It's fairly obvious that baby is his so he had to still be cheating on her after March 2007.

I don't think the party insiders had anything to do with the interview.  ABC News went to him and told him they were going to run the story and they had their own facts about it and he did the interview to head them off and twist it his way- that's why he did the interview.

You know, I was totally wrong about Hillary winning the nomination but I pegged Edwards right- he was 100% hypocrite.

Don't look for him to come clean voluntarily.  He went kicking and screaming to that interview- and when he was there, everything he told were NEW lies.  I don't think he knows how to tell the truth.  There will need to be a federal investigation on his campaign finances- he'll tell the truth under oath- but that's the only way you'll get it.

No, I think he is in a good spot.  He's ahead but not so much that "overconfidence" will come in and he will rest on his laurels.  I think he knows what he is doing.

Unless both are on the ticket- there are going to be many people pissed off- probably enough to hand McCain the election.

How that can happen, to get them both on to the satisfaction of both- I don't know- doesn't seem likely right now- I think we're doomed to have a McCain presidency.  It makes me really sad.

I don't know- If Obama gets it but if Clinton is in reach if she had MI and FL, then it will be seen as a "stolen election" and will cause friction.

But I don't see Obama backing down or agreeing to VP right now.  I would like that ticket, though- but I'm afraid we will be fighting it out to the end- I don't see either giving in and I don't see Hillary not demanding that FL and MI count- it's going to be a mess.

I hope she wins in the end- unfortunately, I have to get back to the "real world" and won't be able to come here as much.

I personally never dismissed his money advantage- obviously it is a plus.  But as Mitt proves, money can't buy the nomination.

California has always been Clinton Country- it would be very hard for anyone to beat her here.  These celebrity endorsements mean zero here because we see celebrities all the time so Oprah just wasted her time- this isn't South Carolina.

Great diary- although it's hard to control the emotions.

Don't count the Clintons out- she's not just going to be sitting around twiddling her thumbs while he racks up states and delegates.

I think he might end up as President too and i'm already sick to death of "my friends...."  Blah.

I knew Maria Shriver would do nothing here- as I've said before she is no "First Lady of California"- she's practically been invisible since Arnold won as Governor.

Caroline was actually a good endorsement- and her speech was quite well-done.  Ted Kennedy's endorsement seemed more about himself than it did about Obama- it was obvious I think to most he was doing it out of some sort of grudge.

If Gore endorses Obama, I will never forgive him.  Where's his loyalty?  If Bill has not chosen him as VP,  he never could have springboarded to the Dem nomination in 2000, and although he lost, his high profile during that time has helped him spread his "global warming" message around the world.  People might scoff and say it's because of Bill that Gore lost the 2000 election, but I say that's bull.  Before he became a "darling" of today, many people couldn't stand him.  I don't know how many people I fought with about Gore but there was a big dislike for him- he's "boring," "I can't stand listening to him talk,""He's a phony""I just don't like him for some reason."  He never would have won the Dem nomination unless he had been Vice-President all those years.  Stabbing them in the back is incredibly ungrateful- Gore would have been only marginally known if it wasn't for the Clintons.

The tie goes to Clinton because the media and the Obama campaign made it seem like he would win California- the press they gave to the Kennedies was ridiculous, not to mention Oprah running down here, as well as the pundits talking about how Ted would get Obama many latino votes.  And again, like in New Hampshire, the polls were saying she was going to lose there but didn't.  There were people here on MyDD who bitched and bitched today at the Clinton supporters that they refused to accept what the polls were saying- that Obama was going to win California.  So Clinton winning California is now a surprise.  California is a huge prize- if Clinton had 14 states but lost California to Obama, her campaign would be in deep trouble even if she had gotten most of the states.  Clinton's win was not just against Obama, it was against Obama, Michelle, Oprah, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Maria Shriver so it's much more impressive.  It's amazing how much she was up against and still won- and her taking Mass. makes it that much sweeter.  The big news is that she triumphed over the Kennedies, who used every means at their disposal to try to get her to lose, trotting out Kennedy after Kennedy to keep the news going.  Ted was right about passing the torch- the power of the Kennedy clan has now proven to be pretty worthless and it's their "time," their "era," not Hillary's, that's "over."