States May Lead the Way on Health Reform

In Canada, it took the dogged determination of one province, Saskatchewan, and a visionary leader Tommy Douglas, to pave the path to a national health care system, which they call Medicare.

For all the detractors of the Canadian system in the studios of Fox News and the board rooms of rightwing think tanks, consider this one note: In 2004, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation conducted a national poll to select the greatest Canadian of all time. The winner in a landslide -- Tommy Douglas.  

While the federal window remains open for reform, with two national single payer bills, John Conyers' HR 676 in the House and now Bernie Sanders'  S 703 in the Senate, many nurses, doctors, and health activists are turning to the states to lead as well.

It's worth recalling that Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously called states "the laboratories of democracy."As columnist Froma Harrop has suggested,"being closer to the people and more attuned to the local culture, states are better equipped than the federal government to introduce new social policies. Innovations are usually first tried in the places most receptive to them."

More than a half dozen U.S. states now are considering legislation to establish single payer systems, essentially an expanded and updated form of the U.S. Medicare system to cover everyone in their states.  Here's a roundup of some of the state bills:

California

The latest bill SB 810 passed its first legislative test Wednesday in the Senate Health Committee on a party line 7-4 vote before a room packed with nurses, doctors, medical students, California School Employees Association members, and healthcare activists.

In her lead testimony, Malinda Markowitz, RN, co-president of the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee noted that "nurses know insurance companies don't provide any value whatsoever in the delivery of medicine. Under SB 810, we would be free of their interference, their denial of care, their massive bureaucracy, and their waste of healthcare dollars."

UC Irvine medical student Parker Duncan said that he did not want to "be in a world not doing what I was trained to do," referring to the paperwork that is one of the expensive burdens that undermine the ability

Twice this decade California's legislature passed earlier versions of SB 810 (SB 840 carried by now retired Sen. Sheila Kuehl), but the bills were vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. State activists say they will continue to push single payer in California, even if they need to wait until the next governor, who won't be Schwarzenegger, is elected in 2010.

Colorado

House Bill 1273 by Fort Collins Democrat John Kefalas, passed its first vote in the state House April 6. The bill sets up a 23-member commission to design a universal health-insurance system.

"Our current health-care system is not well," Kefalas said. "Our current health-care system is unsustainable, with the cost of health care and the numbers of the uninsured rising dramatically."

Press reports note a state Blue Ribbon Commission on Health Care Reform two years ago studied single payer and found it was the only approach that saved money compared to what Coloradans now spent on healthcare.

Illinois

HB 311, the Healthcare for All Illinois Act, sponsored by Rep. Mary Flowers, had its first hearing in March. Though no votes have been taken yet, the new Gov. Pat Quinn is a long time supporter of single payer reform.

At an introductory press conference, Brenda Langford, Cook County RN, said that "Illinois can once again be a symbol of hope and progress for our nation. Nurses are tired of watching our patients suffer from denial of care and lack of access to coverage.  We see far too much of this at Cook County hospitals--and that's why we support guaranteed healthcare through a single-payer system."

Maine

LD 1365, sponsored by Brunswick Rep. Charles Priest, and co-sponsored from legislators from all over the state, had its first hearing April 13.
The hearing came just days after both houses of the Maine legislature passed resolutions calling on President Obama and Congress to enact federal single payer legislation. A poll this winter showed 52 percent of Maine physicians also favor single payer.

As Cathy Herlihy of the Maine State Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee put it in a state forum featuring U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe, a single-payer system is the "the only solution," she said. "We do not have time to wait. Our health should not be sacrificed for limited reforms."

Pennsylvania

Two single payer bills are alive in the state, House Bill 1660, the "Family and Business Healthcare Security Act of 2009," and Senate Bill 300.

Gov. Ed Rendell has said that if a single payer bill were to make it to his desk, he will sign it, reports Chuck Pennachio of Health Care for All Pennsylvania.

The state Democratic House Caucus is holding a public forum on the bill Friday, April 17 at 10 a.m. at the University of Pennsylvania campus in Philadelphia, featuring speakers from Physicians for a National Health Program, the Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals, and other single payer supporters.

The hearing comes on the heels of a resolution passed by the Philadelphia City Council calling for both state and federal lawmakers to establish a single-payer health system.  

Other states

Single payer bills are also on the docket in Minnesota, Missouri, and Washington.

Tags: AFL-CIO, California Nurses Association, Health care, healthcare reform, Labor, National Nurses Organizing Committee, nurses, single-payer health insurance (all tags)

Comments

11 Comments

Re: States May Lead on Health Reform

This is great news to hear and thanks for spreading it.

by MainStreet 2009-04-16 04:05PM | 0 recs
by architek 2009-04-16 07:21PM | 0 recs
Re: This study is worth reading

Not a single payer system.

by MainStreet 2009-04-17 04:57AM | 0 recs
Re: This study is worth reading

Yeah the Mass plan is the worst of all worlds.

by National Nurses Movement 2009-04-17 10:09AM | 0 recs
maybe states doing it

could be the way to reform compromise we've needed all along. I mean look at Massachusetts, the only thing Mitt Romney has ever had a part in that was done right

by Lakrosse 2009-04-16 06:01PM | 0 recs
by Alice Marshall 2009-04-16 06:07PM | 0 recs
Patients have less access now in Massachusetts

These are stories from Massachusetts patients:

http://www.citizen.org/hrg/healthcare/ar ticles.cfm?ID=18399

Basically, the situation has resulted in many people not being able to get care who could before.

People who might be sick but who might lose their job are still terrified to go to the doctor afraid that their whole family's insurance rate would go up if they turn out to be sick and later have to buy insurance on their own.

Also, before people who couldn't afford insurance could go to free clinics and get free care, now the clinics are unavailable.

The chronically ill still can't afford insurance, so they either have to pay fines or they are exempted. (but still uninsured)

The high deductible plans - the only ones many people can afford, have high deductibles and copays so they often avoid going to the doctor.

by architek 2009-04-16 07:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Patients have less access now in Massachusetts

All the reasons why any attempt to keep the insurance companies involved in health care will be a bust. Hence, why the diarist did not list the Massachusetts model as a solution or even as a stepping stone to single payer health care.

by MainStreet 2009-04-17 05:00AM | 0 recs
I agree..

But Obama seems to be heading towards the "minimal" healthcare "solution" being pushed by the healthcare-industrial cartel.

Sure, people will have choice, but it will be a choice between a number of unacceptable options.

For example, how could anybody predict what diseases that they might get years hence, (and so expand their policy - at extra cost - to cover them)?

Thats one of the ideas being floated to make healthcare "affordable".

These proposals are literally "rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic".

by architek 2009-04-17 05:33AM | 0 recs
Re: I agree..

And I can wholeheartedly agree here too.

Given Obama's apparent fear of repeating the HillaryCare debacle, it is up to the states to push the issue of single payer care. Unless the insurance industry is ready to unleash its propaganda in these states, and succeeds, it is through the states that single payer will come if at all.

by MainStreet 2009-04-17 05:51AM | 0 recs
Hillary's health care plan was workable

Hillary's plan's balance sheet worked.

Unlike Obama's.
Look at what he does, not what he says. IMO, Obama has been dishonest in his portrayal of his healthcare goals.

He is not doing what it takes to help Americans. He is trying to help big business, and repeating frames that we all know are not working for people, like the big lie that consumer driven healthcare represents a choice. For many people, its been a disaster because they dont have the money for the kind of coverage they need - the risk ends up being way too high. Our insurance model is geared towards catastrophic single events and it also fails when people have chronic illnesses. Drug costs in particular are obscenely high, even those of generics are tens or hundreds of times higher than they should be.

The states don't have the money or the power to implement the kinds of changes we need.

Look at the mess in Massachusetts.

by architek 2009-04-18 04:57PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------