Barack gives Hillary "the finger"

Previously entitled "Grown-ups only for President, please!"

Even my 74-year old mom took one look at this, and said: he's giving the finger!

Obama's own campaign posted this on You Tube in support of his candidacy. What does that say about his character, maturity, arrogance, respect for women, and respect for Hillary? Who's Barack's target audience? What is the message he means to convey? This is the guy who says he'll sit down with enemy leaders around the world and diplomatically discuss our differences?

And he did it twice!  At 2 separate events...same speech, same pause, same gesture -- proving that Barack Obama deliberately flipped off Hillary.

Here is the short video version of the second time Obama made the obscene gesture while talking about Hillary's debate performance.

And here is the longer version of the same incident. You can see by the audience reaction and Barack's own smirks that there was no ambiguity as to what was intended.

Long version...

In the words of my 22-year-old niece: "If you're going to have the audacity to flip someone off as a presidential candidate, then at least have the chutzpah to actually flip them off....how old are you that you have to scratch your face with your middle finger instead?  If he had done it directly, he'd still be a jack ass, but now he's a jack ass and juvenile."

For more detail , including the mainstream media outlets which are now running the story, there are a couple of excellent posts at No Quarter.

Cross posted at texasdarlin.wordpress.com

Tags: asinine, can't believe it's recommended, flips off, Hillary, i can feel my brain melting, LOL mydd, obama, Recommended, Senator Obama, so i herd you liek mudkips?, the finger, this is extremely sad, Troll Diary (all tags)

Comments

334 Comments

Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Do you think we're retarded?

by politicsmatters 2008-04-18 06:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

by ragekage 2008-04-18 06:33AM | 0 recs
When TD posts..

a diary....everyone who wants a Democrat for President hurts.

by JoeCoaster 2008-04-18 07:31AM | 0 recs
If she's right.. then this race should be OVER..

but then again.. Bush did it and got away with it later..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVynnbx1X sc

But seriously, I think that is a very rude and UNPROFESSIONAL thing to do.

by architek 2008-04-18 08:51AM | 0 recs
touching your face...

Touching your face is "rude and UNPROFESSIONAL" now?  Wow...that's some tough gesture standards you got there.

But seriously, quite insulting our intelligence. I understand that "smear politics" depends on quantity more then quality but this is ridiculous.  

by JoeCoaster 2008-04-18 09:00AM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

What's ridiculous is that you have a democratic candidate flipping the bird at another democratic candidate.  There's no ambiguity to this.  I saw it last night on TV and immediately realized what he was doing, as did the crowd he was addressing, to judge by the hoots.

I was watching the news with my mother, by the way.  She was shocked at the behavior and announced very loudly and on the spot that he had just lost her vote.  (You should also know that I had been working to get her to switch from Obama to Clinton for months, with little headway.)  That kind of action doesn't go over well with a certain generation.

But let's not pretend he didn't know what he was doing or that we are reading intentions into something that didn't really happen.  It was too obvious and the audience reaction was too distinctive...not to mention it happened twice.  Even Keith Olbermann paid it token coverage last night.

by mtnspirit 2008-04-18 09:28AM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

Please look at the video showing it from another angle if you really want to pursue this.  Go to about 20:00 and wait.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:30AM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

I concede...  the hardest part for me was having to tell my Mom that we misread Obama's gesture.  Now she's back to being a die hard Obama supporter.  Sigh.

by mtnspirit 2008-04-22 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

did a future version of all you people pushing this line come back via time machine to warn you not to stake your reputations on this clearly false charge? Demostrably so? As in, "look at another angle" as in "this is why people see Bigfoot or clouds shaped like Bunnies... because its what they're looking for?"

Cuz if I was future you(plural) I'd totally do that.

by Lettuce 2008-04-18 09:50AM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

Wow, someone has given me my first troll rating EVER.  Not sure I understand why, but it's pretty exciting!

by mtnspirit 2008-04-18 12:43PM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

Ahhhh, Now I understand...this is tit for tat.

by mtnspirit 2008-04-18 12:52PM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

I wish I could say that I am surprised by Clinton supporters but at this point, nothing shocks me anymore.  You are so angry, so upset, so helplessly maligned that the ONLY thing you can do is INTIMATE or ASSUME that he is giving her the bird?  OMFG - you people seriously need to grow up.  This, THIS RIGHT HERE is the best that you have to throw at him?  Feigned outrage over a supposed slight that didn't happen.  You people are sad...go read a book, see a movie, do something other than pouring over youtube footage like it's the Zapruder film.  You have officially crossed over into crazyland...enjoy your stay.

by Rockville Liberal 2008-04-18 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

Hmmm...sounds like you are the angry one.  Maybe you should hold that discerning judgment of yours up to a mirror?

by mtnspirit 2008-04-18 02:46PM | 0 recs
Re: touching your face...

anger and annoyance are two wholly separate emotions, but thanks for playing.

by Rockville Liberal 2008-04-18 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: If she's right.. then this race should be OVER

This is probably the stupidest post ever. Congratulations!

It pains me to see how someone's love for Clinton can create hate for Obama and vice-versa.

Why aren't you on the McCain websites? You are not a Clinton supporter and we know it.

Tard.

by comingawakening 2008-04-18 12:58PM | 0 recs
This diary is trash

and should be deleted by the admins.  A new low for MyDD.

by ReillyDiefenbach 2008-04-18 10:32AM | 0 recs
retarded is the word you chose?

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 06:41AM | 0 recs
Re: retarded is the word you chose?

Megadittos, Teresa.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:31AM | 0 recs
Re: retarded is the word you chose?
I am happy to agree with 'TeresaInPA' for probably the first time ever.

Seriously TexDarlin, there is so much wrong with this diary, but "retarded"??? That is just flat wrong and you should know better!

by power of truth 2008-04-18 10:17AM | 0 recs
It was politicsmatters, NOT

Texasdarlin.

by splashy 2008-04-18 12:26PM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Politicsmatters:

Certainly no one can know what was in Narcissus' juvenile thoughts when his middle finger extended to scratch that itch at the very moment that he made the comment "Hillary Clinton was in her element."

But the audience seemed quite willing to presume his middle finger was part of a deliberate gesture. Their response is clear--they were reacting to the gesture.

And, whatever you may think about retarded people, I suspect even low-functioning people would get the picture after the middle finger, the JayZ brush-off and the shaking the dog poop off his shoe gesture.

So, you may not be retarded; just obtuse.

Barack Obama responded like every narcissist. When criticized, they respond with aggression. This was passive-aggressive behavior by definition.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 06:44AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Ah... college psych courses rear their heads on the board yet again... diagnosing Obama as a narcissist?  

I want a second (unbiased) opinion....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 06:46AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Well, I do have a few college courses in psychology; because I have post-graduate degrees in counseling and human development, with undergraduate degrees in Social Work--with more than a decade working as a professional in diagnosing and counseling in community mental health. I have worked for psychiatrists in emergency evaluations for commitment under the Baker Act, and worked in in-patient treatment as well. So, yeah, get your second opinion, by all means, but I think you'd find pretty much the same assessment of Barack Obama anywhere you go. He fits the DSM criteria quite neatly. Of course, it's just an opinion, but I've got the education and experience to back up that opinion.

What about you?

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 06:59AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Then you should know better than to diagnose someone you have never examined.  

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 07:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Please Point Out My Diagnosis...

Are you honestly trying to argue that saying his behavior is passive-agreesive is a diagnosis? That assertion alone proves you don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about. Moreover, I made it clear that it wasn't a diagnosis, but an "opinion" using that very word.

I shouldn't even need to make the point, but clearly when one is responding to a 2nd grader, one must define things in their limited view. So, here it is for you, in terms you can comprehend: That is not a diagnosis.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 07:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Please Point Out My Diagnosis...

No, it isn't, but saying saying that Obama's passive aggressive behavior is typical of a narcissist as per the DSM sounds like a diagnosis to me.

Also, this is a HUGE pet peeve of mine.  Mental illness is medical condition and it shouldn't be reduced to a throwaway comment on a political blog. It is bad enough if a layperson does it.  When a trained professional does it then that really pisses me off.  You should know better.  

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 08:05AM | 0 recs
Re: Please Point Out My Diagnosis...

Clearly, judging by your well thought out reply, you are not a 2nd grader either....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:13AM | 0 recs
They can't dispute the substance of the argument..

so they attack the arguer..

Typical N behavior, AS WELL..

Birds of a feather flock together?

by architek 2008-04-18 08:53AM | 0 recs
Re: They can't dispute

"Typical N behavior"

"N" behavior, huh wonder what that N-word could be?

Because if its Narcassist then, obviously its not intended to be a bad thing after all virtually everyone would agree that the last Dem president was a Narcassist, so I'm left only with another possilbe N-word.

by Socraticsilence 2008-04-18 09:11AM | 0 recs
Re: They can't dispute the substance of the argume

uprated, not because it's a helpful comment, but because I'm pretty sure the N is for narcissist, not what others were thinking. Please tell me I'm not wrong on this.

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-04-18 12:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Sanctimony Doesn't Help Your Argument

Trained professionals assess pathologies every day, including trained mental health professionals.

http://hnn.us/articles/7106.html

It was clearly not a diagnosis, and your sanctimonious attitude only makes your argument weaker, since you clearly don't know what constitutes a diagnosis in the first place.

And...

Leaving aside your fake sanctimony and obviously cynical momentary and convenient compassion for the mentally ill, I'd have to say that someone who has spent decades helping people with mental illness, I'd have more of a right than you would to determine whether or not it is fair to judge Obama's behavior as passive-agressive or narcissistic.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 08:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Sanctimony Doesn't Help Your Argument

Yeah right!  Referring to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM to drive home your point about passive agressive behavior in narcissists is clearly just a passing thought that any layman could make.  

Leaving aside your fake sanctimony and obviously cynical momentary and convenient compassion for the mentally ill, I'd have to say that someone who has spent decades helping people with mental illness, I'd have more of a right than you would to determine whether or not it is fair to judge Obama's behavior as passive-agressive or narcissistic.

What diagnosis would you give to your hostility toward me?  I judged your actions and you are judging me by calling me a fake and stating that my concern for the mentally ill is disingenuous.  What kind of personality disorder can't respond well to criticism Dr. Phil?

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 08:27AM | 0 recs
Never love anything that CAN'T love you back...

How to recognize a narcissist

http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/howt o.html

by architek 2008-04-18 08:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Never love anything that CAN'T love you back..

How to recognize a [expletive deleted]

http://www.mydd.com/comments/2008/4/18/1 02120/357/155#155

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 09:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Please Point Out My Diagnosis...
Well, if it's "just an opinion" then your credentials don't really matter. Everyone has an opinion.

Reminds me of a famous quote:

Opinions are just like assholes. Everybody's got one...
by power of truth 2008-04-18 10:22AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

I still want a second unbiased opinion...

And diagnosing someone without direct contact and observation is probably not a good idea... unless you are Bill Frist and then it is a political move...

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:01AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

I'd be more interested in a first opinion.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:10AM | 0 recs
Re: By all means, go and get one.

I'm sure you could benefit from a professional counselor in your community.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 08:17AM | 0 recs
Re: By all means, go and get one.

Thank you for demonstrating how grownups debate.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 08:42AM | 0 recs
As I understand it, the typical narcissist NEVER

ever, ever goes for psychiatric help on anything. They can't admit that they are wrong so they certainly are never going to go to a therapist. However, the incidence of narcissists is probably very high as people who had a very stressful early childhood have a high incidence of it.

Obama would qualify as having probably had the stress, based on his father's treatment of his Kenyan wife and children and his American family.

It was a similar situation for Bush. Bush's father and mother were very cold and distant. Bush had an older sister who died when he was very young of a long and painful illness and Bush Sr. forbad the entire family from mentioning her name and they went golfing, I think, the day after she died.

That would effect almost anyone, I think. Thats COLD.

by architek 2008-04-18 09:04AM | 0 recs
Re: As I understand it, the typical narcissist NEV

Please stop acting like a troll.  I said that a psychological diagnosis of a media personality by a partisan was silly, was told that maybe I needed help too.  And you're continuing the ad hominem.

You're better than this.  I've seen you write good diaries and good posts.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:12AM | 0 recs
Re: By all means, go and get one.

troll-rated... that was uncalled for and you know it.

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 09:24AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

There has been no 'diagnosis' fool. Clearly you don't even know what constitutes a diagnosis, or you wouldn't even make such a ridiculous argument.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 07:58AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

you started the ridiculous argument, I just replied...

So it is your opinion that Obama is a narcissist, but that is not a diagnosis....  even though by one of your previous replies you stated that you have the professional acumen to make such a diagnosis...  I disagree with your opinion then...

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:16AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

I didn't start an 'argument,' at all. I merely asserted an opinion about Barack Obama's behavior. You are continuing to make all sorts of ridiculous arguments about my opinion, i.e, arguing. I am simply responding by pointing out to you, in turn, each flawed argument you are making.

You're being childish, first trying to assert that it was a diagnosis, then trying to say that it's unprofessional, then this, then that...

The point I have made all along is that

1) I clearly did not make a diagnosis.

2) Professionals in mental health can--and do--make assessments about pathological behavior all the time in their capacity as professionals who have the education and experience to judge behavior.

3) You are confusing an opinion with a diagnosis and seeking to smear my professionalism, when you don't have the faintest idea what you're talking about--which undercuts your own opinion quite clearly in the first place.

4) If you want to disagree that Obama is a narcissist or exhibited classic 'passive-aggressive' behavior, you are free to do so.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 08:33AM | 0 recs
Hey, nobody was trying to make a 'diagnosis'

I think we were just speculating that it would explain a lot.

For laypeople to make any kind of diagnosis would be illegal.

by architek 2008-04-18 09:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Hey, nobody was trying to make a 'diagnosis'

Well, perhaps we ought not "speculate"... similar to something that I have pointed out to people when they accuse either or both of the Clintons of being sociopaths....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 09:26AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

So far in this thread you've referred to another poster as a second-grader, as a fool, and suggested that one should seek professional help.

Who's being childish?

by yedi 2008-04-18 10:57AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

this really is a worthless thread, isn't it?

by SeanF 2008-04-18 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Probably a sad case of FPD... Flamer Personality Disorder...  but that's just my opinion and in no way a diagnosis....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 02:27PM | 0 recs
Taking a cue from Bill Frist, eh?

by bjones 2008-04-18 07:10AM | 0 recs
Re: "Bush on the Couch"

Honestly, you are embarrassing yourself. I've made no diagnosis whatsoever. There is clearly no diagnosis in my comment; moreover, I made it clear that it was an 'opinion.'

Of course, if I did make a diagnosis, without having seen the person, it is quite possible to do so, and has been done many times in the past.
One doesn't need to be in the same room with someone to actually make a clear and convincing case for a particular diagnosis.

Ever read "Bush on the Couch?" by psychiatrist Justin Frank?

Sort of makes your pitiable little arguments look a little deluded in light of the fact that psychiatrists write about pathologies and personalities on a regular basis, doesn't it?

http://hnn.us/articles/7106.html

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 08:06AM | 0 recs
Your argument from authority

is crap.

It's crap because anyone can claim to have all the necessary credentials in the world to form a valid opinion of a person's mental condition.

Let me lay it out for you.  This is a political blog, not Johns Hopkins; and as far as I'm concerned, you're just another jackass with an Internet connection and an axe to grind.

by bjones 2008-04-18 08:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Your argument from authority

Oh, so now your argument is this:

You may be a professional, with the credentials to make a diagnosis, but this isn't a mental health site, it is a political site, so you cannot discuss a political candidate's mental health because I say so.

Well, I have to say, that this is not unexpected from you, since the evidence clearly shows that if you had two brains, you'd still be a half-wit.

My opinion about Barack Obama's behavior being classic passive aggressive behavior remains. You can't rebut it, obviously, so why don't you just move on and talk about something you know something about, so as to not humiliate yourself further.

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 08:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Your argument from authority

Fine.  Here's your rebuttal.

Make all the diagnoses opinions you want.  I just think you're full of shit.

by bjones 2008-04-18 08:41AM | 0 recs
This looks interesting also

"Narcissistic and Psychopathic Leaders"

http://samvak.tripod.com/15.html

"(The leader's) intellectual acts are strong and independent even in isolation and his will need no reinforcement from others ... (He) loves no one but himself, or other people only insofar as they serve his needs."

This guy, 'samvak' is a guy who was diagnosed as narcissistic in some prison situation and now he seems to be trying to create a cottage industry around his narcissistic books on narcissists!

:o

Not the best source of unbiased information, but they are interesting for providing an admitted (rare as they are!) narcissists point of view on narcissism.

by architek 2008-04-18 09:12AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Maybe it's more something for a dermatologist to consider than a psychologist?

by fogiv 2008-04-18 07:50AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

Clever.  I lol'd

by bjones 2008-04-18 07:54AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It
Yeah, sure you do.
This has got to be the all time stupidest diary I have ever read on any blog! Is this how desperate Hillary supporters have become, that they want to discuss if Obama did or did not give someone the finger?  But then again I shouldn't be shocked coming from this diarist and her true feeling about Obama. One only has to look at the discusting things posted on her blog.
by venician 2008-04-18 09:20AM | 0 recs
Re: The Audience Reacted To It

No, the audience reacted to his speech, where he said "Senator Clinton looked in her element" or something to that effect.

by freedom78 2008-04-18 07:48AM | 0 recs
From Obama campaign directly

With just enough plausible deniability.

by catfish1 2008-04-18 11:14AM | 0 recs
Re: From Obama campaign directly
And to think, the Clintons suggested this awful, awful man as a VP candidate.Did you see him at :30 in this video?   He looks like he made a gesture resembling someone holding a gun.  Barack makes Pol Pot look like Mr. Rogers.  Clearly, I can't vote for him, and I also couldn't vote for anyone who would consider for a second naming him as vice president.  
Alan Keyes 08!
by yhf1979 2008-04-18 12:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Oh my god.

You can't be serious.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 06:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I think TD is serious....  although, personally, I do not think Obama was flipping the entire electorate off, just the Clinton supporters...  /snark.

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 06:34AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I think he's flipping off Jesus and the flag.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 06:41AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I think he is flipping off the person who troll-rated my comment...

It's my world, I just let all of you live in it...

SNARK!

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 06:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

The person who troll-rated your comment is a McCain supporter.  >shock<

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Wow... that is shocking... Republicans NEVER disagree with me...  oh wait, that should read, Republicans ALWAYS disagree with me...

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:29AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

He's clearly flipping off Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.  Also, in Obama's super-racist church, that gesture is a secret high-five to Louis Farrakhan and the Weathermen.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 07:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

And Hamas.

Actually, he's practicing what it's going to be like when his finger is poised over the "nuke Israel" button.

All of which is classic narcissistic behavior.  I read it in the DSM IV.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:15AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

He's actually flipping off the troops because he wants them to lose in Iraq.

Also, he has a little button hidden in his cheek that activates the Black Pantherbot 3000 and sets it on its mission to get whitey.

by CrazyDrumGuy 2008-04-18 08:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Come on now, look at the clip.  His face is itching and he scratches it regularly.  Do you really think he was scratching his face the entire time in order to set up some sort of weird motion that is only going to be noticed if you freeze frame a still?

by thezzyzx 2008-04-18 06:28AM | 0 recs
I never do any scratching with MY middle finger..

Do you?

the gesture HAD to be intentional..

by architek 2008-04-18 09:14AM | 0 recs
Re: I never do any scratching with MY middle finge

Because you say so...?

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 09:28AM | 0 recs
Re: I never do any scratching with

Um, no it didn't.

by LandStander 2008-04-18 10:05AM | 0 recs
I do.

So I guess that clears that up.

Sometimes, when my focus is elsewhere - say, like speaking to a group of people - I've found myself doing things I didn't even realize, e.g. scratching my head, twirling a pen, playing with my keys. Guess what? None of that meant anything other than that I was a little fidgety at the time.

I would imagine that being on the campaign trail for 15+ months, one might let certain aspects of their presentation go on autodrive. But that's just my semi-rational take on things.

by bookish 2008-04-18 10:41AM | 0 recs
This is what you guys are left with?

Obama scratches his face and you think he is giving Hillary the finger. How precious. Has any campaign or its supporters ever been as desperate as the Clinton 2008? I think not.

Keep up with the attacks. Obama brushes them off and rolls on. Latest Newsweek poll shows him up by 19 nationally on Clinton. The sand is running out of the hourglass.

by johnnyappleseed 2008-04-18 01:35PM | 0 recs
That's not even the worst one!

This picture just surfaced, too! Take it and run with it, Tex!

by ragekage 2008-04-18 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: That's not even the worst one!

LOL!!!!! Amazing

by Democratic Unity 2008-04-18 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! REALLY!

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVynnbx1Xsc&amp;hl=en"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVynnbx1Xsc&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

by architek 2008-04-18 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

What I love about the clip is the reference.  No one over 35 is going to get what I'm talking about, which is good, but there's a reason the younger people in the crowd erupted.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Yeah, they were responding to the speech.

You should take a look at the book "CNN's Tailwind Tale: Inside Vietnam's Last Great Myth"  While the subject is Vietnam, it also about why people believe what they believe - from a Amazon review

What Lembcke provides is the cultural atmospherics that make some people believe anything that supports their predispositions. Most alert people already know this, but rarely do we see such outrageous claims go unchallenged by pros.

You don't like Obama, find him and his supporters naive, childish and arrogant, so you believe that he is giving the finger and the crowd reacting.  

Instead of looking for that, take a look at the longer clip and ignore the gesture.  Listen to the speech, the crowd reacted because of the words being said.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 06:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

You misunderstand completely.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I apologize, then.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 07:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

It's quite alright.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Jay-Z!

by DPW 2008-04-18 06:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Shhhhh!

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Please share the joke with the rest of the class, otherwise you are dooming me to hours on google trying to work it out.

by interestedbystander 2008-04-18 07:42AM | 0 recs
by DPW 2008-04-18 08:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Thanks DPW, I'm one of the kewl kidz now.

by interestedbystander 2008-04-18 08:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

No problem. For what it's worth, I don't think it was really a Jay-Z reference. The gesture of brushing dirt off your shoulder was around well before that track, but I think it resonated more with younger folks familiar with this contemporary pop cultural example.

by DPW 2008-04-18 08:29AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Well, you may not think so, but the crowd didn't just go wild over some bygone colloquialism.

by bookish 2008-04-18 10:44AM | 0 recs
Scarbough ...

..was in full outrage mode over the "brush shoulder" gesture this morning. He had no idea what it meant but was still trying to spin it negative. He landed on the idea that it was a 'elitist' gesture. LOL!

By the end of the show email came in that set him straight. The emailer joked that  "if you were any whiter you would be clear". Truer words were never spoken.

 

by JoeCoaster 2008-04-18 07:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Scarbough ...

I actually emailed Morning Joe this morning (the first time I've ever emailed any show), but it was in relation to Joe's concern trolling about Obama delivering his weakest debate performance in the 21st debate ("oh noes, should the supers be concerned about the fact that he still can't perform after 21 debates?!!!?"). By all accounts, Obama's debate performances have continued to improve, and Chuck Todd emphasized this repeatedly following the CA, TX and OH debates. He had one bad day. It happens. Actually, I didn't even think he was all that bad--just a little flat.

I like Joe okay, but he tends to adopt whatever  "wisdom" prevails in that morning's editorials, even if he should know better.

by DPW 2008-04-18 08:10AM | 0 recs
Re: Scarbough ...

See that kind of sucks because now everyone is going to know it's a Jay-Z reference, and we get into "is he too black" territory again.

As long as young people are the only ones that get it, it's fine.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 08:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Scarbough ...

It was great seeing Rachel Maddow getting him so mad that he walked off the set of "The Road to the White House".....I love her

by hootie4170 2008-04-18 08:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

The video link below shows the truth. He used two fingers. But don't let the truth stop your bullshit.

by kitebro 2008-04-18 11:39AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Actually, I'm 55 and I know it's a flip off. That's the way you do it when you are trying to hide it from "straight" people, or your BOSS who could fire you.

Doing that has been around for many decades now in the counterculture.

by splashy 2008-04-18 12:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Heh.

See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWLHQ3S-O q8

by vann 2008-04-18 03:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

We're seriously grasping at straws here, aren't we?

by chewie5656 2008-04-18 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Tiny, invisible straws that don't exist.

by LandStander 2008-04-18 10:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Please watch this side-on view video of the same event.  The relevant bit is at 20:50:

http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941

No "bird" in sight, just a plainly visible two finger cheek scratch.

Some screen caps:

In the future please try not to assume the worst of our Democratic Presidential Candidates.

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 06:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

the fact we are wasting time on this.

but like I said this needs to be pushed, once the supes see MSM talking about stuff like this?

yeah they will end the primaries once and for all

by TruthMatters 2008-04-18 06:35AM | 0 recs
If he didn't actually flash the finger..

we should all drop it.. seriously..

by architek 2008-04-18 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

The diarist is not trying to assume the worst of our Democratic Presidential candidates...  just trying to smear Obama by any means necessary....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 06:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

The flip of the bird is debatable and for the most part, a non-issue.

That being said, the clips you provided are a different viewpoint BUT none come even close to resembling the original image presented in the diary. Tell me, which side view pic goes with the direct view pic?

by soyousay 2008-04-18 06:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Just watch the video I linked to and skip to the time I suggested.  You can then see the entire cheek scratch for yourself.

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 07:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

It really isn't debatable... but more importantly, I don't see why Clinton supporters are pushing it.  Going after Obama over Wright and "bitter" thing (I am sick of gates) didn't work that well.  And at least there was something there, this is just insane.  

I am an Obama supporter, sure, but I agree with the poster (don't remember who) arguing that they are both centrists with strengths and weaknesses.  I admit that there areas where Clinton is stronger than Obama (i.e. healtcare). Clinton goes down when she focuses on these type of dumb attacks on Obama and does better when she focuses on her own strengths.

If you want to waste your time on trying to

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 07:02AM | 0 recs
This is what makes the rec list.

And I'm happy. Any rational undecided that comes to this site and sees this inanity would turn tail and head to a more reasonable place to help them make up their mind. Keep up the good work.

by bookish 2008-04-18 10:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Aw. You spoiled the childish fun for the diarist who wants a grown up to be president. What a crock this diary is.

by kitebro 2008-04-18 11:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

So it went from extracting one word from Obama's speeches and turning them into Clinton campaign talking points.

Now you're going to focus on the itch on his cheek?

Nice job on reaching the newest low.

by Mardarkin 2008-04-18 06:34AM | 0 recs
Frontrunner

Consolaton is you have to be the frontrunner in a big way to get this kind of scrutiny.  

by mady 2008-04-18 01:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

i didnt see it until just now, im speechless.

by canadian gal 2008-04-18 06:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

That'll be a relief.

by interestedbystander 2008-04-18 07:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Snap!

by fogiv 2008-04-18 07:54AM | 0 recs
Hey TD, where have you been recently?

by SevenStrings 2008-04-18 06:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Ok, I slept on the story last night.   And I found my conclusion.

I'm making this comment from a point of view of someone who is living in a foreign country.

Granted that Obama's finger was unintentional, it will create a nuke bomb if he did this while making speech "in the same context" referring to a foreign leader.

Imagine he's making speech referring to Sarkozy the French Prime Minister, Merkel the German Chancellor, or Hu Jintao the Chinese President, and scratch his face with his middle finger. There will be an uproar in those countries, and they won't take excuse from Obama supporters swamping the blog.

His conduct is unpresidential. He is not ready for prime time. DNC backs a wrong horse. And it turns out to be a huge embarrassment.

by JoeySky18 2008-04-18 06:39AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Don't speak for Europe.

Nobody gives a crap about somebody itching their face.  Nobody except this diarist.

by Mardarkin 2008-04-18 06:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Sweet Lord you cannot be serious....

I have seen a lot of manufactured outrage on this board in the past month or so, but this sets a brand new standard....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 06:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Next he'll be scratching his balls in public.  Yikes!

by Becky G 2008-04-18 07:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Well said, Joey.

Although I believe his gesture was conscious and intentional.

(Great diary, TexasDarlin.)

by susanhu 2008-04-18 09:18AM | 0 recs
Wow, this is what you have become?

Sad.

by pinche tejano 2008-04-18 09:52AM | 0 recs
Obama won

Get over it. Or support McCain. Whatever

Every diary like this is an epitaph for a Clinton supporter. They will have no home in a couple weeks.

by johnnyappleseed 2008-04-18 01:45PM | 0 recs
You have got to be kidding.

No wonder people are disenchanted with politics if this kind of specious nonsense is considered important.

by MBNYC 2008-04-18 06:43AM | 0 recs
McCain would be a better president

than this childish man.  Now I know why he doesn't think he is a baby boomer, he still thinks he is 25.

I was going to vote for McCain because I did not want to reward his race baiting and sexism.  Now I will vote for McCain because even with his republican values he will be a better president.

We have all seen this gesture.  We all giggled at it when we were in middle school.  I won't vote for someone who does it in a public appearance as a call out to his childish supporters.

He is an ignorant angry sexist asshole child.

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 06:48AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

You seem full of hate.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 06:50AM | 0 recs
no, Obama is full of hate

and I have seen that all along.  Now he has shown he is not just hateful, but a hateful child.  I don't vote for sexists or angry hateful children for president.  

Obviously his supporters think this is cool and funny.

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 06:54AM | 0 recs
Re: no, Obama is full of hate

no really Teresa, you do seem a little too keyed up on this....  It was a freakin' itch on his face and now we have gotten so far into minutiae that we are dissecting which finger he used...?  And you are using it as the ultimate excuse to vote for John McCain?

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:00AM | 0 recs
Re: no, Obama is full of hate

Actually, his supporters don't know what the hell it is you all are talking about.  We're not conspiracy theorists.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 07:03AM | 0 recs
Re: no, Obama is full of hate

No, his supporters are too busy worrying about real issues than to try to find Jesus in the tortilla.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:15AM | 0 recs
Re: no, Obama is full of hate

True enough.  It's just sad that this is what some have been reduced to.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 07:18AM | 0 recs
Teresa, dont vote for McCain..

If Obama wins the nomination, reconsider.. If after that, you still really can't stomach voting for Obama, then sit it out.

McCain represents take from the poor and give to the rich. Look at the situation in Arizona.

Its the most regressive state, tax wise.

by architek 2008-04-18 09:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Teresa, dont vote for McCain..

I think you've got the wrong guy.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 11:20AM | 0 recs
Teresa, ask yourself this question.

What is it that Obama could do that his supporters would NOT support?

I've never been an AVID Hillary supporter - John Edwards and always Al Gore.  Maybe that is why I've been able to criticize her actions or words and not defend those who "attack" her when she's just plain wrong.

But, I have begun to ask myself "Just what would Obama have to do before his supporters, by and large - in the majority, would criticize him?"  

by Southern Mouth 2008-04-18 12:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Teresa, ask yourself this question.

He would have to have something on par with Hurricane Katrina.  That was the moment the media turned on Bush.  The blind following of both men is about equivalent at this point.

by BPK80 2008-04-18 02:41PM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

hahaha unless you are like 27 yo did NOT see that in middle school, Jay Z just wasn't that popular that long ago.

but by all means vote for McCain no one will tell you not too.

by TruthMatters 2008-04-18 06:50AM | 0 recs
You thiink jz invented that gesture?

we were doing it in the 60s in class.  

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 06:56AM | 0 recs
Re: You thiink jz invented that gesture?

you were doing it in class....?  To the teachers one would presume....?

That's it, I cannot vote for you....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:04AM | 0 recs
yes when we were 12

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 07:18AM | 0 recs
Re: yes when we were 12

So you have a history of doing this kind of thing...?

Wow... wait until the media gets a hold of this....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:21AM | 0 recs
This is not a bookmark

Thank you for saying you will vote for McCain.  

I look forward to ignoring you when Clinton finally drops out of the race.  

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 06:52AM | 0 recs
so?

go ahead.  I do not plan on campaigning for him on this or any other blog.  I won't do that like people have been doing for years on dkos.  I will not be a troll. So you won't have to work hard to ignore me.  Just remember why the democrats lost 50 states when you are crying in November.  It will be because you all backed this poor excuse for a democrat.

(break)

 An Obama supporter just came to my door, white woman in a big gas guzzling SUV, with lots of gold on and she got an earful from me.  I tried to be nice but I told her to go look at the videos and mark this as the final reason, not just to support McCain if Obama is the nominee but to feel okay about it.

And I told her I have never voted for anyone but a democrat in my life.

I am not voting for Children to sit in the oval office making decisions about peoples lives and war.

by TeresaInPa 2008-04-18 07:13AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Sorry.  I am too dismissive sometimes.  

I hope you change your mind.  

by Blue Neponset 2008-04-18 07:22AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

First off... by what metric will Obama lose all 50 states...

And secondly, gas-guzzling SUV, lots of gold...?  You felt the need to point out these descriptions why?

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:23AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Could you please watch this side on view video of this incident?

http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941

Jump to 20:50.  That's the point where he says "Senator Clinton looked in her element" and scratches his cheek.  The same section of the Raleigh, NC speech that is in all the YouTube "he-gave-her-the-bird" outrage videos.

Please take a look as the angle of this video shows every finger of his hand clearly.  He plainly scratches his face with two fingers - nothing from this angle can be misinterpreted as "giving the bird".

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 07:26AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

OK. I did it and just like in all the other shots, his middle finger is extended and his index finger is bent a little. It is certainly not a full bird, but that's how the sneeky bird is given, as any kid can tell you. The question is not if he did it, it is whether or not it was intentional, and there is certainly no way to determine that.

There are some clues from the crowd reaction and his clever grin afterwards, but certainly nothing definative.

An interesting exercise is to imagine yourself giving a speech to a big audience, and put your hand up to your face in the same manner. Then imagine you get the same sort of crowd reaction, and you grin.

One thing is for sure. He will have to stop scratching his face in a manner that can be so misinterpreted from now on.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 07:41AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Oh come on now... the other angles, and the screenshots taken of them implied all the fingers completely folded save the middle finger.  In the above side-view video it's clear that there are two fingers extended, side-by-side, both bending slightly together within the two scratch strokes.  Sometimes perfectly parralel, sometimes one finger half-an-inch lower but still extended.  The whole thing lasts all of a second.

At least admit from this angle the whole thing becomes a tremendous stretch that no one would have commented on (if this was the version they saw)?

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 07:52AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

I really don't think so. I understand what you are saying about the index finger, but just do the jesture yourself exactly as he does it and imagine yourself up in front of the entire school. It's not a simple touch, it is two quick strokes. See what I mean. I am not making any conclusions about whether it was deliberate, but any audience from any angle would recognize the jesture, and they did. Then watch his reaction to the crowd. He realizes that they caught the jesture, and he grins. Again, that does not mean that he intended to do it, but he knows at least at that point that the crowd picked up on it. That's all I think we can say.

As I say above, the rest of the jestures in the speech that are deliberate are much more of a problem for me, because I do not think that that kind of baiting bullying behavior is appropriate in a candidate for president.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 08:04AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

After all the shitstorm of the last week on bittergate, are you really willing to believe someone that is unfailingly courteous would really risk a gesture like this?  It is insane.

by interestedbystander 2008-04-18 10:15AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

So, putting aside the finger for a bit, since I agree--whatever people think--we can not know for sure whether it was intentional or not, lets look at some things from the speech that were certainly intentional.

Brushing the lint from his shoulders, like he is equating her with dandruff:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Wiping off his pantleg, whatever he means by this:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Pumping his arm at his side. This one I find particularly offensive. Imagine if Clinton had done that talking about him.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Supporters will say, he was just having some fun, but it was a sophomoric, mean spirited kind of "fun."  The kind of fun you find in the schoolyard when a bunch of bullies are ganging up jeering at someone. It is not fun, and it is not pretty.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 08:17AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

As explained to you last night in your own diary on this non-issue, he was wiping the mud of the "mud-slinging" debate off of himself.  He is not "equating her with dandruff" or "wiping her off his pants" or whatever other crackpot theory you care to invent.

This little episode actually reflects the looniness of some on this site far more than anything it says about Obama.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 08:33AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

I read your post last night, and I disagree.

As I say above, imagine if Hillary Clinton used these jestures inspiring catcalls from a fired up audience.

This is not innocent fun. This is deliberate mean-spirited baiting with some very provocative body language. If you don't think so, just pretend you are talking spit about someone and make the same hand motions. This is playground bully stuff, and I think he should be called out for it.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 08:40AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

It isn't playground bully stuff unless you're predisposed to seeing outrage around every corner.  For example, I guess applause is now "catcalls."  Your own analogy makes no sense - he's not confronting anybody, so how could he possibly be "bullying"?  Plus, he's explaining his debate performance the other night, a debate that Clinton is considered to have won.  So, how is the loser of the debate "bullying" the winner?  

You know what's provocative?  Holding a press conference and saying, "Shame on you, [Candidate X]," or pantomiming the "light coming down from the heavens" to enlighten the cultist Obama supporters.  That's provocative.  This is only provocative to you and others because ordinary voters, those people "clinging to guns and religion," had the temerity to laugh at the farce that they saw on television the other night.  And that hurts your feelings because Clinton "won" that debate.  

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 08:49AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Mommy, Mommy, Barack is making fun of me and he's being mean to me.

by venician 2008-04-18 09:30AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

There's a reason why these recent diaries, the outraged YouTube videos and the partisan blogs that focused on this were primarily concerned with the "bird" angle.  I think we all have a kind of inherent understanding as to how badly it could have played (for all sorts of reasons, gender, racial, etc) if it had been real, especially on the eve of a hotly contest primary contest (which is exactly why an intelligent, canny politician, as both our Democratic contenders are, would never do it).

These videos played last night on the evening news on nearly every channel.  Both the "Senator Clinton was in her element part" and then the segment where he talks about the the old style, attack and distract from real issues politics.  In that part he talks about how when running for President you have to expect it, and when you get broadsided by it you have to let it roll of your shoulders - brush yourself off and keep at it.  He had just had a rough debate; he knew it and the audience knew it too.  It was a spirit raising rallying call in response to all that.  It played well with the crowd and, even though it was cut in different ways on all the evening news shows I watched it on, it seemed to play well there too.

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 08:44AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Great analysis.  If I made these gestures at a staff meeting I'd be in HR within the hour...Think of it...any of us if we made these gestures in front of a group ...How would they be interpreted?  Would you make these gesture during a sales pitch?  No.  

by grego101 2008-04-18 08:54AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

I just scratched my face while talking to my boss. He didn't care.

Then I talked about a rough patch I had on a case I was working on, and brushed my shoulder off saying I just gotta brush that off and keep going.

He says "Yep, you just brush that off and keep going. That's a great attitude to have".

by Darknesse 2008-04-18 03:13PM | 0 recs
Re: so?

ooops...

here's the wiping off his pants vidcap:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 09:01AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

"And I told her I have never voted for anyone but a democrat in my life."

Did you keep a straight face when you told her that?

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:27AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

You care more about face-scratching than the deaths of American soldiers, gotcha, never thought I would see a modern Dem with that much contempt for our soldiers, but hey I guess I shouldn't be suprised that the Clinton-McGovern wing of the party has nothing but contempt for our fighting men and women.

by Socraticsilence 2008-04-18 07:35AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Clinton-McGovern wing?  Contempt for our fighting men and women?  WTF?  McGovern was a bomber pilot in WW2.  You DO realize McGovern was a very liberal guy, right?  Just shut up.

Obama is indeed juvenile, passive-aggressive, and full of himself.  I want a president who at least pays attention to the issues.  One speech about being against the Iraq invasion is insufficient to convince me that he would be strong in foreign policy.

by Montague 2008-04-18 07:47AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

So you are voting for McCain too, I presume...?

If foreign policy is all that matters to you then that is a wise choice...  If the Supreme Court, women's issues, the economy, and gas prices matter, then maybe not...

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:01AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Hell, no, I would never vote for McCain.  And even for foreign policy, that's a sucky choice.  McCain sucks for foreign policy.  The other issues matter, but you know what?  I'm tired of being held hostage over those things.  They can wait a bit longer, esp. as I don't trust Obama with them.

by Montague 2008-04-18 06:23PM | 0 recs
Re: so?

Yeah, I don't buy the Clinton-McGovern wing business... but for me not picking Richard Holbrooke as your chief foreign policy advisor (and picking Samantha Powers) is a strong indicator to me that he won't be a hawk.

I don't want Holbrooke anywhere near the white house.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 08:24AM | 0 recs
Re: so?

I don't want hawks in there either, but Samantha Powers is not a good substitute.  

I was a little strong there, but I get mad when people get down on McGovern.  He was my first campaign - when I was too young to vote but not too young to spar with high-school classmates about the issues, or put up yard signs, or leaflet neighborhoods.

McGovern has been treated poorly in retrospect.  He was a good guy.

by Montague 2008-04-18 06:25PM | 0 recs
Re: This is not a bookmark

Really?  I'm already ignoring her now.  What use could someone who's going to swing from a pro-choice, anti-war candidate to an anti-choice, pro-war candidate have?

And then there's this gem: "He is an ignorant angry sexist asshole child."

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:24AM | 0 recs
Re: This is not a bookmark

Funnier still that sexist was used as a reason for McCain over Obama...  didn't McCain refer to his wife as the c-word and a trollop...?  And angry, aren't stories about his temper practically legendary around Capitol Hill...?  And ignorant, he doesn't the difference between Shia and Sunni?  And... well, he's 72 so I cannot point to a child reference...

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:04AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

Teresa I have been reading your nasty, hateful posts for months.  And now you have finally done it - you are going to become a Republican because Obama scratched his face.  I hope after June 3rd you never have the gall to post here again - you are truly a disgrace to democrats.

by interestedbystander 2008-04-18 07:48AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

Well then future republican, please remove yourself to redstate or some other such smear zone.  

You'll find a place more aligned with your views while simultaneously sparing the rest of us your idiotic comments.  It's win-win.

by fogiv 2008-04-18 07:58AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

Jeez, Theresa, tell us how you really feel. And please by all means use your democratic right to vote to pursue endless war in the middle east and make sure we can continue with top-down economic policies that make it harder and harder for americans to afford food and gas and healthcare. Go right ahead, please.

This is really the bottom of the barrel. You actually think that Obama would give Clinton the finger on TV? Your perspective for rational thought and common sense has flown right out the window. That you would actually consider voting for endless war in Iraq solidly proves the point. The only one acting like a child is you.

by AHunch 2008-04-18 08:46AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

THE

VIDEO

PROVES

YOU

WRONG.

Seriously. Are you so insecure in your dislike of Obama you have to reach like this for evidence?

by Lettuce 2008-04-18 09:55AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

Get help.

by mikeinsf 2008-04-18 10:46AM | 0 recs
Re: McCain would be a better president

Teresa finally jumps the shark.

Change your sig to "typical white person will be voting for McCain"

by Skaje 2008-04-18 01:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Uh, admins, aren't we supposed to have standards here?

by Mostly 2008-04-18 06:49AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Where's the Zapruder footage to settle this once and for all?

I weep for this site.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 06:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Yeah, we do have some experience with Presidents doing this in the past. So, it's not like we're surprised by it or anything. What's the big deal?

Maybe it's a sign of qualification for the office of the President of the US:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpL6EIMSh O4

by Tennessean 2008-04-18 07:03AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

 HRC supporters are making to much of this!  how dare they think that BO is giving HRC the finger when most people use their middle finger to scratch their face!  how stupid are they to make a non-issue when MSM is picking this up and agree?  even though BO is specifically disparaging HRC at the very moment a 2 different events when is face is itchy, they are reading WAY too much into it?  i mean HRC supporters are really delusional.

by canadian gal 2008-04-18 07:09AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Well, he only did it at one event, so...you've just answered your own question.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 07:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

You said it...!  Oh wait....

The MSM will make an issue out of a non-issue if it will help prolong this thing...  ratings are up... that will change once a nominee is chosen...  I suspect their motives are not exactly pure at this point...  That and it is probably a slow news day...

As to Clinton supporters making an issue out of it... I would like to say I'm surprised, but I would be lying.

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:15AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Yes. Delusional.

History will look at this as a turning point in modern psychology. Pushing this issue will qualify one for immediate institutionalization. Billions will be saved on Psychological care, since no need for any other analysis. Anyone who thinks Obama is 'flipping the bird' from this are likely too far gone, and would thus overcrowd America's already overtaxed asylums. And the loss of business would leave tens of millions of unemployed mental health professionals with nothing better to do than depress the tens of millions of homeless citizens left over from the Bush Depression.

The country will collapse under the strain, but the cable news channels will be forced by all the Wall Street suicides to leave team coverage of Is-it-a-UFO-or-Bigfoot-or-Obama-Flipping -the-Bird-Gate. Having to do so will lead to mass self-immoliations at CNN and Fox News, a tragedy that will lead to people watching old Law and Orders instead.

In their weakened state, Fred Thompson defeats a one-term President Obama who was unable to pass any health care or economic reforms because Congress were too busy going on the cable nets to comment on "The-Zapbruder-Film-Shows-Obama-Flipping -The-Bird-Gate" than to actually legislate.

President Thompson then dozes off, his forehead hitting the button that sends all the nation's nukes to Ottumwa, Iowa, home of Radar O'Reilly from MASH.

CURSE YOU AND YOUR ITCHY FACE, OBAMA!

CURSE YOU OBAMA!!!???

by Lettuce 2008-04-18 07:40AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Would that I had more than 2 to mojo you with..

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:08AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Please, put your thinking cap on and watch the videos again.  It's the same event people!  How is this hard to understand?  I think what's going on here is a case of people seeing exactly what they want to see.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 10:00AM | 0 recs
Obama is simply another George W. Bush

I have been saying it for a while now.  Obama has no history of ever doing anyhting worthwhile.  He is privileged and is used to being funded by criminals.  He is also fond of and thinks it is cute to insult other people by flashing the "bird."  There are no records that are kept of his time in office in Illinois.  The ONLY difference is the accent.  His followers are just as blinded as Bush's followers.  There is absolutely no difference whatsoever.

by macmcd 2008-04-18 07:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

I was wondering if you were going to comment or if you were just going to troll-rate a bunch of comments you don't agree with and leave...

You are completely wrong by the way.  And comparing Obama supporters with GWB supporters...  thy are called Democrats by the way and if Clinton gets the nomination, you will need their support.

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

right back at ya!

by canadian gal 2008-04-18 07:23AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

I will gladly vote for either one of them....  I decided over a decade ago that Democrats were the ones without their heads up their collective a$$es and have voted straight-ticket every election...

Shame the Clinton supporters do not seem to be saying the same thing.  As to whose fault that is, well, you all make you own decisions, so blame or fault is beside the point.

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 07:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

Must... fight... troll... bait...

- "Never done anything worthwhile." Not worth commenting.

- "Priviledged." Compared to whom? Clinton? Bush? Anyone in the Senate? Compared to the average politician, Obama had a much less priviledged upbringing than most, and as one of the few Blacks in politics, a harder upbringing than most of the ones that are left. He's certainly the least affluent of all the major Democratic and GOP candidates, even including his book sales since he became famous.

- "Funded by Criminals." Hmm, largest new donor base in history, millions raised... maybe some are criminals, but, if this is your try at a Rezko comment, we could Hsu it up if you'd like.

- "Flashing the bird." One sees what one wants... I don't think anyone above the age of fart jokes would even notice.

- "No records of his time in office in Illinois." Really? Maybe they were lost in the Earthquake, along with your ability to use Google.

- "Followers just as blinded as Bush's followers." I don't know, you have to be pretty blind to write a post in which every statement, with the possible exception of your "I have been saying it for a while now" is, again, demonstrably false.

- "There is absolutely no difference..." between your posts and a PhD thesis written by monkeys who were originally tasked to write Hamlet.

by Lettuce 2008-04-18 07:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

I'm very proud of you.

You emerged from the shadows of leaving troll-ratings for every Obama supporter on this site long enough to actually comment on something.

Progress!

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-04-18 07:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

It is very strange to me that Obama reminds me in far too many ways of Chimpy.  No one could be as bad as Chimpy, and by no means do I think Obama is that awful, but still.  Weird parallels.  I do think he did the scratching thing on purpose.  I do think it's juvenile.  It's not the reason I want him to lose, though.

by Montague 2008-04-18 07:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama is simply another George W. Bush

No need to troll rate, macmd.  Your comments are as one-sided as mine, but - like Obama on Clinton's Bosnia retort - no need to pile-on.  

by stryan 2008-04-18 07:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Just an FYI:

THE MERE ACT OF WRITING THIS POST , excuse me, the mere act of writing this post, and suggesting something this ridiculous removes ANY ABILITY to qualify any other human behavior as 'Grownup.'

You can be an expert in childishness, which explains why anyone would see that clip and think the middle finger was in any way employed.

P.S. Given Bush's use of it though, and Cheney's vocab, maybe it's the new form of presidential discourse. Ha! I kid. Seriously though, you've got to be kidding.

by Lettuce 2008-04-18 07:20AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Again, this thread belongs on Hillaryis44.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:25AM | 0 recs
One thing is for sure...

This is NOT two different occurances.

I played the above clip at the exact same time as this one. It's easy, just put them next to each other with the Baltimore Sun clip on the right and sync them up.

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/pol itics/blog/2008/04/obama_fingers_a_gotch a_debate.html>Baltimore Sun Clip

It's easy, just put them next to each other with the Baltimore Sun clip on the right and sync them up.

His words, mannerisms and the crowd reactions are exactly the same.

The difference in the backqround is due to two different TV angles. I know it seems like it can't be the same backdrop, but that is one of the things that video does. The crowd is actually much further back than they look, so the angles fall on different people. Look at the banner text to see how far apart they are.

I don't know if it was the bird, but it was only one occurance.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 07:28AM | 0 recs
Re: One thing is for sure...

MediaFreeze,

Can you take a look at the video I posted up thread?  Since you've watched the other versions critically you'll be able to identify it as the same Raleigh, NC rally but from a drastically different angle.  Jump to 20:50 to see the the cheek scratch with all of Senator Obamas fingers plainly visible - you'll clearly see a two-fingered cheek scratch with nothing left up to interpretation.  

Thanks.

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 07:36AM | 0 recs
Re: One thing is for sure...

I did and just posted some of my impressions below your post upthread.

Whether or not it was intentional, the crowd certainly thought it was the bird. And, at least after he does it, and the crowd reacts, he seems to grin in a manner that indicates he realizes what he has just done. Your angle shows that the index finger was out, but bent and the middle finger extended. So, it is not a full bird, but it could be the old grade school sneeky-bird. I don't think any angle can be dispositive at this point. I think we simply can't know whether he intended it or not.

I do find the rest of the speech and the hand jestures that he uses, pumping his arm at his side, brushing the dandruff off his shoulder, and wiping his pant leg to be very insulting, and those are definately deliberate provocative jestures.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 07:50AM | 0 recs
Re: One thing is for sure...

I think you might just be looking for reasons to be outraged at this point....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 10:18AM | 0 recs
Re: One thing is for sure...

Then explain why the crowd on the other side of his face reacted the same way? You can see that they do from that more enlightening angle.

by brimur 2008-04-18 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I'm quite serious about this thread being deleted.  It's misleading and serves no purpose but to stir people up and NOT get anyone decent elected.

This is the Dean scream with the applause edited out all over again.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 07:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!
What is wrong with some of you people at this site? If you're not seeing sexism and misogny behind every corner, than your seeing hate and obscene gestures under the bed.
Some of you really need to get out more often.
by april34fff 2008-04-18 07:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

What is this...the FOURTH diary on whether or not Obama flipped the bird?  

I've said it before, but it bears repeating:

THIS IS SO DUMB THAT THEY ACTUALLY MADE A SEINFELD EPISODE ABOUT IT!  

That's where we are.  

Congrats, Us!

by freedom78 2008-04-18 07:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

oh man we gotta find a youtube of that episode!

by TruthMatters 2008-04-18 07:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

It's not on there.

The episode is called "The Pledge Drive."

But here's a preview that shows the key moment:

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/the-pl edge-drive/2699324209

by freedom78 2008-04-18 08:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

Going from Rocky to George Costanza

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 08:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

What is interesting is why people would find this credible.  For example, the fact that Obama is making other dismissive physical gestures in the same clip (brushing his shoulder and hip).  For example, the fact that he sneers at Clinton frequently.  For example, the fact that he called her "likeable enough."

I don't know whether he was flipping off Clinton or not (I suspect he was), but for me the rest of the clip is enough for me to form an opinion of his attitude, and I suspect for a lot of other voters too.  

by markjay 2008-04-18 07:54AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

I think you're just mad that voters had the gall to laugh at the other night's silly debate.  Pantomiming the removal of mud after a "mud-flinging" debate is now a capital offense?  You either have no sense of humor or have lost all perspective.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 08:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

tough call....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

Yeah, it's probably a false distinction.  My vote is for both.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 08:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

Maybe we should talk about Hillary laughing at all his answers during the debate?

by ProgressiveDL 2008-04-18 03:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

And bullshit non-issue #44587 makes the rec-list at MyDD.

So glad I signed up here, folks.  Really taking intelligent discourse to a new level.

by Capt America 2008-04-18 08:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I would like to say I'm surprised that this hit the rec-list, but I'm not...  that is usually where the Obama hit-pieces end up....

And to think, yesterday there was a debate that Obama supporters actually hate Clinton more than they like Obama....  It would seem that, on this site and some others, Clinton supporters actually hate Obama more than they like her....  Hence the threats to vote for McCain... something that I doubt Senator Clinton would advocate....

by JenKinFLA 2008-04-18 08:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

I can say that I didn't believe it, I had to go back and check.

Here is why I am surprised.  It's insane and makes Clinton supporters seem delusional.  Normally the hit pieces at least are somewhat grounded in reality or would at least someone could imagine how it would be "devasting."

All this does is show how political passions can make see ghosts.  Its getting close to "9-11 was an inside job" bumper stickers.  

It reveals nothing about Obama, but a lot about people who "see" this or can't imagine the audience is reacting to the speech and "ohhh" line that was just delivered.  And sadly, a lot about this site, with it being on the rec list.  I kinda hope it goes to number 1.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 08:34AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please!

The only thing better is if we could get a pictorial history of the evolution of the finger in politics by a character from a reclusive American author.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 08:35AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated

Well, now that this has made the rec list, I thought I'd unveil a joke.

Q: What do you call someone who votes for Hillary in the primary and McCain in the general?

A: A dittohead.

OPERATION CHAOS

by Mostly 2008-04-18 08:29AM | 0 recs
Sadly,

that's not actually a joke.  :-(

by McNasty 2008-04-18 08:55AM | 0 recs
TexasDarlin please update...

Since you have made the rec list, I would ask you to please update the diary to correct one big inaccuracy.

It is not two debates.

You say:

And he did it twice!  At 2 separate events...same speech, same pause, same gesture

As I explain above, it is two different camera angles. The difference in the backqround is due to two different TV angles. I know it seems like it can't be the same backdrop, but that is one of the things that video does. The crowd is actually much further back than they look, so the angles fall on different people. Look at the banner text to see how far apart they are.

Play your above diaried clip at the exact same time as this one.

Baltimore Sun Clip

It's easy, just put them next to each other with the Baltimore Sun clip on the right and sync them up.

His words, mannerisms and the crowd reactions are exactly the same. It is the same speech.

You can also look at the side view clip provided by moreperfectunion to see how far back the audience behind him is and see why it looks like two differentt audiences even though it is just two different angles.

http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941

It simply does your post no good to have a glaring inaccuracy in it.

As I have posted above, I do think that discussion of this issue is relevant. I am not sure whether he intended to flip her the bird, but it is clear from the audience reaction that they thought he did, and that he realizes it at least after the fact.

What I find much more troubling as I have also said above, is the other provocative gestures that he makes and the content of the speech. Look above for the vidcaps of him brushing his shoulder, pumping his arm at his side, and wiping off his pantleg. These actions are certainly deliberate, baiting, bullying behavior.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 08:34AM | 0 recs
Re: TexasDarlin please update...

Yes, it's all "clear" that that's what the audience thought and what Obama himself thought.  Can I pay you $5 for a palm reading?

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 08:37AM | 0 recs
Re: TexasDarlin please update...

Come on, it is too clear that they at least think it is the bird. I'm not saying he knew it when he did it, but it is no use denying reality.

I really don't care as much about the finger as the rest of his behavior, which I think is pretty insulting.

by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: TexasDarlin please update...

No it isn't.  It was in reaction to the speech, once again, feel like I am taking crazy pills!

If I was watching my candidate give a speech and saw them give their opponent the finger in the middle of a speech my reaction would be "Oh no, this person has lost their mind and want to throw the election away" not cheers.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-18 09:00AM | 0 recs
People see Jesus in Cheetos too,

don't worry, you're not the one here taking crazy pills.

I've seen hunters mistake cows for deer after a couple days in the woods.  One guy even started cutting up the heifer before he realized his eyes had played tricks on him.

Some Clinton supporters here have obviously been lost in the wilderness for too long.

by McNasty 2008-04-18 09:10AM | 0 recs
Grown-ups only for MyDD, please!

Thank you.

by venavena 2008-04-18 08:42AM | 0 recs
Funny

I can't believe this made it to the recommended diaries.

Silly season, indeed.

by chewie5656 2008-04-18 08:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated
Tap yer toes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFIR5MgsG 70
by nogo war 2008-04-18 08:49AM | 0 recs
It's lonely up there on that cross.

What's next for MyDD?  WTC conspiracy theories?

by McNasty 2008-04-18 08:54AM | 0 recs
Re: It's lonely up there on that cross.

I think that would actually be a step up in the level of discourse.

by LandStander 2008-04-18 08:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only

I can't wait for the inevitable "Hillary is Nazi" response p[ost with all the freezeframes which clearly show Hillary comes out with a Nazi Salute at every rally. I mean sure that's not wehat she's actually doing but if you freezeframe it right you can clearly see Hillary subconcious affinity for the third Reich.

by Socraticsilence 2008-04-18 08:56AM | 0 recs
by MediaFreeze 2008-04-18 09:09AM | 0 recs
You should be so proud.

The stupid leading the stupid.

by McNasty 2008-04-18 09:12AM | 0 recs
Re: It's up on Fox now...

Congratulations.

If it makes the air, will they play that little "stinger" sound effect with it too, you think?

by bjones 2008-04-18 09:24AM | 0 recs
Re: It's up on Fox now...

Good lord.

The quote redstate.com.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:25AM | 0 recs
Re: It's up on Fox now...

Typical Fox, all insinuation and innuendo, and they get the basic facts wrong: two fingers, not one Fox.

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 09:34AM | 0 recs
Re: It's up on Fox now...

I've got two fingers for Fox.

by you like it 2008-04-18 02:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

I think this one's a stretch.  A lot of people, particularly men, seem to use the middle finger rather than the index finger.  We should give him the benefit of the doubt on that.

Overall, though, I think his comments on the debate were whiny and thin-skinned.  Obama doesn't seem to be able to handle criticism or even hard questioning, even though his own campaign's jabs at Hillary have been quite nasty.  The questions about Rev. Wright, about Obama's San Francisco remarks regarding small town people, and about his Weather Underground friend Ayers are legitimate.  People want to know what kind of person Obama is, and those are indications.

I thought his response about Ayers, and his counter attack citing Bill Clinton's clemency to two other Weather Underground members who served many years in prison, was disingenuous -- the very sort of thing he was whining about.  After all, giving clemency (not pardons!) to two individuals who have served years in prison and who (as far as I know) are not making current statements that they wished they had committed more crimes, is very different from chumming up to someone who is completely unrepentant and who got off on a technicality.  If Obama does not see the difference, then his moral compass needs adjustment.

I said months ago that he is one of those rare people of whom I can say, the more I see of him, the less I like him.  If he is the nominee, he'll go down in flames because his free ride with the media is finally coming to an end.  It is just sad for the Democratic party that it took so long to happen.

by PlainWords 2008-04-18 09:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

You're lost to all reason.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:26AM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

I disagree that he is being thin-skinned. When George Stephanopoulus said, " let's turn to the economy as it is the number one issue on voters minds," it was an absolutely terrible moment becasue he didn't actaully say that until more than an hour in to the debate. That is what Obama was leveling criticism at. It's not taking tough questions, its taking irrelevant ones.

by AHunch 2008-04-18 09:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

If this had been a debate in the general election, Obama's comments about getting to "the issues" might have made some sense.  But in the primaries the difference between the two Democratic candidates is a matter of capability and character.  The two candidates are not much different on the issues.  

The first 45 minutes was about character.

I don't think that's so bad.

by PlainWords 2008-04-18 12:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

I see your point and am agreeable to it, but asking the question, " does Rev. Wright love America as much as you do?" is not a capability or character question. How is any fair-minded person supposed to ask that question, and more importantly why should they?

by AHunch 2008-04-18 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Benefit of doubt

I agree that the wording of the question was, well, stupid at best.  Obviously he was trying to avoid suggesting that Obama does not love America.  It would have been better to say what he (presumably) meant, perhaps something like:  "What are people to think when you have close associates, even spiritual advisors, who preach hatred of America?"

That said, Obama should be grateful that the question did not get asked the way I have posed it.  That would have been much worse for him.

Obama's reaction to the questioning in the last debate, as well as the offended reaction of many of his on-line supporters, highlights one of my major character issues with him.  He had no problem when it was only Hillary who was treated that way, and neither did most of his on-line supporters.  Frankly, the questioning Obama got at the last debate was nothing compared to what Hillary has had to put up with all along from Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, Tucker Carlson, and quite a large number of others in the electronic and print media, not to mention vicious cartoons blaming her for everything but the holocaust.  And yet Obama and his supporters never raised a peep about that.  That dichotomy has been a major awakening for many women.  It has made us question whether we want to be a part of a "progressive" movement that has such a double standard.  It took me right back to the 60's when Stokely Carmichael said the only position for women in SNCC was "prone" and John F. Kennedy said that members of Girls Nation could never be President, but they could look forward to being First Lady some day.

This campaign has made many of us realize how little things have changed since then.

by PlainWords 2008-04-18 01:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Grown-ups only for President, please! [updated
If you posted a video from the other location showing him making the same gesture at the same time, maybe, just maybe this would be remotely relevant. I've agreed with most of your diaries because I, too, would like to see Hillary Clinton as President. But, somehow this one reminds me too much of the disaster ABC News called a debate a few nights ago.
by zenful6219 2008-04-18 09:27AM | 0 recs
citizen dave gives

texasdarlin "the finger" or was i just scratchin an itch.

(please stand by for live video feed)

by citizendave 2008-04-18 09:29AM | 0 recs
A new low

in diary posts.

by Newcomer 2008-04-18 09:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;


It's ironic that your response to a speech pointing out that it's silly to get bogged down in distractions is to get bogged down in a silly distraction. All you're doing is proving the point he was making in his speech.

I've seen the alleged evidence, and the assertion that he "smirked" and that the audience reacted in a way that proves they thought he was making a rude gesture is no more than wishful thinking. The man's face probably itched under the lights, so he scratched it, and the audience cheered what he had just said. That's all this is.

You're really grasping at straws, here.

by roseaupensant 2008-04-18 09:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

hmmm.   the last president that gave the finger to the cameras was....???? what a contemptuous display of his hurt ego.

as clinton put it today... we need a president that can stand the stress of the white house, and it's far more stressful than a 90 min debate. we need a president that isn't going to whine about how hard it gets, how hard the questions get.... don't we already have that kind of president?

by swissffun 2008-04-18 09:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

What do you make of Hillary Clinton's complaint about getting the first question during the Ohio debate?

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:54AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

there's a real difference from a joke and seriously whiny.

by swissffun 2008-04-18 10:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

do you really believe that?

That somebody whining in the middle of a debate that they get asked everything first, boohoo, maybe we should get the other guy a pillow, is more noble than a candidate saying, "these distractions don't matter, you need to brush them off and take care of the problems of the American people"?

Seriously.  Please explain how you can possible believe what you just posted.

by RidleyGriff 2008-04-18 11:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

you are so on the ledge I'm not going to bother. seriously.

by swissffun 2008-04-18 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

On the ledge?

On the contrary, I'm sitting down, waiting for the nonsense to stop so our nominee can start battle McCain, and trying desperately to understand where you're coming from.

But instead of answering the question, or starting a dialogue, you make some bizarre half-insult that doesn't really even make sense.

So I'll ask again -- do you really think that Obama talking about the need to brush off silly attacks, and focus on the issues at hand, is "whiny" compared to Hillary complaining in the middle of a debate about getting all the questions asked to her first?

by RidleyGriff 2008-04-18 02:16PM | 0 recs
You're lying (again).

Look at this angle (from Obama's right) from CBS News. Obama clearly uses two fingers to rub his cheek. The second finger is obscured by the middle finger in the front view you've chosen to highlight.

What pathetic tripe (again).

by Bob Johnson 2008-04-18 09:44AM | 0 recs
Re: You're lying (again).

Yeah, you'd think that a diarist who was previously banned would have a little more journalistic integrity.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 09:48AM | 0 recs
The diarist is fingerlesss.

She types with her nose.

by Bob Johnson 2008-04-18 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: You're lying (again).

And those people sitting to his left are laughing - at his words. They can't even see his hand from their side.

by myddfree 2008-04-18 10:17AM | 0 recs
Re: You're lying (again).

not to mention that it was only one event.

Do you remember that time a different diarist posted a diary on the premise that since obama had an average contribution of 98 dollars he was elitist? Then it turned out Hillary had a higher average contribution?

This one's almost as fun as that one was.

I just love it when people get called out on their shit but then don't update or unrec.

by shef 2008-04-18 02:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I think TD must be right.  Just look at who agrees:

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/18/ did-obama-give-a-flip-response-to-clinto n-attacks/

by rkt 2008-04-18 09:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I love the smell of smear diaries in the morning.  Seriously though, I think this is the diary that unequivocally proves that you're either a troll or at least severely delusional.  I refuse to believe that any rational human being can watch those clips and not realize that they are from the same event.  You're either lying or crazy.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 09:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

By the way, you take the time to make your title more incendiary but don't correct the glaring error that this speech was only made at one event (not two, as you claimed)?

What a freaking joke.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

ZOMG! He flipped her the pinky too!!!!  This is such satisfying debate!!!

by quixote27 2008-04-18 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

What a joke this diary is.  

by Mostly 2008-04-18 09:57AM | 0 recs
so this is what it's come to... n/t
by grasshopper 2008-04-18 09:57AM | 0 recs
I vote that Texas Darlin is deleted

Anyone second me?

by Democratic Unity 2008-04-18 10:00AM | 0 recs
Re: I vote that Texas Darlin is deleted

I don't know about that, but I vote this diary be deleted.  I've already written one of the admins.  Anyone second me?

by Mostly 2008-04-18 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: I vote that Texas Darlin is deleted

She's already been banned once.  Her supporters clambored to have her reinstated.  For insight like this.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 10:23AM | 0 recs
Another example of scortch earth politics

Manipulate a scratch for a finger to wallow in animosity and partisanship.

What would Obama do with another distraction argument...

(Dusting dirt of shoulders)

by optimusprime 2008-04-18 10:02AM | 0 recs
Reminds me of 9/11 conspiracy theories...

...if you look closely you can see a detonation on the 67th floor

by optimusprime 2008-04-18 10:04AM | 0 recs
STUPID DISTRACTION

Today on Obama's website he is giving a speech on the economy and he is scratching his face with his middle and ring finger.

It really is NOT a big deal.

by puma 2008-04-18 10:12AM | 0 recs
Re: STUPID DISTRACTION

Clearly he is flipping off wall street.

Snark.

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 10:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Just another attempt of a losing campaign trying to find anything they can, throwing it out there and hoping it sticks....it's sort of sad that they have resorted to Obama-bashing diaries instead of focusing on Clinton's strengths...A true sign of desperation.....

by hootie4170 2008-04-18 10:18AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

This diary makes me embarrassed to have been a Clinton supporter. I apologize on behalf of all moderate Clinton supporters that pledge allegiance to progressive values.

Loyalty is admirable, but how is this diary going to help either DEM defeat McCain?

SILLY

by SurfCityDEM4Life 2008-04-18 10:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Good god. If this isn't a stretch I don't know what is. Grow up and get a life.

by Djo 2008-04-18 10:26AM | 0 recs
My goodness

   you Clintonites are getting desperate. This is just absolutely ridiculous. I expected better from TexasDarlin, but apparently this person is now in the Alegre, Campskunk and Linc mold of Hillary hero-worshipper as opposed to loyal opposition.
by southernman 2008-04-18 10:28AM | 0 recs
Why expect better?

As usual, TexasDarlin posts a hitpiece diary, then runs away and does not comment.

After it has been proved that she is mistaken, that indeed there's only one event, not two, she never corrects the mistake.

Dishonest and despicable.

by McNasty 2008-04-18 11:18AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I know everyone here is so busy analyzing polls etc., and cannot imagine how this might mean anything to anyone..I can only speak for myself but it would matter.., alot..if he is the pres and is representing the US to the world..yes it would matter.  I think it does matter.  I would probably have a great time hanging out with him at a bar  etc., but it really is a question of plain old manners..

by grego101 2008-04-18 10:33AM | 0 recs
mean anything to anyone?

Don't worry, this diary has been recommended for promotion on one of the leading progressive blogs.

Analyzing Obama's phantom finger is now a serious political matter. We are making progressives everywhere proud. </snark>

by JoeCoaster 2008-04-18 10:46AM | 0 recs
TD... Wow.

I thought FOR SURE I'd see "snark" or "humor" in you tags.  

Being someone of more than average intelligence, you certainly don't really believe that he flipped her off.  Clearly...CLEARLY you have posted this to stir things up or to advance the myth as a form of political fighting, but now that you have been called on it...I beg you to admit that you PERSONALLY don't believe he has done something so silly.

You are far better than this, TD.

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 10:34AM | 0 recs
Are You Frickin' Kidding Me?

Sad sad sad.  You took time to post this, and then it gets on the list of most reccd diaries?  What an embarrassment for this site and for you.  What a joke.

This is a "jump the shark" diary.

by mikeinsf 2008-04-18 10:40AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

If Obama is the nominee he will be beaten so badly in November that it will leave the party damaged for a generation.  Women, African Americans, Hispanics, and labor will all be at loggerheads.  Not to mention that we will see the Supreme Court set in stone for decades to come.

So, great! We give the nod to some juvenile, inexperienced, all-hat-no-cows political neophyte from Chicago and throw away 50 years in the process? Because a McCain presidency will cement all the domestic and international abuses of the Bush administration.

Truly pathetic.

by johnnygunn 2008-04-18 10:41AM | 0 recs
or not....

Obama is the one great hope for the progressive agenda in American. He has unique mix of intellectual and political strength blended with out and out charisma. Obama will win the election and begin a new era in American politics. An era where liberalism is not a dirty word.

No Fear!

by JoeCoaster 2008-04-18 10:54AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Not when we all get behind the democratic nominee, using our brains and logical higher-selves.  

If we decide that bruised feelings and egos and negativity are more important...than you are right, McCain wins.  

Whoever wins the nomination will call for their supporters SINCERELY to support the Democratic nominee.  If we listen ...we win.

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 10:55AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Higher selves ??????????

With a candidate that resorts to giving his opponent the finger?

Y'all just can't see that Obama is the Wizard of Oz, can you?

by johnnygunn 2008-04-18 11:46AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Give me a break.  You don't really believe he did that, any more than you believe in Santa Claus.

No one REALLY does.  

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 12:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I'm delighted he did it.
Just shows how petty he is.

It may produce roars of approval from the converted,
But it will alienate those very voters who Obama claims to be bringing in.

Personally, I hope he gives Hillary the finger every day between now and May 6th.

by johnnygunn 2008-04-18 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Dude.. you are totally delusional OR trying to convert people...I dunno.  But clearly, Obama was no more flipping Hillary off than she was responsible for the death of Vince Foster.  

Both are fantasy, pure and simple.

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 01:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I'll leave the conversions to the Obama camp.

by johnnygunn 2008-04-18 01:50PM | 0 recs
I know you believe that

but saying it over and over isn't convincing anybody else.

Frankly, nominating a Democratic candidate that couldn't even win the most states, votes, or delegates in our party's own contests is not only suicidal for November -- it's moronic.

Think about it.  Senator Clinton COULDN'T EVEN WIN THE NOMINATION.

Why on Earth do you think she would do any better in November?  Seriously, why?

You know what will happen if she tries to attack John McCain?  Everybody will think she is being angry, that McCain is a nice guy, and her negatives will rise, her positives will drop -- just like what's happening with her attacks on Obama now -- and McCain will win.

I respect your support of her, but to think she can do better than Obama in November after watching this nomination battle is myopic, at the very least.

by RidleyGriff 2008-04-18 10:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Just for grins, I read through this entire diary...

...then I threw another $100 Obama's way.  

What, that wasn't the intention behind this diary?

by mascho 2008-04-18 10:48AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

That's a good idea. We ought to tack on .29 (numeric h+r+c) to every donation that results from such nonsense.

There's another $50.29 from me.

by bookish 2008-04-18 10:56AM | 0 recs
He did it at two events? Where is the link?

Sorry I'm late to the party here, but just came home for lunch.

TexasDarlin states that Obama did this at two separate events...same speech, same pause...

Is there a link for this other event?

by SluggoJD 2008-04-18 11:04AM | 0 recs
Re: He did it at two events? Where is the link?

It didn't happen at two events.  The diarist took time enough to change the title of her hit job, but she didn't have the common decency to set the facts straight.  As usual.

by rfahey22 2008-04-18 11:11AM | 0 recs
Nope

As has already been demonstrated upthread, TD confused footage of the same moment from two different angles for two different occurrences...which really says a lot about her cognitive reasoning skills (or lack thereof).

Furthermore, stills of the same moment from yet another angle show that Obama in fact scratched his face with two fingers, thus making this whole diary even more laughable than it already was.

by Elsinora 2008-04-18 11:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

This diary got recommended?  Really?  I mean, really?

by RussTC3 2008-04-18 11:22AM | 0 recs
It says a lot about MyDD


   that a crap diary like this makes the recommended list.

  Next you'll be accusing Obama of murdering someone for crack money.

by southernman 2008-04-18 11:22AM | 0 recs
Re: It says a lot about MyDD

That reminded me, the loonier Clinton supporters tried doing something a while back about tying him to a crackhead named Larry Sinclair.

I still laugh about it.

by bjones 2008-04-18 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: It says a lot about MyDD

It makes the recommended list because the Hillary hardcore have a mailing list. So as soon as any one of 'em posts, all the other subscribers know.

Can't fault being organized.

I think this diary suggests they don't actually read the diaries before hitting  the "rec" button though, 'cause from where I'm sitting this just makes a bunch of Hillary supporters look extremely silly.

While I don't think that hurts Hillary herself -- why should it? -- it certainly doesn't do anything to promote their candidate of choice.

by Huck 2008-04-18 02:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I'm just scratching my head at how the diarist can get away with this.  The lie that it's two events, plus the lie that it's a middle finger at all now that there's a side shot of it.

PATHETIC

by Mostly 2008-04-18 11:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Which finger are you using to scratch?  Because I think you're really flipping us all off.

by mascho 2008-04-18 11:42AM | 0 recs
Seriously, get a grip on yourselves

 What's next? Parsing stills for covert gang signs? Playing clips backwards trying to hear him say "Hills-A-Bitch"? I realize 15 months of this grueling slog has unhinged alot of folks on both sides, but this is right up there with looking for stealth Illuminati codes in a Bush speech....

Obama 08

by Kordo 2008-04-18 11:29AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I thought I had seen the stupidest possible diaries on here, I really did.

But this takes the prize. Congratulations.

by DeskHack 2008-04-18 11:46AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

DaveOinSF
susanhu
Caldonia
Tennessean
nonwhiteperson
TeresaInPa
campskunk
LindaSFNM
msharp
Beltway Dem
KnowVox
ghost 2
americanincanada
psychodrew
BRockNYC
OtherLisa
JoeySky18
toddy
aroundtheblock
Molee
linc
cameoanne
BPK80
catfish1
macmcd
jarhead5536
Nobama
bach
susanclare
devans
mcctx
curryorama
mbolack
environmentally blue
DemAC
Zebra01
Cassyma
mztower
canadian gal
louisprandtl
CoyoteCreek

You should all be ashamed of yourselves, if you're capable.

by DeskHack 2008-04-18 11:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Beat me to it.  

What a joke the diary section has become, led by a couple of people so blinded by Hillary-love that they think this diary isn't insane.

by PantsB 2008-04-18 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I'm almost ready to recommend the ridiculous diaries along with the rest of these people, if for no other reason than to put the craziness on display for everyone to see in hopes that someone will bring some sanity back to this once-reputable site.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Oh, I just joined the REC list too, you might want to add my name on there. If you don't like this site, I assume that you Bots are welcomed at Kos? Sorry we don't embrace the first "frat boy President".

by zcflint05 2008-04-18 01:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

If being a part of the reality-based community makes me a "bot," then consider me honored.

http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 02:03PM | 0 recs
No shame

Getting the word out on the reality behind the Obama "Wizard's Curtain" before it's too late is a fundamental mission of any Democrat interested in preserving our realistic chance of taking the White House in the fall.

If Obama becomes the nominee, I'll join his contingent in trying to cover up his flaws, but for now, I stress them to show the clear contrast between him and Hillary.  I don't want to see New York and Massachusetts in play this fall...

by BPK80 2008-04-18 02:35PM | 0 recs
You're right. I'm ashamed..
Ashamed at Senator Obama's juvenile behavior.
I long tried to reason the behavior of the Obama supporters especially at the DailyKos. Now I know, it flows from the top. Your indignation is best reserved  at Senator Obama's direction if you follow logic. Senator Obama just lost my vote.
by louisprandtl 2008-04-18 03:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Why are you still allowed to post here? Pathetic.

by amiches 2008-04-18 11:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Just out of curiosity, when you see an instant replay in televised sports do you think the players are actually redoing the play for you see it again?  I only ask because you seem a bit confused by the idea of multiple cameras.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 11:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

The videos are clearly of the same speech; the poster is wrong about that. There weren't two incidents.

When I first saw posts going up about this before I saw the video, as a Clinton supporter, I thought making a big deal out of a scratch was going too far. People do scratch their faces in odd ways. But when I saw it, the gesture, the pause, the smile all seemed rehearsed. He was milking the situation, and "in her element" was not a line that would get that kind of response on its own. I watched it a couple of times to see if my initial reaction still held. It did.

Compare the much more natural pinky finger scratch early in the long version to the pause that comes with the middle finger scratch. He knew what he was doing.

You can call all of us crazy all you want--and will probably do so on most of what we say--but coming to the conclusion that he was giving her the bird is not too far of a stretch.

by bently2 2008-04-18 01:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Please watch this view from the far right of Obama around the 20 minute mark.  It is completely obvious that he's simply scratching his face.  The fact that we're even talking about this issue makes us look foolish.

http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 01:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Unbelievable that trash like this makes the recommended list.

by berkeleymike 2008-04-18 11:59AM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Unbelievable?  You must not have seen the diary by linfar that contained links to anti-Muslim, right wing trash like Freedoms Enemies and Creeping Sharia.  That made the rec list too before the mods deleted it.

They've got a coordinated little system set up where they get each others diaries on the rec list each time they post them.

by thatpurplestuff 2008-04-18 12:10PM | 0 recs
Just donated another $25 bucks to Obama

This is garbage.  Go work for McCain.

by jkfp2004 2008-04-18 12:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Just donated another $25 bucks to Obama

Whether they realize or not (and some of them do) ... they already ARE.

by a gunslinger 2008-04-18 12:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Just donated another $25 bucks to Obama

Rather work for him than Obama, at least McCain has a shred of decency

by zcflint05 2008-04-18 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I know I for one could never even imagine scratching my face with my middle finger, especially in public.  Have the naysayers ever actually tried it?  It feels jarringly awkward and rude.  

Clearly, something else was going on here.  It's not the end of the world, but does reveal his character more and more.  

by BPK80 2008-04-18 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Obama's own campaign posted this on You Tube in support of his candidacy.

That sucks!

by SHIBAM8P 2008-04-18 12:33PM | 0 recs
think you're right

That was timed, on cue, plus he smirked.

Anyone a little street wise knows what this means and the crowd sure did.

by Robert Oak 2008-04-18 12:34PM | 0 recs
It's obvious that is what he is doing

I have seen this many times with people that want to let the people around them know without letting the "authority figure" know they were flipping them off.

It's a way to keep "plausible deniability" that they aren't doing that, so they don't lose their job or whatever. It's sneaky and very unprofessional.

If you have ever been around working class people y'all would know this. It takes a deliberate act to scratch your face with the index finger down. It's not the natural way our hands work.

The deniers are either naive or going along with it and think it's fine. Either way, it's adolescent behavior, not befitting a president.

by splashy 2008-04-18 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: It's obvious that is what he is doing

It takes a deliberate act to scratch your face with the index finger down. It's not the natural way our hands work.

That would be a good theory except his index finger was NEVER down.

Just watch the video that was shot from straight to the side of the podium:
http://www.ustream.tv/swf/3/viewer.111.s wf?&loc=/&vid=355941
(jump to 20:50 for the two-fingered cheek scratch)

by moreperfectunion 2008-04-18 01:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

A Senator...Harvard graduate?

Hey Dear Oprah Please look at your Guy!

Maybe MSNBC can talk about this new Obama gesture.
He also whines like a baby... uhaah according to Hannity.

by SHIBAM8P 2008-04-18 12:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

He clearly didn't give her the finger.  I think the stills from above and common bleeping sense should tell you that.  Watching the video should tell you that.  

He scratched his cheek with both his index and middle finger!  I mean lets be real.

And maybe there's a hint on why you're HRC supporters in thinking thats what the audience was cheering.  They were cheering "She looked in her element" ie gotcha manufactured controversy politics...

Sort of like what this story is trying to be a part of!

by PantsB 2008-04-18 12:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

After his insults to the small town folks...
I bet he can be a low as it gets.

I need a President who respects women, who fight for them, and who will put our priority in her list.--- that candidate is Hillary. Thank you very much.

by SHIBAM8P 2008-04-18 12:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

This diary is useful for separating the batshit Hillary supporters from the sane ones.

I mean my god.

by Mostly 2008-04-18 12:47PM | 0 recs
Oh grow up.

The guy was scratching his face.

by Travis Stark 2008-04-18 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I prefer the nutbar thread where Obama was ref-ing a Jay-Z song while flipping off Hillary...

I like a good two-fer in my completely insane conspiracy theories!

Texas Darlin', you been outdone!

by WashStateBlue 2008-04-18 01:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

How trashy, and how exposing of this so called honorable person's character. He reminds me so much of George W with his personality--pompous, arrogant, struggles to speak without a teleprompter, and now, he has his own middle finger moment. This is pretty obviously the middle finger--and the whole "brush your shoulders off" thing reminds me of a classic college frat boy.

Just joins his other "frat boy" moment in the debate where he made sure to stress that when he got his HIV test it was with Michelle and NOT ANOTHER MAN, we wouldn't want to think he was gay or anything...

by zcflint05 2008-04-18 01:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Maybe we shouldn't reinstate banned people.  Just a thought.

Are the admins honestly surprised by this?

TexasDarlin is a troll and has nothing to add to this site.

by Skaje 2008-04-18 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Oh yes, please, go all the way with this important controversy.  I mean, after all, the  previous "political distractions" have done Senator Clinton SO MUCH GOOD that Obama now leads her nationally by 14 points.

I watched the "brush off" speech and it was quite obvious that he was refering to the dirt figuratively thrown at him, not to Senator Clinton personally.  And if it is a gesture that is familar from hip hop culture so what?  I saw him scratch his face while the audience reacted to his crack about Senator Clinton being "in her element."  Even from the front it did not really look like he was giving the finger and I don't care how many times you saw some smart aleck kid do a "sneaky finger" in high school.  You guys are starting to look and sound like loons.

I know that you are now wedded to your insane intrepretation and your over the top notions about Obama's character.  It is a shame that you can not see the damage you are doing your candidate with this garbage.

by oldbattleaxe 2008-04-18 01:50PM | 0 recs
Barry loses my respect, episode 15

The guy just can't stop himself, can he.  He is honestly acting like a teenager....and he is MY age.

As much as I can't stand Dick Cheney, Dubya, Rumsfield etc, I would not flick them the bird like that.  Have some fucking respect, Barry.

by avrdream 2008-04-18 02:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Barry loses my respect, episode 15

I'd flic the bird to Cheney?

But, I am a classless doof, unlike Obama, who was just scratching his face here?

by WashStateBlue 2008-04-18 02:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

I saw the 8 second video on YT last night.  I had trouble believing that someone running for president would do this. Then I saw the complete arrogant clip of him doing this, and arrogantly mocking some concerns that have been following him for months .  I saw the audience observe it and laugh directly at that particular movement, and saw the smirk on his face while he waited for the audience to react.  

I thought about it again today, and truly decided that I can't stomach voting for him.  I have been trying hard to bring myself around to voting for him just because he is a democrat and I don't want anything to do with republicanism , but I truly don't think I can do it.

He is a completely foriegn being to me.  His arrogance is worse than Bush's, and he seems not to really care if he is hurting or insulting over half the democrats who are supporters of Hillary's.  He just doesn't care.  He snickers with his own supporters.  Others be damned.  He is childish and insulting and seemingly below the stature of a president, and I won't be able to shake that impression by November.

by Scotch 2008-04-18 02:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

This is a Rorschach test.

Those that want to see "something bad" will see it

To everyone else, he scratched his cheek.

by Huck 2008-04-18 02:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Rashamon.....

by WashStateBlue 2008-04-18 03:00PM | 0 recs
Bogus Story of the Day

Congratulations... Politico just declared your story Bogus Story of the Day

by mikeinsf 2008-04-18 03:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Barack gives Hillary &quot;the finger&quot;

Are there still people who think he flipped her off?

It's easy to see who is still connected to reality and who isn't. Those that aren't can be easily dismissed going forward.

by Darknesse 2008-04-18 03:51PM | 0 recs
Just amazing
this whole silly conversation.
Is this all you have, Hillary supporters?
by barnowl 2008-04-18 05:42PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------