• comment on a post Final: VA Primary Election Post over 5 years ago


    I'm an Arlington voter who was strongly pro-Moran and anti-McAuliffe at the beginning of the campaign. I did end up voting for Moran after talking to him personally, but if it had been for his personal assurances I probably would have voted for McAuliffe.

    The main reason for this is the tenor or Moran's campaign was incredibly negative and turned off a lot of people who wanted to support Moran. McAuliffe's campaign on the other hand showed what a professional campaign should look like and how a Democratic primary should be conducted. You could learn a lot from them Jerome.

  • I'm not at all sure what you mean.
    It seems to me that Stiglitz agrees with this post. he recently said that tose who lobbied for more lax regulations should feel sorry. In this case the diarist is also saying that those who supported lax regulations messed up.

    What conflict are you referring to? (Also you want to justify those accusations you make below?)

  • on a comment on Counting the people over 6 years ago

    is that the data that you link to shows Clinton leading in one of the five measures that they have listed. The one she leads on has two asterisks which guide you to this:

    **(Senator Obama was not on the Michigan Ballot and thus received zero votes. Uncommitted was on the ballot and received 238,168 votes as compared to 328,309 for Senator Clinton.)

  • comment on a post Counting the people over 6 years ago

    Counting Michigan is bullshit and you know it.

    If you give Clinton votes you need to at the very least give Obama the uncommitted votes. Problem is you can't really do that. You can't count Michigan and have any kind of relevant popular vote count. Saying otherwise is pretty stupid.

  • on a comment on Campaigning Means Something over 6 years ago

    Barack Obama isn't just doing well because he is black. This state has a huge union population and has some of the worst economic conditions in the country. They are seeing something more than that he is black.

  • comment on a post Campaigning Means Something over 6 years ago

    You talk about the Michigan polls as if the data went as far as every other state. The last poll they show is early December. It probably tightened up some. In fact, I saw a Michigan poll recently showing Obama beating Clinton in a primary match up.

  • comment on a post The Big Tent option misses Robert Reich over 6 years ago

    There used to be a point where you were opposed to Republican talking points. You used to do Ad Watches where you would criticize Democrats using Republican messaging. You need to open your eyes.

    People aren't mad at Clinton for attacking Obama. I could care less if she was attacking him on his policy differences. She isn't attacking him on his health care plan, she is saying the he is a liberal elitist (as was apparently Kerry and Gore).

  • comment on a post Some must reads over 6 years ago


    Your analysis is far more biased than his, so don't write him off as an "optimistic Obama supporter." He did a strong statistical analysis. It could be wrong, but that doesn't make his research biased.

  • comment on a post Post Debate Thread over 6 years ago

    A travesty of a debate. McCain and the Republicans won this one. Obama will have a big fundraising couple of days.

  • The at large delegates are awarded proportionally. It'll be close to a 50-50 split if there is a small win.

  • comment on a post A Draw over 6 years ago

    Obama leads by an average of over 5 points in that poll. While not a huge lead, it isn't a draw.

  • Specifically, the primary was infeasible because the lists generated from the January 15th primary would need to be accessible for the new primary. That is to prevent individuals who voted in the Republican party from voting in both. Even if that weren't the case, individuals did cross over because it was clear the Democratic primary would not count. Many Democrats crossed over to make mischief because their Democratic primary votes wouldn't count. What happens to those Democrats?

  • Feel free to report me, I'm confident that they will support my use of the ratings system.

    This site is intended for individuals who will promote the Democratic party. That includes voting for the Democratic nominee for President. Saying that you are going to vote for McCain or work against the Democratic nominee is not acceptable on this site. As I said, you have every right to do that in your personal life, but you are promoting the Republican party if you do.

    Clinton has herself urged her supporters to back Obama if she does not secure the nomination. She knows what is at stake.

  • Ah yes, but it disenfranchised many of the voters who had voted in the January primary. Furthermore, with the January 15th primary ruled unconstitutional they are unable to use the prior list to figure out who is eligible to vote.

    I'm sorry, one of my criteria was that it not disenfranchise voters, this is what the primary plan did.

  • Why would you leave your name on a ballot that is to have no influence on the nomination? Michigan violated the rules, the Democratic leadership in the state knew that they were doing this. If they wanted their votes to count they would have stayed within the parameters of the DNC rules.


Advertise Blogads