I am so glad to see you again! I bet there was some sort of mistake.

I do not find it "offensive" when Obama tried to block re-vote in MI and FL. I do not find it "offensive" when Hillary, following DNC rules, claimed that superdelegates can choose whomever they want. Both incidences are about public sphere.

But I find it very offensive when Obama campaign attacks Hillary's character/personality. If you can not see the difference, I guess our party just became the Rovian republican party.

furiousxgeorge just troll rated this comment? Being a Hillary supporter deserves a "troll rating". What a wonderful judgement? I guess Obama taught furiousxgeorge "judgement".

Great diary. I really hope Obama and his campaign realize SOON that they really pissing off so many Hillary supporters. I am seriously getting tired of Obama rules.

I found your attempt to be "witty" somewhat juvenile. At least to try to explain either why Obama has been consistent in your opinion or why being inconsistent does not matter for your candidate.

I am a Hillary supporter but I did not say anything about Hillary in my comment. Why do you need to bring Hillary here? Do you think Obama is cool just because he, as you believe, is better than Hillary? That's the quality of Obama as a politician? Being perceived better than Hillary from his supporters? Well... Frankly I do not expect you to be able to answer these questions. I just wanted to let you know that your comment is not funny or witty at all.

Obama did not call "next door neighbor's family doctor" or his relative "spritual mentor". Obama is a damaged good for the general election not because his association with Rev. Wright but because his inconsistent reactions to the news.

I guess today's "issue" from Obama is tax returns. It is getting seriously boring. Even I can write "expected" reactions from Obama people.

"Oh! She did not disclose her tax records yet! Oh! There must be something fishy there! Of course, she is a liar!"  

Endless and baseless character assassination.

Maybe the strike did not reduce traffic yet but it certainly reduced the credibility of the site. Dailykos is now officially DailyObama. The manager of the site, kos, publicly claims that he does not have any intention to be "fair". Well... That sounds suicidal for a blogger.

I do not think Ricahrdson's endorsement will boost Latino support for Obama. I like Richardson a lot. He did great things for our community. Yet, we do not vote for someone just because of one's ethnicity. Frankly, his endorsement would make little or no difference. I can name tens of Latino politicians who are well respected in the community and support Hillary.

Latino community supports politicians based on issues not based on someone's endorsement. I do not know why Richardson decided to support Obama but it seems quite a supid move to me considering his own base is not that thrilled about him.

Look, I am fully aware of the dire reality. Racial composition of our "leadership" positions is disgrace. We do not have enough minority politicians, minority academicians, minority business leaders, minority lawyers...etc. Terrible. I am 100% with you in terms of assessing the reality. However, I do not accept any suggestion that somehow Obama is the "last" or "closest" chance that African American community or even minority community could have. He represents a great chance but his failure should not be interpreted as a failure of the whole community. If he fails, our minority youth will learn so many lessons from him. It would be the beginning of new hope not its end.

That does not justify inconsistency on Obama's part.

That's the most absurd thing I ever heard. Yes. Obama could be the closest to the nomination/presidency so far in the history but I truly believe that African American community and its potential is much bigger than Obama. Of course, African American community will rise and we will have an African American president. Do not equate Obama's failure with African American community's failure!

I am a Hillary supporter but I agree with many Obama supporters on the point that this is our chance to be reflexive on our rhetoric's and reality of racial relations in this country. Rev. Wright's comments are inflammatory. If other black church leaders have been saying these remarks, it is time for them to be reflexive about themselves, too. Maybe their philosophy and intentions could be justifiable yet their rhetoric's need to be revisited if we really hope to live in a multiracial society. I am more than sure that we will rise above this experience.

Hum.. I did not know Obama did not release his state senat records.I thought he already released everything since he was so persistantly asking Hillary to release EVERYTHING. I guess... another Obama rule?

OK. Which is Obama camp's talking point? Hillary was not involved in any serious matters in the White House and is exaggerating her experience? Or Hillary was the force behind everything bad happened during Clinton administration such as NAFTA? I am hearing these conflicting arguments all day. It seems rather desperate.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4 480868&page=1

This article is why I worried. I really resent the media which did not even bother to ask serious questions to Obama.