Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

permalink

Go PACK!!!

I'm a die hard Pats fan but today my favorite team is the PACK....Go Packers!!!!

by joedemocrat 2004-10-31 05:33AM | 0 recs

permalink

I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

...if it really did have predictive power, I would be pretty happy about that right now. Green Bay, which was widely considered to be a Super Bowl contender before the season started, had a surprisingly bad stretch where they lost 4 games in a row early this season. But they looked far better in their last two games, winning each of them comfortably with huge numbers on offense, 38 and 41 points in those two wins. The Redskins have one of the best ranked defenses in the league, but their offense is mind-numbingly bad, no more than 18 points in any game all year. The Packers' defense has been their undoing in most of their losses, but Washington's offense is so bad that it's hard to see where the Redskins can find an advantage. They've had a terrible season, and few people think they can beat the Packers today.

Anything can happen in sports, as the Red Sox just demonstrated, but we're talking about a pretty sorry bunch of underachievers in the Redskins, and a pretty confident Packer team that's plenty motivated to continue turning their season around.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 05:50AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

According to the spread, the Packers are favored to win by 1 or 2 points, depending on the bookie.

But let's not get crazy about this - coincidence does not equal causation.

by bushsucks 2004-10-31 06:01AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Exactly, if the Redskins had lost their last pre-election home game in 1984, clearly there would not have been a 20 point shift in the electorate to Mondale. It really doesn't matter to us who wins this game. But, if I had to bet on it (and I don't bet on sports, despite following them very closely), I'd bet on the Packers to win by a lot more than 1 or 2. They're a hot team, and the Redskins are crap.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 06:06AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Interesting you choose 1984, I think this election could be a repeat of that year.

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 07:16AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Yeah your right, except in reverse. Kerry wins by such a large landslide victory, that the media narrative will be "How come no one saw this coming?"

Just like it was in 2000, when everyone expected Bush to dominate the electoral college.

by agpc 2004-10-31 08:07AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Now whose wearing the rose color glasses.

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 09:26AM | 0 recs

permalink

Funny you should mention that...

Your boy Bush has practically had Rose Colored Lenses infused directly onto his eyeballs so as to guarantee he doesn't have to worry about Iraq, the Economy (still think its "strong and getting stronger?"), Jobs, Health Care, the stock market, Osama Bin Laden (dead or alive?), amnesty for illegal aliens, social security, and any other domestic issue you choose to insert.

I mean your boy is such a loser that he is the only president to lose jobs for 75 years. You think he will actually win this election? Hogwash.

But if you so desire, put your money where your mouth is. I bet you $1,000 that Bush is loses. Wan't to take that bet?

Nah, didn't think so.

by agpc 2004-10-31 12:48PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Funny you should mention that...

This is like betting on a Vikings game with a Vikings fan. How should we arrange the deal? Can I be assured you will pay if Kerry loses?

On to the issues: the economy argument is stale and inaccurate. If you look at this economy compared to the Clinton economy going in to his reelection the unemployment rate is the same, growth is higher now than then. It is so laughable that you insist on saying we have a horrible economy. Give me a break.

Iraq - Small setbacks seem to make excite the liberal base but overall the Iraq reconstruction is moving along well. War is never perfect and John Kerry wont stop all attacks on Iraqis volunteering for National Guard etc. I think your expectations are set higher than the average American.

Health Care - What about health care? Some people don't have it, insurance rates are high. What is your complaint now? As Bush said a litany of complaints is not a plan. Bring your numbers into perspective by comparing them to history. I personally am for expanding Medical Savings Accounts to bring competition back to the industry.

Stock Market - The Nasdaq sits at about 1,974.99 that is still higher than anything before 1999. It went though a correction no doubt in late 1999, but that was part of the recession. It has been on the climb since late in 02. I may be missing your argument though.

Amnesty for illegal aliens - Should there be or not? I do not believe amnesty is what the president is advocating.

Social Security - Yea I won't ever see it if things remain how they are. I support the President's plan to allow me to put some of my social security in to the private market to gain interest.

Anything else you wish to discuss?

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 02:55PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

only the most deluded partisan hack could suggest that Bush is as popular as Reagan and that Kerry is as weak as Mondale.

by johnny longtorso 2004-10-31 10:59AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Democrats have no memory. The liberals in this country and especially in Europe where protesting heavily against Reagan. They called him arrogant, stupid, a cowboy, a Hawk, a fumbling fool, you name it. In 1984 it was obvious that Reagan had the country behind him, but not if you listened to the far left in this country and the world. Just as today with Bush. We will find out on Tuesday. I will bring the crow, one of us will be eating alot of it.

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 03:00PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Democrats have no memory? you seem to forget that Reagan's average approval rating in 1984 was 57. what's Bush foundering at, the mid-40s? how exactly do you equate those anemic numbers with "having the country behind him"?

it's not just "the far left" that wants Bush out of office. if it were, he would be going above 50 in the polls. you are either delusional, in denial, or both, to think otherwise. and if it were, you'd have facts to back that up, not just the same old ad hominem "liberal""far left""Europe" rhetoric.

by johnny longtorso 2004-10-31 04:26PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Bush job approval has been fluttering aroung 50 not low 40's.

by Patrick Henry 2004-10-31 05:54PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Still waiting for your wager. Of course, although you talk big, you are smart enough to realize that neither candidate will win that kind of EV margin.

by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 11:10AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: I don't put any stock in this at all, but...

Duh.... do you think so? Hmmm.... so you seem to think this is a coincidence? Of course it is, Bush-breath.

by GoPackers 2004-10-31 11:52AM | 0 recs

permalink

Last Redskin home game and the Election

Since 1936, when the Skins win their last home game before the election, the party in the White House stays in the White House. When they lose, there's a switch.

Here's a link:
http://www.snopes.com/sports/football/election.asp

by bushsucks 2004-10-31 05:53AM | 0 recs

permalink

Redskins Story is True

I'm a die hard 'Skins fan, but I wouldn't worry too much today. The Pack's been throwin' the ball around pretty well the last 2 weeks, and the Redskins have their two starting safeties out for the game, one injured and one just got a dui & is suspended.

I'll be at the game, probably rooting for the Redksins 'cuz it's just a coincidence (I hope) but....

by RecoveringRepublican 2004-10-31 06:12AM | 0 recs

permalink

obviously my rational mind says there's no link

but all the same it'd be a nice omen if they were to lose...

by asf6 2004-10-31 06:15AM | 0 recs

permalink

Go Pack Go!

Die hard skins fan here (Centreville, Va). Everyone in my office is a big skins fan.

Today, it's all Green & Gold.

Go pack go!

by jbryant0007 2004-10-31 06:20AM | 0 recs

permalink

My sympathy to Skins fans

I'm a 38 year Packer Backer and you better believe I'll be rooting today like never before! Living in Jax, FL I'm also a Jaguar fan and familiar with Brunell. As long as Favre is on his game Mark will melt like the wicked witch on Oz. Sorry Redskins 'cause otherwise I like you guys and who couldn't love watching the return of the great Joe Gibbs.

by JaxDem 2004-10-31 06:32AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: My sympathy to Skins fans

Go Ahman Green!!! Favre is not quite the player he is; Green's your workhorse. Luckily, the Skins Run Defense is not as good as their pass defense who will be missing Taylor I believe.

by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 06:52AM | 0 recs

4a2fab88-ed3b-47a4-8f14-3ec8a24504ac_normal

permalink

against the tide

I will be rooting for the Redskins anyway. This is a year for all these olds myths to die anyway.

by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 06:38AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: against the tide

I agree. 2004, we're changing the rules, every precedent (except for the incumbent rule!) out the window. Red Sox wins the pennant, and Democrats outclass Rethugs in every bit of the political game.

by aruac 2004-10-31 06:53AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: against the tide

Ah well, I guess the Packers want to continue the tradition.

by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 09:22AM | 0 recs

permalink

Try being a Bears fan

For the first time ever, I am cheering for Green Bay. Luckily, I know several Bears fan doing the same. It is hard for us, but a GB win is better than a Bush one.

by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 06:48AM | 0 recs

permalink

I already

put some cash on the packers this morning. Technically it's not the incumbent that wins or loses depending on how the Skins do the prior sunday to the election, it's the incumbent PARTY, e.g. in 1988 neither bush1 or dukakis was an incumbent, but the redskins won the sunday before so bush1 (incumbent party) won. go pack, but even if redskins win, kerry wins tuesday 311-228 at the least, 385-153 if their truly is a gale force at his back. The 311 is all Gore states won again plus new hampshire, ohio, and florida. but if there truly is a surge for kerry going on right now he could pull in nevada, arizona, colorado, missouri, arkansas, north carolina, virginia, and west virginia. let's dream.

by fred 2004-10-31 07:25AM | 0 recs

permalink

What did I tell you about the spread?

6:28 left to go in the 2nd quarter, Packers lead 17-0. The Redskins have not scored more than 18 points in any GAME all season. This is a flat-out ass-kicking.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:03AM | 0 recs

permalink

Redskins won't lose

until the Red Sox win the World Series...

by yettrab 2004-10-31 09:09AM | 0 recs

permalink

I hate the Packers

But I'm happy they're up 17-0 in the second quarter.

by DraconisRex 2004-10-31 09:10AM | 0 recs

permalink

BTW...

I don't believe in any of that stuff... But I know the superstitious do... So, if the Pack wins... Hey, if it's only one-half percent, it's better than the Redskins and one-half percent the other way...

by DraconisRex 2004-10-31 09:13AM | 0 recs

permalink

OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!

The Pack? Root for the Pack? If I do that I'll have to turn in my Bears jearsey.

Geez, this politics stuff is killing me. First I find myself more interested in C-Span than the Bears lately. Then I find myself focusing on the polls in WI more than the Bears game plans. Now I'm rooting for the Packers for Democracy!!!???

Damn I can't wait for Wednesday so the world can go back to being normal and I can again focus on my poor pathetic Bears.

go pack.

Rick 'em
Rack' em

Rick 'em
Ruck 'em

Get that ball and really
FIGHT!

(i feel so dirty)

by michael in chicago 2004-10-31 09:17AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!

You gotta take one for the team, Michael. Time to suck it up. :)

by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:18AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: OK, Now you're asking a lot of me!

I feel your pain. At least the tradition doesn't involve rooting against the Bears.

by yitbos96bb 2004-10-31 11:12AM | 0 recs

permalink

17-7 GB at halftime

Two stupid Packer turnovers cost them at the end of the half, they should be up at least 24-0. Redskins defense, after giving up a league-best 230-240 yards per game so far this season, has already given up 234 yards to Favre on 14 of 18 passing. Washington offense is as lousy as ever: dropped passes, shaky QB protection, careless penalties, utterly shambolic clock management. I don't think this one's going to be close.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 09:35AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: 17-7 GB at halftime

Another stupid interception pass, 20-14 with 5 minutes left!

by Jerome Armstrong 2004-10-31 10:57AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: 17-7 GB at halftime

And now yet another pick. This is pathetic. The Redskins actually have a chance.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:00AM | 0 recs

permalink

Wow, what a dramatic turnaround just now...

Redskins looked like they had scored to go ahead, but their TD was called back on a (questionable) penalty. Then GB intercepted a pass on the next play!

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:07AM | 0 recs

permalink

olbermann had this last week

See

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/

(scroll down, I think)

by newmanme 2004-10-31 10:58AM | 0 recs

permalink

Favre must be a Republican

3 Interceptions.
Favre looks like he's throwing the game.

2 mintues to play.

by davidscott 2004-10-31 11:07AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Favre must be a Republican

Well, things are looking a lot better now than they were about 120 seconds ago.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:08AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Favre must be a Republican

Packer defense comes up BIG!

Brunell intercepted!

by davidscott 2004-10-31 11:11AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Favre must be a Republican

From what I'm told, Favre has a reputation for throwing interceptions.

Going into this game, my dad (huge Packers fan) told me that it was going to come down to Washington's offense vs. Green Bay's defense, which could possibly suck more. As for the other way around, don't expect to see it much as Favre doesn't like holding onto the ball for more than a couple downs or so.

Nice to see that it looks like we'll win even if that turned out to be essentially correct.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:13AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Favre must be a Republican

Yes, Favre does throw lots of picks, it was always his biggest weakness (though he's an obvious first ballot Hall of Famer when he retires). Even a team with a dreadful offense like Washington can stay competitive when the other team keeps turning the ball over.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:17AM | 0 recs

permalink

packers will win

packer interception they have the ball on wash 20 with 2 minutes left

by markgolf630 2004-10-31 11:08AM | 0 recs

permalink

Scary Omen

Wow. Is this how the election is going to go? Washington looks like they will win it only to have the TD called back on a conroversial motion penalty. Then the very next play Green Bay intercepts and looks like they will run out the game.

God I hope Tuesday night is not like this game. I couldn't take it. Will Bush look like he will win it, only to have Kerry take the nod on some controversial state poll numbers?

Karma is a bitch if this happens.

(I can't believe I rooting for the Packers like this!)

by michael in chicago 2004-10-31 11:12AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Scary Omen

I wasn't aware of any part of the superstition that ties the result of the game to the result of the election other than who wins. IE, I don't think a scarily close victory on one field is necessarily supposed to translate to a scarily close victory on the other. I think it's just that if all is said and done and the smoke clears and one team is ultimately on top, so is their candidate.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:16AM | 0 recs

permalink

28-14 Packers

They score again, looks like this one's in the bag. It's a clear illustration of how there is one stat that's probably more important than any other in the NFL: turnovers. GB should have been up by 3 or 4 TDs for the entire 2nd half, what with the Redskins' abysmal offense, but they're gonna escape because of a lucky break.

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:16AM | 0 recs

permalink

It's a final: Packers win 28-14

So chalk this up as an (obviously irrelevant) indication that Kerry will win on Tuesday!

by Haggai 2004-10-31 11:22AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: It's a final: Packers win 28-14

Hey, I'll take it. Especially because now either Kerry wins or an over-eighty-year-old tradition dies. Either way, something big happens. I'll much prefer the former, of course, but...you know.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 11:23AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: It's a final: Packers win 28-14

Fox News broke in to their programming to annonce the victory and its predictive implication. (Hey, gotta watch Fox when you can bear it. Keep an eye on the other side)

This gave them something other to report than the "margin of error" tutorial they ran every time they showed their poll where Bush had lost so many points in their polls this week. And the race tied.

They were even explaining how it was really six points either way in the MOE not 3.

They would show the RealClearPolitics.com poll first--with URL--then give the MOE lesson, then show theirs.

Needless to say up until yesterday it was "Bush ahead", no MOE advised.

by MazeDancer 2004-11-01 03:48AM | 0 recs

permalink

Green Bay wins

This should be widely reported so that Bush voters know that they don't have to go to the polls on Tuesday.
Plus, it must be true: late in the game, (after showing a bad Viking game for most of the day), my Fox/Sinclair station finally went to the GB game, only to immediately cut away. "NFL Rules" the announcer said . . .

by marvin 2004-10-31 11:29AM | 0 recs

permalink

As someone living IN Green Bay,

I would have to say that Scalia was correct in ruling the Skins' TD null and void and that the ruling would not apply to any other games....

Al Harris for Sec. of Defense!

by Tundraman 2004-10-31 11:35AM | 0 recs

permalink

2-1 EV ratio

28-14 Pack = 359-179 Kerry

That happens when Kerry wins all of the swing states, including AR, VA & WV, but not including MO & NC. Actually, not an entirely unlikely outcome. This is my new prediction ;)

Landslide. Mandate.

Fox News broke into interview on polling problems to report:

Graphic: "Redskins just lost... Kerry wins??"

Announcer: "...does not bode well for the administration."

haha

by scottmaui 2004-10-31 12:54PM | 0 recs

permalink

UK Bookies

MSNBC reported that the bookies in the UK may adjust their odds based on the outcome of this game. We may doubt the relevance of this, but when oddsmakers take it into account, they are at least realizing that there are some real consequences in the narrative and the morale or phychological effect it creates.

by scottmaui 2004-10-31 12:58PM | 0 recs

permalink

An unremarked football open

Navy (Lt. Kerry) beat Air Force (ANG LT Bush) earlier this season...in Colorado Springs, home of the Religious Right, West.

And I enjoy seeing the Skins lose, omen or no omen.

by Ragamuffin Gunner 2004-10-31 01:18PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: An unremarked football open

And the Boston Red Sox won, too.

It may not mean anything, but maybe it will at least make Football Fans for Truth shut up for a while.

by Kjorteo 2004-10-31 02:37PM | 0 recs

permalink

And a Wisconsin team beat them

Take note: Not only did the 'Skins lose the home game - predicting a Kerry victory - they lost to the Green Bay Packers. According to my tea leaves, this means Wisconsin will put Kerry over the top.

by DanK 2004-10-31 02:17PM | 0 recs

permalink

Well, this is entertaining

But probaby not very productive.

by clawed 2004-10-31 02:21PM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

成人电影成人论坛成人图片成人网站成人小说
黄色电影黄色论坛黄色图片黄色网站黄色小说
劲舞团激情电影激情小电影美女视频录像色情电影
色情论坛色情图片色情网站色情小说性爱电影
性爱论坛性感美女床上自拍诱惑妹妹激情色吧人体艺术图辑三级片
成人论坛
成人小说
黄色电影
激情小电影
劲舞团
免费电影
免费三级片
美女视频录像
人体艺术图辑
三级片
色情小说
成人电影
色情电影
性爱电影
性爱论坛
诱惑激情妹妹色吧
性感美女床上自拍
黄色小说

by kan101 2006-05-08 08:10AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

成人电影
成人论坛
成人图片
成人小说
黄色电影
黄色图片
黄色网站
黄色小说
激情电影
激情小电影
美女视频录像
色情电影
色情图片
色情网站
色情小说
性爱电影
性爱论坛
性感美女床上自拍
诱惑妹妹激情色吧
人体艺术图辑
三级片

by kan105 2006-05-13 04:01AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

激情小电影
成人交友网
在线激情视频
自拍
写真
林心如三级片
免费成人电影下载论坛
人体艺术
一夜情
成人小电影
大众成人网
成人论坛
成人电影下载地址
免费成人电影下载网站
成人网
色情小电影
成人电影下载
在线激情电影
黄色网
同志激情小视频
在线偷拍电影
美女走光
成人网站
激情电影下载
性交电影
激情电影
在线偷窥电影
黄色论坛
在线黄色电影
性交小电影
色情网
性激情小视频
明星激情小视频
免费偷拍电影
色情电影
色情小说
情色论坛
偷窥小电影
成人小说
免费激情小视频论坛
免费三级片
三级片下载
黄色小电影
偷拍电影
免费激情电影
无码成人电影
色情网站
激情网站
无码激情小视频下载
三级片
走光图片
黄色电影下载
成人电影下载在线欣赏
网友视频
成人电影
成人图片
大陆成人交友
偷拍电影下载
在线性交电影
走光
在线色情电影
免费黄色电影
免费色情电影
黄色网站
黄色小说
黄色电影
情色小说
艺术激情享受
色情图片
视频交友
大众色情网
成人18
偷拍小电影
性交电影下载
激情小视频下载网站
免费性交电影
激情视频
成人电影下载区
免费偷窥电影

中国性爱城
大众激情小视频
在线成人电影
成人交友网站
偷窥电影
性成人电影下载
色情论坛
成人电影下载播放
黄色图片
偷窥电影下载
18电影
色情电影下载
韩国激情小视频
成人视频
色情电影
黄色电影
成人电影
激情电影
三级片
艺术激情享受
黄色网站
色情网站
成人网站
激情网站
性交电影
性教育电影
性爱电影
走光
写真电影
黄色小说
色情小说
成人小说
成人视频
激情视频
美女自拍
写真
激情小电影
性生活电影
自拍

by yyy777 2006-05-31 12:27AM | 0 recs

permalink

Re: Root for the Green Bay Packers Today

圣诞树网站建设 google优化 Google左侧优化 google排名 Google左侧排名 GOOGE左侧优化 5490;名上海google优化 google优化排名上海google左侧&# 25490;名上海google排名上海google左侧&# 20248;化 google优化 Google左侧优化短信群发短信群发器短信群发群发短信短信群发器小灵通群发器小灵通短信群发器短信群发软件手机短信群发软件短信群发设备手机短信群发设备手机短信群发器网站建设网站设计网站制作美女图片美女写真性感美女制服美腿西洋美女走光偷拍网友自拍两性包装印刷上海包装印刷免费电影免费下载电影免费在线电影上海印刷上海包装弯管弯管上海hp笔记ੑ 2;维修上海惠普笔记本维修上海IBM笔记Ĉ 12;维修上海DELL笔记 412;维修上海联想笔记本维修上海东芝笔记本维修上海acer笔记 412;维修上海华硕笔记本维修上海索尼笔记本维修上海sony笔记 412;维修上海hp笔记ੑ 2;维修上海IBM笔记Ĉ 12;维修弯管弯管加工路灯节能路灯监控合同能源管理 google优化 google左侧优化 google排名 google左侧排名短信群发短信群发企业短信群发短信平台路灯监控路灯节能合同能源管理短信群发短信群发软件短信群发器上海短信群发上海短信群发器上海短信群发平台上海短信群发价格上海短信群发业务上海短信群发软件上海短信群发公司上海短信猫上海手机短信群发上海移动短信群发短信群发设备上海短信群发系统短信群发系统上海上海绿色短信系统上海短信系统上海短信投票上海短信投票系统短信管理系统短信投票管理系统上海短信投票管理系统武汉短信群发免费短信群发软件免费短信群发手机短信群发武汉短信群发平台短信群发软件下载免费手机短信群发软件手机短信群发软件免费短信群发软件下载短信群发软件破解版手机短信群发软件下载免费短信群发软件破解网上免费短信群发软件手机短信群发器短信群发器价格手机短信群发器破解版免费手机短信群发器免费短信群发器小灵通短信群发器北京短信群发器深圳短信群发器上海短信群发器武汉短信群发器下载免费短信群发器免费手机短信群发手机短信群发破解版网上手机短信群发手机短信群发器价格短信猫报价上海短信猫报价短信猫深圳短信猫价格短信猫池短信猫二次开发短信二次开发平台西门子短信猫广州短信猫报价广州短信猫商易短信猫上海短信群发公司北京短信群发公司杭州短信群发公司郑州短信群发公司福州短信群发公司长沙短信群发公司沈阳短信群发公司武汉短信群发公司西安短信群发公司深圳短信群发公司短信群发价格短信群发平台短信群发卡上海短信群发卡短信群发机上海短信群发机短信群发设备企业短信群发漫游短信群发漫游短信群发器上海漫游短信群发国际短信国际短信资费国际短信怎么发如何发国际短信发国际短信动感地带国际短信中国移动国际短信移动国际短信国际短信软件国际短信群发软件国际短信收费国际短信群发国际短信群发通道上海国际短信群发国外短信国外短信群发国外短信群发通道免费国际短信免费发国际短信怎样发国际短信联通国际短信国际短信多少钱国际短信多少钱一条国际长途短信动感地带国际短信飞信国际短信国际漫游短信移动发国际短信国际手机短信国际短信如何发送国际短信价格上海国际短信价格神州行国际短信手机发国际短信如何发国际长途短信国际短信费用国际短信业务国际短信合作怎样发送国际短信国际漫游短信费用电脑免费发国际短信发国际短信便宜联通发国际短信手机自动发国际短信动感地带发国际短信上海国外短信群发老板手机号码上海老板手机号码老板手机群发老板手机短信群发上海老板手机号码群发八口短信猫 8口短信猫池 ; 四口短信猫 4口短信猫单口短信猫短信猫上海八口短信猫上海四口短信猫上海单口短信猫小灵通短信猫移动短信群发短信群发工具短信群发业务小灵通短信群发移动短信群发软件联通短信群发中国移动短信群发多口短信猫上海短信猫销售上海短信猫销售公司上海短信猫批发上海短信猫销售商短信猫上海销售商国际短信群发公司上海国际短信群发公司国际短信群发代理上海国际短信群发代理国际短信群发通道国际短信群发渠道国际短信服务公司上海国际短信群发通道上海国际短信群发商国际短信群发业务国际手机短信国际手机短信服务国际手机短信公司国际手机短信业务国际手机短信群发国际手机短信群发公司上海国际手机短信国际企业手机短信群发国外手机短信群发国外企业手机短信群发上海企业短信群发

by feigeone 2007-12-22 09:55PM | 0 recs