Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Moore Says Weinstein Wanted Clinton Scene Cut

Moore said after the premiere that movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, a personal friend and supporter of the Clintons whose company financed the film, "begged" him to remove a scene exposing Hillary Clinton as the second-highest recipient of campaign donations from the health-care industry.

Sicko is nice enough in its initial portrayal of Hillary. A funny scene describes her as "sexy" and "sassy" as photos of Hillary over the years are splashed on the screen. The movie suggests the former first lady took Washington by storm and scared the pants off the menfolk who ran the town when she showed up proposing universal health care.

It does, however, hint at her lack of political skills working with Republican leaders in Congress at the time. Moore includes a famous exchange from the 1993 health care debate when, testifying before Congress, the then-first lady compared then-Rep. Dick Armey (R-Texas) to Dr. Kevorkian

After her health-care overhaul plan failed, Clinton went "silent" -- as Moore put it -- on the need for health-care changes. And then she began raking in the dough -- big time -- from the industry when she started running for office.

There were audible gasps from the overwhelmingly liberal audience when the film pointed out that Sen. Clinton got nearly a million dollars from the health care lobby, making her the second-highest recipient of donations (behind former GOP Sen. Rick Santorum) from the very industry that Moore demonizes.

Clinton's campaign had no comment on Weinstein's attempt to have the scene removed.

here's the link http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2007/06/21/AR2007062102150_ pf.html

Tags: Hillary, michael, moore, sicko (all tags)

Comments

32 Comments

Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Ummm.  What is Clinton's Heathcare Plan?  I want a detailed plan, link, please?  Because I have not heard anything from her, in regards to this.  And why is this not a surprise?  I am sure they ALL have some type of heathcare, pharmaceutical, etc. in their coffers.  Would Bloomberg do this?

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 07:40AM | 0 recs
Hillary has no plan

and has already said NO UHC in a first term.

Americans are stupid - her low information voters have no idea about this.

It's kinda sad really

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 07:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary has no plan

Of course.  Everybody is stupid because they are not in agreement with you.   That "theme" is what is sad.

by georgep 2007-06-22 08:00AM | 0 recs
No I'm saying honesty

if she has no plans to radically change healthcare in a first term shouldn't her voters know that?

It's the "slick Hillary" thing saying things so both sides hear what they  want.

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 08:03AM | 0 recs
Re: No I'm saying honesty

what voters need to know is that a UHC plan in the first quarter is unrealistic. It would be nice, I agree, but you have to be realistic in the fact that unless there are least 60 dems in the senate, it wont pass a cloture vote.

HRC tried going at it headstrong and it didnt work because of the political climate. Go at it piecemeal and you will have a better chance at getting everyone covered. Start with children, which is what HRC is proposing, and you will be deomonized if you vote against it.

It is only June, and there is still a lot of time in the primary season, throw all your apples in in the first two months, and it wont work. Slow and steady wins the race.

by sepulvedaj3 2007-06-22 12:12PM | 0 recs
Re: No I'm saying honesty

I want to read the plan.  Though John Edwards is more expensive, I like the single pay.  Obama's plan has not sat well with me.  I always will envision Hillary wanting UHC, and she was the one to put it out there.  So, I do want to read her PLAN.

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

"I am sure they ALL have some type of heathcare, pharmaceutical, etc. in their coffers.  Would Bloomberg do this?"

I am trying to figure out if your constant Bloomberg mention in many matters means that you are considering voting for him.  

by georgep 2007-06-22 07:59AM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

No, I am not voting for Bloomberg, and it was meant as a /snark.

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

If you cared at all (instead of feigned concern) you would know that Clinton is going to unveil her health-care program soon completely.  It is unveiled in 3 parts, one of which has been released a couple of weeks ago.  

by georgep 2007-06-22 08:02AM | 0 recs
Unless she's changed her mind

she has said no universal health care in a first term.

it's like her vote on the Iraq war.

people were arguing she said it was a mistake until the press made it clear she never did.

same pattern.  If a topic is not good for her, she clintonizes it so low information voters don't know the truth.

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 08:05AM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Look, I do want to read her plan.  All of them need to be dissected with a fine tooth comb.  And since she was the treadsetter on this, it should be the BEST.  So, put the link up so I can read her "first part".

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 12:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'
Hi ibs (can I call you that?).  Here's the link Hillary Clinton's Health Plan Part I:
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/ healthcarecosts.pdf
by markjay 2007-06-23 01:21PM | 0 recs
hold on...

I'm not a Hillary supporter by any means, but I'm not sure this is fair. Hillary tried very hard in 93 and her ideas were not at all bad. If health-care wants to give her money because they are afraid of her, this does not mean that Hillary is some sort of sleeper candidate for the Healthcare industry.

I definitley have my issues with her, but lets remember that at the end of the day she is at worst a corrupted and failed idealist, and has never been on par with the republican corporate mafia.

by alipi 2007-06-22 07:43AM | 0 recs
Did you know

the only plan HIllary has released is No universal health care in a first term?

The rignt wing media tells their listeners  she will do it, but she hasn't

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 07:51AM | 0 recs
Did you know

that no Republican will ever propose any health care reform whatsoever. Hillary is still lightyears better than any Repug and I think that Moore's movie should have pointed this out.

by Populism2008 2007-06-22 09:11AM | 0 recs
Moore

won't even support Edwards' plan why should he care about Hillary's?

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 09:13AM | 0 recs
You know what,

that was 1993, this is 2007.  Where is her PLAN?  Does she state as Obama and Edwards, coverage for everyone in her first four years.  1M, I thought maybe a few hundred thousand, but 1M, from this industry that DON'T WANT US COVERED.  That is another issue that will resonate with the public.  I expect her "plan" and soon.

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 08:00AM | 0 recs
don't let the facts get in the way

just Look at Hillary's scars from 1993 and go into a trance.

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 08:05AM | 0 recs
Re: You know what,

Unless we pick up about 10 to 15 Senate seats (and a lot more in the House) in 2008 UHC in anyone's first term is a very uphill battle. Candidates can promise anything they think voters want to hear but the political reality is they need the votes to actually get it done. The healthcare and insurance industries are opposed to any form of UHC and it will be a very difficult battle to get it passed.

Hillary Clinton is the only leader alive who has been successful in getting UHC for at least part of the U.S. population. She was successful in getting CHIPS passed which has provided UHC tens of millions of children in the United States (and does so as a direct program without involving private health insurance policies).

by robliberal 2007-06-22 09:08AM | 0 recs
Hillary's

the worst person to pick up ANY seats PERIOD.

read Sabato's piece

by TarHeel 2007-06-22 09:14AM | 0 recs
Re: You know what,

Agreed robliberal.  Hillary Clinton is the only candidate who has done more than issue a position paper and has actually attempted to pass universal health coverage.  She also played a large role in the passage of SCHIP which is a very good, if limited, program.  I have few problems with her on domestic issues -  it is her hawkish foreign policy that concerns me.

"does so as a direct program without involving private health insurance policies"

This isn't really correct.  In most states, SCHIP beneficiaries are enrolled in state designed and financed plan administered by private insurance companies.  

by John Mills 2007-06-22 12:03PM | 0 recs
Re: You know what,

If she cannot get a health plan passed in her first term why would you think she could get it done in a second term?

Historically most presidents accomplish very little in their 2nd terms. Most big things are passed in a first term, By the middle of a second term both party's start concentrating on the next presidential election

by BDM 2007-06-22 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: You know what,

Not always true.  Reagan passed tax reform and Clinton passed SCHIP in their second terms.  Those were both major pieces of legislation.

by John Mills 2007-06-22 12:47PM | 0 recs
Re: You know what,

and you know what, we better have a damn good combination in 2008 so UHC will be PASSED.  A good team with "coattails".

by icebergslim 2007-06-22 12:51PM | 0 recs
This Makes No Sense

As someone who worked on Capitol Hill on health reform in 1993-4, this is absurd.  Hillary and Bill Clinton made a lot of mistakes but they were very committed to achieving universal health care and expended a lot of political capital on it.  After all they are the only people in the last 30 yrs to do more than pay lip service to expanding health coverage.  They did not mess it up "on purpose."

by John Mills 2007-06-22 12:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Hillary will not try to enact radical healthcare reform in her first term because she doesn't want get stuck in the same quagmire that she did as First Lady. It would waste all of her political capital, fuel the anti-HRC Right, and jeopardize her reelection chances in 2012.

HRC in 2008 guarantees no healthcare reform before 2012. She has said so herself.

by LandStander 2007-06-22 09:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

As much as I would like to see comprehensive health reform, having watched the Clinton health reform efforts of 1993-4 up close I realize UHC will most likely come on a gradual basis.  There are too many vested interests both politically and in terms of employment (don't forget tens of millions of people work in health care).  You can only create so many winners and losers at one time which is why it will go slowly.

by John Mills 2007-06-22 12:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

she guarantees no UNIVERSAL health care reform, but has not said she doesnt guarantee ANY health care reform. This is an uphill battle, and no one elected in 08 will succeed if they rush into it headstrong. Theres just not enough support and unless they pick up more democratic senators (a whopping 10) it wont have a chance in hell.

Criticism for being realistic is pure smear and utter BS.

by sepulvedaj3 2007-06-22 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Do you mean she is not going to try and campaign on it to be accomplished in her first term.?

If she campaign's on it and win's then she needs to push it. She will not accomplish it in a 2nd term for most presidents accomplish very little in a 2nd term.

I wish she had some gut's and would lead for once, instead of looking at where the political winds are blowing.

by BDM 2007-06-22 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Look, it's simple.  Hillary will not push Universal Health Care, period!  It's BS to say that she'll get to it in her second term since there may well be no second term.  So, if universal health care is an important issue to you, there is no sense in hoping that Hillary will do anything on universal health coverage while she is President.

Plus, strategically, you don't go into this issue already saying "Geez, we don't have enough votes for universal coverage, so we'll do little by little first".  You start by proposing universal coverage and compromise from there if need be.  I'll at least give credit to Edwards and Obama for proposing universal coverage.  They're at least going into the health care debate from a position of strength.  If either of them win, they at least can say they have a mandate to push through a universal health care package as president.

by minvis 2007-06-22 12:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'

Criticism for being realistic is pure smear and utter BS.

Did you read the comment that you responded to (mine)?
I did not argue that HRC would put off fighting for healthcare reform because she was being realistic (which I guess implies that Obama and Edwards are not realistic). I argued that HRC would not pursue healthcare reform because it burned her once, and she doesn't want to get burned again.

What do most people remember about Hillary? Bill's BJ and her failed attempt at healthcare reform. What the fastest way for her presidency to go down in flames? Another BJ for Bill or another failed attempt at healthcare reform. She will avoid both of those like the plague.

And what does this all mean? From my perspective, it means that a HRC presidency will ensure our healthcare system stays broken for another 4 years.

by LandStander 2007-06-22 12:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary supporter tries to censure 'Sicko'
"Hillary Clinton is the only leader alive who has been successful in getting UHC for at least part of the U.S. population."
Romney passed UHC for massachusets like he reminds anyone that will listen.
by joachim 2007-06-22 01:24PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------