• on a comment on Why not Hillary? over 3 years ago

    I don't know why people come here to stump for McCain.

  • on a comment on The GLEE that Obama may lose? over 3 years ago

    They were pretty much all voting for Hillary (at least the doors I knocked on) and many of the voters seemed disconnected to Obama. They didn't like his name, questioned where he came from. One woman kept calling him Bahama, her husband thought he was born somewhere else....of course the muslim rumors....(this was back in April).

    And yet any attempt to say that racism was playing a role in the voting was met with total outrage, and in some cases and endorsement.

    This is why you will always get a chilly response here - you've thrown your lot in with some real creeps.

  • on a comment on The GLEE that Obama may lose? over 3 years ago

    The only way "300 delegates" makes any sense is if you're mad that the RBC didn't decide to award the entire states to her.  

    Otherwise you just pulled that number out of your ass.  Michigan and Florida do not have 600 delegates, let alone enough delegates for one candidate to WIN BY that much.

    That's the funniest part about the RBC decision - actually the second funniest; the funniest is the fact that Clinton supported the original decision to strip them all, and that was just fine and dandy with you.  The SECOND funniest part about it is that allowing the full delegations would have made no difference in the who the winner was.

    So, it's not the principle of it, as your favored candidate was instrumental in the original decision, which you support.  And as craven as it would be, it's not because it didn't allow her to win by hook or by crook, which, although it's a point in favor of your integrity, it's a knock on your ability to count.

    So I'm sort of baffled.  Whenever this happens, I head over to No Quarter, and there the REAL reason that old time Democrats are so upset is laid bare.

  • on a comment on Why not Hillary? over 3 years ago

    You ought to perhaps read between the lines?  As an Obama supporter I really appreciated the tack she took on the issue.

    "Of COURSE I want to be his Vice-President!"  Like, who wouldn't be?  That has to be her position, especially after the reports of her saying in private that he couldn't win - I'm sure you read that in the papers too.

  • on a comment on The Earmarks McCain Used To Mock over 3 years ago

    To wit: the BIG difference.  

  • on a comment on The Earmarks McCain Used To Mock over 3 years ago

    I just want to know the difference between a Governor's earmarks and a Senator's earmarks.

  • on a comment on Why not Hillary? over 3 years ago

    Seriously.  I know the GE just started and everything but what a disappointment he's turning out to be.

  • on a comment on Why not Hillary? over 3 years ago

    She may not have wanted it for a variety of reasons; your saying that she had to say she wanted it regardless of her actual feelings isn't just maturity (as per Souvarine) - it's common sense.  Were she to say that she didn't it would be read as a vote of no confidence.

  • on a comment on Why not Hillary? over 3 years ago

    Hers, or his?

    Just want to get down which Democrat you're slandering with no evidence.  So much of that going around.

  • on a comment on The Earmarks McCain Used To Mock over 3 years ago

    ?

  • on a comment on The GLEE that Obama may lose? over 3 years ago

    That's actually a lie - the "kitchen sink fuscillade" was a direct quote from a Clinton staffer describing THEIR strategy.

    Distusting.  You remind me of Republicans who used to use the phrase "politics of personal destruction" to describe Bill Clinton's campaign tactics knowing full well that he used that phrase to complain about what they were doing to him.  Did you learn that trick from Sean Hannity?  The phony outrage is just so reminscent of him.

  • on a comment on The GLEE that Obama may lose? over 3 years ago

    It's really a shame that you feel that the only way to get ahead is to it on the backs of other minorities.  The history of the the both the civil rights movement and the women's right's movements run counter to your claim, but you may be some kind of supremacist.

  • This was inevitable.  You can't have the first major black candidate and the first major female candidate run against each other - in the democratic party - and not expect people to fly off the handle over bullshit.

  • on a comment on Rasmussen: McCain up 1; Intrade over 3 years ago

    Like I said, people who are voting for the Phillis Schlafly ticket are going to have to get used to their opinions not being respected anymore.  Because if you get such a basic decision wrong, what good are you on more complicated things?

  • "Us?"  Who's the one who calls Obama supporters "diaper babies" right after the primary, then switches, thinking no one will notice and talks about how Hillary Clinton is useless and her supporters need to shut up in ever diary right before the convention, and is now a "Hillary supporter" again, stirring up things, once again, when people start sniping at each other?

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------