It's not just this post,but a lot of your posts.  I DO appreciate that you read and respond to comments. Maybe my reaction is more anbout me than about you.  I'll keep reading and I'll let you know. :)

Every time I read a post by you, Jerome, I shake my head.  I agree with Trey Rentz...you've changed as a blogger (did it start with the Hillary / Obama split, or before?). 

Your posts have an overtone of anger and derision. You seem to delight in the woes of Democrats--or more specifically, the perceived shortcomings of your fellow liberal bloggers. (Though I rarely see you spend much time discussing the shortcomings of Republicans.) It's almost as if you end every post by saying "I told you so! Nanny Nanny Boo Boo!" 

I'll admit, I'm out of line to play armchair psychologist, but I'll do it anyway.  It seems like you're pissed that your co-author of "Crashing the Gates", Kos, has met with so much success, and you're constantly shouting about how everybody else has it wrong, except you, and why aren't people paying more attention to you!?

Really?  Everything I 've read about him seems to indiacte he's a total a**hole. 

Lol.  I mean "Trial" lawyers.

Trail Lawyers are the guys representing Mark Sanford.

"Because the costs of attending college have risen so fast, students are choosing majors and careers that are remunerative since they are coming out with higher debt loads."

Milton Friedman is responsible for the rise of Trail Lawyers!  Isn't it ironic?  Don't'cha think?

"And [Obama] he won by only seven points."

Seven points Chuckles? Would that be the popular vote? Because I thought the election was decided by a landslide electoral college victory. Laughable.  You who vociferously defended the legitimacy of G.W.Bush in 2000, who LOST the popular vote, now wish to bolster your absurd fantasies by pointing the the popular vote as somehow more consequentail than the electoral vote?

We might agree on something, if only you were consistent with how you use your facts and figures.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1101030922-485769,00.html

Obamas = Plural

Obama's = Possessive

Obamas' = Plural Possessive

That is all.

Remember when Bill Gates was Evil and all those Mac lovers would wax poetic on how cool and with it and progressive Apple is / was.  

Apple has always been about total control of their software, and their products. Ironic, given their famous Big Brother ad from 1984 Olympics.

iFuck Apple.

To put it another way:

Wither, Conservative Fundraising!

"...the Supreme Court found that due process requires a judge to recuse himself if large campaign contributions create the appearance of impartiality."

I think you mean the appearance of partiality, not impartiality.  Or to put in another way, the appearance of a conflict of interest.

What do Hams have to do with anything?  I just don't understand this guy, or his party.

Wait!  Did you say the MOTHER of all isms?

Shame on you. You're undermining your own point. If we take you at your word then it's the Father of all isms, no?

I'm struck by the fact that the diarist is an obvious jismist.

And for the record, I'm no "Johnny Come Lately" to this site. I read it often from my Bedroom-cum-computer room. And I graduated Summa Cum Laude from University.  

She gives a good stump speech.

Ok. I'm going to hell for that.

but seriously, I hope Madigan doesn't go to DC. I want her as Gov.

That's the problem with liars. You never know when they're telling the truth.