Texas GOP Goes To War-And Meet Our Next Texas US Senator

As of 4PM EST, news is spreading across the Lone Star State that their senior Senator, Kay Bailey Hutchison is running for Governor, and will declare her candidacy on June 6th. She'll be taking on her recent bete-noir and current GOP Governor Rick Perry in what promises to be a bloody GOP primary indeed. Perry has a great deal of support from conservatives in the state, while Hutchison is wildly popular in the state itself and especially with moderate GOPers (what one would use to call "Old Guard" Republicans in the state, back when the GOP was a minority there). Already, Perry has compared Hutchison to Hillary Clinton, and Hutchison has attacked Perry as corrupt and ineffectual. The GOP leaders will have to take sides in this race, and the end result will NOT be pretty for the GOP.

Meanwhile, the Senate seat of Hutchison's comes open...

...and here, as potentially with the Governor's race the Democrats stand to have a chance to win. This is quite unlike in 2002, when the GOP was at high tide in the state, the GOP cleared the primary field for current Senator John Cornyn and the GOP had a popular President to campaign for the nominee. None of this will be true in 2006. The GOP juggernaut, when not held aloft by Tom DeLay is falling back, as Democrats picked up seats in the State House for the first time in forty years. Scandal upon scandal has rocked the GOP in Texas, and not just with DeLay. Governor Perry, House Speaker Tom Craddick and several Congressmen have come under fire themselves for ethical lapses. While under ideal circumstances the Democrats would need a few more years to regain momentum, our time is NOW. Enough public disgust exists with the GOP currently that the opening exists for a comeback in 2006. The open Senate race and-should Perry beat back Hutchison-a battered Governor could very well result in two major pickups in Bush's backyard.

Now, with the floodgates open, let's take a look at who may/will run for the GOP and the Democrats in 2006 for the Senate:

THE DEMOCRATS
Out: Martin Frost, Ron Kirk, Nick Lampson, Jim Turner, Charlie Stenholm, Max Sandlin
Running for Governor: Chris Bell
In: Barbara Ann Radnofsky
(http://www.radnofsky.com)
Allow me to introduce Barbara to the blogosphere. She is, I am convinced going to be Texas' next US Senator. I got to know Barbara through my cousin, a trial lawyer down in Texas who's worked with her in the past. Mike (my cousin) told me she was exploring a Senate run, and I was intrigued. So, I met up with her at the DNC in Boston last summer. Well, let me tell you, I was politically lovestruck by Barbara. She was passionate, enthusiastic, honest-and she paid the dinner bill, too! She told me of her deep desire to help the people of Texas, who for so long have been shafted by Bushes and Perrys and DeLays. So I've been helping her ever since. In January 2005 she officially filed her candidacy, and she's been off and running ever since.

Barbara has an extraordinary record in the private sector. After graduating from the University of Houston at age 20 (she entered college at 16!), she became a lawyer, litagator and mediator. She's been recognized nationally as one of the nation's top lawyers, and in 2003 was named "Texas Superlawyer" by Texas Monthly Magazine. She currently works with Vinson and Elkins, LLP (where Ron Kirk currently works at), and is very active in helping students learn peer mediation techniques. For this, she's been recognized as Chief Arbitrator by the Internation Court of Arbitration (based in Switzerland) in 2002, and in 2004 served as President of the Texas mediation program. She's also served on the boards of the Anti-Defamation League and the Friends of World Aids Research and Prevention organization.

With her resume, Barbara has an extensive private sector background, especially in health care and education issues. She also has developed a remarkable scholarly knowledge of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and frequently lectures on them to Texan religious groups (this works REALLY well with religous voters who would vote Democratic if not for the "values" issue). All together, Barbara has the ability to serve as a great US Senator.

Barbara's also been eager to reach out online. Off the Kuff, Burnt Orange Report, Irregular Times, Greg's Opinion and many other small blogs have covered her campaign. In addition, Barbara has a frequently updated blog of her campaign, as well as an independent blog run by a supporter. Here are some of the links:

http://www.irregulartimes.com/radnofskyinterview.html

http://radnofsky2006.blogspot.com/

http://www.gregsopinion.com/archives/005730.html#005730

http://www.burntorangereport.com/archives/002992.html

http://www.offthekuff.com/mt/archives/003919.html

You can read for yourself what they think of Barbara. Trust me, they're worth it.

Barbara's stances on the issues:
Pro-Choice
Responsible Gun Rights
Opposed to Gonzalez, Would have confirmed Rice (along with all, but 12 Democratic Senators)
Preserve Social Security by the 1% option (rolling back the millionaire's tax break to secure the funding)
Gradual decrease of US troops in Iraq
Her numero uno issue in Health Care reform

If you want to know more in detail about her issue stances, I urge you to go the links above and read the interviews. They cover the issues very nicely.

But enough about Barbara-let's talk about some of the GOP candidates that will run:

THE REPUBLICANS
Out: Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (Incumbent)
In: Congressman Henry Bonilla, Lt. Governor David Dewhurst
Thinking About It: Attorney General Gregg Abbott, Congresswoman Kay Bailey Granger, Congressman Joe Barton, State Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Above:

Henry Bonilla:
Strengths-The Latino Republican could easily be a great poster boy for the GOP in 2006 and beyond, and his $780,000 fundraising quarter in 2005 won't hurt either.
Weaknesses-A Latino playing well amongst North Texas conservatives? Don't count on it. Also, ethics problems abound for anyone tied to DeLay, as he is.

David Dewhurst:
Strengths-Favorite of the Perry group, and with plenty of connections. Less connected to scandal than Perry and Texas GOP DC Delegation.

Weaknesses-Less well-known, and much more conservative than Bonilla. Also has much less money to start out with.

Greg Abbott
Strengths-Law/Order man in corrupt state might play well with fed-up voters.

Weaknesses-How on earth are you supposed to play well as Mr. Law and Order when you're neck-deep in the same system as DeLay and Perry?

Kay Granger
Strengths-Much like Hutchison, a moderate Republican with few scandals attached.

Weaknesses-Unlikely to gain organizational support from DeLay and Co. , and may lack statewide gravitas to win. Plus, can you imagine two "Kay Bailey" names on the ballot? Oh the confusion!

"Smoky" Joe Barton
Strengths-Plenty of cash, statewide campaign experience (lost to KBH in 1993 GOP primary to succeed Lloyd Bentsen)and knows where the money lies.

Weaknesses-Hated by environmental groups ("Smoky" refers to his pro-pollution stances on the environment), tied closely with DeLay, possibly too much of a retread.

Michael Williams
Strengths-Personally wealthy, few strings attached and with no scandals around him.

Weaknesses-Hey, can YOU name your State Railroad Commissioner? Talk about a waste of statewide ballot space! No name ID plus few ties to powerful GOP leadership = no chance.

Wildcard: State Comptroller Carole Strayhorn (or whatever her last name currently is) may very well run for Governor, Senate or Lt. Governor. Her popularity and independence could be a key factor in the state's races.

ALL in all, Texas is shaping up to be one heck of an interesting state in 2006. The GOP will bleed, the Democrats will rally around their candidates, and-who knows? It sure would be nice to have Lone Star Democrats in power once again! Keep your eyes peeled and the popcorn hot, becuase the Lone Star Circus is coming to your computer soon!

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

44 Comments

I love it.
Taking a Senate seat in texas would be like a gigantic poke in the eye for Dubya.

That governors primary is going to be buuuuuuhhhhlooooody too.
I love it.

-C.

by neutron 2005-05-31 01:19PM | 0 recs
More on the race
Mr Liberal - thanks for the heads up/email earlier today.

Radnofsky is the only candidate so far that has been actively campaigning for the seat. When KBH officially announces there will be a major domino effect on the GOP side.  Rep. Bonilla will definitely run, and Lt. Gov. Dewhurst is likely to run. Unless Dewhurst does not run, I would think it to be extremely unlikely for any of the other statewides to run for the Senate seat.  Conventional wisdom is that AG Abbott and Comptroller Strayhorn would then duke it out for Lt. Gov (the most powerful statewide office in TX Gov't). Then a whole slew of down-ballot open seat races would ensue.

On the Dem side, Radnofsky has had the field to herself, making the rounds.  Another candidate that I've heard of is Juan Garcia.  Garcia is a former officer in the navy who was originally recruited by the local leaders and the state party to run for state representative against Gene Seaman, a Corpus Christi area Republican.  Then, several weeks ago, a "Garcia for Senate" website (since taken down) appeared by supporters of Garcia.  When contacted by the Corpus Christi Caller Times, Garcia said that he was considering a run.

A lot of Democrats would like to see State Rep. Rick Noriega (D-Houston) run for the seat.  Noriega is currently in the army reserves and is serving in Afghanistan.  Noriega's wife filled his seat during this past session. Noriega has been in the state house for several sessions now and has a progressive voting record.

As for current and former Dem congressmen, Frost has ruled out a run.  Lampson is running against DeLay. I would seriously doubt that Sandlin is interested in a run. Chet Edwards would be a great candidate, but we'd lose his seat in congress. Charlie Stenholm would be a good candidate statewide at some point, but I don't know if he is interested.

Anyway, I need to go... I'll comment more later.

Byron
Burnt Orange Report

by ByronUT 2005-05-31 02:35PM | 0 recs
Re: More on the race
Sandlin, who was my congressman, would have no chance.

He got 36% in 2004 as an incumbent.
Yeah, he got redistricted, but 36%?

Plus, Sandlin wouldn't endorse Kerry over Bush.
A major no-no in my book

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 09:18PM | 0 recs
Re: More on the race
I pretty much agree. Sandlin seems to be out of politics. East Texas was brutal last year, not just for Sandlin, but several of our state reps.  The one Dem state rep incumbent to lose was in east texas, and several thought-to-be-safe state reps came within a few hundred votes of losing.  There was a major GOP/Bush turnout effort of straight-ticket voters. Sandlin is a good man, but I agree, he'd probably be a poor choice for senate nominee.  I don't believe that he is considering a run.
by ByronUT 2005-05-31 09:25PM | 0 recs
Re: More on the race
Straight ticket did hurt.
Sandlin was thought to potentially have some Republican support coming.

Now we have "Big Ears" Louie Gohmert -- a Delay neophyte

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 09:44PM | 0 recs
CATI Project
Texas liberals are fighting back and keeping track.  Join us and monitor the Texas right wing at:

The more bloggers who sign up, the merrier.

by Garemko 2005-05-31 04:26PM | 0 recs
Dem field WILL get more crowded
While I like what I hear so far about Barbara, there's no way she is going to have the Dem field to herself. While the other names listed have ruled out a Senate run, those decesions were made while Hutchinson was the incumbent, and 99.9% unbeatable (as she will be for Gov. if she manages to win the primary).

Considering Frost's active campaign for DNC chair, I think it is very likely that he will seriously consider this race once again - he does not seem content being outside of politics, and it would be perfect payback for him for yet another redistricted Dem to mount a campaign for higher office. My bet is that he gets in the race, and if he does, he will likely be a slight favorite to get the nomination.

by demhusky 2005-05-31 04:48PM | 0 recs
Another one in the Governor's race?
My aunt (who lives in Dallas) told me two months ago that Hutchinson was in.

She also told me that the State Comptroller, a moderate-to-liberal Republican/former Democrat by the name of Carole Keeton Strayhorn, was going to jump in the race and really shake things up. She's an extremely vocal Perry foe and she might be able to lure independents and conservative Democrats.

by craverguy 2005-05-31 05:06PM | 0 recs
scotty's mom
i don't think i could bring myself to pull the lever for anyone who spawned scott mcclellan.
by annatopia 2005-06-01 07:03AM | 0 recs
with all due respect
Democrats have zero, I repeat zero, chance of winning a Senate seat in Texas in 2006. Let's talk again in five or ten or fifteen years, when the demographics of that state change.

In 2004 we heard all about how bloody GOP primaries in various states were going to help our candidates. Didn't help in a single Senate race. All we got was Colorado, where we had an exceptionally strong candidate. Texas is much more red than Colorado.

by desmoinesdem 2005-05-31 06:06PM | 0 recs
US v. Lay
I am not sure your demographic argument is persuasive. Even DeLay finds his fortress CD-22 infiltrated by lots of Asian-Americans who are not huge liberals but want more spending on education. Southern Texas is now solidly Democrat and enclaves continue to pop up around Dallas and Houston. Sure there's plenty of them rural parts of the state where the GOP still does good for itself...but the clock is ticking.

Still, the wildcard in '06 especially in Texas is US v. Lay. No one really knows just what Ken Lay will do to defend himself. Just how much he will talk and just who is willing to argue was complicit with him. Most of the Texas Republicans are going to look either to be tools or utterly immoral. Cue GOP politican talking about the culture of life... Dick Cheney and Bush will be finished after the trial ends (in terms of political prowess)...and who knows who will survive into the future.

But make no mistake, Kerry's poor showing in '04 is not indicative of how all Democrats would do in a "red state". Northeast "liberals" always poll poorly in places where locals describe "scalawags" and "carpetbaggers" with the same derision as the Vichy Government.

by risenmessiah 2005-05-31 08:51PM | 0 recs
Never say die
With the DeLay corruption scandal unraveling, the Iraq War and the WOT coming apart at the seams and the potential for a serious economic downturn, don't ever think that any Republican has a safe seat.

There are a wide number of events that could trigger a monumental backlash against the theocons. When it happens it could result in a tidal wave of unexpected Democratic victories.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-05-31 11:23PM | 0 recs
It would be nice to see
about 100,000 Dems register as Republicans for that primary....

Revenge is a dish best served cold!

by Nazgul35 2005-05-31 06:51PM | 0 recs
Re: It would be nice to see
I've voted in a couple Texas primaries, once in 2002 and again in 2004. And if I remember right, party affiliation was not required when I registered to vote. So think the primaries are wide open to the public. :-)
by fgvanzee 2005-05-31 07:46PM | 0 recs
Re: It would be nice to see
Texas primaries are open. There is no party registration.  You show up at the primary voting location and you may ask for a Democratic or Republican ballot. Your voter registration card is then stamped "Democratic" or "Republican" and you may only vote in the run-off primary election of the party in which you voted in the primary.

Having said that, I would discourage Texas Democrats from voting in the GOP primary.  Democrats will likely have primaries of our own - especially with a likely open U.S. Senate seat, and a potentially competetive guv race. I've spoken with a lot of Democrats that are considering voting in the GOP primary for KBH in order to get rid of Perry.  I would discourage such behaviour.  KBH would be a lock if she were the GOP nominee for guv.  

Rick Perry's approval ratings have been consistantly in the 40s over the past year.  A Dem would have a chance against Perry. It's not unrealistic unless we say it's unrealistic.  Perry and KBH will be spending up to $50 Million attacking each other. KBH will call Perry an ineffective do-nothing governor. Perry will call KBH a Hillary-loving liberal. It will be bitter.  

Kansas elected a Democratic governor under similar circumstances as Republicans waged a bloody primary between the social conservatives and the moderates.  Don't forget that states just as red as Texas have Dem guvs (Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana and of course Kansas). All it takes is the right candidates and the right circumstances. The stars are aligning....

by ByronUT 2005-05-31 09:14PM | 0 recs
One more Dem in 2004
DesMoinesDem,

Colorado was great, but you forgot our pick-up in Illinois.  Guy by the name of Obama.  It was in all the papers...

by rayspace 2005-05-31 07:29PM | 0 recs
That wasn't because of the GOP primary.
Ryan's little scandal didn't break until after he was already the nominee.
by craverguy 2005-05-31 07:38PM | 0 recs
Re: That wasn't because of the GOP primary.
That, and because that seat was ours for the taking so long as we didn't nominate Roxy Hart.
by Hannula 2005-05-31 08:14PM | 0 recs
what is
Radnofsky's denomination?
by dre2k5 2005-05-31 07:51PM | 0 recs
Re: what is
she is Jewish
by texasdemocrat06 2005-06-02 08:47AM | 0 recs
Here's my take on GOP nominees...
As another Texas here, here are my thoughts on who will be the GOP nominees:

David Dewhurst -- US Senate.

Karl Rove likes him after his assistance with redistricting, so he will reward him.  Plus, Dewhurst is a wealthy energy guy, so he can spend his own money.  Being Lt. Governor gives Dewhurst a higher profile than being a Congressman like Bonilla.  Besides, Dewhurst fits the Rove type epitomized by W. and Cornyn.
He's conservative, but he smiles.

Kay Bailey Hutchinson -- Governor

Even a lot of Republicans hate Perry.
He has a Delay-like mean streak, but not the power.
Hutchinson has always been popular down here.

Note that both Perry and Hutchinson are part of the Rove family.  Who does Daddy Karl like?

In many ways, this is the "unimportant" race in the GOP.  Perry has no future beyond Governor and is fighting for his survival.  Hutchinson is looking to wind her career up at home in Austin.

Greg Abbott -- Lt. Governor.

Abbott's legal opinion as Attorney General started the ball rolling on redistricting.  I can see Rove wanting to move him up along with Dewhurst.

The common thread in all of these races?  Karl Rove.

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 09:39PM | 0 recs
How 'bout Strayhorn?
Do you think she'll run? If so, as a Democrat or a Republican? And how well do you think she could do?
by craverguy 2005-05-31 09:43PM | 0 recs
Re: How 'bout Strayhorn?
Funny you should mention ol' Carole...

She hates Perry, and Perry has gone after her (budget issues; she tries to keep him in line as controller).

If she runs, it will be for Governor only, in my opinion.

Rumor from Texas Monthly magazine says that Carole may switch parties and run as a Democrat.  This would make sense in order to avoid the Perry-Hutchinson race, which would be bad news for her.  Then again, she has 2 sons working for Bush right now, so a switch would awkward...and we also know how ruthless the Rove-Cheney-Bush types can be. Still, she would have an easier primary.

If she can get Perry head-to-head, she has a chance.  However, I think a lot of Republicans (i.e. Karl Rove) will go after her mercilessly for not being a team player, which will hurt her badly.  Still, Democrats hate Perry and would take Carole over him in a heartbeat, and Carole could reasonably win enough Republican votes to pull it out.

Winning will be tough for her in any case.
The Republicans will be gunning for her, regardless of her party affiliation.
But she is a major wildcard!

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 10:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Here's my take on GOP nominees...
Dewhurst is likely to be rewarded. He's carried water for the GOP for several years now, although has worked with Democrats in the senate better than a lot of people excpeted.  Most of us saw him as a rich right-wing nut buying his way into the most powerful spot in TX gov't when he ran for lt guv in 2002.  Dewhurst has actually managed to maintain a relatively cordial relationship with Dem state senators while also appeasing the conservative base of the GOP - not an easy task. If Dewhurst runs for Senate and invests his money into the race, he'll probably win the nomination.  Dems will try and paint him as a right-winger but it will be a bit more difficult than in 2002.  Still, Dems would rather run against him than Bonilla.  We can attack Bonilla for his DeLay ties, but he would take a significant share of the Hispanic vote, and without a strong Hispanic vote for Dems, we would have no chance. Plus, a Hispanic Republican senator in Texas would hurt long-term Dem attempts to solidify Hispanics as a Dem base constituency in Texas.

Guv - I don't know where Rove will stand.  Or Bush for that matter. They will probably stay out of it.  You are right, however, in that Perry no longer serves a useful purpose for Bush.  Bush needed Perry in 1998 to assure that he would hand over power to another Republican if he were elected Prez.  Bush needed Perry in 2002 to lead the GOP ticket and not be embarrased in his home state. Now, he has little further use of Perry. Bush will stay out of the race, but the actions of his loyalists will be telling.

Abbott will be the conservative / GOP establishment choice for Lt Guv if he runs.  They want Strayhorn gone. Strayhorn might consider switching parties, but to do so would embarrass her son, White House Press Sec't Scott McClennen. She wouldn't do that, even though she dislikes Perry and would probably like to see him defeated.

by ByronUT 2005-05-31 10:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Here's my take on GOP nominees...
You're right about Rove.
The fact that two of his former candidates are going head-to-head says a lot about where the race fits into Rove's plans.

US Senate and Lt. Governor are what Rove's really after.  With Dewhurst and Abbott, Rove sees the future of his Texas Republican Party (along with John Cornyn.  The governor's race is about the past to Rove; Perry and Hutchinson really don't have futures, though for different reasons.

Dewhurst and Abbott may have futures, however.
This is what Rove is banking on.

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 10:08PM | 0 recs
With regards to the Democrats...
Radnofsky -- has been making the rounds and is working to get her name out.  I don't know about her chances, but I have been impressed with her effort.  She even came to my area, Northeast Texas.

Bell -- Name recognition may still be an issue in many parts of the state (or even anywhere outside of Houston, to a certain extent).

by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 10:19PM | 0 recs
Also an issue for Bell:
He just lost his own seat. If he can't keep his own seat, why should primary voters think he can take somebody else's?
by craverguy 2005-05-31 10:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Also an issue for Bell:
Good point.

Remember thought that he was redistricted out of his seat

by v2aggie2 2005-06-01 07:41PM | 0 recs
Juan Garcia -- the US Senate Candidate
I heard that he was Obama's roomate at Harvard
by v2aggie2 2005-05-31 10:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Juan Garcia -- the US Senate Candidate
that is true
by texasdemocrat06 2005-06-02 08:48AM | 0 recs
the kinky factor
all this talk is well and good, but yall are totally forgetting about kinky freidman. i agree that the GOP primary is going to be bloody, but you're forgetting the x-factor.

at first i thought kinky was going to be a joke, but now i'm not so convinced.  every time i am in a public place and the subject of politics comes up, someone mentions kinky. i am not exaggerating. i've heard college students, native texans, redneck-types, indys, dems, and republicans ALL talk about voting for him. i am seeing kinky bumper stickers in the poor neighborhoods and the moneyed places like oak lawn and highland park. we would be fools to think that he's not going to pull some votes from both the dems and the reps.

this is going to be an interesting 2006 in texas. i'm not so blind as to think that we're going to have a democratic senator (with all due respect to those more optimistic than me, that thought makes me laugh out loud even though i'd love to see it). as to the gov's race, i'm pulling for chris bell, but i don't think anybody can credibly say "oh yea, dems will take the dome back" with any sort of confidence. i'm telling you, don't forget the x-factor. that is really going to shake things up quite a bit (and maybe a little shaking is what we need).

by annatopia 2005-06-01 07:12AM | 0 recs
Re: the kinky factor
I hear that he just hired Bill Hillsman, the adman behind Paul Wellstone and (more ominously for the two parties) Jesse Ventura.
by craverguy 2005-06-01 12:57PM | 0 recs
yup
he's serious about the race.  he is no joke, and we would be foolish to write him off and pretend like this is a two-party race.

shit, i know dem and rep activists who are already lining up to volunteer for him.  he's pulling from both sides, maybe even enough to create a situation where the winner doesn't pull over 50% at the polls.

by annatopia 2005-06-01 01:27PM | 0 recs
Re: yup
Maybe enough for him to win by plurality, the way Ventura did.

Personally, I like that outcome better than the idea of Perry, Hutchinson, or one of the "Democrats" in the race winning it.

by craverguy 2005-06-01 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: yup
i hear ya.  but i honestly think chris bell would make a good governor.  

but at this time i don't see anyone sneaking in if KBH gets through the primary.  hell, even if perry is bloodied, as i see it at this time perry would win.  

hell i dunno, ask me again when the primaries are gearing up.

by annatopia 2005-06-01 01:44PM | 0 recs
Vinson & Elkins
I realize that we can't be too choosy in Texas, but if we're going to focus on being "reform Democrats" in 2006, maybe we should field a candidate who isn't a lawyer for the corporate firm that represented Enron and employed Albert Gonzales.
by Crazy Vaclav 2005-06-01 08:41AM | 0 recs
well said
thank you.
by annatopia 2005-06-01 08:56AM | 0 recs
No Connection Whatsoever
Yes, Barbara's a member of Vinson and Elkins. She's also been there a lot longer than either Enron or Gonzales have been. She has ZERO-I repeat, ZERO-ties to either of those terrible areas, and she certainly repudiates Enron and Gonzales' conduct (In fact, she's repeatedly made it clear that she would NOT have voted to confirm Gonzales).
by MrLiberal 2005-06-01 11:50AM | 0 recs
regardless...
you are dreaming if you think that texas is going to elect a democratic senator next year.

believe me, i would love to take back this state. but it's going to take more than two years to do it.  your predictions are wildly optimistic, IMO.

by annatopia 2005-06-01 12:24PM | 0 recs
The company you keep...
She can get up and plead "corporate firewalls" or whatever the current jargon is, but the fact remains that she has chosen to continue to associate with this firm fully knowing that it was not just a silent bystander but actively involved in assembling Enron's off-the-books partnerships and suppressing Sherron Watkins' whistleblowing.

I know that at a firm of 500+ lawyers you don't always know what's going on down the hall, and there are big advantages to associating with the largest firm in town, but if she were going to repudiate the culture that allowed Enron and Gonzales to flourish, she would do so by joining a different law firm. (If she's a "superlawyer," it probably wouldn't even require a pay cut.) No matter how earnest she might seem, she's not going to come across as a credible voice for reform with pockets stuffed with Enron money.

by Crazy Vaclav 2005-06-01 12:51PM | 0 recs
Re: The company you keep...
It is true that Vinson and Elkins is a conservative law firm.

It is true Barbara Radnofsky is a non-conservative Democrat.

It is also true that Barbara Radnofsky is a partner at Vinson and Elkins.

She didn't get their by being dumb.
And judging by the above truths, she bucked the odds.

Judge her on her own merits, not her employers.
She has her own identity.

by v2aggie2 2005-06-01 07:45PM | 0 recs
Dewhurst's $$
Dewhurst is a multi-millionaire. He would have plenty of money and he will probaby spend over 10 million of his own $$ if he runs for the senate. He will outspend Bonilla easily.

Texas Democrats may have a chance to take some seats away from Republicans in 06, but its unlikely that Radnofsky and Bell are the two to do it.

David

by texasdemocrat06 2005-06-01 12:46PM | 0 recs
Abbott
abbott isnt thinking about the senate. he has his eyes on the lt guv for sure. he originally filed for lt guv in 2002 and then pulled out when cornyn went for the open senate seat and left AG open. abbott wants to be lg.
by texasdemocrat06 2005-06-01 12:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Abbott
abbott's a goddamned hypocrite.

but gop-leaning texans don't care about that, unfortunately.  that's why i'm very skeptical about how the "reformer" line will play here.  i mean, I like it, but i'm not a typical texas gooper.  they don't care about that shit.  as long as there's an R next to the name, IOKIYAR.

by annatopia 2005-06-01 01:24PM | 0 recs

Login

 

Sign-in-with-twitter-lighter

Advertise Blogads