Idaho, North Carolina and Ohio--Reflections As We Enter the Home Stretch

If somebody had told me six months ago that I would be campaigning in Boise, Idaho during the final two weeks before the election, I would have suggested rest and medication.  But here I am, Monday morning, on my way to Boise, not just for our candidate for Congress, Larry Grant, but the entire Democratic ticket--Jerry Brady for Governor and former Congressman Larry LaRocco for Lt Governor.  They are all managing amazing races and have upset the National Republican Party.  Recent campaign stops from Dennis Hastert, Dick Cheney, and Ken Melman, the RNC Chair are evidence, as is the hundreds of thousands of dollar that the national party never expected to invest.  Cheney is even coming again this week.

The reason is apparent-- we have 3 outstanding individuals with strong private sector credentials, who are smart and committed.  The Republican ticket, by contrast, is distinguished only by its extremism (even for Idaho).  Larry Grant's opponent won the Republican nomination for the Congressional district with only 26%, and the papers have been filled with criticism of him from his own Republican colleagues in the Idaho House.

My day of meetings in Idaho was capped by an evening at the home of Bethene Church, the wife of the legendary Senator Frank Church.   Bethene was not only the late Senator's political partner, but has been the matriarch of Idaho Democratic politics for years.  She entertained an exuberant gathering of over 100 prominent Idaho Democrats, including former Governor (and former US Secretary of the Interior) Cecil Andrus.  It was a special honor for me to be their speaker.  Thirty-five years ago, I testified before the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, chaired by Senator Church, to support lowering the voting age.  It was my first appearance before a Congressional Committee, as and remains a cherished memory.

I was able to bring some insight, inspiration (hopefully), and some badly needed campaign resources.  The onslaught of money and negative advertising is daunting...and a theme I encountered throughout the week.

I returned to Portland for a change of clothes, part of a night's sleep and then hopped onto another plane to D.C.  Part of what is difficult about this schedule is the ongoing work as research, speaking and office work continues.  While you try to make up for it on planes and weekends, the crush mounts.  There was a chance in Washington that afternoon to meet with staff and deal with some meetings.  There was also an opportunity to spend time with my favorite institution in Washington: the Library of Congress.  I met with Dr. Billington and some of his top staff about how we prepare about the new Congress and help broaden the awareness of the Library.

As I am traveling, meeting new people, and dealing with the campaign, my thoughts continually drift to how to make the new Session better, not just in the terms of the legislation, but a reflection of our values and what we want to accomplish.  Helping members, new and old, take better advantage of the amazing resources of the Library of Congress is one example.  

I vow to put to writing the advice that I am giving to candidates and some of their advisors about what happens after their elected.  It is startling to recognize how much energy goes into the election - leaving candidates stressed and exhausted with only days to transition to become members.  I am thankful I was that I was elected in special election with less pressure and more time to get up to speed.

It's not just experience with candidates I'm visiting and their staff.  My time in Holiday Inns gives me the opportunity to reflect on things that I have observed, some of which I learned at great cost.  I vow everyday to share a guide for new members, their family and staff.  On this trip I start to write  it.

After my last meeting at the Library of Congress, I dash to the airport to spend the afternoon and evening with Heath Shuler.  We have events scheduled with North Carolina environmentalists, small businesses and local officials.  We begin with a clean water event featuring, small independent contractors and their employees.  They are endorsing Heath because of his commitment to clean water and the abject failure of incumbent Charles Taylor to use his position on chairing the appropriate subcommittee to back up rhetoric with action.  Having worked with Heath now for almost a year, I've watched this bright, talented, young (still not 35) former pro-football quarterback become an articulate, impassioned defender of the environment.  It was Heath, who called me a couple of months ago, saying he was taking his volunteers down to watch Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth".  His passion was evident at a community forum sponsored by the environmentalist that Heath headlined along with other local candidates.  Little Asheville turned out almost 140 people for the evenings event, equivalent to a Portland crowd of over 1,000.  

I ended the evening speaking with Heath at a fundraising event that featured people from the environmental community.

Heath, like the other candidates I campaigned for, is being subjected to the most vile and distorting campaign ads.  At every stop along the way from Idaho to North Carolina and Ohio, I would take time to surf the television channels.  In some cases, campaign staff would show me their copies of the ads, which are unbelievable.  While the scurrilous Republican ad against Harold Ford may get the front page of the New York Times, this is a reoccurring theme on immigration and law enforcement.  I saw Heath simultaneously being attacked on one hand being a tool of the liberal elite and on the other for not attending the one joint appearance that his opponent had accepted on a Sunday.  It was widely known Heath had made a personal commitment early in the campaign that Sundays were reserved for his church and his family - it did not stop him being attacked.

The next morning I met with local officials and activists on livable communities, development, affordable housing, and transportation.  There was great interest in the Portland experience and a desire to have an exchange between our two communities.  I have not been in Asheville before, but it was an amazing experience with very sophisticated and committed local officials, business people and activists.

As I returned to Charlotte to catch the next plane, I marveled at the unappreciated sacrifice on the part of many.  When Heath is elected, the 300 miles from home to DC will require an hour plane trip and over two-hours driving each way.  He is thinking about making the weekly commute in some sort of mobile office so that he can travel and maintain his own schedule and still spend times with his wife and small children.

After the two-hour drive, I jumped on a commuter jet to Cincinnati.  This would be my first "three district" day.  I was going to Cincinnati to support John Cranley, a young city council member in a bruising campaign against incumbent Steve Chabot, with whom I crossed swords on the egregious legislation which would send local land use disputes to Federal Courts.  Below is a link to a Cincinnati Enquirer article that gives a flavor for the debate and this terrible bill opposed by 36 Attorneys General including the Ohio Republican Jim Petro: http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll article?AID=/20061015/NEWS01/610150363-1/CINCI

Cranley is committed to the environment, transportation and affordable housing.  We had a great meeting with local activists, including an old friend, who served with me on National Civic League Board right out of college.  David Altman, a brilliant attorney and committed environmentalist, has been deeply involved with civic affairs and hosted a great round-table discussion with John.

Along with the round-table, we filmed an interview on the egregious Chabot legislation, spent time working with Cranley's staff on becoming better acquainted with the situation in Ohio.  Then it was off to a house party, staged in a huge home in one of the tonier suburbs.  It was a sharp contrast with some of the depressed areas of Cincinnati that we had toured.  The people were clearly committed to John, a progressive breath of fresh air in Ohio politics.  

At each stop in Ohio, I encountered people who were extraordinarily frustrated with the scandal-plagued Ohio Republican leadership, from the Governor to Congressman Bob Ney and beyond.   The sense of change in the air was palpable.  It appears, if the voting machines actually work, that Ohio is poised to elect a Democratic Governor, a Democrat to the US Senate, and win in each of the three Ohio districts where I have campaigned.  Coupled with the likely replacement of disgraced Congressman Bob Ney by Democrat Zack Space, it appears the complexion will alter dramatically.

The last stop was for Doctor Victoria "Vic" Wulsin.  Vic was amazing; high energy, engaged, and bright.  Her commitment and work in public health not just in this country, but in Africa, would add such an important dimension, especially to the work my office has done in seeking to bring safe drink water and sanitation to poorer countries.  I would have supported her even if she wasn't running against "Mean Jean" Schmidt.  

Congresswoman Schmidt earned her national notoriety with her attack on Congressman Jack Murtha.  Her efforts to insult him literally brought down the House.  I will never forget the reactions of outrage, not just from Democrats, when she tried to lecture Jack, a decorated Marine veteran, on cowardice.  Even though she was eventually forced to apologize, the damage was done and she is hopelessly tarnished within her own Party.  She received the lowest re-election total of any Republican incumbent in this year's primary and is fighting for her political life.  I was happy to make that fight a little more difficult.

At each stage, it was interesting to watch how the vicious media attacks encouraged and energized the campaigns.  It is also clear that the final stretch is all about turnout.  While last minute resources are still being sought, ads placed and public appearances being fulfilled, the hard work is in turnout.  It was a message that I took to each and every community, as I met with staff and volunteers discussing techniques for engaging voters.  

The majority clearly wants change.  In every campaign I visited, Republican voters were defecting to support Democrats, Independents were breaking 2-1 in favor of the Democratic challengers and Democrats themselves were charged up.  What remains to be seen is whether that potential actually translates to reality as the voting process becomes more difficult, the political atmosphere becomes more toxic and the vastly superior resources are spent by Karl Rove's vaunted 72-hour machine.

I returned to Oregon encouraged by what I saw and ready to meet a conference of national transportation leaders for a speech and a discussion--whew!  

I returned more energized and optimistic than when I left, but with a clear realization that the final ten days are going to be even harder than I thought.  Now the TURNOUT ground game begins in earnest.

Tags: Heath Shuler, John Cranley, Larry Grant, Vic Wulsin (all tags)

Comments

4 Comments

NC-11

Thanks for coming to Western NC to help Heath - he's going to be a great Democratic representative for North Carolina.

by Bear83 2006-10-30 05:18PM | 0 recs
Thank you Rep. Blumenaur for recognizing

the help some of these good Dems need.  And for realizing that the NetRoots are an up and coming power!

by momoaizo 2006-10-31 02:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Idaho, North Carolina and Ohio--Reflections As

Your energy is amazing and your desire to mentor the freshmen/women class is inspiring. Thanks for this report.

You said that Heath is thinking of making the weekly commute in some sort of mobile office. You probably know the best travel mode for working on the go (short of a private jet) is high speed rail.

The Southeast High Speed Rail projects a 6-7 hour travel time between D.C. and Charlotte. That's with the measly 85 m.p.h. average speed projected by the SEHSR. Upgrading the rail infrastructure lets it carry the 125-150 m.p.h speeds that are common in Europe and Asia. Then the trip from D.C. to Charlotte would be 3-4 hours.

When the line is extended to Atlanta as the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce advocates, Heath could board in Greenville and save even more driving time.

by billybob 2006-10-31 03:49PM | 0 recs
Your Honor, a Suggestion

Sir, a Suggestion for a Law?

I tune into Talk Radio frequently. I have noticed several times, that talk show hosts, not unlike Enron, choose their call screeners to pick and choose amongst the callers.

Democrats, for example, are let through if they are stupid. Republicans are pushed through if they are related to the talk show host, or paid, or otherwise made to sound wonderful. The occasional democrat that gets through , does so only by trickery. For example, yesterday a talk show host asked a question of our gubernatorial race in Georgia, if it was fair game to call out someones past, if they had tried drugs - 20 years ago - and if it was relevant. A caller, an attorney - was let through. He was likely supposed to rail on about how the democrat had tried drugs and how it would be fair game, etc. but instead, he endorsed the democratic candidate and the call ended abruptly.

These are the only democrats, apart from the sincerely screwball - that are allowed to speak.

However, to listeners of talk radio, they represent america. When a talk show host polls an audience, he states, without equivocation, that Audience is in fact America speaking.

Sir - will you introduce a law that requires non partisan, independent screening of calls to talk show hosts? Obviously there are guidelines that must be followed for all talk shows - obscenity, profanity, vulgarity can be screened out - this is after all a public broadcast of a caller.

But that said, is this not, an issue that helps both republicans and democrats?

For example, many of these talk shows suffer from their hosts ability to be able to rig the lines.

The lines will light up, with his friends calling in. Or he can send email to his friends when he is on the air, and the talk show host artificially inflates his numbers and the advertising that the station sells, becomes less valuable. And so, in turn, their base advertisers begin to desert the station, losing them revenue.

Also, they suffer from the vaccuum that creates extremity of ideas. For example, one talk show host who ritually screens his calls with an extreme intensity - and does not let more than one, or two callers on the air, at times, during his entire four hour show - made an allegation this year that a person who was making a statement about parkinsons disease was, in effect, lying about it - causing irreparable harm to the GOP candidate.  The debate in question was a scientific one, and the talk show host acted to skew the GOP majority away from a rational discussion of the issues, which in turn contributed to the now-statistical defeat of the senate candidate.

Finally, it is, in essence, truth in labelling.
I am tired of hearing "America" represented by two rednecks that are getting twenty bucks a piece under the table to call in and say they are so happy with the way things are , or the way things ought to be.

I am an independent, sir. I try to think out each election and devote considerable time to ea. election, I choose a party then work hard for that party for the term, not the election. When I vote, I line up my support behind that candidate for their tenure.

I wish to say, that as an independent, who depends entirely upon objectivity -

What would things be like, if the FDA allowed the food companies to label the ingredients of their food any way they pleased?

Why does the FCC allow talk radio to identify the callers of America without regard, or respect to how those callers are comprised?

by heyAnita 2006-11-01 12:46AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------