment IMO (and should be career-ending) is the accusation that the clintons were using racism so that obama loses and she runs in 2012.

ive seen some wackos on both sides in the blogosphere say this - but no one with any credibility in RL - he ought to be ashamed.

by canadian gal 2008-08-04 01:05PM | 0 recs
Understand that...

a lot of people saying mean shit would probably like you to forget... and are trying as hard as they can to remember what they said, just so they don't say it again!

Emotions run high. So does 'cleverness' that hurts.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I think most of us can agree that it is singularly unhelpful to relitigate this issue.  Minds will not change.

That said, I think the charge of racism is singularly toxic in our politics, and I think Bill Clinton is entitled to try and clear his name.  The responsibility lies with those who made the inflammatory accusation in the first place.

If Bill were saying, "you know, I don't like how Obama mischaracterized Hillary's health care plan," or some other whine about politics as usual, I'd agree that he ought to suck it up and quit refighting the primary.  But I don't feel that way about the accusation of racism.  That's not one he is obligated to take for the team.

by Steve M 2008-08-04 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I don't think any relitigation is nessessary. The prevaling POV in that thread is that Bill Clinton is backing up McCain's attacks by saying what he did; and defending himself from accusations of being a racist. I think he has every right to do that. I don't care what John McCain's doing or not.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 01:15PM | 0 recs
Nobody said that.

Look. If you're going to quote another diary, at least put in some sources.

What various commentators, including myself said, that whatever the rights and wrongs of 'who played the race card first' this is precisely the wrong time to start debating them on MYDD, now that McCain is hurling exactly the same accusation at Obama.

Do you believe McCain is right or wrong? Then debate that issue.  Tarnishing the Obama campaign at this time with that accusation plays into the hands of McCain quite clearly

by duende 2008-08-04 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Nobody said that.

Unfortunately it seems that is what some here want. Why else would they rec. this diary?

by venician 2008-08-04 03:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

The prevaling POV in that thread is that Bill Clinton is backing up McCain's attacks by saying what he did; and defending himself from accusations of being a racist. I think he has every right to do that. I don't care what John McCain's doing or not.

Wow, you sure you're not actually Bill Clinton yourself? Cuz just like the Big Dawg, all that matters is defending the Clinton Brand, all else be damned. All that matters is making sure no one thinks ill of me. Who cares if by talking about this issue at this time I am adding fuel to McCain's baseless attacks? Who cares if my comments are not at all helpful to the Democratic Nominee. After all, Ya gots to look out for number one, right?

by John in Chicago 2008-08-04 02:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

" Who cares if my comments are not at all helpful to the Democratic Nominee. After all, Ya gots to look out for number one, right?"

Who? I couldn't care less, if it means staying silent in the face of scurrilous, baseless, ruthless political attacks that deface the legacy and reputation of the only Democratic Party president who was able to get reelected for two terms. Who are the true Democrats here? The ones who indulge in disgusting and false charges against a stand up Democrat, for mere personal ambition, or the ones who stand up for principles? Who is playing the politics of personal destruction by making libelous accusations of racism, a charge that is political dynamite, and renders a politician radioactive, not to mention degrades the concept of "racist" so that it loses all meaning and impact for the situations when it really needs to be a powerful accusation? It's really a gross insult to everyone who has suffered the consequences of real racism, to inoculate the real racists against that word. That's foul play for our entire society, and sets back the civil rights movement by generations.

There is no excuse for this crap, and you Obama supporters can troll rate me all you like, you won't silence us, you only discredit yourselves.

by 07rescue 2008-08-04 02:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Q: Who are the true Democrats here?

A: Definitely not the ones that go to RedState in order to form a McCain alliance.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-08-04 02:24PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

You got that link purplestuff? People ought to know where this agent provocateur is coming from.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Here's the first time they went to RedState to make friendly... kinda funny because a lot of users there didn't even pretend to hide their hatred of the Clinton's while this tool was trying to make nice.  The irony of going to RedState because they feel that Clinton was treated unfairly apparently doesn't trigger 07rescue's irony meter.  These are the same people that would swear on their childrens lives that the Clinton's killed Vince Foster.  Haha.: First Encounter of the Third Kind

Here's a cute diary in which 07rescue reassures the users at RedState that yes, the liberal media exists and yes, it is hell bent on attacking McCain and supporting Obama.  Damn that liberal media!

There is plenty more where that came from in the comments of random entries over there.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-08-04 02:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Cheers. And forgot to say how great your homophonic sig line is.

by duende 2008-08-04 03:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

You get a MOJO from me. How anybody could expect Bill Clinton to stand there and allow himself to be portrayed as a racist for the team is crazy. He is supposed to take one for the team? Which team? They want him to take it for the team that tried to label him a racist? Yeah that is like asking a rape victim to share custody of the baby with her rapist.

by 2maddogs 2008-08-04 02:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Yeah that is like asking a rape victim to share custody of the baby with her rapist.

<sarcasm>Yes. It's exactly like that.</sarcasm>

by Mystylplx 2008-08-04 04:13PM | 0 recs
The Democratic Party

reputation of the only Democratic Party president who was able to get reelected for two terms. Who are the true Democrats here? The ones who indulge in disgusting and false charges against a stand up Democrat, for mere personal ambition, or the ones who stand up for principles?

I hate this argument.  It says, "Being a true Democrat doesn't mean trying to implement a progressive agenda, it means not criticizing ourselves." Keeping our burnished memory of the past is more important than working for the future.

Bill's attempt to subtly invoke Obama's race without stating it outright backfired because Obama was able to subtly make it come off as racist without stating it outright.  It's that wink-wink implication shit that all politicians traffick in, like Team Obama calling McCain 'confused' and Bill mentioning Jesse Jackson, and Jesse Jr. saying she didn't cry for Katrina.

The reason they like it is because it's easy to get supremely literal-minded and rigid ideologues to defend it loudly and insistently in the media and, of course, online.

by Koan 2008-08-04 03:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I don't want to jump into this debate midstream, but you make a couple factual errors.

"the only Democratic Party president who was able to get reelected for two terms." (referring to Bill)

There are many things wrong with this.

1) Bill did not get "REelected" for two terms, he got elected once and reelected once.  If it's just poorly worded, then Johnson got "reelected for two terms."

2) Many other Democratic presidents got elected for 2 (or more) terms.  Truman, FDR, and Wilson did it just in the past century.  

Now, if you had said Bill was the first one to do it in 40 years, I would have agreed with you.  As is, it is incorrect.

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 03:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Sorry, but Obama brought this on himself.  All he had to do--way back in January--was say, "Bill Clinton is not a racist."  Instead, he chose to reap the benefits of the negative attacks.

Bill Clinton has the right to defend himself and rehabilitate his reputation.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 02:19PM | 0 recs
All he needed to do is say

We don't need racist votes to win.

... someone growing up near and around Jim Crow... neither side escaped untarnished. Everyone's got issues, people.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

You mean he should have said ""Bill Clinton is not a racist." .......as far as I know.  :)

by venician 2008-08-04 03:41PM | 0 recs
Obama never said he was racist.

Duh.

He never said "Bill Clinton isn't a child molester" or "Bill Clinton doesn't drown kittens for fun" either.

Bill did behave like an asshole during the campaign.  His rhetoric was so over-the-top that it pushed Ted Kennedy into endorsing Obama.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

As I recall Bill Clinton actually called Obama a racist regarding the whole Punjab thing. And that was Bill Clinton himself, not just some mid-level supporters as is the case with Obama.

So what you're suggesting is Obama brought this on himself by remaining silent and not choosing to come to his opponents defense... politics is a contact sport, folks, and he had no obligation to rush to Hillary's or Bill's defense.

by Mystylplx 2008-08-04 04:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Got a link for where Bill Clinton himself called Obama a racist?

by Denny Crane 2008-08-04 07:33PM | 0 recs
Well, you SHOULD care

what John McCain is doing.

Wake the hell up.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

very nicely put. thanks.

by swissffun 2008-08-04 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Bill Clinton talking like this is not how he clears his name. All would be forgiven if he didn't try to avert responsibility and said, "I am sorry if people took any of my comments as playing upon racial prejudices. I didn't say any of those comments with that intention and I believe my life's work shows my dedication to equal justice in this country. We have a historic opportunity to elect a great Democrat as president this year. I have pledged to do whatever I can to help elect Barack Obama president."

by Lolis 2008-08-04 04:32PM | 0 recs
Show me where Clyburn accused Bill of racism

Simple as that. I've read the charge twice today, surely the quote isn't hard to dig up.

by Neef 2008-08-04 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Show me where Clyburn accused Bill of racism

He accused them of tearing down Obama so Hillary could run in 2012:

Clyburn accused Clinton and her husband yesterday of marginalizing black voters and opening a rift between her campaign and an African American Democratic base that strongly backed Bill Clinton's presidency. Some surrogates in her camp are trying to render Obama unelectable against the Republican nominee so she could run for the Democratic nomination in 2012, he suggested. The discussion flared up yet again when Bill Clinton suggested this week that Obama's campaign had played "the race card" after the former president compared the candidate to Jesse Jackson after the South Carolina primary.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 02:34PM | 0 recs
I hate raking over the ashes...

But if this is the best you've got, I think Clyburn (a former close friend of the Clinton's) gets a pass. He did not at all accuse Bill of racism. He warned the campaign of the danger of marginalising the black vote. A very different thing you will have to agree. From the same source

"We keep talking as if it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter that Obama gets 92 percent of the black vote, because since he only got 35 percent of the white vote, he's in trouble," Clyburn said. "Well, Hillary Clinton only got 8 percent of the black vote. . . . It's almost saying black people don't matter. The only thing that matters is how white people respond. And that's what bothered me. I think I matter."

by duende 2008-08-04 02:52PM | 0 recs
Re: I hate raking over the ashes...

I didn't say he did accuse of him racism.  Somebody else did.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 04:18PM | 0 recs
Sorry. But you can see the confusion

Your comment upthread looks like an answer to the question "Show me where Clyburn accused Bill of racism". But if there's no proof, let's not dig up these old ghosts.

by duende 2008-08-04 05:09PM | 0 recs
It was.

I was just trying to contribute to the conversation. That's all.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 05:54PM | 0 recs
That is clearly a harsh comment

but do you think he is calling them racist?

by Neef 2008-08-04 02:57PM | 0 recs
Re: That is clearly a harsh comment

No, I don't.  And I never said he did.  Somebody else did.  I just offered that clip to contribute to the discussion.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 04:21PM | 0 recs
Pretty thin, I think

Some surrogates in her camp are trying to render Obama unelectable against the Republican nominee so she could run for the Democratic nomination in 2012,

This isn't about the Clintons, really--it's about the perception that some people with their ear floated this as an idea.  I find that pretty plausible; I remember reading that kind of sentiment on pro-Hillary blogs between the end of the campaign and now.  Clyburn's warning them that such a perception would and does hurt their stellar reputation among the Democratic black base.

That's a far cry from calling them racist.  And I must say, if you think either President or Senator Clinton is above using race for the usual cynical political reasons . . . well, I'm not sure we'd be talking about the same people.

by Koan 2008-08-04 03:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Pretty thin, I think

Just to clarify, I'm not the one who said Clyburn called them racist.  I just offered the clip to contribute to the discussion.

There is no evidence the Clintons played the race card.  The people who argue that apparently believe that they can read minds.  And they ignore their work in the civil rights movement and the relationship they cultivated with the AA community.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 04:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Pretty thin, I think

There is no evidence the Clintons played the race card.

Of course there's no evidence they played the race card.  (Which is a phrase that I happen to believe has zero functional meaning.)  The whole point of suggesting and implying is that it's deniable, and you and your surrogates can say "there's no evidence."

I can't read their minds, but it strains my perceptions of human nature and what I saw during the campaign to suggest that the Clintons, canny political players that they are, did not try to invoke Obama's race in ways they thought would help them.  Like I wrote somewhere else, if my choices are between the Clintons being tin-eared and thoughtless and the Clintons being savvy and maybe a little desperate, only one feels plausible to me.  My take only of course.

by Koan 2008-08-04 04:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Pretty thin, I think

Like I wrote somewhere else, if my choices are between the Clintons being tin-eared and thoughtless and the Clintons being savvy and maybe a little desperate, only one feels plausible to me.

That's true if there was only one interpretation of these "insensitive" comments.  What people did was harp on the worst possible meaning.  Given their long record on civil rights, they deserved better than that.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 04:40PM | 0 recs
Fair

but my point is that I believe that the Clintons knew what the worst possible meanings were in at least a few cases.  They're just very very good at politics and it's hard for me to believe that they didn't know what messages they were sending, figured they'd catch some heat for it, decided that plausible deniability was worth the risk of backfiring, and put the messages out anyway.

Maybe this makes me a cynic, but that's what being a political junkie will do.

by Koan 2008-08-04 04:51PM | 0 recs
Nice thread!

I just want to say that I really enjoyed this whole thread. Civil & well-spoken by all.

Reminds me why I still like this place some days.

by Liberal Monk 2008-08-04 06:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Fair

In all fairness, I'm sure I've done the same thing to Obama.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 07:01PM | 0 recs
This is sad...

A diary quoting another diary, about an issue there were hundreds of diaries about two months ago.

And you're sole justification for this is?

I'm standing behind the Big Dog. There's alot of kveching about how these comments seemed to back up McCain's talking points on the race card.

You want to know what?

I guess maybe people shouldn't have called Bill Clinton racist, or insinuated that Bill was a racist back then.

You mean 'people' on the 'internet' sometimes 'insinuated', and for that you're willing to back up John McCain's attack?

Pathetic indeed. I thought better of you. Even after you hiderated me.

by duende 2008-08-04 01:09PM | 0 recs
Re: This is sad...

what is this silly charge that any of this is 'backing up McCain'...??? don't even THINK of calling Bill a McTroll!!!!!!!!!  

by swissffun 2008-08-04 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: This is sad...

For the second time 'you' refers to the diarist, not to Bill. Bill can look after his own legacy. He's been great in many ways to African Americans. Listening to the interview, I think he was goaded into expressing his pain over the issue - a pain I believe he has some responsibility for.

But for two diarists here to make a big meal of it, three to four months on, just as McCain is accusing Obama of 'playing the race card first' is not helpful. That's what I and others mean by saying this kind of diary backs up McCain's attack, albeit unwittingly.

by duende 2008-08-04 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: This is sad...

ok. explanation taken.

by swissffun 2008-08-04 01:59PM | 0 recs
Thankyou

I know that tempers flare on this issue, and it's easy to misread what others say. I've done it myself

by duende 2008-08-04 02:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Thankyou

isn't that just too true?! tonight though the atmosphere seems strangely, pleasantly, .... pleasant actually. maybe i've just had too much supplement, but still.

when i saw the clip earlier tonight, i just knew this was going to be a fire starter --- and it's been much better than i expected.

by swissffun 2008-08-04 02:06PM | 0 recs
Yummy

Share that supplement! Sricki needs some for her typos. That ruined my evening. I hate misprunts

by duende 2008-08-04 02:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Yummy

if you're in the neighborhood i will ---- ZH...

by swissffun 2008-08-04 02:13PM | 0 recs
Re: This is sad...

No one is "backing up" John McCain's attack, moron. Do you have reading comprehension issues?

What I'm saying is that the main justification in that thread that I quoted for saying that the Big Dog should not speak out about this is that Senator McCain has been going down a line of attack that accuses Senator Obama of race baiting.

To be perfectly honest, I don't think Senator Obama is race baiting in the general election. I do think there was some shit in the primary that Bill has every right to defend against.

So McCain is wrong on this one; no where did I insinuate that he was correct on his line of argumentation.

However, what I am saying; is that no one should tell Bill Clinton to shut up because McCain is making attacks on this line right now; the simple fact is; if they didn't want Bill to talk about it, or don't like the the timing, maybe half the party shouldn't have accused him of being a racist.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 01:19PM | 0 recs
z.

duende is one of the good guys - i promise.  please consider this.

by canadian gal 2008-08-04 01:22PM | 0 recs
It's in your own head....

Go read the other diary and check the comments Half the party didn't call Bill racist. He's clearly not.

Was Bill running for president? No

But did he make a patronising remark comparing Obama's electoral chances to Jesse Jacksons? Yes

It backfired. Not because of some disowned Obama campaign memo, but because AA's felt the remark to be patronising. Who am I or you to tell them otherwise.

I'm so tired of this false reverse accusation. Obama never even called Ferraro's comments racist, merely divisive.

So here you go... igniting all those old arguments.

I've read your posts before. You're smart. You should know this would happen. Move on. I like Bill. But from the 90s, he's a demographic salami slicer, and didn't know how to cope with Obama

by duende 2008-08-04 01:30PM | 0 recs
bill's a wreck

I don't think he could have pulled off his election, after that bypass surgery.

And, with his wife running, and losing, I'm sure it's killing him up inside.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:24PM | 0 recs
Re: This is sad...

It was my recollection that really only a handful of people considered Bill Clinton to be a racist.  Most people just weren't paying close enough attention.  I think gas prices and the mortgage crisis are on most people's minds.

by the mollusk 2008-08-04 01:44PM | 0 recs
Zc, my friend and colleague,

I concur with CG on this. And in any case, there's no need for name caling.

by sricki 2008-08-04 01:56PM | 0 recs
*calling

There's no need for typos, either...

by sricki 2008-08-04 01:57PM | 0 recs
Re: *calling

you're among friends. don't be so uptight, it's ok.

by swissffun 2008-08-04 02:02PM | 0 recs
Thanks. ;)

I just hate typos so very much.

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: *calling

Hide-rated for purity-typing.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-08-04 02:04PM | 0 recs
Fair enough.

Things got a little heated, but I didn't particularly appreciate the tone of his post. I don't take kindly to saying that I was "defending" a McCain argument when I wasn't. Either way, my apologies, Duende.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 02:34PM | 0 recs
You're awesome, zc.

I think everyone gets a little hot and bothered about issues like these. It was hell during the primaries.

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:38PM | 0 recs
Thank zc

As I said to swissfun upthread, it's easy to misread in the heat of the moment. I do it myself. And my tone was probably harsher than intended because the previous diary was a lot more intemperate.

I didn't think you should raise this issue, now, as Bill requested. But you can have my apology too. I take that back. This has actually been a good discussion to have, heated but reasonable, and perhaps goes a little further to overcome some of the misunderstandings and misreadings of a few months ago.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Thank zc

ummm...what do you mean the previous diary was intemperate ?  I thought I was very temperate....

by SevenStrings 2008-08-04 04:03PM | 0 recs
You are 100% validating McCain's attack

Of course, the games that the Obama campaign (especally pre-South Carolina primary) played with race are fairly well known and documented, which are not limited too:

-Releasing a memo just days before the primary painting one the greatest Presidential champions for African Americans as a filthy racist.

-Obama campaign co chair going on national television and telling us how "Hillary Clinton did not cry for Katrina"

Even outside the campaign, not so undeclared Obama supporters trashed Bill and Hillary, like James Clyburn, accusing the Clintons of nothing less than racism, an entire effort that was in ways, at least aided by some mid level players in the Obama campaign, with the full knowledge that Senator Obama would not have been able to win the Democratic primary carrying only 60% of the African American vote, which was around the percentage he was carrying pre Super Tuesday.

You are flat-out accusing Barack Obama of being an Al Sharpton-style race hustler.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:02PM | 0 recs
Re: You are 100% validating McCain's attack

When the shoe fits......

by Marjoriest 2008-08-04 03:26PM | 0 recs
Only 10 McCain points for you. eom

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:27PM | 0 recs
Re: You are 100% validating McCain's attack

If that memo pre-South Carolina wasn't race hustling, then I don't know what was.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 04:14PM | 0 recs
How about talking about

"hard working Americans.  White Americans?"

Oh, but I see.  It's a misunderstanding when Candidate A says it, but it's race-baiting when a low-level staffer for Candidate B says it.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 04:21PM | 0 recs
A six year old child

could have come up with a more adult position than that.  That leapt out at me, too, Duende.

I guess maybe people shouldn't have called Bill Clinton racist, or insinuated that Bill was a racist back then.

The natural six year old reply would be: And maybe this person in the Clinton campaign shouldn't have said this, and that one this, and this one that... and so on, and so on.  

by Dumbo 2008-08-04 03:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

You wrote a whole diary because of a two posters who have different opininon on this?

You say you don't want to rehash the primary wars but then list examples of incendiary comments, but only from Obama's campaign, but not the actual race-bating performed by the Big Dog?
C'mon, no one is clean in this one.  Also, I don't think aqnyone actually thinks Big Dog is a racist, nor was he called a racist

Why don't you write a diary about the posters who want Hillary as VP but then viciously bad mouth every other potential democratic VP candidate, as if they aren't respectable party leaders. And yes, I like the Big Dog a lot, I just think you are wasting time and yes rehashing the primary wars.  

But if you think it is cool for the Big Dog to not use his effort in getting Obama elected b/c he was called out for his obvious race-baiting, well.... that's just like.... your opinion, man

by KLRinLA 2008-08-04 01:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

jeez ---- how can anyone that likes the Clinton's, much less the Clinton's themselves RESIST going all out to help Obama get elected when supporters of his (like yourself) speak so well of him (race-baiter doesn't paint any different a picture than racist --- sorry)??  how better to reinforce the sentiment than to slip in that tag line on your comment?

very helpful, thanks.

by swissffun 2008-08-04 01:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Swiss, it's very possible to race-bait and not be a racist, ok.  And calling someone out using a race-baiting tactic is not the same as charging them with racism.  I know you are not an idiot, so I know you can grasp this slightly nuanced concept.  Try it out, gargle it around, see??, do you get it now?  

by KLRinLA 2008-08-04 02:02PM | 0 recs
I disagree

Looking back at the primaries now, I think race baiting is too strong a word.

'Framing' might be a better one. I'm completely convinced the Clintons don't have a racist bone in their bodies, but they are master tacticians, knowing which demographic to appeal to in different states. The campaign (particularly Wolfson) wanted to 'frame' Obama as not Black enough in the early stages, and then in latter stages, needed to appeal to the Appalachian vote - hence 'hard working white people'

As I say, I think it's the old politics of salami slicing and triangulation that worked so well for the Clintons in the 90s, especially when media was much more local or state orientated. These contradictions didn't work in the age of the blogosphere where news in spread so much more diversely.

So let's just say the campaign framing got it wrong. Race baiting is a bit too strong.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:09PM | 0 recs
I'm not convinced

but I am convinced that if they have a racist bone in their body, it's not for lack of trying to rip it out barehanded. (is my statement stronger than yours? ;-)

You're right, it was framing.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:26PM | 0 recs
Re: I'm not convinced

Blogsurrogate - your pithy witty style is so reminiscent. I have this weird feeling you've been here before in another incarnation. If it is who I think it is, welcome back. You were missed.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:45PM | 0 recs
*giggle* I figure I ain't who you think I

am, but I would like to meet who you think I am. ;-)

This is risingtide, on default "they banned me again, wtf?" account.

yes, zerosumgame, go ahead and troll rate me for being a zombie -- i didn't even see any troll ratings this time!

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-05 06:13AM | 0 recs
Re: I disagree

that is fine with me, I dont really care what we call it, it surely wasnt racism but it wasnt clean as a whistle either.  Whatever, I still think Bill has a right to defend against the msm's added spiciness and innuendo filled questioning of the event, I would just like to see him campaign more for Obama, and put this to bed, it's GE time and we should focus on the prize.

by KLRinLA 2008-08-04 05:52PM | 0 recs
Many of my white brethren

are really really really sensitive.  They get het up over the smallest things.  Sometimes I'm embarrassed to share pigmentation with them.

by JJE 2008-08-04 02:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Can someone please post another three-line diary on today's tracking polls?

by the mollusk 2008-08-04 01:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

chickens (white, brown, all kinds) are coming home to hyde park to roost.

by darwinism 2008-08-04 01:30PM | 0 recs
Attacking the Clinton's....

...party loyalty is absurd. Almost as ridiculous as trying to tag the racist label to them.

To make any comparisons between what Bill Clinton's saying now, in terms of tying it into to anything happening on the McCain campaign, is just as absurd, as well.

The Clintons are going all out for Obama. If anyone wants to speculate otherwise, then they are the trolls, themselves.

by bobswern 2008-08-04 01:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Attacking the Clinton's....

One commentator on one diary accused Bill of doing this deliberately. NO-ONE ELSE DID. Go check the diary if you want.

Please don't tar the vast mass of Obama supporters with that brush. Especially not now.

Inflaming these old wounds only helps McCain.

by duende 2008-08-04 01:54PM | 0 recs
Name three things Bill has done

or even said to help Obama get elected.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Name three things Bill has done

To be honest, that's not his job or his responsibility.  To some extent, I think it is Hillary's responsibility because of how divisive the primary was (and it would be Obama's responsibility if she had won).  Bill can do whatever he wants.  Hopefully he is helping Obama win, but we aren't bashing Carter for not going all out for Obama.  So it isn't as if we are holding all previous Democratic Presidents to this standard.  And we aren't holding Elizabeth Edwards to this, so it isn't spouses of previous primary candidates.  So no, Bill is not beholden to do anything for Obama.  It would be nice, though.

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 03:47PM | 0 recs
Well, then Bill isn't entitled to respect

as a party leader.  He's just another private citizen nursing a grudge and hurt feelings.

He should not be in Denver this month.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Well, then Bill isn't entitled to respect

Fair enough.  But what about Carter?  Is he not a party leader?

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 04:22PM | 0 recs
Carter isn't making statements

that echo McCain's attacks.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 04:24PM | 0 recs
Fight fight fight!!!

Let's fight this ovah and ovah forevah!!!

by JJE 2008-08-04 01:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

it's nice that he finally admitted it.  now we should be able to move on.  if i thought clinton had any shame, i'd observe that he should be ashamed of himself for repeatedly, continuously using racist frames to diminish barack.  but i'm glad he's finally come to terms with this stain on his reputation.  i only wish he'd done it a year ago (when he first started peddling this divisive crap)...

by bored now 2008-08-04 01:54PM | 0 recs
You're not helping either...

It goes both ways. No need to inflame supporters of the last dem president at this time. Neither side should reignite that argument now.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: You're not helping either...

Obviously I strongly disagree with bored now on this, but he has a right to express his opinion and there is no call for troll or hide rating him for doing so.

He has explained his reasoning at length here in the past, he is not just provoking.

by souvarine 2008-08-04 02:15PM | 0 recs
Re: You're not helping either...

I trolled him - not hiderated - for 'racist framing': as I explain upthread I think that is an inflammatory on this issue at this time.

That's what I think troll ratings - though I don't like them - are for. Feel free to disagree, but please don't quote the rule book. It's almost completely subjective.

I would have hr'ed, but there was some content

by duende 2008-08-04 02:22PM | 0 recs
Too bad.

A vicious lie gets you HR'd.

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:27PM | 0 recs
Hahahahahahahaha

Somebody wrote a comment without reading the diary!

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 02:12PM | 0 recs
well, it's true...

i didn't read the diary.  i didn't have time yesterday.  i was merely relieved that bill clinton had said it.  the belief that one has no prejudices is kind of delusional and i don't particularly prefer to think of clinton as someone who is delusional.  the point is, now that he's admitted this, we can all move on.  i'd have thought this was a good thing...

by bored now 2008-08-05 04:04AM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

One day, I hope to hear a politician address the basic truth: that America's brutally racist history, one that is barely a generation behind us, has left none of us untouched. That even if we don't consciously embrace racist ideas, the pernicious mythologies of white superiority and black inferiority are imbedded deep within the American psyche. And they express themselves not merely in the impolitic statements we occasionally make, but in the sustained institutional barriers to equality and social justice that still disempower and marginalize people of color all across the country.

Well, actually, Obama did address this to some extent in Philadelphia, though not in these exact terms.

It would have been indeed bold and brave of Clinton to say, "Yes, I am a racist, because racism has been and still is part of America." Unfortunately, we all live in a bit of functional denial as far as that goes.

by BobzCat 2008-08-04 02:10PM | 0 recs
That would have been good...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1 0/31/92331/990/129/404631

just what I started writing, to start a conversation on race.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

This is the only Democrat since FDR to win two terms in office. For some reason, the pot smoking hippie Obama supporters are out to ruin his legacy. The way I see it, they can go fuck themselves.

by bsavage 2008-08-04 02:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

"For some reason, the pot smoking hippie Obama supporters are out to ruin his legacy."

Yeah, they stay up all night listen to the Allman Brothers live at the Fillmore, and come up with schemes to trash the Clintons.

It's the Pot-smoking that makes them most effective, however.

Everything they have to run to 7-11 with the munchies, they can put up another banner in Haight Asbury to trash the Clintons....

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 02:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

No offense, but many Obama supporters were not even born when hippies were around.  And Truman served (almost) two terms, though not elected twice.

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 03:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Here are the facts as I see them:

1. Bill Clinton was the best president of my lifetime.

2. Mr. Clinton said many stupid, thoughtless things in the days leading up to the SC primary.

3. Sen. Clinton, whom I also admire greatly, ran, at times, a petty, awful, dispiriting campaign that I found bewildering and heartbreaking.

4. Sen. Obama outworked and outsmarted the Clinton campaign and earned his party's nod.

4. The next time we vote is Nov. 4, and it's probably the most important election of our lifetimes.

Therefore...

Please, for the sake of sanity, can we leave the primaries behind, once and for all? What part of "Hillary ran an awful campaign" do you die-hard Hillary lovers still not grasp?

I'm a yellow-dog Democrat, and I entered the primary season with an open mind. My attitude was "let the best candidate win."

He did.

by BenderRodriguez 2008-08-04 02:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

What part of "Obama is unqualified and the least likely to make any progressive changes if elected" don't you understand?

by Marjoriest 2008-08-04 03:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

1. There are two qualifications to be president:
You have to be 35, and you  have to be a natural-born citizen.

Therefore, anybody who ran this year -- or any prior year -- is qualified.

2. Sens. Obama and Clinton differed very little policy-wise. I heard or read nothing during the primary season that indicated Clinton was more progressive than Obama.

3. The only thing that I understand -- and re-understand and re-understand and re-understand -- every time I visit this site is that Clinton supporters can't grasp the reality that their "inevitable" candidate lost because she ran a horrid campaign while Obama orchestrated a brilliant one.

Nov. 4, people. That's what matters. Not the SC primary or the seating of delegates from Florida or "bitter" this or any of the other nonsense.

Nov. 4.

by BenderRodriguez 2008-08-04 04:01PM | 0 recs
And you are

qualified to judge what it takes to be President?

Really? You know the ins and outs of the job pretty well, huh? I mean, it's not like you watch it from many-times-removed arms length, in snippets, and through a biased media filter.

by Neef 2008-08-04 07:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Unfortunately, the most important election of our lifetimes was in 2000 and Florida (and Republican vote suppression) blew it.  As important as this election is, a President Obama needs to be a fixer just to get us back to zero.  Al Gore could have actually started us on the path toward a new future.  

/wistfulness

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 03:57PM | 0 recs
At the risk of restarting the primary war

That's like saying, "At the risk of causing a stink by crapping on the sidewalk..."

The only purpose of this diary is to cause a stink -- which any asshole can do.

by Glaurung 2008-08-04 02:15PM | 0 recs
its really sad

that he has to actually say this, because if not for the conservative anti-Clinton media, he wouldn't need to do so. We can also thank Obamalite Clinton-haters for this, as they smeared the perception all over the internet. When can an elite former President get the honor he deserves?

by Lakrosse 2008-08-04 02:18PM | 0 recs
That's the thing, he doesn't

need to say it. It's baffling to everyone that hears it. No one thinks he's a racist. For all the drama in this diary, no one can produce a quote calling him one.

by Neef 2008-08-04 02:23PM | 0 recs
not to stir the shit

but I can.
Go check out skepticalbrotha, go check out FieldNegro.

Go get yourself some color on those cheeks.

People said what shit they felt.

And some black folks felt... betrayed.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:30PM | 0 recs
So how wide

are we casting the net now? If it shows up on Google it's popular opinion? By those standards, Obama gives blow jobs to weirdos in limos, while hoping people don't figure out his fake passport.

You have to draw a line, because you can find anything on the Internet. I have yet to see ANY quote calling the Clintons racist, much less a near-mainstream one.

by Neef 2008-08-04 02:46PM | 0 recs
If you read black blogs

... you read those two (they're good blogs, I promise).

Honestly, Field seems a bit more mainstream than the political blogs -- people who aren't political still read him.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-05 06:02AM | 0 recs
jack and jill politics also kept a running score..

of racist frames bill clinton used throughout the primaries, starting right before yearly kos in chicago.  it was a fairly long list.

i can certainly understand why bill clinton has taken umbrage to all this -- he somehow decided he was smarter than everyone else and believed that he could get away with using code words that belittled the possibility that a black man could be on equal footing with him.

what i don't understand is the reaction of everyone else.  even if you think bill clinton god-like, i thought the democratic party believed in fairness and justice.  clinton's use of racist frames was in no way fair or just.  they were rovian at best.

i'll repeat what i've said before: i don't particularly know if clinton is a racist -- although i'm glad he admitted it.  but i was shocked by his eagerness to use racist frames -- to offend black democrats repeatedly -- in this context.  he should have backed off this line of argument a year ago, apologized for his insensitivity then, and attacked barack without relying on racist foundations.

if he were rational, instead of emotional, about this campaign, he would have seen that this was his only way out.  bill clinton reinforced the popular belief that undercut hillary's candidacy: that they would say or do anything -- including things that could be rationally seen as racist and were certainly offensive to black democrats -- to get her elected.   the need to deny this demonstrates to me that we don't really hold to any democratic values, and that, if we do, fairness and justice aren't among those values we share or cherish.  the need to defend bill clinton here diminishes the democratic party...

by bored now 2008-08-05 04:20AM | 0 recs
poor pump-head...

it's not emotional. it is pure and simple brain damage.

Nobody "forgets" to talk about his wife during a campaign speech -- and instead talks to highschoolers about his own legacy.

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-05 06:11AM | 0 recs
Okay, let me say this

about the race-baiting meme, and then I'm going to try to completely avoid talking about it (at least in front of Obama supporters) for the rest of my life.

If you read my "I won't vote for Obama!" diary, you know exactly how I feel about the way the MSM, people in the blogosphere, etc tried to paint Bill and Hillary as race-baiters. They consistently manufactured controversies, and the MSM's most outrageous faux race scandal may have been the fairy tale thing. It was particularly disgusting.

I've rec'd this diary (largely out of habit) because this is the issue which enraged me the most during the primary season.

That said, I'm going to concede one point. Bill shouldn't have made the Jesse Jackson comparison in SC. It was the closest thing to "race-baiting" by the Clintons this cycle, and I think Bill was really trying to diminish Barack's probable win in SC by saying JJ won it twice. There were definitely racial undertones. I don't believe Hillary would have sanctioned that comment.

Other than that, there was NO race-baiting IMO. Honestly, this whole issue nauseates me.

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Okay, let me say this

Looking back on this, I agree, Sricki. Race baiting is too strong a word. I think the campaign didn't know how to 'frame' Obama, and some unfortunate remarks came out in their attempts to do so, that's all. Let sleeping (big) dogs lie.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Okay, let me say this

I still don't believe there was any racial framing. Bill has a loud mouth, and he stepped out of line, but in general, I saw nothing racist or racial in what Hillary or her campaign did.

I know this is something almost every Obama supporter and every Hillary supporter disagree on, but I honestly never saw racial framing. Even if it was there, it was probably overlooked by the vast majority of Clinton supporters simply because the MSM and the blogosphere "cried wolf" so many times.  

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:34PM | 0 recs
I'm agreeing.

I didn't call it racial framing. Just framing. Along with the elite thing, it's what politicians learned to do in the 80s and 90s.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:37PM | 0 recs
Agreed,

the elite thing was unfortunate. I disapproved strongly of that... among other things. The saber-rattling, fear-mongering, and the gas tax holiday all disappointed me.

by sricki 2008-08-04 02:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Okay, let me say this

I could not have summed it up any better myself... excellent job.

1) The Jesse Jackson comment was the only comment by Bill that really bothered me, and I think the other allegations are complete baloney... especially the fairytale comment.  I honestly don't see how people could misconstrue it as racist.
2) This whole issue is nauseating.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-08-04 02:37PM | 0 recs
I respectfully disagree

Jesse Jackson, Sr himself was not offended by that statement.  Have you considered the possibility that he said that because he trying to minimize the importance of the SC primary itself?  JJ won SC twice but did not get the nomination.  I don't necessarily think it was about race.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 02:58PM | 0 recs
You're quite possibly right,

but it was to iffy for my taste. Something about it struck me as not altogether appropriate. Regardless, I don't think he meant any harm.

by sricki 2008-08-04 03:02PM | 0 recs
Re: You're quite possibly right,

My problem with the whole thing was that people were running around saying he intended to make a racially insensitive remark.  In making that assessment, they ignored all of his work on civil rights and his relationship with the AA community.  They felt that they could read his mind.  That was not fair, at all.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 04:01PM | 0 recs
Re: You're quite possibly right,

What I heard people saying was that he intended to attempt to define Obama as 'just the black candidate.' Lots of people have won SC and not gone on to win the nomination. He could have used a different example and I have a hard time believing it was purely coincidence.

Now that doesn't make him racist, nor does it rise to the level of 'race-baiting' (though I admit I probably used that phrase to describe it at the time...;) but it is, as has been said above, racial 'framing.'

by Mystylplx 2008-08-04 04:32PM | 0 recs
of course JJ didn't think

a comparison to himself was offensive.  Few people think that they suck.

by JJE 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
So, why didn't he mention

John Edwards?

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:04PM | 0 recs
Re: So, why didn't he mention

The fact that JJ won it twice may have had something to do with it.

Should he have censored himself because his wife's opponent was an African-American?  

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 03:56PM | 0 recs
Bill should have taken his own advice.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/ 2008/04/bill-clinton-no.html

When I watched that debate last night, I got kinda tickled," the former President said at an American Legion Hall event in St. Mary's, Pennsylvania, "After the [debate], her opponents', oh, the people working were saying, 'Oh this is so negative, why are they doing this.' Well they've been beatin' up on her for 15 months. I didn't hear her whining when he said she was untruthful in Iowa or called her the senator from Punjab."

"And, you know, they said some pretty rough things about me, too. But you know, this is a contact sport. If you don't want to play, keep your uniform off," Clinton told a loudly cheering crowd.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 04:19PM | 0 recs
Re: I respectfully disagree

Jesse Jackson, Sr himself was not offended by that statement.

With all due respect drew, the AA community is not monolithic.  To say "JJ Sr wasn't offended by it, so the rest of the AA community shouldn't be either" is wrong.

I know you don't feel this way but that's the way you came across.

Would you say the same thing about LGBT community or women?

by hootie4170 2008-08-04 03:14PM | 0 recs
Re: I respectfully disagree

I implied no such thing.  The comment was ABOUT Jesse Jackson, Sr.  I think he take she count for something.

by psychodrew 2008-08-04 03:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Okay, let me say this

Sricki, I agree with you, but, what is interesting is, the one that really lite up the black folks I know (mostly comments from the sisters that work with my girlfriend was)

"HARD WORKING white voters" when Hillary said it.

They didn't like Bill's comment, because, as you said, it kind of downplayed Obama into the Jess Jackson level of candidate.

They were furious about Hillary's comment, and here's why:

If you want to dog whistle to the white folks in those area of the country, the meme to play is

"Blacks are lazy, looking for a handout-welfare folks"....

So, I guess, a dog-whistle is in the ears of the beholders.

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 02:59PM | 0 recs
I went round and round with people

on that comment. Got into very heated exchanges with several people over it. This is the response I was cutting and pasting in an effort to combat it, but in all honesty it made me so angry I could barely think straight.

by sricki 2008-08-04 03:11PM | 0 recs
Re: I went round and round with people

Yeah, I think I even remember that post from you.

But, as I said, dog whistles are in the ears of the beholder?

For example, these black women are for the most part young. Jesse Jackson didn't mean a lot to them, the sort of blew off that comment.

But, to a person, that have had to put a with a lot of weird shit in their lives: all are college educated, most with graduate degrees; But they are stuck in a mostly white working world where as Black Women they are fighting a DOUBLE whammy!

You intimate to any of them, they were "token" hires or got a hand-up, and...

My girlfriend has remarked, when she travels with them on business, if they go to a very southern white setting (they do health training for rural clinics on contracts, as part of their company) the white staffers will almost always come ask HER the technical questions, and she is the IS director of the corporation?  It's the black women who have the masters degrees in this kind of training.

It's tough out there for the sisters IMHO.

Again, a dog-whistle is in the ear of the beholder and, I really think, as a white person, I just am not in the position to judge.

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 03:25PM | 0 recs
I don't think it was race-baiting

but I also don't know a black person who didn't distinctly feel excluded from being "hard working".

I will never know why she didn't simply say "blue collar".

by Neef 2008-08-04 03:22PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't think it was race-baiting

BINGO!

My take is, she probably was in meetings, where they were looking at demographics, and focusing in on white rural appalachian voters.

It just stuck in her mind. White.

And, as Sricki said, she tried to correct the phrase, even as fast as she said it, she knew how it would read.

Do I think Hillary Clinton thinks Black Folks are lazy or White folks are harder working?

Of course not. But, one word put in one place sure can convey a loaded meaning, if the audience is used to reading language a certain way based on their life experience.

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 03:30PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't think it was race-baiting
That's part of what got me too, and among other things the Black vote not "counting".
The other thing, was all the people who had never personally dealt with racism, who were suddenly experts on race, and race relations, fully qualified to instruct people (even Black people) on what they were, and were not allowed to view as racist.
by Maori 2008-08-04 04:54PM | 0 recs
it was

'hard-working white voters' for me, too.

I have the utmost respect for Senator Clinton and her political skills, but if my choices are

(a) she was so unbelievably tin-eared and thoughtless as not to immediately understand the different coded messages that everyone listening would respond to in that phrase, or

(b) the campaign got a little desperate in the waning days and decided to made a play for Appalachian voters in a way that probably made her feel uneasy and maybe a little ashamed . . .

. . . I know which one feels more plausible to me.

by Koan 2008-08-04 03:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Okay, let me say this

Really smart comment and I pretty much agree with it all.  I was duped into thinking Bill was race-baiting with the "fairy tale" comment by the MSM.  It was a while before I really saw the whole context and realized it was not about race at all (and shame on me for not looking earlier).  I think we all believed what we wanted to believe.  I did the same thing with the RFK comment (though I never thought it was really about race) and now I realize it was probably meant to be innocuous and just sounded bad.

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 03:59PM | 0 recs
You have no idea

how much I appreciate that sentiment coming from a long-time Obama supporter. Everything became so confusing and twisted in the primaries. I think some Obama supporters occasionally saw racism when it wasn't there, and Hillary supporters saw sexism when it wasn't there. Maybe we all became a little hypersensitive.

by sricki 2008-08-04 04:05PM | 0 recs
Re: You have no idea

I think you are right about the hypersensitive thing, on both sides.  That's something all liberals do, and conservatives never do.  As harmful as it sometimes is in a political race, I'd rather be hypersensitive than unsensitive.  I mean...I like to think none of us would ever call any woman the c-word.  In any context.  Ever.  And I like to think none of us would ever call a black person the n-word.  Ever.  

In the end, I actually regained any lost respect for Hillary or Bill.  Hillary is a terrific woman and a great politician, just as Bill was.  They are both good Democrats.  And even though I HATE the DLC, I can respect the fact that they probably saw no real alternative in the 1990s.  

At this point, I would be totally fine with Hillary as VP.  I am almost to the point where I would welcome it.  None of the other candidates (besides Clark, and he seems to be out of the running) excite me or the electorate in the way that Hillary potentially could.  I think there is a risk of re-energizing Republicans, but it might be worth it.  

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 04:21PM | 0 recs
Bill Clinton is a Democratic Giant

And the notion that he's a racist has always been ridiculous. That said, I'd like to see some support for the assertion that the campaign actively pressed this meme. I think interpreting the "Katrina" comment as race-baiting is about as silly as interpreting Bill's "Jesse Jackson" statement that way. Both comments might be tough campaigning, but that's all.

Bill has a right to defend himself. Frankly, he should defend himself. Unless you're ready to concede that our party has been no better than the Republicans on the national level since the 60's, you have a vested stake in that man. If you believe in Democratic causes or even fairness and intellectual honesty, you should all be struggling to see him absolved of these baseless charges of racism (brought by the pundits and reporters, not the Obama campaign and I won't concede that point without evidence).

Both sides had their ears perked for race. A few times on both sides ill motives were assumed where we ought to be believing the best of our fellow democrats. The loudest true believers on both sides picked up on these misinterpretations, and with the amplifier of the internet and the efforts of the MSM to make things as DRAMATIC as possible, made race and racism one of the driving narratives of the primary. Both campaigns tried to diffuse this. When it was clear that the narrative was not changing and that the media was framing the race issue themselves, both campaigns began making efforts to get out in front of the issue. If you can't avoid a needless battle, you had still better try to win it.

This isn't an either/or thing, where either you believe Obama sabotaged the Clinton's with race-baiting or you believe the Clinton's used racist rhetoric to try to undermine Obama. Reality is more nuanced than that, and anyone who believes that either of the two most powerful voices for progressivism we have today would sink that low is a damned fool.

by warmwaterpenguin 2008-08-04 02:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton is a Democratic Giant

I think you put the points excellently, especially in that last paragraph. But I do think that there's justice, and there's timing: in the fierce urgency of now, it's not Bill who particularly needs defending.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:29PM | 0 recs
I do agree.

by letting people forget about the stupid shit everyone pulled during the primary, everyone will be happier.

And twenty years later we'll be laughing at the whole damn thing. We had two progressives running for office, and we were fighting a war that was fifty years won!

by BlogSurrogate57 2008-08-04 02:32PM | 0 recs
Re: I do agree.

I agree.  If Obama wins the election, the History textbooks will read like this:

In 2008, Bush's approval ratings were at near-historic lows.  Having regained seats in the House and Senate in 2006, Democrats were poised to expand their lead in both houses.  Senator Barack Obama, Senator Hillary Clinton, and former Senator John Edwards were the primary candidates to be the Democratic nominee.  It was a historic primary in that an African American and a woman each had a terrific chance to be the nominee.  In the end, it was Clinton vs. Obama in a tough, hard-fought battle.  Obama ran off a string of wins in the middle, while Hillary closed very strong in the last 1/3 of the race.  Superdelegates were expected to play a huge role in swinging the vote to one candidate or the other, but in the end, nearly every superdelegate chose to support the candidate that won the most pledged delegates. Obama won the nomination by a slim margin and would go on to face McCain in the general election, where he would win in a landslide.

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 04:09PM | 0 recs
I can concede that.

I wish we Democrats had defended him better earlier; he might not feel the same desperate need to protect his own name. Presidents like Bill have their names writ large on history; I understand a certain urgency to keep that name clean, particularly when its being jeopardized not just with the opposition but with the base.

Nonetheless, I can agree, the timing is very poor, and as much as I believe we should be fighting like crazy for Bill's legacy, I'll take ensuring the future over explaining the past. The charge is baseless and Bill will be (and largely already is) absolved, but the time to address it is, as the Big Dog said, next year.

by warmwaterpenguin 2008-08-04 02:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

The timing is only poor because it's reflects badly on Obama and let's face it he does not need any more problems. Sorry to say it but this dirty laundry needs to be aired and those who offended named.

They should hire you to the Obama campaign Duende. Your an excellent bullshitter and sure do know how to turn something around  to make both yourself and your position sound reasonable.

I hope certain segments of our party have learned their lesson or if not may they learn it come November.

by Iceblinkjm 2008-08-04 02:49PM | 0 recs
Indeed, may we lose horribly

Fuck abortion rights, the economy, the constitution, the environment, and the lives of our soldiers. I hope some people who are mean on the internet learn a valuable lesson instead.

by warmwaterpenguin 2008-08-04 02:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Indeed, may we lose horribly

Obama nor his friends do not deserve to lead this nation for using such tactics on it's citizens. From where I am standing from Penguin McCain and Obama are looking awfully similar.

by Iceblinkjm 2008-08-04 02:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Indeed, may we lose horribly

What tactics? Pointing out racists and racially questionable conduct. Blaming the victim is very GOP.

by LiberalDebunker 2008-08-04 03:05PM | 0 recs
&quot;such tactics&quot;

but no quotes. Vague attributions, but no sources.

Yeah, that's enough to remove the differences between Obama and McCain. Part of me hopes you get the governance you deserve. Unfortunately, I'd have to live through it, too.

by Neef 2008-08-04 03:17PM | 0 recs
Re: &quot;such tactics&quot;

Maybe Iceblink will move to Russia or China?

by ProgressiveDL 2008-08-04 04:11PM | 0 recs
Re: &quot;such tactics&quot;

I realize that you are not to bright but even you should know that once a couple of comments are hidden they commenter in question can no longer see them (hence the term "hidden", go ahead and look it up, we can wait) don't you? And if you want a couple  of examples there was the whole lie about the Clinton's turning BHO's face darker (turned out it was only one version of the video that was compressed and stretched and posted on youtube, not by the campaign at all), and then there were LOT's of efforts to make any word uttered by Bill or Hillary all about race. It got to ridiculous length's, even to branding pure statements of fact as such. You really cannot play stupid like that and think you have any serious comments to make.

NAd yada yada yada did HE personally say it? That never matter to you when it was someone called an HRC "surrogate" so to play it now only shows what you are.

by zerosumgame 2008-08-04 04:52PM | 0 recs
I have no idea

what random neuron fired and made you explain hidden comments. Thanks?

Look, this is the internet. Anything that happened frequently, where there were "LOT's of efforts", leaves a trail. Where's Obama or a surrogate calling the Clintons racist? It's that simple.

I could care less what you heard from your aunt's brother-in-law's cousin thrice removed, or what the "buzz" was on some YouTube video. If you are making the charge that the Obama campaign called the Clintons racist, and you can't back it up with something like an example, YOU are doing the smearing.

No doubt the Clintons were accused of bizarre things. Obama is accused of bizarre things (looking at you Larry Sinclair). The question is, were the bizarre thing accusations from the Obama campaign?

Don't accuse me of "playing stupid" because I won't accept your paranoid whisper campaign as gospel truth. What kind of argument is "you're pretending you don't know"? That's crazy talk.

by Neef 2008-08-04 07:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

The Obama campaign doesn't need me. Besides, I am reasonable. Even when a tosser like you calls me a bullshitter.

by duende 2008-08-04 02:57PM | 0 recs
Shorter Zcflint:

What John McCain and Rick Davis said.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 02:49PM | 0 recs
Bill accused Obama of playing

the race card, and then lied and said he never made that accusation.

He and McCain are reading from the same playbook.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 02:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill accused Obama of playing

IIRC you're right. Not that Bill would admit that.

by LiberalDebunker 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
The two faces of Bill:

Morning of April 22, 2008

"I think that they played the race card on me. We now know, from memos from the campaign that they planned to do it along."

Afternoon of April 22, 2008

NBC/NJ: "Sir, what did you mean yesterday when you said that the Obama campaign was playing the race card on you?"
CLINTON: "When did I say that, and to whom did I say that?"

NBC/NJ: "On WHYY radio yesterday"

CLINTON: "No, no, no. That's not what I said. You always follow me around and play these little games, and I'm not going to play your games today. This is a day about election day. Go back and see what the question was, and what my answer was. You have mischaracterized it to get another cheap story to divert the American people from the real urgent issues before us, and I choose not to play your game today. Have a nice day."

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Bill is not a racist.

Bill did make some untimely and insensitive comments during the primary.

The Obama campaign blew these comments way out of proportion and should (with Bill's permission which we do not know if has given) state Bill's record with regards to the AA community.

Bill was suckered into talking about the primary and made comments in which he rightfully defended himself of racist accusations, but it was poor timing because of the current GOP meme about Obama playing the race card.  It was in no way a strategic move by Bill to undermine Obama.

But the one thing the GOP kicks our asses on, is staying on point in order to strengthen the framing of election. All of the GOP big-wigs, no matter their previous positions, will follow McCain's lead because they know how important winning the POTUS is in setting the agenda of the country for the next four years.  We have too many Dems with bruised feelings, large egos and big mouths that are unwilling to jump on board because of their pride.  The need to take a humility pill and do what's best for our party and the majority of the country.  Just my opinion.

by hootie4170 2008-08-04 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Bill pushed for easier executions, welfare "reform", and the continuation of a racist criminal justice system which has decimated the African-American community. What should Obama share?

by LiberalDebunker 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
Are you suggesting that Bill Clinton

wasn't aware of what was going on with the presidential campaign when he made those comments?

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

For some reason, the idea of a humility pill cracked me up.

Humilia.  Side effects of humility include dry mouth, blurred vision, drowsiness, dizziness, and indigestion.  You should use caution driving or operating machinery until you know how humility will make you feel.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-08-04 03:07PM | 0 recs
As the poll that showed 53% of white

people thought Obama was being racist when he said that he was being attacked in a racist manner, many Americans are clueless about what the term even means.

by LiberalDebunker 2008-08-04 03:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I've asked this before in another diary long ago, and I'll ask it here.

Who here, discussing what is and isn't racism, is African American?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Why is that?  Are you suggesting that only AA have a say about what is or is not racist?  Sorry but we can agree to disagree.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 03:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

No not at all.

But I see a lot of people here completely dismissing the notion of the Clintons using racially coded language and talking points.

African Americans didn't turn away from the Clinton's because we're easily fooled by the MSM.

We turned away because

1. We came to realize just how brilliant a politician Obama is. Remember Clinton started out with 70% of our vote.

2. The Clinton's, lawyers who parse every word, said things that were racially tinged (who's electable? etc.)

3. The whole notion of Bil Clinton being some sort of icon to Black people is something perpetuated by the media. We liked him better as a politician by default.

 

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 03:53PM | 0 recs
So when you say &quot;we&quot;

do you speak for all black people?  And if so, who appointed you?

The same thing, the word "unelectable" has thrown at Hillary too.  WHY?  Because she is a woman or a Clinton or a democrat or old?  Pick on and with some group it will work.  Is Obama going to have people who won't vote for him because he is black?  Of course.  That's reality...the same people would never vote for a woman either.  Some people think Obama is unelectable because he does not have the kind of fight it takes to go toe to toe with the rethugs.  

Saying using the word "unelectable" could be racist, could be sexist, could ageist.  Take your pick.  But to paint the Clintons racists for using it smears you, not them and that is what has happened here.

You are playing this...you can't call Obama a "roll of the dice" because it's racist.  HUH????
Ridiculous. If anything it's about a lack of experience. And here's a clue for you....regardless of race or gender if you are young, things like that will be used against you.

Jesse Jackson Jr used sexism several times.  So did the Obama campaign and the media.  But somehow sexism is minor.  
Give me a break.

by Jjc2008 2008-08-04 05:16PM | 0 recs
Re: So when you say &quot;we&quot;

Actually, I only speak for all Black people in the Tri State area.

Serious, no snark.

I ask the question about who is black in this diary because it seems to be a bunch of White "progressives" speaking authoritatively on what is and isn't racial politics.

It would be like me and my dawgs (that's ebonics for friends) having an enlightened discussion about sexism and misogyny while watching BET uncut.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Well only you have that in your handle.

During the flame wars, a lot of posters here put their ethnic backgrounds on the table to help explain where they were coming from. It seemed to go both ways - some African Americans were more bothered by Bill's remarks, some less, than other 'white/hispanic/british/french' contributors.

by duende 2008-08-04 03:24PM | 0 recs
Bill Clinton: I am not a racist

I am just so desperate to get back into the White House that I am willing to campaign like one.

by TrueBlueMajority 2008-08-04 03:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

And also, since when is Bill Clinton the great  advocate of black people?

I certainly don't remember his Presidency that way.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 03:07PM | 0 recs
Uprating against troll abuse

Would need to be convinced of this remark, but it still doesn't deserve a troll rating - it's reasonably expressed

by duende 2008-08-04 03:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Uprating against troll abuse

Thanks.

My point is how many here have actually talked to Black people about their supposed love for the Clintons?

I don't remember my life changing (or the people in my community for that matter) during the Clinton Presidency.

The whole first Black President thing is a media creation.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 03:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Uprating against troll abuse

Slightly more than just a media creation surely. He did get AAs, especially in the south, voting for him in large numbers. And he used to be close to several black leaders like Clyburn. It's a UK perspective, but I thought his religious background helped too in some instances - wasn't Jeremiah Wright a spiritual counsellor during some of his more 'troubled' moments.

Whether that translated into legislation, improved education or economic benefits, you'll have to tell me.

by duende 2008-08-04 04:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Uprating against troll abuse

Ditto.

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 06:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Uprating against troll abuse

Ditto.

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 06:07PM | 0 recs
Re:

I to am tried of the whole Bill Clinton is a racist nonsense.  But the real issue is the boy who cried wolf.  BO supporters and some of his campaign surogates suggested that the clinton's used race for political advantage.  OK the primiary is over.  But now the BO campaign can't say the exact same thing against McCain and that is what is hurting BO and his campaign right now in the polls.

First Bill Clinton, who has done more than most americans to support AA issues, is a racist and guess what just by chance the next candidate that BO is running against is a racist too?

For the good of the democratic party and getting BO elected he, his campaign, and his supporters need to stop using race as a political weapon because it will turn off a lot of indies and working class democrats.  Just my opinion.  Race is a politically loaded issue and it could really end up hurting us in the fall.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 03:29PM | 0 recs
So, you support John McCain's attack

and accusation that Obama is playing the race card against him.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 03:47PM | 0 recs
Re: So, you support John McCain's attack

Dude,

This is a straw argument.  It is like you are asking me if i have stopped beating my wife.  You will have to do better than that.

What i am saying is simple.  BO can not say things like "McCain is going to try to scare you by suggesting that I (BO) dont look like the other presidents on the dollar bills", period.

What do you think BO was saying???  I mean come the meaning of this is clear.  What i am saying is BO needs to stay away from saying things like this because race is a load word and issue and it could end up hurting him in Nov with indies and working class voters, PERIOD.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 03:52PM | 0 recs
McCain ran an ad showing

how 'funny' Obama's face would look on the dollar bill.

But, it's never the white Republicans who are the wrongdoers.

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 04:00PM | 0 recs
It's never the white people period.

Poor poor white people, so put upon and oppressed.  It's a wonder we manage to make it through the day.

by JJE 2008-08-04 04:48PM | 0 recs
Race in america is a minefield

Look at the minefield we are playing in, and we are all democrats, probably pretty progressive?

Think how this plays in the general public?

It's really a miracle Obama is doing as well as he is, it's a sign we ARE at a demographic breaking point, where there is a new racial awareness line starting at about 40 years and down.

My parents are gone, but I think, even as life long democrats, they would have felt uncomfortable with Obama, more naturally comfortable with McCain.

I hear my girlfriends 70 year old mom talk about Obama, and I just can see the lens she is looking through.

Talk to my daughter (19) or my girlfriends kid's and they are sort of flumoxed why race has anything to do with it.

They, of course, from the day they entered the public school system were in integrated schools, lived in integrated areas?

We are witnessing a transistion in my humble opinion, and in 30 years, this just wouldn't have the power with the voters who will be around then.

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 03:49PM | 0 recs
He may not be a racist

because hard working white Americans(the biggest racist statement of the campaign, bar none)would see that Obama was living in a fairytale where even a black person could win south Carolina, I mean come on, even Jesse Jackson won that place.

Amirite guys?  Hard working white Americans, the exact moment when everyone in my family, that voted for Clinton twice, you know us, the lazy African americans voted for him at a 90% clip.  

Blue collar, she didn't use the phrase for a reason, the Clintons are politicians extraordinaire, and at that point in the primaries, they decided the vaunted "Southern Strategy" was their only chance for winning. It did work in Appalachia, but they went to Nixons well too late and lost the nomination anyway.

by Brandon 2008-08-04 03:53PM | 0 recs
Re: He may not be a racist

And since when is being blue collar and hard working suggest being racist?  I guess by defination that anyone who is white must be racist.  I totally understand.  What we need is a post civil right defination of racist.  When just being white means you must be racist.

Just one white man's opinion.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 04:02PM | 0 recs
Re: He may not be a racist

She said "hard working WHITE Americans".

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 04:13PM | 0 recs
Re: He may not be a racist

REALLY,

When did "hard working white americans" become racist?????

I guess if you want you can make any statement racist.  It is called racial blackmail.  

If you every use the word white you are racist. Sorry but it is almost 40 years since civil rights and it is time to stop calling everyone a racist who you just have a rightous disagreement with.  It demeans the word "racist".

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 04:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

At the risk of "rerunning the primary war", Hillary Clinton wooed racist voters as they had never been wooed by a Democrat candidate for decades when she spoke about "hard-working white people".

If you don't want the race card played against you, stop being racists and stop wooing racists.

And now the Clintons, as I expected, keep throwing obstacles on Obama's path. What a big surprise that they'd prefer a McCain victory, same as all the Clintonistas here.

by Aris Katsaris2 2008-08-04 03:53PM | 0 recs
This is accurate

It reminds of those people who start a racist statement with, "some of my best friends are black."

by Brandon 2008-08-04 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

What goes around comes around. the obama camp ran a dirty campaign that trashed Clinton as racist. I'm glad he's a human and didn't take it like a dog. Why after being trashed should he shut up?

What goes around comes around. Obama played dirty pool. Why shouldn't it come around?

by CalDem 2008-08-04 03:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Do you know any Black people?

And if you do, how did they feel about:
-the Jesse Jackson comment in SC
-Obama being painted as a drug dealer
-"hard working white Americans"
-the who's electable talking points?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 04:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

what an insulting, racist question which I won't dignify with a response. you know nothing of me sir, so keep your dignity and don't spread racist crap.

as for the rest of your comment, equally stupid. either innocuous or never happened. and, in case of the last, asking 'who's electable' isn't racist, it's what everyone asked. Obama argued he was -- did that make him sexist? Of course not, it just made him wrong. Clinton saying she was more electable didn't make her racist, it just made her right.

by CalDem 2008-08-04 04:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I'll go ahead and take that as a "I don't know to many Black people."

Next time you want to show faux outrage just put your hand near your chest and say "well I never...!"

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

You going to answer the questions or sit there with your jaw agape giving the flies a place to hang out?

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 06:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

cite where and when Bill called him a drug dealer? oh and who wants to cut off his nuts?

by zerosumgame 2008-08-04 06:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Two Clinton surrogates heavily insinuated that Obama was a dealer (one while in Clinton's presence, Black guy no less).

Jesse Jackson wanted to cut Obama's nuts off.

If you want me to do any more news reporting for you you'll have to pay me.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 06:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

ah so only those "surrogates" (can you document that BTW? please do) count, but none of BHO's do...yup, real consistent there

by zerosumgame 2008-08-04 07:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

oh and BTW nice way to dodge the questions and keep on promoting a lie.

by zerosumgame 2008-08-05 07:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I agree. The allegation is so vicious it demands a response.

by feelfree 2008-08-04 04:23PM | 0 recs
Stupid? Vicious? Why?

I think they're valid questions.
With so many self-appointed experts on race relations here, why can't they be answered?

I'm reading more opinions on how Black people feel (Bill Clinton is a hero, etc.), or how they should feel ("hard working White people wasn't race baiting), why is a response by an ACTUAL Black person invalid?

You don't think it's a tad arrogant for White people to be telling Blacks how they're supposed to feel, and what they should think, then to call them 'stupid' and 'vicious' when they disagree?

by Maori 2008-08-04 05:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Stupid? Vicious? Why?

You'll never get a response to this. You're making too much sense.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Stupid? Vicious? Why?

Which black person speaks for me? Even if the majority of blacks feel as you say why do they or you decide what I think? Why is another black person's response representative of me?

by feelfree 2008-08-05 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

ZCLint, you can read the last 3 comments, and that is why I winced when you did this diary.

Nothing will start the primary war anew so much as the race card, who played it, when, etc....

by WashStateBlue 2008-08-04 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

There is a lesson to all this for Democrats.

The African American vote cannot be taken for granted anymore.

The GOP is famous for more overt racial politics.

But White liberals and Democrats have practiced a different form of racial politics by assuming that Black people will take whatever you give them and not be savvy enough to see through the coded language.

We're expected to stay in our place.

Yet the same people here protesting that there was no racism in the primary will swear up and down that sexism was prevalent.

And...ah hell, who really cares?  

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 04:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

just because someone did not vote for obama does not mean that they are racist. Also, no political party should feel obligated to feel indebted to a group of people regardless of race. Please do not imply that.

by Ignored and Disgusted 2008-08-04 04:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I don't see where that was said at all.

by Maori 2008-08-04 05:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I Never said that not voting for Obama in the primaries makes one a racist.

I will say however, that if you voted for a democratic candidate in the primaries but will not vote Obama in the general, even though he shared at least 90% of the same policy proposals with the other candidates, well.....

To your other point, the political parties should be indebted to all groups of people, considering we elect them.

The point was not to take a group of people's votes for granted and say/do things that they would even remotely consider offensive.

Take Obama and the Jewish vote for example.

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:26PM | 0 recs
Oh, Christ...

Some folks just won't get over the primaries. Dismissing a SC win by saying Jesse Jackson won it twice is exploiting racism. Does that make Bill Clinton a racist? No. Does that make him a manipulative piece of shit? Yes. Bill could have said just as easily that John Edwards won the SC primary and it didn't make him president. The man is not stupid, and every word that comes out of his mouth is said for a reason.

As I stated above, I don't think Bill Clinton is a racist. But I do find it odd that he offered that up, without being prompted. Furthermore, it's always racist people who claim "I'm not a racist." Everyone else just ignores or mocks the allegations. I think Bill realizes what he did was wrong and he's trying to shirk the guilt. A good first step would be to stop acting like a whiny prick. It's not very endearing.

So yeah, Bill Clinton's not a racist and Richard Nixon wasn't a "crook."

PS. Speaking of Jesse Jackson, he and Bill are really two peas in a pod, aren't they. They just can't stand someone new taking over their territory. Time for them to retire and STFU.

by potus2020 2008-08-04 04:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh, Christ...

You're dense. The reason why Bill made the SC comment was simple--JJ Jr won SC two times but did not win the nomination, and he was trying to compare that to the situation Hillary was in, and the overall importance of the primary.

Of course, given the undertones of the Obama campaign's smearing of Clinton via memos at that point, it's not shocking that the netroots bit instantly, flaming Bill Clinton as a racist manipulator.

Bill Clinton will always be relevant. PS--Barack isn't even the President yet, so let's not try to compare those two.

by zcflint05 2008-08-04 04:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh, Christ...

haha I love your analysis, yeah he was bringing up Jesse as an example of Hillary's struggle.  Good one!  He could have brought up numerous democratic candidates who lost South Carolina, but Jesse is what came to his mind.

by hocuspocus 2008-08-04 04:15PM | 0 recs
Do you understand that comparing your

opponent to Jesse Jackson is a long-established racist dogwhistle in the South?

by Geekesque 2008-08-04 04:23PM | 0 recs
Will he do it again?

You know, when the Gore campaign didn't use him as much as he thought they should, President Clinton ended up hurting the campaign with some of his comments that made it into the media.

And it looks like he's going to do it again. I don't believe he's a racist, but he is reinforcing my belief that his legacy is far more important to him than a Democrat (other than a Clinton) in the White House.

by Liberal Monk 2008-08-04 04:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Poor Bill --he is such a victim of everyone-must have been the problem with Gore and Kerry too.Poor Poor Clintons-maybe it would be best if he holes up with Ferraro and they can lick their wounds Oh the agony of it all. Guess  he will have to continue on the Ron Burkle plane and play play play as he has been for the last few years.and leave the election to the grown-ups.Pouters are a downer.

by katiekat489 2008-08-04 04:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

how depressing, it's still about racism and still smearing Bill?  I guess you know what was in his heart, better than he?  

by anna shane 2008-08-04 05:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

Why does Bill Clinton continue to undermine Hillary? This sort of thing not only stirs the pot, but he has made it impossible for Hillary to get the vp nod.

by politicsmatters 2008-08-04 05:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Bill Clinton: I am a racist.

I guess you dont remember your own hackery and all the evil and untrue smears you wrote about HRC.  Because i remember all too well.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 05:53PM | 0 recs
Race card

Obama's campaign did play the race card to undermine Bill Clinton. That should not be surprising as Obama was running against the 90s. The 4 page memo that Bill obtained was the proof and since that Bill has not forgiven Obama. Negative campaigning is part of politics but as Democrats, we have a line not to cross especially against the only other President we have who is on our side in 40 years. Obama made the choice to cross that line and for that reason itself i could not forgive Obama.

by stevent 2008-08-04 05:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

You can forgive "hard working WHITE Americans"?

Or better yet, as a Black man am I supposed to forgive a politician making this kind of remark?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

And what is racist about saying "hard working white americans".  I get it it is code.  Code that is so secret that only you and your kind know it and it think it is your job to go around calling everyone a racist.l

To people like you there are only two types of whites.  Racist and those who dont know that they are racist.  

You need to stop this racial blackmail game that you play where anyone who use the word white is a racist.  Your defination of racist is anyone you disagree with.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 05:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

First off Chief, I never said that Bill and Hillary are racist.

Quite frankly they're too smart to be racist.

I said they used racial politics.

More-so after South Carolina.

Hillary Clinton:

I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

If Obama said something like this about his support from Black voters, what would the response be?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 05:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

First off Chief,

"I said they used racial politics" is CODE.  It is CODE for callling the clinton's racist.  

I guess you missed the memo from the BO campaign telling his supporters to suggest that the Clinton's were using racial politics.  Dude that is called CODE for the clinton's are racist. Please we all know what his campaign was doing.

Look BO is the dem candidate and that is that and we are all democratics but we are not stupid.  We all know what was done to the clinton's.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 06:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

So you mean I've been speaking in code this whole time?

Damn! I didn't even realize it.

Quick question, did the Clinton's do anything in the  primaries that can be considered racially insensitive?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 06:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

Quick answer.  What is racially insensitive?  And i am serious what does that mean.  You see my point.  It is a statement totally lacking in any quantitative meaning.

It means anything that anyone wants it to.  Let me tell you i know racism and have seen it up close and personal in all its evil and destructive way.  I just dont understand racially insensitive.  

I have seen a young black kid walking at night down the wrong street when four locals got out of their car and beat him within an inch of his life.  30 feet from me bleeding from his face. Seen race riots at my public school in the 60's with kids bleeding from all over.  Had some young kids throw me against the build on the way home from school and mug me at knife point. I know racism.  I am really sorry but racially insensitive does not mean much to me.  

Is that what we should all be livng are lives by.  We all need to be racially sensitive.  Life is short and most people have enough trouble just making ends meet and IMHO racially insensitive sounds alot like PC.  Suggesting the clinton's as racist or racially insensitive demeans the meaning of the word.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 06:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

The things you've seen my friend...

Anyway, trying to keep our internet argument within the realm of politics, racially insensitive means doing or saying something that may upset or offend a voting group (significant, loyal one at that).

Imagine if Obama were to say something antagonistic towards Jews.

Something that you and I on MyDD can say without getting in to trouble like "Most Jews vote for Democrats".

What would the media response and the response from the Jewish community be?

by yungblakman 2008-08-04 07:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

And you called yungblakman dense earlier?  Please.  The statement was made in one of the most bigoted areas of the country - Appalachia - was she trying to sing Kumbaya to folks?

What I can't believe is this bullshit is being played for all to see once again.

Does Bill Clinton want to reclaim his legacy or does Bill Clinton want to whine?

If he wants to reclaim his legacy he can do so by going to the African American community and campaigning for Obama.  It's that simple.  THAT gives him a chance to gussy up his image.

Until then, he's doing nothing but whining.

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 05:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

Dude,

I think you are mistaken i never wrote this "And you called yungblakman dense earlier?" but i am waiting for some proof.  Good luck.

Try to get your fact right.

And you say Appalachia is the most bigoted areas of the country? Really, want to present some proof of that?  The fact is Bill Clinton was smeared when BO supporters played the race card on him.  Nothing new that has beed done for years.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 06:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Dude

It can be forgiven to make a mistake on a comment 200 positions upward for that I apologize.

However when a quote is right in front of your eyes, such as this one:

The statement was made in one of the most bigoted areas of the country - Appalachia - was she trying to sing Kumbaya to folks?

You have issues.  See DAVE, the key words there are "one of the most" bigoted.  DON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA.  DO VOTE FOR OBAMA.  JUST GET OVER IT.

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 06:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Dude

First off if you know zero about appalachia if you think it is anymore bigoted than the northwest or southwest side of chicago.  Of for that matter many other urban parts of the US. So get your facts right.

I have post 1000's of times on this page and i have never said i would vote for anyone other the democratic candidate.  If fact i think i was one of the first HRC on this page to say it is time to unite, put our difference aside, and back BO.  Again try to get your facts right.

What you are saying is since I dont agree with you on this issue I am some kind of democratic turncoat who is going to vote for McCain.  Again get your fact straigth.

It is insulting that you would suggest that this debate is about who i will vote for.  It is about my opinion that you seem to think i am not entitled to.

david

by giusd 2008-08-04 06:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Dude

Ooooh touchy, touchy...

You assume what you want to, DAVE.

Apparently you have no view of any place outside of Chicago.  So provincial, Dave.

And, having stayed in Appalachia for an extended period of time, lived in Selma, Ala. for a year and grown up in the city of Cleveland, a city divided along racial lines by a river, I have a little perspective.

Sorry if that bugs you.

As for debating about for whom you'll vote, to be quite honest, I don't give a damn.  That is between you and your conscience.

What I basically said: QUIT FRAKKIN WHINING.

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 07:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Race card

Evidence? Links?

by LtWorf 2008-08-04 06:03PM | 0 recs

Login

 

Sign-in-with-twitter-lighter

Advertise Blogads