Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Barack Obama Sided with Credit Card Loan Sharks While Hillary Clinton Stood Against Them

Obama's numerous corporate donors were pleased -- especially The Bond Market Association's legislative affairs guy Mike Williams. While Obama voted against the 2005 bankruptcy bill, he voted against "an important amendment, which was defeated, that would have capped credit-card interest rates at 30 percent." 

"[Obama] studied the issue," Williams said. "Some assumed he would just go along with consumer advocates, but he voted with us on several points. He understood the issue. He wasn't closed-minded. A lot of people found that very refreshing." -- "Barack Obama Inc.,"Harper's

Sen. Hillary Clinton voted for the cap on predatory credit card interest rates.

The American economy is collapsing, middle class families are floundering, home foreclosures are spreading, housing prices are diving, unemployment is up (did you see the disturbing report yesterday?), oil is at $100 a barrel, and what can working families do to thank Barack Obama in this crisis? Obama made good on his rhetoric to work with Republicans -- by exploiting middle class and working people. (Dayton Amendment, U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote -- Obama Nay; Clinton Yea)


"There's a reasonableness about him," he said. "I don't see him as being on the liberal fringe. He's not going to be a parrot for the party line." -- Robert Harmala of Venable, one of the nation's top corporate law firms.

Here's what David Sirota had to say about Sen. Obama's vote for credit card company usury -- and please note that Sirota corrects the Obama campaign's attempt to confuse the issue:

October 24, 2007 11:13 AM

Obama Camp Feigns Outrage, Distracting From Obama's Vote to Allow Loan Sharking

The Obama campaign is attacking the Washington Post's Harold Meyerson for saying that Obama voted for the credit card industry-written Bankruptcy Bill in 2005, which is not true. Obama voted against the final bill. However, Obama did, in fact, vote against an amendment to that bill that cuts to the core of the matter. [...]

It was an amendment by Sen. Mark Dayton (D-MN) "To limit the amount of interest that can be charged on any extension of credit to 30 percent," as the Senate's website notes.

So sure, while Meyerson got the details wrong, the spirit of what he wrote is, in fact, right. Obama sided with the credit card industry on the core issue of whether it should be allowed to loan shark and charge customers more than an astounding 30 percent interest rate.

Adds Mother Jones magazine's article, "Campaign Contributions from Credit Card Companies? Priceless":

Obama, who made a strong floor speech in opposition to the 2005 bankruptcy bill, nonetheless voted against a key amendment that would have put a cap of 30 percent on interest rates. Financial firms, according to Ken Silverstein's much-discussed Harper's article "Barack Obama Inc.,""constitute Obama's second biggest single bloc of donors." You'll find nary a word about the debt crisis on his campaign web site.

Share this with your friends who are drunk with the prospects of "hope" and "change" and the end of "special influences":

Yet it is also startling to see how quickly Obama's senatorship has been woven into the web of institutionalized influence-trading that afflicts official Washington. He quickly established a political machine funded and run by a standard Beltway group of lobbyists, P.R. consultants, and hangers-on. For the staff post of policy director he hired Karen Kornbluh, a senior aide to Robert Rubin when the latter, as head of the Treasury Department under Bill Clinton, was a chief advocate for NAFTA and other free-trade policies that decimated the nation's manufacturing sector (and the organized labor wing of the Democratic Party). Obama's top contributors are corporate law and lobbying firms (Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden, Arps, where four attorneys are fund-raisers for Obama as well as donors), Wall Street financial houses (Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase), and big Chicago interests (Henry Crown and Company, an investment firm that has stakes in industries ranging from telecommunications to defense). Obama immediately established a "leadership PAC," a vehicle through which a member of Congress can contribute to other politicians' campaigns--and one that political reform groups generally view as a slush fund through which congressional leaders can evade campaign-finance rules while raising their own political profiles.

Already considered a potential vice-presidential nominee in 2008, Obama clearly has abundant political ambitions. Hence he is playing not only to voters in Illinois--a reliably Democratic and generally liberal state--but to the broader national audience, as well as to the Democratic Party establishment, the Washington media, and large political donors. Perhaps for this reason, Obama has taken an approach to his policymaking that is notably cautious and nonconfrontational. "Since the founding, the American political tradition has been reformist, not revolutionary," he told me during an interview at his office on Capitol Hill this summer. ...

Read all: "Barack Obama Inc.: The birth of a Washington machine," Harper's magazine.

Tags: bankruptcy, Barack Obama, Credit Card Companies, Dayton Amendment, Hillary Clinton, The Bond Market Association (all tags)

Comments

20 Comments

Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Thank god there won't be a revolution.

Comments and tips are welcome!  And congratulations to my Seattle Seahawks!  

by susanhu 2008-01-05 04:01PM | 0 recs
Congrats, Susan!

Enjoy victory tonight... And enjoy MORE victory on Tuesday! I hear Hill's doing pretty OK in the debate tonight. Let's hope she keeps exposing the vapidity of Obama's "change" talk, and that she shows New Hampshire what change really looks like! :-)

by atdleft 2008-01-05 04:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

If you're trying to pump up Hillary on the basis of Obama's shortfalls, it would do one to remember the old adage about calling the kettle black. Ands that's not a pun either.

Hillary is the corporate candidate and she even defended herself by trying to hide behind social workers. Won't work. CHANGE means just what Hillary has shown herself as being incapable of providing. Yeah, READY from day one. But we ask: ready for what? The same old, same old, Washington politics of policy to the highest bidder?

by shergald 2008-01-06 03:39AM | 0 recs
sorry

I think what you mean is Clinton is the honest candidate.

by MollieBradford 2008-01-06 04:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Obama seems to have a thing against Unions and all working people.  He doesn't want to get on the bad side of the Republicans before he brings us all together.

by NewHampster 2008-01-05 04:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

If he voted against the whole bill, who cares about one amendment. Maybe he didn't want to let it legitimize an otherwise horrible bill.

by dmc2 2008-01-05 04:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families
did the bill pass?  He knew it would, he covered his ass by voting against it.  He stopped the democrats from protecting people by voting for that amendment.
He's slick and slimy and most of his followers are kooolaide drinking idiots.  
by MollieBradford 2008-01-06 04:47AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

This just makes me furio......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

by mcdave 2008-01-05 04:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Be sure to let David Sirota know.  He thinks it IS important.

by susanhu 2008-01-05 04:24PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Oh I will. Don't worry about it. I'll drive to his house and tell him if I have to!

by mcdave 2008-01-05 04:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

Oh gosh.  In all unseriousness, I have to confess that remark made me laugh out loud!  You might be a fun guy to chat with. Someday! :)

by susanhu 2008-01-05 05:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

You're correct, of course.  

I was punchy from being really tired -- the cats got into a tussle and kept me awake half the night -- so his remark hit my funny done.

by susanhu 2008-01-05 07:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

:) Thanks Susan! Heh, I actually appreciate that!

Actually...I really enjoy ZINGs and the hillary folks have landed some pretty good ones on the blog over the last couple of months too:)

by mcdave 2008-01-05 09:28PM | 0 recs
Re: YOU THINK THATS FUNNY?

Yeah I guess. Who are these morons who are agreeing to get credit cards with 30% interest? Perhaps they deserve their fate? Ever think of that? ha!

by mcdave 2008-01-05 09:31PM | 0 recs
Re: YOU THINK THATS FUNNY?

This seems like a good time to repeat my observation that many of Obama's supporters are extremely hard to recognize as progressives.

by Steve M 2008-01-05 11:33PM | 0 recs
Re: YOU THINK THATS FUNNY?

nobody "gets" a credit card with 30 percent interest Einstein.

by MollieBradford 2008-01-06 04:50AM | 0 recs
Silverstein was a rabid Gore basher

The likes of Silverstein, Cockburn, St. Claire dumped on and attacked Gore viciously in 2000 with similar type of harangues. This same group also dumps of Clinton routinely and they will set their sights on HRC, big time, should she be the nominee.

Hence, quoting their work attacking Democrats doesn't do much for your credibility.

Second, apparently on this 30% interest rate thing, there were 18 other Dems that voted against it as well (and Obama voted against the whole bill).

Further, apparently there may have been some other concerns about it potentially having been poorly written.


The Bankruptcy Bill, Examined
03-Mar
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 31
Dayton Amdt. No. 31.; To limit the amount of interest that can be charged on any extension of credit to 30 percent.

REJECTED

While reasonable sounding, 19 Democrats voted against this amendment; we will be charitable and assume the amendment was poorly written. There was some concern that the amendment would supercede any State usury laws. Sen. Kerry was among those voting against it.

by NeuvoLiberal 2008-01-05 06:41PM | 0 recs
For a Better Way, Bill McKay!

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/ob ama/679143,credit120307.article

Clinton message- experience; Obama message- change.  Score: Obama better

Clinton strength- wonk; Obama strength- leader.  Score: Obama better

Clinton point of view- the past; Obama point of view- the future.  Score- Obama better

Clinton base- narrow and old; Obama base- broad and young.  Score: Obama better

Clinton's best format- debates; Obama's best format- big stage speeches.  Score: Obama better

Clinton aura- competence; Obama aura- inspiration.  Score: Obama better

Clinton strategy- top down; Obama strategy- bottom up.  Score: Obama better

Clinton historical statement- broader across American demographic; Obama historical statement- deeper into American history.  Score: Obama better

Final score: Clinton- good; Obama- better

by mboehm 2008-01-05 07:20PM | 0 recs
What do I think?

I think you are on to something. This is possibly the best comment I've read in a couple of weeks. Please tell me more.

by mcdave 2008-01-05 09:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Inc. vs. Working Families

C'mon where'd these idiot Obamamites think all that Hope money was coming from.

$100 million just drops out the sky people.

by DWCG 2008-01-06 06:09AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------