Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means necessary"

I know there's a strong argument to be made that sites like No Quarter should be ignored. Just visiting them for grins supports their hit count. But their destructive hate-mongering is increasingly disturbing.

Personally, I worry some about innocent/naive lurkers who might not get exposed to refutations of all the lies. Moreover, in my dabbling at No Quarter (whether arguing, parody trolling, truth-telling) I have perceived a softening from some (some) of the regulars when directly challenged. Left to their own devices, they seem to have way too much fun imagining themselves saving the world from the Marxist/fascist/wimpish/brutal Obama -- "by any means necessary," as they like to say.

The dangerous rhetoric at No Quarter is not limited to the comment threads. It can be seen on full display in the work of regular featured writers. One recent offering connects Barack to Hitler thusly: Obama gets backing from George Soros who was raised appreciating Hitler's cult of personality, which is why he's latched onto Obama -- because he sees Obama as the same kind of personality as Hitler (and that's why the Soros puppet Obama must be stopped by any means necessary).

You get the idea. There's much more to these cesspools than waiting for "whitey" tapes, hero-worshiping Larry Sinclair, and investigating Barack's birth certificate (which, BTW, is a certain TexasDarlin's current labor of love).

The strange-bedfellow aspect of these sites is pretty fascinating. So-called progressives (who haven't gotten over the "crimes" against Hillary) embrace a marriage of convenience with outright government haters and racists. As long as they all agree to hate Obama, the most disagreement they voice among themselves comes in the form of fond chuckles ("you make me laugh, silly"). Hard-core feminists hold hands with homophobic Muslim haters.

I find this all not only scary, but a prediction-come-true on my part. Months ago I wrote diaries and comments (in various places) about how, if Barack won, we'd see a new coalition of absolutists, from across the traditional spectrum, who would feel shut out of Barack's promise of a new political culture that attempts to move us beyond the culture wars. What I hadn't anticipated was the fierce degree to which their very identities would feel threatened. I predicted such an alliance, but not the violent tendencies that are fueling it. (I mention this not to toot my horn -- just to, once again, bring up the broader cultural dynamics that are some of my longstanding interests.)

While I certainly haven't spent weeks and weeks at these sites (my IP was banned recently from NQ), I have gradually come to believe it's a worthwhile way to spend some energy -- especially if one is feeling the need to burn off some extra feistiness . They clearly have some influence. Fox and friends regularly feature these PUMA types. No Quarter and Larry Johnson were recently featured in Financial Times and American Prospect (linked prominently at Real Clear Politics)

And I do think without the occasional voice of sanity (and, sometimes, ridicule), they will feel more free to carve out an increasingly Captain Kurtz-like outpost -- providing justification to the craziest of the crazies out there.

I know many of you vehemently disagree, but that's my opinion.

[Note -- a version of this diary was crossposted at DailyKos]

Tags: breeding ground, cesspool, hate, junkies, lies, slime, smears, toilet (all tags)

Comments

65 Comments

I got scared for a moment

I just read your title and thought Obama named Hillary as his running mate.

by Brandon 2008-06-26 12:16PM | 0 recs
Wow. The very first comment ....

in an otherwise timely diary shows that nuttery exists on both sides of the party.

by emsprater 2008-06-26 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: I got scared for a moment

Weak sauce.

by John in Chicago 2008-06-26 05:41PM | 0 recs
Defeating Obama "by any means necessary

Obama has some troubling character traits that are manifest in his feasting on the behavior of his minions.

But Obama has not shown us any signs he is Hitler.

His movement however is troubling.  There were definite threats of violence and rioting from dailykos regulars if the SDs had gone to Hillary.

There is a definite tend towards might makes right from the dailykos crowd that reminds me of the hayday of the neo-cons.

At first I thought Obama was 100% innocent as the movement existed against Hillary before Obama was the leader but as time goes on I don't think he is 100% innocent but he is far from 100% guilty.

And I totally 100% reject talk of by any means necessary which implies violence which is totally not called for.

Voting for McCain I am ok with but its important to avoid inflamatory language that bespeaks violence.

by dtaylor2 2008-06-26 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama "by any means necessary

Seriously, go pollute some other minds, most here find this type of post disgusting, and quite sickening. As far as the original diary goes, it's a no win situation over there. I have had people use my name at sites like this to "prove' obama people are crazy, after I've spent post after post trying to have decent conversations. they are cult like personalities at these places, nothing more, nothing less. If the front page of No Quarter doesn't make a rational person sick enough to not trust them, maybe nothing will.

by Dog Chains 2008-06-26 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama "by any means necessary

So to some up dtaylor2s comment:

Obama is not Hitler, as far as I know.....

by venician 2008-06-26 12:40PM | 0 recs
Your english teach is not happy.

So to some up dtaylor2s comment:

some = sum

Sorry, but couldn't resist

by jsfox 2008-06-26 02:24PM | 0 recs
WOW!

Obama has some troubling character traits that are manifest in his feasting on the behavior of his minions.

Explain and prove please.

His movement however is troubling.  There were definite threats of violence and rioting from dailykos regulars if the SDs had gone to Hillary.

There is a definite tend towards might makes right from the dailykos crowd that reminds me of the hayday of the neo-cons.

Links please

I get you don't like the guy and  as a long time Obama supporter that's OK by me. However, please before throwing up, what I consider, inflammatory remarks offer up some proof  to back them up. If these are opinions and not facts please state as such.

by jsfox 2008-06-26 12:42PM | 0 recs
Re: WOW!

Perhaps... the comment was referring to the whiplash some Obama haters have been going through of late. Initially they framed all their opposition in terms of him being a naive, weak, empty suit that would be stepped on by the system. Now that he's clearly emerging as one of the most potent political forces we've seen in decades, they have to find new ways to justify their hatred. So instead of him being an ineffectual idiot, he's a wickedly powerful evil genius.

by Petey 2008-06-26 12:48PM | 0 recs
Uprated for TR Abuse

I don't get the troll ratings abuse here.  What you say is an opinion.  The more the troll raters pile on, the more they just illustrate the stereotype of absolute intolerance for dissent.  

by BPK80 2008-06-26 05:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means

You people need to stop exaggerating.

There is nothing more hateful or dangerous being written there than that has been written at dkos or huffpo which folks at noquarter probably find equally loathsome.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 12:34PM | 0 recs
Any word

on the Karl Rove indictment or the Whitey tape from your hero?

by JJE 2008-06-26 12:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Any word

You must have me confused with someone you know.

I am not an Obama supporter. I am not into the hero worship thing.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 12:49PM | 0 recs
Larry Johnson

the guy whose blog you're defending.  Always with the big scoops that never quite materialize.  That guy.  Since you're defending him I assumed you admire him.  But if he's not your hero could you at least try to convince him to become an hero?

by JJE 2008-06-26 12:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Larry Johnson

I think he may already be a hero for some people, but I don't get the impression he encourages it.
by feelfree 2008-06-26 01:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Larry Johnson

A RELUCTANT hero.  How appealing.

Anwyay, when are we going to see the whitey tape?  I'd hate to have him proven to be a racist smear merchant.  Put up or shut up.

by MeganLocke 2008-06-26 09:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Larry Johnson

You have turned into quite the myDD stalker.

Incivility has turned into unhinged.

by feelfree 2008-06-27 10:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Larry Johnson

The funny thing about it (other than slinging insults while whining about incivility) is that i don't know you from libertyleft.

Literally.  I went to my "feedback", saw three replies from you and thought you were a completely different person.

by MeganLocke 2008-06-28 06:59AM | 0 recs
Wow, you are extremely tolerant

The front pagers at DKos and HUffPo should not even be in the same sentence with comparison to No Quarter.  HuffPo and Dailykos may have some crazy comments here and there but No Quarter is a fucking cesspool filled with racists, delusional bottom feeders, GOP operatives taking advantage of idiots, and the mentally and/or emotionally insane.  Get a grip on reality before speaking.

by KLRinLA 2008-06-26 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Wow, you are extremely tolerant

I found dkos and huffpo filled with women haters who wallowed in the cesspool of sexism. Commenters at those sites despise women and often see them as less than full human beings. They used language more foul than anything a republican has said about Hillary Clinton including corrupting her name and referring to her in contemptible sexual terms.

Spare me your outrage at noquarter. I know what I've read.

I encourage you to get a grip on the truth.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 12:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Wow, you are extremely tolerant

"I encourage you to get a grip on the truth."

Obama's birth certificate is fake, Larry Sinclair is a political prisoner, and any day now a video of Michelle Obama is going to materialize in which she derides "whitey" for 20 minutes.

Those truths?

by thatpurplestuff 2008-06-26 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Wow, you are extremely tolerant

This goes for all the female poster, there as well?

by jsfox 2008-06-26 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Wow, you are extremely tolerant

Show. Me. One.

You claim that Daily Kos is "filled" with woman haters, using language "more foul than anything a republican has said about Hillary Clinton including corrupting her name and referring to her in contemptible sexual terms."

Yet you know that Daily Kos, like this site, is community moderated.

Show me one single post that is as vile as you describe that was not negatively moderated by the community.  Find me one link that uses language "more foul than anything a republican has said" that wasn't troll-rated to Hell.

Let's see it.  Support or retract.

by mistersite 2008-06-26 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Wow, you are extremely tolerant

by John in Chicago 2008-06-26 03:02PM | 0 recs
You're a liar.

I post at DKos, and nowhere, at any time can the vileness at NQ, be seen there.
Blatantly sexist comments are immediately hidden, and a lot of the posters, and FPers, are feminists (real ones, not fair-weather drama queens, ready to vote for Mc C-word).
Every site gets its trolls, difference is, at NQ, they're encouraged, there's a reason they were investigated by the Secret Service.

If DKos is so reprehensible, why do elected officials regularly post there?  
Why is there more actual CONTENT, as opposed to whining about who was mean to Hillary, and who feels their "free speech" is being stifled?

by Maori 2008-06-26 06:26PM | 0 recs
Re: You're a liar.

You appear to be quite disturbed. Well the comments had to appear first and someone had to read them before they are hidden, right?

I disagree that dkos is any better than noquarter. I guess that makes you a liar too.

I don't know why officials would post there. Maybe it is that birds of a feather thing. KO posts there. I'm not impressed. He is vile and contemptible too.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 06:37PM | 0 recs
Re: You're a liar.

You just slandered about 100,000 people and half the Democratic members of Congress, who do post there.

You were asked for proof and couldn't provide it.  End of story.  And here's a troll-rate for calling someone who called you out disturbed.

by MeganLocke 2008-06-26 09:08PM | 0 recs
Re: You're a liar.

Gee have you gone through every comment I've made on myDD?

You've turned into quite the head case.

by feelfree 2008-06-27 10:38AM | 0 recs
And there ya go.

You make ridiculous remarks that you can't prove, or adequately defend, and of course, it's everyone else who has the problem.

So...all this aside, what are you going to do when he wins?
Because that likelihood seems to have YOU 'disturbed'  :-)
Try to smile.

Obama/Whomever 08

by Maori 2008-06-26 10:01PM | 0 recs
Are you male?

I think you need to get a grip on the truth.

Males tend to think sexism didn't exist in progressive blogs. markos and huffpo were cesspools of misogyny all day, every day during the primary.

A person would have to be willfully ignorant to not acknowledge it or address it.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 01:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means

either you haven't spent any time over there, or you're part of their hate-filled tribe.

We're not just talking about people who enjoy flame wars, we're talking about an impassioned, single-minded effort to destroy Obama by any means necessary.

Do they really believe he's the antiChrist? No doubt some do, some don't. Regardless, the coalition generally ACTS as though the continued existence of the republic is now in their hands.

by Petey 2008-06-26 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means

...destroy Obama by any means necessary.

Hmmm.....I recall dkos and huffpo had a similar intent but the target was Hillary Clinton.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 12:58PM | 0 recs
Really?

here is a HEADLINE from last night....

A PICTURE SAYS A THOUSAND WORDS

 title=

Stromfront on your list of sites to defend?

by Is This Snark 2008-06-26 01:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Really?

Yeah I saw that. Obama brought it on himself. He played what some people call the race card in one of his speeches recently.

As you can see the folks at noquarter ran with it.

Larry Johnson has taken down worse and called people out on the racist blogs and commentary. You wouldn't happen to have in cut and pastes of that would you?

by feelfree 2008-06-26 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Really?

um ... and we haven't heard gender or sexism mentioned by any of these people who think race shouldn't be mentioned?

NO Q card decks seem to have 20 gender cards and most posters keep a few more up their sleeves

by wrb 2008-06-26 01:15PM | 0 recs
"what some people call"

Obviously people who don't know what the fuck it means.

On the plus side, it's nice to have the Internet's dumbasses in one - eminently avoidable - place.

by Neef 2008-06-26 01:21PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

You do make a compelling argument, Neef.

by Petey 2008-06-26 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

Evidently you don't read a lot of blogs. "Internet dumbasses" are unavoidable because they are everywhere.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 01:28PM | 0 recs
That's just Brownian motion

centered on NQ.

Don't worry about it.

by Neef 2008-06-26 01:31PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

True, they're everywhere - but at some sites, like this one, they're discouraged.  At NQ, open racism is not only encouraged but openly practiced by those who run the site.

Anyone who willingly attaches his or her name to that site, willingly attaches his or her name to racism.  It is that simple.

by mistersite 2008-06-26 01:42PM | 0 recs
I wholeheartedly agree...

They think such behavior is cute. And the features writers engage in it as well.

by Petey 2008-06-26 01:47PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

I feel the same way about markos and huffpo. Open sexism and misogyny was encouraged by those who run the site. Sexism was allowed to go unchecked.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 02:01PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

You haven't answered my challenge above.  Show me one instance of someone on Daily Kos saying something about Sen. Clinton that is worse than anything Republicans ever said about her, and not being troll-rated to smithereens for it.

Let's see it.

by mistersite 2008-06-26 02:27PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

You can go over to the dkos  and dig them up. I no longer visit the site not even to lurk. I'm sure you know the way.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 06:21PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

You made the claim; you support it.  Don't expect others to do your homework for you.

by mistersite 2008-06-26 06:33PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

I didn't ask you to do anything. You're making demands. I refuse to do your bidding.

Until YOU prove otherwise I'm standing by what I said.

dkos and huffpo were and could still be sewers of misogyny and sexism among blogs.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 07:07PM | 0 recs
Re: "what some people call"

You won't do it because you cannot.

I'm simply astounded that you would defend NoQuarter.  No one who looks at black people as subhumans has a right to complain about injustices against anyone else.

by MeganLocke 2008-06-26 09:11PM | 0 recs
Do you know what GFY stands for

You think Senator Obama deserves to be called a spade because he said the GOP was going to use his race as a weapon?

Let me guess, there is a perfectly acceptable reason they chose the Ace of SPADES.

"inadequate black male" was an accurate statement too I guess.

Fighting off bastard black descendants is also valiant struggle.

All of these are defended and promoted at the hate site you defend.

The only front page post deleted in the past three months was one contrasting Cindy the princess against the angry, ugly bitter Michelle.

It was racist and sexist.

Since Harriet 'black male' Miers, and Paula 'black bastards' Abeles are front page celebrities at that shit hole I'll let you guess why that story was pulled.

by Is This Snark 2008-06-26 01:23PM | 0 recs
Re: Do you know what GFY stands for

I think you're overreaching. They are reacting to Obama's words.

I honestly have not read anything any worse than what I have read about the Clintons.

People here constantly say that kind of trashing of those in the political arena is "just politics".

I find the backlash from the primary at sites like noquarter falls into the reap what you sow category.

A lot of people were pushed out, drowned out, forced out and alienated from a lot of blogs.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 01:33PM | 0 recs
Gotcha loud and clear.

by Is This Snark 2008-06-26 01:43PM | 0 recs
Yes, the reason they're so irrational

and embracing such disturbing alliances is that they are primarily fueled by an emotional/ego response -- retribution for perceived crimes.

by Petey 2008-06-26 02:42PM | 0 recs
A very much disagree... but...

even if what you say is true, there's a rather unique undercurrent of danger behind all the Obama hatred.

I don't even like to think in these terms, but, clearly, Obama-bashing, for assorted reasons, fuels a special sort of insanity in some. I think we all have some responsibility to imagine what kind of nutjobs we may be emboldening with published lies and hatred. Calling Hillary a bitch (not that I've done so) isn't likely to cause some loony in his basement to start imagining ways he's going to save the world from her.

by Petey 2008-06-26 01:45PM | 0 recs
Wow...I can't believe you that but,


I'm happy you did. This is what I hear you saying.

Hatred of Hillary Clinton expressed in a blog is a trivial issue.

Hatred of Barack Obama expressed in a blog is somehow a threat on his life and a serious issue.

by feelfree 2008-06-26 02:13PM | 0 recs
No, that would be a mischaracterization

first, because I've never seen the "by any means necessary" message directed at Hillary -- either in tone or literally -- while this is the defacto tone, and, in fact, basis of the entire NQ site... and I have also seen such sentiments literally repeated there with abandon.

My point is that Obama hatred directly fuels a special kind of hater that Hillary hatred never did. (That's probably the reason we never saw this  particular sentiment expressed toward Hillary or McCain.) For you to portray this as some sort of racial double standard on my part is disingenuous or dangerously naive.

Hatred is one thing. Creating a "community" of self-defined saviors of the country is another. Will most of the assholes at NQ take their "by any means necessary" sentiment literally? No (except they obviously believe in the liberal reliance upon lies and smears), but they do actively stoke the fears and egos of the sort of creeps that most worry me.  

by Petey 2008-06-26 02:37PM | 0 recs
Re: No, that would be a mischaracterization
Actually, Petey, we have seen similar hatred of Hillary, but it came from far right wing Republicans, not members of our own party.
These Obama haters are no different from Bill O'Reilly or Michael Savage.
by skohayes 2008-06-26 02:47PM | 0 recs
I haven't seen it, I really haven't...

But for the sake of argument... let's get real: if Michael Savage started shouted one day that "Hillary That Bitch Clinton must be stopped!" and then the next day that "Barack Hussein The Communist Obama must be stopped!" -- you don't think his pleas would be received differently by certain loonies?

I honestly didn't want to go in this direction, but it seems rather obvious to me, in part because of the nonstop violent vitriol I've seen at places like NQ.

Part of it is content, part of it is context, and part of it is how unrelenting it is.

by Petey 2008-06-26 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: I haven't seen it, I really haven't...
Oh no, I agree with your point.
 I made the mistake of going over to NQ one day and I won't go back. The thought that these people actually call themselves Democrats is what scares me.
I'm sure most of it is being fed by republicans posing as Democrats, but still there are some people there that are registered Democrats.
 
by skohayes 2008-06-26 03:10PM | 0 recs
I agree, it's a loony coalition

but I'd put the number of "progressives" at about 50%. And certainly most of the regular essay writers there think of themselves as Dems-on-strike. The perceived crimes against Hillary were so great that they're willing to hold hands with anyone who hates Barack.

by Petey 2008-06-26 03:26PM | 0 recs
Straw man after straw man

This is why no one takes the NQ types seriously. most of us enjoy a good debate, even a vigorous one. But you folks offer no meat.

In case it wasn't obvious, you're implying he claimed the Hillary Hate was trivial.

Of course he didn't. He said it was different. But that wasn't an extreme enough position to rebut (or rather rebutting it might take some effort), so you distort it.

It's just another straw man to build and argue against.

by Neef 2008-06-26 02:45PM | 0 recs
And... while they like to say they are tolerant of

diverse perspectives, I found it interesting that my IP was banned (and all my posts erased) after responding to a slew of epithets and threats to beat me up -- whereas the original attackers are still posting there.

FYI, I had posted a comment in a diary that celebrated Kim Jong Il's so-called "endorsement" of Obama (another lame, oblique attempt at guilt by association). I asked a fellow poster whether he was planning on having as much fun condemning McCain for his "endorsement" by McCain's Vietnamese torturer. This made the cheery tough guy go ballistic, calling me every name in the book and threatening to pummel me if he ever saw me -- because, he said, I was ridiculing a war hero.

by Petey 2008-06-26 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Really?

by John in Chicago 2008-06-26 03:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means

Only someone who shares the views of the hate-filled screeds on these sites would defend them.

by MS01 Indie 2008-06-26 01:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Defeating Obama/Hitler "by any means

A front-pager calling Obama a "spade" and repeatedly comparing David Axelrod to Hitler isn't anything worse than here or HuffPo?

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/07/ i-call-a-spade-a-spade/

Can you please link to a frontpager here or at HuffPo making similar comments?  I do not believe that it ever got that bad, here or there, and thus think you're making very inaccurate claims.  

by bosdcla14 2008-06-26 06:19PM | 0 recs
Today's headline at HillaryIs44

Voting For Barack Obama, Part VI

Obama supporters are packing extra Hopium in their hookahs lately. They need it. Obama supporters are learning what we have known since our very first day of publication through to today:

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.

Every post there is about Obama, none are about Hillary.  I wonder how the people who visit that site feel about the fact that it's turned from a militant pro-hillary site that often bashed Obama to an integral cog in the Republican Smear Machine.  They don't even talk about Hil as VP anymore, just how to get John McCain into office.  How transparent a scam is this?  Can members honestly think it was ever really sponsored by anyone except the GOP?

by semiquaver 2008-06-26 01:24PM | 0 recs
George Soros

I do not want to dignify the essay in question or the website with my participation, but let's be clear on one thing:

George Soros is a Hungarian Jew who experienced anti-Semitism and the NAZI occupation of Hungary first hand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_soro s

Soros may be a complicated figure in some respects, but to label him an admirer of Hitler is an irresponsible calumny that is beyond belief.

by Strummerson 2008-06-26 02:22PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------