Why Coakley vs. Brown Doesn't Matter

In the senate race of Coakley (D) vs. Brown (R) today - to be held in Massachusetts - a party desperate for something to pin its hope of survival on - will watch closely to see who the voters will select to replace Ted Kennedy.

 

Healthcare reform will be reported as being held in the balance. However, the race is not relevant.  Why?

Because so much was gained in the last session of congress - towards real reform - and the staggering amounts of money that were spent by the Insurance lobbyists - wasn't able to stop it.

In fact, a healthcare reform package passed the House of Representatives - with clear element of a National Health Service. The public had their say in government.

In the senate, a deeply flawed bill arose from the machinations of a deeply flawed institution. Like the GOP during the Bush era, 'pay for play' ruled the senate. What arose from its chambers stated that every man woman and child in America must pay a private health insurance company for coverage, but there would be no viable National Health Service to insure competition and provide a reasonable alternative to the kind of HMO-class , 600 percent higher in cost, 37th ranked in the world healthcare we seem to be so 'happy' with here in the states. And that bill was to be reconciled.

It still can be reconciled, and the legislation that arose from both chambers can be formed into a bill that can be signed.  In all likelihood, it will. If only the House can stand strong on the National Health Service element - the center of the bill - and the senate can capitulate that , constitutionally - they cannot require Americans to buy a product from a private company without providing that alternative - the selfsame one that was given as a gift to the returning veterans of World War II, in Britain - and currently - to every member of the Senate - National Healthcare.

 

Brown is riding high on a typical Republican strategy - earned media, plus special purpose entity boosters and the typical populist messagery that has been the earmark of every successful republican campaign. Coakley, on the other hand, attempted a negative campaign. This was all awash in television advertising that had either the wrong effect, or no effect at all.

 

Meanwhile, the blogosphere voted on the Senate version of Healthcare reform - and found the 60 vote majority the Senate maintains to be lacking in substance and meaning.  Capitulation on the part of Senators whose lobbyist money putatively heads towards such ineffective, expensive media to run their campaign - and in whom we find a growing disconnect between what the people want (72% of us want healthcare reform) and what the lobbyists seem to need to keep the status quo.

 

But what will happen is the status quo will be shattered. The house bill will stand. And a new version of the Senate bill will be put into place.

And the reconciliation of those bills will maintain and support a National Health Service. So much was spent to such little effect that even the lobbyists will aquiesce they have failed.

And the plaintive cries of the GOP , who will point to their new 41 seat 'domination'  - when - and not if - the Dems figure out that the progressive, independent movement that swept Obama into power - wants real healthcare reform - will go after every senate seat available and they will win.

Brown is riding a wave of support that comes directly from the dissatisfaction people have experienced in the visible disconnect between their needs as a constituency, and the lobbyism that has become entrenched in the GOP and in Washington DC .

They want a National Health Service. If the Dems lose today, there is a strong probability they will learn their lesson - keep the elements of the house bill that work - and launch a new senate campaign later in the year to speak to the active 2010 voters of the progressive, independent and new democratic base . And they will pick up Senate Seats all across American in 2010. As well as House seats. The landslide elections of 2008 will pale in comparison.

 

And if the Democrats win, in Massachusetts - a state that voted for John McCain over George Bush in the 2000 primary -  then the message of the close election of Sen. Coakley  will be heard loud and clear in the Senate. Get Real. or Go Home.

Poll

What will happen today?

| 1 votes | Results

Tags: Senate, healthcare reform (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

With all due respect, what planet are you living on...?

But what will happen is the status quo will be shattered. The house bill will stand. And a new version of the Senate bill will be put into place.

And the reconciliation of those bills will maintain and support a National Health Service. So much was spent to such little effect that even the lobbyists will aquiesce they have failed.

Any "new version of the Senate bill" would be subject to filibuster.  With the Republicans now holding 41 votes, the only way any "new Senate bill" could emerge from that chamber would be by somehow persuading Snowe and/or Collins, under heavy partisan pressure from their own party, to jump ship and vote for it (while keeping Lieberman on-board, of course).  In other words, such a bill would be practically guaranteed to be a lot worse for progressives than the current Senate bill.

If you can't see that, you're out of touch with reality.

 

by JDWalley 2010-01-19 10:24AM | 0 recs
RE: With all due respect, what planet are you living on...?

No. Your timeframe is wrong.

I am not saying healthcare reform is going to be alive and well after the GOP gains their vote + blocks the bill. I am saying that it will be alive and well after the next round of elections.

 

We really have to remember the scope of change that is being attempted here. This is epic legislation.  I am referring specifically to the fact that less and less senators can be bought off.

Look how hard the lobbyists had to work just to fail this last time around. Trust me, if the Dems align with a strong support of NHS the next two election cycles will result in the right house/senate makeup to get it done.

 

by Trey Rentz 2010-01-19 01:32PM | 0 recs
Wrong on so many levels

A) Brown wins the only thing that may get passed is the Senate Bill, not the House Bill because it would need to be passed in the next ten days or so.

B) If the Senate Bill does not pass before Brown is seated HCR dies as it is now written.

C) Will anybody take it up again? Not before action is taken on jobs and certainly not before the mid-terms. So my guess we will not see HCR taken up again period for the foreseeable future.

So hope for a Coakley win.

by jsfox 2010-01-19 11:11AM | 0 recs
RE: Wrong on so many levels

No, I disagree.  Too many inroads have been made this past year against the lobbyists that have been trying to keep this legislation out of the books.

HCR will be taken up again in the near future, if not now, and it will pass. The lobbyists are fighting a losing battle.

 

by Trey Rentz 2010-01-19 01:34PM | 0 recs
wow

I didn't know there was still that much kool aid floating around. 

If Coakly loses it is because the majority of Americans including those in MA do not like either bill and are hoping to kill the whole mess by electing a republican.

Yes she should have campaigned harder.  But the real problem is that the people keep yelling and my clueless party refuses to hear. Unfortunately, for that reason a liberal democrat may lose today and a real creepy conservative guy may win.  This election is mostly a referendum on the President's policy and the party's willingness to enable it.  The only place that gets more lobbyiest money than Obama is a whore house in downtown DC.

 

The ONLY way to keep the insurance industry protection act alive is for the congress to vote on and pass the senate bill exactly as it stands.  And it is irrational to say that the legislation will be revisited.  it has cost the party and the president too much good will and political capital.

 

BTW, your claim that insurance companies are not getting exactly what they want is just plain funny.

by TeresaINPennsylvania 2010-01-19 02:18PM | 0 recs
RE: wow

And who knew there was still PUMAs left to remind us about Kool aid.

 

 

by jsfox 2010-01-19 04:40PM | 0 recs
RE: wow
I thought about this thing alot. I think the concept of passing the Senate Bill as it is, because we're afraid anything else might not go - is false. IMHO the best way to proceed is 'damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead'. Think about this for a second. 1. The house modifies and recommends amendments in reconciliation 2. Those reconciliations strengthen and correct the senate bill 3. That bill, strengthened and merged - goes to the senate floor. It should at minimum include a national health service. At that point, the Senate will be under a filibuster by the GOP. My vote here is to go ahead and let the GOP shut down government for as long as they like. Weeks. months. even years if necessary. Let the GOP go into the election cycle, being a losing party without the votes - the Senate as a body has a majority, if not a supermajority - that support real healthcare reform. So let the GOP try to shut down government. See what happens. Do you think it will help them with their electoral chances? I think the Dems standing up for us, and fighting hard - will energize the progressives and the base and set up a deathblow for the GOP. In the end, the American people should be made aware that the GOP simply wants to shut down government if their lobbyists don't get their way. It sets us up for a big fight, I know. And ultimately it might kill off HCR in this election cycle. But. It would guarantee its passage in the second election cycle. Coakley lost b/c she was the wrong person - and the wrong person came up on the dem. side b/c the dems were asleep but in 2008 they were awakened and they re-wrote the entire political landscape. and fair disclosure, I'm an independent and I don't care which party is in power as long as someone gets something done up there. I am paying for it after all..
by Trey Rentz 2010-01-21 06:32AM | 0 recs
RE: wow

And history shows I was right and you were wrong.  Now matter how the white house spins it, even the people who voted said it was mostly to stop the HCR bill,  The most telling statistic is that something like 40 percent said the bill was too conservative. 

Democrats went to the polls and voted for Brown because the bill was not real healthcare reform and they knew it.

Somehow I think you imagine calling me PUMA is an insult... but to me it is just a name that means SMARTER THAN YOU all along.

 

by TeresaINPennsylvania 2010-02-02 10:04AM | 0 recs
my vote min your poll

would be for, Brown loses and the democrats stick their fingers in their ears.

I hope I am wrong and Martha wins.  Then I hope she tells the Obama admin to kiss her ass.

by TeresaINPennsylvania 2010-01-19 02:20PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------