Republicans? We don't need no stinking Republicans!

Well, if I was in the agenda derailing business, I would not be too worried about the Republicans at this point. Whether or not you believe Obama's early bi-partisan play was simply to back them into a corner and get them to reveal their new mantra as the party of NO (No plan, No ideas, No clue, No future) or to actually see if there was a chance they would work for the good of the American people and not just for the upper 1 percent-ers and the base, the answer has pretty much been mailed in.

But, that is not the real problem looming to derail the progressive agenda anyway.

There will be zero or near zero votes for any of Obama's agenda from the Rush-publicans. Seems all their efforts are to rewrite history (Pelosi's recession?  WTF?)and to kneel and kiss the ring of Limbaugh the Great and Powerful.

Where we will see our chances for real reform in basic economic fairness (tax policy), health care reform and energy policy deep-sixed is from Congress members who, though they have a "D" behind their names, are really ideologically closer to Ronald Reagan then Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

We don't need an opposition party, we have one already. In spite of the fact Obama ran on a platform that was overwhelmingly approved by the American people, our Democrats in Congress are going to over-ride that electoral mandate.

Sadly, and not to open the primary war wounds, Obama was correct. The most successful President of the last 50 years was Reagan, he turbo-charged the move to the right that Nixon had started coming out of the LBJ era, and, ever since, we have seen our politicians move center right.

My take has always been, it was a con-job, a slight of hand, a triumph of marketing.

I believe the country was never, and IS not as far right as the Republicans took us.  

I think they have been amazingly successful in creating a number of untouchable totems, that raising taxes is always bad, that parts of the federal budget are in financial crisis (SS, Medicaid etc) while other parts, primarily defense and intelligence spending have to simply be put on auto-pilot, never questioned as to their impact in bankrupting the country and never put to the test of, is it always going to be Guns and never Butter?

Watch closely in the next 3 months, it's clear who the party of opposition is, and who are its leaders. Max Baccus, Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson, Senators from Agri-business states, even so called liberal New Yorkers such as Schumer will come home to their true constituents (Wall Street) and shoot down real regulatory reform and changes to implement basic tax fairness.

Sadly, our politicians are stuck in the beltway time-warp. They are a generation behind, political children mostly of the 70s, 80s and 90s; I believe what may be Obama's fate is to be the harbinger of a new political mantra, but to be a prophet who never makes it to the promised land with the children.

I think our PUMA buds have the wrong religious figure in mind for Obama, He's not so much The Christ as he is Moses the Prophet, who will start the exodus from the Egypt of Reaganism, but will not complete the journey and bring us to the promised land.

Tags: DINO's and not Fred Flintstones pet! (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

Re: Republicans? We don't need

they were elected too.  I voted for Barack, but  not as a mandate for exactly what he asks for.  We need debates, not rubber stamps.  I like robust other ideas in our own party.  Also, it won't be all on him if things don't pan out the way predicted.  I don't want social security to be 'reformed' until those reforms are actually needed, I say don't fix it until it breaks, cause it might not break at all. I want single payer, and I'd like a path to that.  I want him to take over the failed banks and then sell them back, at a profit to us, or at least not such a big loss.  I want someone overseeing the overseers.  The more 'ownership' of ideas, the more will work harder to make sure they work as intended.  We're not called big tent for nothing.  

by anna shane 2009-03-25 10:27AM | 0 recs
The problem Anna is...

You're to the left of what even Obama is pushing.

And, we are aren't even going there.

You're not only not going to get single payer, you're not going to get anything, except maybe reforms to the billing systems, which congress will like, because SOME large computer company will get the contracts in someones district.

Max Baccus will see to that.

What you want to see, nationalization of the banks, is ALSO not possible, because of Schumer and our folks, who are as wedded to Wallstreet as any Republican.

All those people we think are too cozy?

Summers, Geithener, Bernake...All birthed in the Bush 1 Clinton Era, all stuck in the 80s-90s.

And, you will NOT get any adjustment to the tax code, the rich will be protected, the Military  Industrial Complex will be protected, all the same groups will have their way.

We have a big tent, but progressives are not in charge, Reagan and his children is still holding sway.

by WashStateBlue 2009-03-25 10:37AM | 0 recs
Re: The problem Anna is...

gross, thanks for popping my bubble.  

I presume you are correct, and that we'll have more missed opportunities in store.

What do you think of Sweden, deciding to let their only car go kaput?  I guess the world doesn't actually need Swedish cars, Greeks never thought to manufacture any.  

Anyway, I'll think of how much worse it would be if we'd gotten McCain.  Maybe Barack is being practical.  I'd like to think so anyway.  

by anna shane 2009-03-27 08:03AM | 0 recs
Re: Damn

 and I was just getting over those suicidal feelings.

by QTG 2009-03-25 03:41PM | 0 recs
You picked a bad week to quit drinking!

To quote the movie Airplane!

Yeah, I'm fuming myself.

I thought we actually WON the election?

Turns out, to Evan Bayh, that was not really that big of a deal.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2009/03/24/AR2009032402461. html

by WashStateBlue 2009-03-25 03:50PM | 0 recs
Re: VP Bayh???

Bayh was a serious contender for VP?  OMG,one heartbeat away for that jerk.  (And his Republican successor would have been even worse in the Senate).

I was lectured years ago for writing a diary on Daily Kos labeled. "Tom Carper, Corporate Democrat."  Among other things I attacked his bipartisan sellouts.  I was years ahead on that dude.

Lincoln?  She feels walled in by the local power of Wal-Mart.

by David Kowalski 2009-03-25 08:51PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------