I'd glady give up a Senate seat that is already Republican if we gain the Presidency.

I see that skit as an attack on Obama, since the 3 points made about Hillary are actually the backbone of the Obama campaign.

You all claim that AA's won't vote for Hillary if she gets the nomination.  What about whites not voting for Obama if he gets the nomination?  I am more worried about that, since whites have many more votes.

With everything that has been dragging Obama down, the Republicans have an almost unlimited Kerry "voted for it before I voted against it" moments to ensure his loss in November.  With all of this coming out, the new polls show that Hillary is so much better against McCain in the states that we need to win.  The superdelegates really think that the Republicans won't use these tactics to bring down Obama as well as our down ticket races?

The supers aren't switching because the Democratic Party is content with losing another election.

Although I am a Hillary supporter, I feel that this is an unfair attack on Obama.  These investment banks do a lot more than just subprime lending.  99% of those donations are probably from people who do not have anything to do with subprime lending.  Comparing Obama and Clintons donations from Wall Street does not mean that one is more responsible or anyway involved in the subprime mess.

He was also running against 5+ people in those races, so I don't think looking at those numbers is relevant.

The Republicans in the Senate have said they will not agree to it unless both campaigns agree.  Hillary has and Obama has not.  Thus, he IS stopping a re-vote.

I don't understand why he would resign.  The same thing happened to Sen. Vitter and Vitter no one pressured him to resign.  Why the double standard?

Obviously Obama is not in favor of this because he will likely lose both states.  That is why I believe Hillary needs to take her name off the ballot in Mississippi and North Carolina in order to deny Obama wins.  If her name is not on the ballot, he can't claim to have won anything...right?

Dems dont use the same system as the GOP because we like to create complex situations for ourselves just so we can argue about it for months and months.  If we wanted to have a system where it is actually possible for a nominee to be decided without everyone else dropping out, we would adopt a similar style.

Where is this rumor about them calling Texas for Hillary?

Why are Ohio numbers not coming in?

What did the first round show?

Why aren't white superdelegates being harrased to switch their vote based on who won the district?  Seems it is the Obama people making race a big issue in this primary.