Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking about

http://ex-donkey.mu.nu/archives/166079.p hp

March 31, 2006

Obama Endorses Lieberman

Democrat Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois stopped by Hartford last night to endorse Sen. Joe Lieberman for his reelection bid this year. Giving the keynote speech at the party's Jefferson Jackson Bailey dinner, Obama publicly threw his support behind the Connecticut Senator who is facing a challenge from the moonbat Left.

"The fact of the matter is, I know some in the party have differences with Joe. I'm going to go ahead and say it," Obama told the 1,700-plus party members who gathered in a ballroom at the Connecticut Convention Center for the $175-per-head fundraiser.
"I am absolutely certain Connecticut is going to have the good sense to send Joe Lieberman back to the U.S. Senate so he can continue to serve on our behalf," he said.

Obama received widespread attention for his keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, delivered while he was still a state senator.

Lieberman became Obama's mentor when Obama was sworn into the Senate in 2005. They stayed close at Thursday night's event, too, entering the room together and working the crowd in tandem.

Despite the camaraderie between the two, the crowd was clearly more receptive to Obama's remarks than Lieberman's speech about party unity and the potential for Democratic victories at the ballot box this fall.

In fact, scattered boos greeted Lieberman when he took the podium, and he had to stop three times during his remarks to shush the crowd so he could deliver key points.

Here's another account-
http://www.nhregister.com/site/news.cfm? newsid=16408750&BRD=1281&PAG=461&dept_id=566835&rfi=6

and here's a third account from AP

http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/03/31/obama_rallies_state_democrats_throws_support_behind_lieberman/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+Connecticut+news

Obama rallies state Democrats, throws support behind Lieberman By Stephanie Reitz, Associated Press Writer | March 31, 2006

I have no idea whether or not a "Sharpton endorsement" helps or hurts a candidate.

So it's kinda fun to see this play-out.  In the MSM a Sharpton endorsement is bad, however, sharpton did get a huge junk of the primary vote in South Carolina in 2004.

or maybe Al is talking about this..

Lieberman, of course, also has powerful backers. Reid, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have all spoken or written letters encouraging Democrats to back him.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1207783,00.html

There's also Tim Tagaris' account - which makes it clear that Obama avoided connecticut like the plague.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/14 /122820/27

Whatever, Al Sharpton is talking about he did try his best to help Lamont, whereas Obama and Hillary/Bill did not.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Tags: Al Sharpton, Barack Obama, Joe Lieberman (all tags)

Comments

34 Comments

not really full on campaigning

but technically Obama did go to CT in March 2006 to "campaign" for Lieberman.

by TarHeel 2007-03-12 04:06PM | 0 recs
Re: not really full on campaigning

This diary is quite a distortion.

Obama went to CT in March 2006 to speak at the Jefferson-Jaskson day fundraising dinner for the entire CT Democratic Party.  He went at the invitation of the state party, not Lieberman.

by Sam I Am 2007-03-13 12:02PM | 0 recs
I've linked to

3 different sources.

Obama didn't have to even mention Lieberman - but he chose to.
I agree he wasn't pounding the pavement - letter writing and a two sentence endorsement isn't all that much - but Stoller asked what sharpton was talking about and this is my theory.

by TarHeel 2007-03-14 04:03AM | 0 recs
Obama's endorsed Ned Lamont

...after the primary.

Read about it on Ned Lamont's blog.

by faithfull 2007-03-12 04:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama's endorsed Ned Lamont

Yet raised money and campaigned for Lieberman, the most pro-war Dem in the caucus, before the primary.

And did he campaign for Lamont, or just give him a small check and some nice words... do you expect kudos for that?

by Vox Populi 2007-03-12 05:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama's endorsed Ned Lamont

not after Lieberman lost the Democratic primary.

and yes, I usually account thousands in financial support, an endorsement, and a grass/netroots effort as support

by faithfull 2007-03-12 05:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama's endorsed Ned Lamont

It's not worth arguing with the Lamont folks.  Obama's not the only one who flunks that purity test.

by rashomon 2007-03-12 06:19PM | 0 recs
Lieberman was Obama's assigned

mentor in the Senate.  

by Yoshimi 2007-03-12 06:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama's endorsed Ned Lamont

Raised money for?  That's one I haven't heard before.

by Adam B 2007-03-12 06:33PM | 0 recs
Not raised money for...

...gave money to, if you like splitting hairs.

Through Hopefund, Senator Barack Obama is promoting the candidacies of leaders who are committed to changing the course of our nation to ensure the promise of America for future generations.

by faithfull 2007-03-12 09:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Not raised money for...

And IIRC, that was early in 2005, like a year before Ned Lamont even considered a primary, as Obama did for a number of his colleagues -- even Hillary.

by Adam B 2007-03-13 04:20AM | 0 recs
Re: Not raised money for...

Obama's hopefund gift to Lamont was august 2006, so Im not sure we're talking about the same thing.

by faithfull 2007-03-13 06:41AM | 0 recs
Re: Not raised money for...

I was referring to his contribution to Lieberman; it was part of two groups of contributions to his new colleagues in February and March 2005.

by Adam B 2007-03-13 06:54AM | 0 recs
Cool

Thanks for the clarification

by faithfull 2007-03-13 07:08AM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

Wasn't that before the democratic primary in Ct?  when Lieberman was just running for re election and Lamont was not a known contender outside of a few?  Weren't all the dems supporting Leibermann at that time since he was just one of the guys running for re election then?

by vwcat 2007-03-12 05:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

John Edwards didn't endorse Lieberman in the primary.  Maxine Waters didn't.  Ted Kennedy didn't.  Al Sharpton didn't.

Hillary Clinton did.
Barack Obama did.
Chris Dodd did.
Joe Biden even endorsed Independent Lieberman.

Everyone knew that supporting Lieberman was supporting the war.  Not only did Obama say Lieberman was a friend and good man, he begged Connecticut Democrats to renominate him.  They didn't listen.

by Vox Populi 2007-03-12 05:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

he begged Connecticut Democrats to renominate him.  They didn't listen.

Goes to show that there's a limit to Obama's popularity -- won't rub off on Lieberman, LOL.

by dblhelix 2007-03-12 05:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

One thing, these articles are dated March, at which point Lamont (whom I volunteered for) was 40-something points back in the polls.  Once the race got close, Obama stayed away from Connecticut, unlike so many others (see Clinton, Bill).

by Go Vegetarian 2007-03-12 07:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

I'd hardly call his statement begging.

by yitbos96bb 2007-03-12 11:37PM | 0 recs
OK, got it.
Hasn't this topic been run into the ground yet? Obama supported Lieberman in the primary, and Lamont in the general, but not strongly enough. Edwards was better. Clark was better yet. Clinton was kinda bad. Lieberman is a giant ass.
All of this has now been thrown back and forth enough on this site that I think people have decided whether support of Liberman/Lamont is a big issue and whether any particular candidate measures up on it.
Yes it is indicative of stuff, but we've been through it, no?
by jujube 2007-03-12 05:50PM | 0 recs
Re: OK, got it.

There's a lot of strong feelings still, obviously.  And don't mention Duckworth either.

by rashomon 2007-03-12 06:20PM | 0 recs
I agree this has been

discussed.

But Matt asked why Sharpton was talking about Obama "campaigning" for Lieberman, and this was all I could think of - the March 31st democratic event where he urged CT voters to send Joementum back to the senate.

by TarHeel 2007-03-13 04:03AM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking

i don't care if obama helped out liebermann.. and i hate joe..its not that big a deal to me..i don't think its a big deal to 99 percent of americans..

by the way lieberman won the election so connecticutt voters prefered him as their senator like it or not and thats what the election was bout

by serge in dc 2007-03-12 07:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Matt - This might be what Sharpton is talking
Isn't Sharpton a long time clintonista and funny how these little planted stories always show up early in the week on Fox or in a NY paper....
Well, just think about how much she cozies up to Ailes and Murdoch and these stories always seem to come out in these kind of papers...
Seems rather planted to me.
by vwcat 2007-03-12 08:18PM | 0 recs
NY Post

owned by Murdoch is usually where these stories originate... very interesting observation

by TarHeel 2007-03-13 04:04AM | 0 recs
This might be what Sharpton is talking about

Al Sharpton supporting Ned Lamont?

Maybe there is a clue why he actually lost.

by v2aggie2 2007-03-12 08:54PM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

I highly doubt Sharpton hurt Lamont. THose who attack Sharpton's support would have founded some other excuse to justify their non support of Lamont.  Though I admit Sharpton was unable to deliver on the black vote to a great extent.

by Pravin 2007-03-13 03:07AM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

Pravin - I respectfully disagree, especially in the NY metro area.  I think Sharpton hurts candidates as much as he helps.  Depsite his attempts to go more mainstream, he is still dogged by the Tawana Brawley hoax and his more recent commercials for LoanMax, the predatory lendor.  Even when I think he is right, I have a hard time taking him seriously b/c I don't completely believe he is on the level.  

by John Mills 2007-03-13 10:38AM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about
Well you said it.  You said he hurts them as much as he helps them. I believe it was a wash  too. He might have lost a few votes. but he probably gained a few too. Whatever it was, it was probably a marginal factor.  I think people who use him as a scapegoat to not vote for Lamont would have just as easily found another excuse.
He was virtually absent from the campaign in the post primary period. So I do not buy it that one night of showing up on stage had people leaving Lamont.
There was this article in a new england paper about the Harpers Bazaar's editor's trip to some town where the feedback he got regarding the resistance to Lamont didn't seem to have anything to do with Sharpton. There were much stronger factors at work here.
by Pravin 2007-03-13 11:07AM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

Something happened to Lamont campaign after the primary.  It just seemed to lose steam.

by John Mills 2007-03-13 11:24AM | 0 recs
We moved on after the primary.

There were too many campaigns that WE the blogosphere were focused on.

by Yoshimi 2007-03-13 12:08PM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

"Though I admit Sharpton was unable to deliver on the black vote to a great extent."

_____

Not a new occurrence.
He is a self-proclaimed "leader"

And I'm not sure why every Democrat feels the need to get his "blessing"

My bigger point is that when Sharpton is one of the most prominent people on the stage with you, it isn't exactly a positive

by v2aggie2 2007-03-14 08:40PM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

Lamont would have been destroyed in the primary without Sharpton out beating the streets for him.  That's the way it goes.

by Steve M 2007-03-13 09:07AM | 0 recs
Re: This might be what Sharpton is talking about

Maybe, but it was going to hurt in the general election.

by v2aggie2 2007-03-14 08:43PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------