Expert on Fascism warns of dangers posed by Christian right's extremists

I missed this article Thursday, but saw it now, and it's worth reading.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/06/nyregion/06profile.html

"Warning From a Student of Democracy's Collapse"

By CHRIS HEDGES

Correction Appended

PRINCETON, N.J.

FRITZ STERN, a refugee from Hitler's Germany and a leading scholar of European history, startled several of his listeners when he warned in a speech about the danger posed in this country by the rise of the Christian right. In his address in November, just after he received a prize presented by the German foreign minister, he told his audience that Hitler saw himself as "the instrument of providence" and fused his "racial dogma with a Germanic Christianity."

"Some people recognized the moral perils of mixing religion and politics," he said of prewar Germany, "but many more were seduced by it. It was the pseudo-religious transfiguration of politics that largely ensured his success, notably in Protestant areas."

Dr. Stern's speech, given during a ceremony at which he got the prize from the Leo Baeck Institute, a center focused on German Jewish history, was certainly provocative. The fascism of Nazi Germany belongs to a world so horrendous it often seems to defy the possibility of repetition or analogy. But Dr. Stern, 78, the author of books like "The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology" and university professor emeritus at Columbia University, has devoted a lifetime to analyzing how the Nazi barbarity became possible. He stops short of calling the Christian right fascist but his decision to draw parallels, especially in the uses of propaganda, was controversial.

"When I saw the speech my eyes lit up," said John R. MacArthur, whose book "Second Front" examines wartime propaganda. "The comparison between the propagandistic manipulation and uses of Christianity, then and now, is hidden in plain sight. No one will talk about it. No one wants to look at it."

Dr. Stern was a schoolboy in 1933 when Hitler was appointed the German chancellor. He ran home from school that January afternoon clutching a special edition of the newspaper to deliver to his father, a prominent physician.

"I was young," he said, "but I knew it was very bad news."

The street fighting in his native Breslau (now Wroclaw in Poland) between Communists and Nazis, the collapse of German democracy and the ruthless suppression of all opposition marked his childhood, and were images and experiences that would propel him forward as a scholar.

"I saw one of the last public demonstrations against Hitler," he said. "Men, women and children walked through the street and chanted 'Hunger! Hunger! Hunger!' "

His paternal grandparents had converted to Christianity. His parents were baptized at birth, as were Mr. Stern and his older sister. But this did not save the Sterns from persecution. Nazi racial laws still classified them as Jews.

"It was only Nazi anti-Semitism that made me conscious of my Jewish heritage," he said. "I had been brought up in a secular Christian fashion, celebrating Christmas and Easter. My father had to explain it to me."

His schoolmates were swiftly recruited into Hitler youth groups and he and other Jews were taunted and excluded from some activities.

"Many of my classmates found the organized party experience, which included a heavy dose of flag waving and talk of national strength, very exhilarating," said Dr. Stern, who lost an aunt and an uncle in the Holocaust. "It was something I never forgot."

His family fled to New York in 1938 when he was 12. He eventually went to Columbia University intending to study medicine. But his passion for the past, along with questions about what happened to his homeland, caused him to switch his focus to history. He wanted to grasp how democracies disintegrate. He wanted to uncover the warning signs other democracies should heed. He wanted to write about the seductiveness of authoritarian movements, which he once described in an essay, "National Socialism as Temptation."

"There was a longing in Europe for fascism before the name was ever invented," he said. "There was a longing for a new authoritarianism with some kind of religious orientation and above all a greater communal belongingness. There are some similarities in the mood then and the mood now, although also significant differences."

HE warns of the danger in an open society of "mass manipulation of public opinion, often mixed with mendacity and forms of intimidation." He is a passionate defender of liberalism as "manifested in the spirit of the Enlightenment and the early years of the American republic."

"The radical right and the radical left see liberalism's appeal to reason and tolerance as the denial of their uniform ideology," he said. "Every democracy needs a liberal fundament, a Bill of Rights enshrined in law and spirit, for this alone gives democracy the chance for self-correction and reform. Without it, the survival of democracy is at risk. Every genuine conservative knows this."

Dr. Stern, who has two children from a previous marriage, is married to Elizabeth Sifton, a book publisher. They live in New York. He is writing a book called "Five Germanys I Have Known," a combination of memoirs and reflections that looks at Weimar, Nazi Germany, the Federal Republic of Germany, East Germany and unified Germany. He is widely read in Germany and has won its highest literary prize.

"The Jews in Central Europe welcomed the Russian Revolution," he said, "but it ended badly for them. The tacit alliance between the neo-cons and the Christian right is less easily understood. I can imagine a similarly disillusioning outcome."

Correction: January 7, 2005, Friday:

The Public Lives profile yesterday, about Fritz Stern, the scholar of European history who has recently warned of the danger of the rise of the Christian right in the United States, misspelled his wife's given name. She is Elisabeth Sifton, not Elizabeth.

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

yeah..
I mean, look at what this guy David Albo did - he tried to lower the penalty for molesting your own child...

http://www.protect.org/virginia/vaNews.html

They know no bounds...

by wahoopaul 2005-01-08 07:33PM | 0 recs
They aren't there yet
"There are some similarities in the mood then and the mood now, although also significant differences."

I'm not willing to lable them fascists yet. I would put them in the same category as Muslim extremists, fascist wannabees. Muslim extremists and religious extremists both have influence on powerful government leaders. Until they actually control the government, and the ability of the government to exercise deadly force, they remain fascist wanabees.

I am not arguing that either party is not a serious threat, just not a deadly fasacist threat. The religious right in America probably has more influence over government leaders and the Muslim extremists are more willing to use deadly force, although outside of government channels.

I do think warnings like Fritz Stern's serve a useful purpose of "startling" people with the similarities. I don't think common usage of the fascist label will serve us well. I enjoy Pacifica radio, but am put off by Quigly's use of the fascist label to describe the religious right. Some of their leaders may wish they had control of the levers of power, and a minority of their followers do as well.

Even on the religious right I belive there would be rebellion against the government going to far to enforce a religious agenda. I suspect that we are at a tipping point and 2006 will see a rejection by the American people of Bush's conservative and religious extremism. I'll gladly admit I was wrong if the American people don't change course dramatically in 2006. Until then, I will remain a cautious skeptic.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-01-08 09:37PM | 0 recs
Re: They aren't there yet
The truly Christian right is not there and never will be (since being a real follower of Jesus could never coincide with being a NeoFascist), but there's a group of right wing religionists who are already there.  I do not call them Christians because they do not put Jesus' Spirit of Love as primary in their policy and behavior.  IMO they are faux or psuedo-Christians who fly the flag of the cult banners of Dominionism or Reconstructionsism and empahize a harsh inhumane philosphy and conception of the moral order.  For more of my rantings against these evil cults please visit my diaries at jamboi.dailykoss.com
by JamBoi 2005-01-08 10:54PM | 0 recs
They are basically a doomsday cult...
They think that the world will see a final battle between good and evil, "Armageddon" and that the "saved" will be called to Heaven in a "Rapture".

That's why they don't want to invest in schools (why spend money on schools that we wont need in Heaven?) or health care (God punishes bad people by making them sick and helps good people by making them healthy.)

It would all be so laughable but many GOPers, including Bush, Tom DeLay and lterally millions of others believe in this hogwash.

Notice how it conveneiently absolves them of any responsibility to take charge of problems.. arrggh..

by ultraworld 2005-01-09 06:04AM | 0 recs
Margaret Atwood's "A Handmaids Tale"
is a terrifying and gripping novel told from the perspective of a young woman, who, after having survived the (literal) culture wars and taken prisoner by the victors in Gilead (the new name for the US) is forced to become a sex-slave baby producer...(most of the Gilead women have been rendered sterile by radiation when the cities were blown up, since Gilead had most of the bombs in the war between them and the coastal US)

If you read this book, you won't be able to put it down. Its that good...

by ultraworld 2005-01-09 06:09AM | 0 recs
great book
i completely agree.  i first read the handmaid's tale when i was fifteen or so.  reagan was president and i was just becoming aware of the real-life culture wars that were happening at the time.  

about a year and half into bush's term, i re-read the book.  this time around, it struck me as prophetic.  

i'll second the suggestion that everyone should read a handmaid's tale

by annatopia 2005-01-09 06:57AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------