Even More Thoughts on the DNC

While there was nothing new in the content of what the DNC chair candidates said on Saturday, there really is nothing quite like seeing a group of candidates in person without the media filter and spin. For those of us in the DrivingVotes.org group that had never attended something like this, it was certainly worth the trip to midtown. And for many of us, it solidified our position that Howard Dean's core message is the future of our party.

While there was nothing new in the content of what the DNC chair candidates said on Saturday, there really is nothing quite like seeing a group of candidates in person without the media filter and spin. For those of us in the DrivingVotes.org group that had never attended something like this, it was certainly worth the trip to midtown. And for many of us, it solidified our position that Howard Dean's core message is the future of our party.

For those curious about what one of these things looks like, I have posted some pictures HERE

Others on this site have covered the details of the opening statements and Q&A pretty well. But I'll throw in my two cents...

  • Martin Frost: He may be getting a raw deal from many of us on the left, but if you really want a loud, conservative Texan obsessed with national security, there are plenty of them to satisfy you in the other party. His strong assertion that "Democrats love God too" is true of many of us, but met with catcalls from some of the more exhuberant atheists in the crowd.
  • Wellington Webb: A very pleasant surprise for those of us who didn't know much about him. He supported Dean in the primary and that tells you what you need to know about his dedication to core Democratic values. And if we're serious about being the party of inclusion, we couldn't go wrong with having a qualified, inspiring and pragmatic African-American as the chair of the party.
  • Howard Dean: The appearance was vintage Dean and sounds as clear and relevant as it did a year ago. I'd love to see him make another run for President (with Wes Clark as VP). But if I can't have that, DNC chair would work for me.
  • Simon Rosenberg: Not as gripping a speaker as Webb or Dean, but I agree with others in the blogosphere that he's someone who "gets it." His bold call to bump IA and NH out of the lead primary slots should win major points with anyone not from IA or NH. Seems to be everyone's favorite 2nd choice.
  • Donnie Fowler, Jr.: Long on clever rhetorical devices. Short on specifics. His overplaying of the debate on delegates appointed by the chair as a personal attack was a completely unnecessary distraction.
  • Tim Roemer: The last dying gasp of the DLC. His comment about a "Special interest group dictating our party's position on choice," was perhaps the most spine-tingling moment of the morning. While it would be great to be able to diffuse the abortion issue, selling out your base and shattering the lives of millions of women seems like a pretty draconian step. The guy plays right into the Republican "frames" and I'd say that's a sure ticket to permanent minority status.
  • David Leland: Seems like a good guy, although the pacing of his statement was kinda weak. He concluded with a really excellent list of Democratic achievements in the 20th century, but most of us are more concerned with the present and future than the past.

The afternoon session featured the only public discussion of the campaign featuring the candidates for Vice Chair. While this session was much more sparsely attended than the morning, I suspect that this group gave a much better picture of what is really bubbling in the bureaucratic layer between the much-vaunted grassroots and the high-visibility leadership.

Almost no one was in the room for the penultimate presentation of the day by Rob Engel, discussing what went wrong with the numbers in '04. But it was perhaps the key to the future of the party. The '04 strategy was based on Turnout. Since Democrats held a statistical advantage in party affiliation, if they could manage to beat the Republicans in turnout, we could win. But, obviously, that wasn't enough. Since the country is now pretty much evenly divided, the only way to win in the future will be to attract new voters to the party. So the future will be won on Message.

In that light, Dean summed up what seems to be a growing consensus. We need to elect Democratic Secretaries of State and County Clerks to regain a fair voting process. And after eight years of what may be the least competent presidency in our nation's history, America will want a change. To be able to address that hunger, we need to be the party of reform.

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

4 Comments

very nice website
by Parker 2005-01-30 12:05PM | 0 recs
Reaction
The reaction to Rosenberg's comment about ending IA and NH first was very positive - lots of applause.

Also, one thing I forgot to write about myself: He called for a weekly Norquist-style meeting of the heads of all the major progressive groups in DC. Damn straight! We totally need to be doing this. It's how Norquist advances his agenda: One week, the fundies get support for their pet issue, because the next week, big bidness knows it'll be their turn. The ultimate in horse-trading.

by DavidNYC 2005-01-30 12:29PM | 0 recs
Interesting comment about Message
There's been a lot of discussion about the right message for the Democratic party. It looks to me like we could use a little moral authority to add oomph to our message. I'm pretty much of a godless heathen/wayward Presbyterian, but I found Jim Wallis' message compelling. It's not a popular topic, but I'd be interested in your thoughts on the  matter.
by Gary Boatwright 2005-01-30 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Interesting comment about Message
I haven't read Rev. Wallis' book yet but I've heard him on Air America and from my perspective he seems right on the mark. My progressive political views are a direct extension of my faith and seem completely consistent with my reading of the scriptures.

Jesse Jackson's observation was that "Jesus was a liberal, Herod was a conservative. Moses was a liberal, Pharoah was a conservative." Jesus said the two most important commandments were to love God and love your neighbor. To me, it is not loving God or your neighbor to stir up hatred against people whose lifestyle you disagree with, to invade foreign countries and torture their citizens in order to control their natural resources, or to allow your corporate friends to pump mercury into our lakes and rivers that will cause developmental retardation for generations of children.

Jesus is recorded as spending alot of his time with the sexual and social outcasts of his society, not using them as scapegoats for political gain. Jesus' harshest recorded words were not directed at those regarded sexually immoral but at the legalistic religious leaders of his day. Jesus' friends were not the rich but the poor. And he was executed in a brutal and public manner normally reserved for political prisoners.

Rev. Forbes at Riverside Church has said the election of '04 may be God teaching a lesson to the community of faith for falling asleep for thirty years while conservatives took over the evangelical movement for their own political and financial purposes. The old testament is filled with God using ungodly kings to correct the people of Israel that he loved. Perhaps Bush is our Nebuchadnezzar.  There is a "chad" in Nebuchadnezzar :+(

All that being said, your comment that this is not a "popular topic" may be true as well. The numbers may not justify the outreach. Many of my conservative Christian brothers and sisters may be so rigidly married to their ideology and tribal identity that no theological argument, regardless of it's logical construction or impassioned delivery, can distract them from a blinding obsession with sexuality and a simplistic view of the relationship between pregnancy and women's lives.

But the arguments made yesterday all say the key to regaining political viability is speaking of and standing for a set of values that resonates with the hearts of a majority. Most of the non-Christians I know have a sense of right and wrong that is not greatly unlike the definition of right and wrong that comes from my faith tradition. And I believe that progressive Christians and a large body of non-Christians share the values that Dr. Dean has articulated since taking the national stage.

When I hear the receptive change in the tone of voice of the agnostic and/or non-Christian hosts and guests on Air America to Rev. Wallis's arguments, I have hope. Core Democratic values are core Christian values as well. If we can deliver a message that articulates those values with clarity, respect and confidence, I think the Democratic party and the Christian church will be better for it.

IMHO :+)

by ProgressiveChristian 2005-01-30 03:53PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------