What do these people have in common?

MICHAEL MULLOWNEY, of Newton MA?
J RICHARD and CAROL MUNRO, of New Canaan CT?
LEE MURDOCH, of Medford OR?
JOHN S MURK, of Cardiff by the Sea CA?
RICHARD MURPHEY, of Columbus OH?
CHARLES D MURPHY III, of Lafayette and Sea Ranch CA?
DONALD MURPHY of St Louis and Kirkwood MO?
HARRY L MURPHY, of Pacific Grove CA?
LINDA MYERS, of Sapulpa OK?
JOEL MUST, of Bloomfield Hills MI?
CARL MURRAY, of Indianapolis IN?
DAVID MURTON, of La Mesa CA?

You noticed these names all start with 'M'? Remarkable! Observant citizens such as yourselves are the lifeblood of representative democracy!

Here's another thing they have in common: all made FEC reportable contributions of $200 or more to John McCain's 2000 presidential primary campaign. But wait! There's more!!!

In particular, they made these contributions in February, 2000 -- after McCain's New Hampshire primary win, when observant citizens (such as yourselves, no doubt) observed the low-down dirty rotten Rovian campaign George W Bush contrived against McCain in South Carolina ... and reacted with alarm.

In even greater particularity, all are listed among the (150 or so) contributors on the same FEC reporting page as the $500 contribution by Darragh Murphy that led a few of our less strategically-minded brethren to conclude she who founded PumaPAC must be a Republican operative.

And now to the major point ...

All of the named contributors have histories of FEC reportable contributions only to Democratic candidates and committees -- with the sole exception of McCain 2000.  Here's the honor roll again, with added detail:
   

  • MICHAEL MULLOWNEY, of Newton MA ($250 to Niki Tsongas in 2007, $200 Joe Moakley 1999)

  •    
  • J RICHARD and CAROL MUNRO, of New Canaan CT ($800 DNC 1994/1995/1996)

  •    
  • LEE MURDOCH, of Medford OR ($500 Bill Bradbury 2002, $250 Howard Dean 2003, $1850 Barack Obama 2007, $1,500 Steve Novick 2008)

  •    
  • JOHN S MURK, of Cardiff by the Sea CA ($250 Vic Fazio 1996)

  •    
  • RICHARD MURPHEY, of Columbus OH ($1,000 Bill Bradley 1999-2000, $250 Maryellen O'Shaughnessey, $4,600 Hillary Clinton 2007)

  •    
  • CHARLES D MURPHY III, of Lafayette and Sea Ranch CA ($2,000 John Kerry 2004)

  •    
  • DONALD MURPHY of St Louis and Kirkwood MO ($500 DNC 2004)

  •    
  • LINDA MYERS, of Sapulpa OK ($500 Bill Settle(D) 2000, $850 Glen Johnson 1996)

  •    
  • JOEL MUST, of Bloomfield Hills MI ($500 DSCC 2004)

  •    
  • CARL MURRAY, of Indianapolis IN ($250 Kerry 2004)

  •    
  • DAVID MURTON, of La Mesa CA ($200 DNC 2004, $400 DCCC 2004/2007)


Another 18 of these February 2000 Murphy-page contributors gave primarily or exclusively to Republicans.

[Among these, I spotted Ralph and Karen Munro, of Olympia, WA. Ralph is my state's long-serving and well-respected former Secretary of State, who spent a political lifetime trying to nudge his Republican Party back toward the center. I last met Ralph when he stopped in  on Election Night to congratulate one of my (yes, Democratic) candidates.]

Another half-dozen contributors were mixed by party -- a combination of real independents, real big-time influence peddlers, and real eccentrics. (Bill Bradley + Rick Lazio + Ron Paul = ???) In none of these personal political palettes did I notice a major stripe of Bush money.

Another 30+ individuals who gave to McCain in this critical interval have no other FEC reported lifetime contributions.

The effort to derail Bush in the 2000 primaries did not succeed ... but it had a game chance, and it was worth the effort. Savvy Democrats crossed over with their dollars (on the order of 2,500 individuals if we extrapolate from this small sample), and votes (hundreds of thousands, re-registering briefly in nonpartisan status as necessary in some states).

One of these was Darragh Murphy -- not the founder of PUMA, but a savvy Democratic citizen-activist who founded PumaPAC in only the third day of PUMA's viral contagion.

[Cross-posted from The Confluence.]

Tags: Political History, PUMA (all tags)

Comments

33 Comments

And why

are you reporting this?

by kevin22262 2008-07-03 01:44PM | 0 recs
To set the record straight.

And, because Truth matters.

I know.  That has become somewhat of a quaint notion among the netroots, but some of us still hang on to those old-fashioned concepts.

by ghost 2 2008-07-03 02:19PM | 0 recs
Re: To set the record straight.

Wow, people contributed to McCain in 2000 and now they are part of an organization to elect McCain in 2008.  Holy crap, I am stunned by this diary, it has opened my eyes to the obvious truth that PUMA is run and consists wholly of  serious democrats.  Now I will join Puma.

by KLRinLA 2008-07-03 03:17PM | 0 recs
Oh Noes

 over, please

by Mae Scott 2008-07-03 03:33PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

Quick question:

who gives a shit?

by fogiv 2008-07-03 01:44PM | 0 recs
MyDD spent a shitload of pixels on the false info

... along with many other blogs and mainstream journo's.

If false sells like hotcakes, I figured there'd be a market for true.

by RonK Seattle 2008-07-03 03:33PM | 0 recs
I'd prefer a real hotcake,

I'm baffled as to why either version (true or false) is interesting.  

I could care less who started PUMA, or when, or whatever.  I know all I need to know PUMA.

by fogiv 2008-07-03 03:39PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

So they're not Republicans, just idiots?  Is that the point?

Dude, PUMA's reputations is completely in the shitter, no sense in wasting a diary trying to rehab it.  But, I guess you did identify a few of our enemies.

by rfahey22 2008-07-03 02:00PM | 0 recs
If Dem's who might have kept Bush out ...

... of the White House are your "enemies" -- who are your friends?

by RonK Seattle 2008-07-03 02:23PM | 0 recs
Re: If Dem's who might have kept Bush out ...

People that aren't trying to put McCain in the White House, that's who.

by rfahey22 2008-07-03 02:58PM | 0 recs
Re: If Dem's who might have kept Bush out ...

LOL, bravo!

by skohayes 2008-07-03 03:11PM | 0 recs
Re: If Dem's who might have kept Bush out ...
Dems "who might have" kept Bush out of the White House?
Um, in case you haven't noticed, Bush was chosen president in 2000.
I tried to keep Bush out of hte White House by voting for the other guy and giving him money.
by skohayes 2008-07-03 03:13PM | 0 recs
But you were AWOL in the primaries ...

... and proud of it???

by RonK Seattle 2008-07-03 03:37PM | 0 recs
Re: But you were AWOL in the primaries ...
No, I supported Gore in the primaries, too.
Whatever gave you that idea?
by skohayes 2008-07-03 03:53PM | 0 recs
So you made no difference ...

... though you might have if you had understood the situation at hand, and the tactics available to us.

Even if you are upset about the current upset, you might want to study this bit of history to improve your understanding.

That is, IF you engage at politics to improve the world (and not just to improve your opinion of yourself).

by RonK Seattle 2008-07-03 04:43PM | 0 recs
Re: So you made no difference ...
Since Bush was the one chosen, I guess donating to the Republican candidate helped the Republicans more than the Dems, didn't it?
So, PUMA, is voting for McCain going to help "improve the world"?
Please.
by skohayes 2008-07-04 05:06AM | 0 recs
Incorrect.

The 2000 McCain campaign -- and the extra media money he used between New Hampshire and Super Tuesday -- peeled support away from Bush and exposed some of his machinations (for those who were willing to see through them). The result was fewer Bush votes in November.

You know how close November 2000 was. A little help in the right place might have changed the outcome (though the primary objective was to keep Bush off the Republican ticket).

Every day for years the netroots have advertised their innate inability to think in terms of the connection between actions and consequences. Democrats get out-played cycle after cycle.

We're doing it again. We don't have to, but we're doing it again.

by RonK Seattle 2008-07-04 09:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Incorrect.

You know how close November 2000 was. A little help in the right place might have changed the outcome

My point exactly.

by skohayes 2008-07-04 02:54PM | 0 recs
Re: If Dem's who might have kept Bush out ...

Ones who don't want BUSH III.  WOw now that I think about it, PUMA is full of people doing an about Face.  McCain 2000 does not = McCain 2008, but McCain 2008 = BUSH III = BUSH.

So these people who didn't want Bush now want Bush?  

You do know McCain wants to keep Bush tax cuts (which McCain 2000 wouldn't want) which even conservatives now know will destroy our country.

I am not sure which is more delusional, the people in PUMA, or the reasoning behind it?

by KLRinLA 2008-07-03 03:24PM | 0 recs
Yep, she's a Dem

Nice job.

by catfish2 2008-07-03 02:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Yep, she's a Dem

How is a McCain not going to hinder, hamper, and suffocate HIllary's career  over the next 4 years?

by KLRinLA 2008-07-03 03:26PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

This is now on the rec list?!?

(face palm)

by fogiv 2008-07-03 02:53PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

The majority of recs come from members of the Ghost Patrol.

by rfahey22 2008-07-03 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

I know.  I'm awfully sick of seeing substantive diaries slide off the page in the wake of crap like this.

by fogiv 2008-07-03 03:03PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

And Murphy's long record of Democratic contributions is where?

by ihaveseenenough 2008-07-03 03:00PM | 0 recs
Take it back to your PUMA sewer

I've read some of your hatefuel garbage over at The Confluence (back when I thought Riverdaughter's anti-Obama screeds were worth laughing at).

Go back to your echo-chamber.

by emptythreatsfarm 2008-07-03 03:42PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

The only truthful PUMA I have seen is one on Larry King who said first:

"I'm an ardent feminist who is against the war and wants our troops how as soon as possible, so I am voting for John McCain."

After a round of the other panelist shaking their heads at the contradictions in that statement, she added:

"But, the most important thing is, the Democratic Party and Barrack Obama must be punished for what they did to Hillary Clinton."

At least be honest, if you want to vote against your interest, do it with your anger out in the open, don't wrap it in this BS about principle.

by WashStateBlue 2008-07-03 03:58PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

Ronk, I'm going to include a link to this post as an update on mine for cross reference. Great work.

by grlpatriot 2008-07-03 05:13PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

Oh, how cute! All the bitter dead-enders are surfacing in your diary! I'm sure this will merit Very Serious Discussion over at alegre's shack.

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-07-03 05:16PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

XO

by grlpatriot 2008-07-03 05:25PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

Who gives a shit who they've given to in the past or which party they joined? If they're working against our nominee, then fuck 'em all. Period.

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-07-03 05:15PM | 0 recs
Re: What do these people have in common?

Fuck Puma.

by spacemanspiff 2008-07-03 05:21PM | 0 recs
I wouldn't advise it

They can be pretty mean-tempered cats. You probably wouldn't survive the encounter.

On the other hand, if you're referring to the running shoe, hey, by all means, different strokes and all...

But if you're talking figuratively about that little Fox News creation, I'm inclined to agree.

by BobzCat 2008-07-03 09:12PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------