Obama cannot win without help from the superdelegates either. How hard is that to understand? The implication is that Hillary is way behind and cannot possibly win. Speaking in percentages, there isn't much difference at all between Hillary and Obama.
Helen Thomas has forgotten more about how to be a journalist covering a presidential than most of those in the media now will ever know. She is a living treasure who took it to W when the others were mostly kissing his backside.
I'm trying to be realistic here. I don't mean to be "uncivil" as you put it. I think you are being overly naive. I think Wright will be a huge problem because of the way Obama handled it. Even Joe Trippi was saying this morning that there are some serious danger signs in this one for Senator Obama.
Ha! For those of you who don't have your Obamaspeak decoders handy, let me translate. Repeating any truth that reflects unfavorably on Senator Obama is "fearmongering."
I'm quite good at math thank you very much. But this really has little to do with math. The commenter is citing polls to claim that Obama will perform better than Senator Clinton in states where he lost the primaries. And any pollster will tell you that unless there has been a huge event after the election that totally changes the political landscape, a recent election is a more reliable indicator of what will happen in future elections than a recent poll.
Yeah all those Obama supporters saying it is impossible for Hillary to win. Of course, they were saying the same thing before TX and OH weren't they? Talk about serious deficits in math skills...
You guys act like ignoring the fact that he sat in that church and listened to Wright and supported him for 20 years will make it go away. And you act like it won't be the subject of endless Republican big money 527 ads. Think again!
New Hampshire and New Mexico? He lost those too. What about Ohio and FL? How does he poll there? Not so well. He loses in important big swing states. And he is about to lose PA too.
Not him Wright. Wright has been well known for his controversial views, especially in Chicago, for the whole time Barack Obama has been in Chicago. He went to Libya with Farrakhan in the mid '80s.
jeromearmstrong Our Polarized and Money-Driven Congress: Created Over 25 Years By Republicans (and Quickly Imitated by Democrats http://bit.ly/ewXlXI #bblue
Actually, most people think the popular vote winner should win.
Obama cannot win without help from the superdelegates either. How hard is that to understand? The implication is that Hillary is way behind and cannot possibly win. Speaking in percentages, there isn't much difference at all between Hillary and Obama.
Thanks Alegre! Hillary is a really good listener!
This is Hillary's opportunity to win votes if she can show superiority on the economy. And I think she can.
Helen Thomas has forgotten more about how to be a journalist covering a presidential than most of those in the media now will ever know. She is a living treasure who took it to W when the others were mostly kissing his backside.
I wonder how long it will be before Obama copies these ideas and claims they are his?
I've heard countless stories of Hillary winning over what seem to be hostile crowds. She really is amazing when you look at the real person.
I'm trying to be realistic here. I don't mean to be "uncivil" as you put it. I think you are being overly naive. I think Wright will be a huge problem because of the way Obama handled it. Even Joe Trippi was saying this morning that there are some serious danger signs in this one for Senator Obama.
Ha! For those of you who don't have your Obamaspeak decoders handy, let me translate. Repeating any truth that reflects unfavorably on Senator Obama is "fearmongering."
I'm quite good at math thank you very much. But this really has little to do with math. The commenter is citing polls to claim that Obama will perform better than Senator Clinton in states where he lost the primaries. And any pollster will tell you that unless there has been a huge event after the election that totally changes the political landscape, a recent election is a more reliable indicator of what will happen in future elections than a recent poll.
Yeah all those Obama supporters saying it is impossible for Hillary to win. Of course, they were saying the same thing before TX and OH weren't they? Talk about serious deficits in math skills...
Do you really think that those ads won't hurt us if Obama is the nominee? Is your head really that far up you know where?
You guys act like ignoring the fact that he sat in that church and listened to Wright and supported him for 20 years will make it go away. And you act like it won't be the subject of endless Republican big money 527 ads. Think again!
New Hampshire and New Mexico? He lost those too. What about Ohio and FL? How does he poll there? Not so well. He loses in important big swing states. And he is about to lose PA too.
Not him Wright. Wright has been well known for his controversial views, especially in Chicago, for the whole time Barack Obama has been in Chicago. He went to Libya with Farrakhan in the mid '80s.