If anyone here believes that Edwards is more electable than Obama, you must be listening or reading too much meaning to Jerome's wishful thinking and disdain for Obama too long.

We all read the polls. Edwards was in the single digits on most polls last week. Some polls did not even poll him against the top tier GOP.

Only God's knows what motivates Jerome to come up with shit like this. You can promote your candidates but don't take your readers for fools.

Edwards's campaign is in its last throes but if you want to waste your money on him, make my day.

I quoted you sir and I am aware of your previous diaries.

However, the Obama camp believes he will win NV. He is not doing well there because he is just getting organized. He also believes that there is some similarity between some part Illinois where he won and Northern Part of Nevada.

a point?

becoming funny and downright silly.

Jerome, why do you believe that

 
If Edwards wins IA, then he's in an excellent position to take NV on the strength of Labor, and ride the momentum to the nomination.

 If Obama wins IA, then I expect that we will have a mega-battle on our hands, with Clinton making 'a comeback' in NV and NH, and the contest going on for months.  

The opposite is the case. Obama has the Nomination if he wins Iowa unlike Edwards who is expected to win Iowa because he cast all his lot there since 2004. Other than your wishful thinking that Edwards not Obama should be the Democratic Nominee, you have shown no basis for making that statement. Edwards gets no momentum if he wins Iowa. I really don't think he will win it in the first place.

When all the votes are counted, Obama will come victorious if you like it or not. I guess, you are just in denial. I just wish you can be fair to all the candidates.

My prediction is that Edwards will fade following the Q2 report believe it or not.

Jerome, why do you have such a disdain for Obama?

their impeachment right because Bush has not shied away from using all his rights and more under the constitution?

What are they going to do about the signing statements? Is that not a cause for impeachment?

Apples and Oranges. 2006 was Hillary second election for the same office.

hire new staff, buy furniture, create his infrastructure, etc from scratch unlike Machine Clinton, who created her infrastructure from her senate race where she spent over $20 million with a token opposition, and has the Clinton machine at disposal.

You need to think before you spout your hate.

From thier past record, Survey USA is not a serious poll outfit.

I completely disagree with your analysis because it is premised on Clinton being the Nominee and polls that are not relevant today.

Further, the talk of Clinton being the Nominee is premature and a wishful thinking on your part.

In addition, your analysis gives Edwards too much credit. I really don't believe that Edwards will be that much of threats even in Iowa when the Q2 fundraiser is announced.

The Nomination is now between Obama and Clinton your romance with Edwards not withstanding.

and it is fading.

More Good News to come. Stay tuned the battle is yet to be joined.

Hillary is a head nationally because of name recognition only.

In the States that matter, she is behind. I am sad, Matt left. Jerome must be mad now because it becoming obvious that their Candidate Hillary is not electable.

Just the signs of things to come. Clinton wins in the Opinion Polls and Obama wins at the ballot box.