LOL. Yes, she should drop out for the good of the Obama Party. Did you not see the article linked this morning that said Democrats are doing extremely well and the continued fight for the nom is a good thing? Or are you simply choosing to ignore that?

Oh yes! That Hillary should just drop out for the good of the Party--OBAMA AND HIS SUPPORTERS.

Gut feeling or a wish? Not gonna happen.

No McCain sits on the sidelines with NO Clear Target.

It's perfectly fine for the Democratic Party. Good, actually. See the front page article.  This is only a horrible thing for the blogosphere and Obama's supporters at that.  They're the only ones (and Obama himself) that want this race over NOW.

And for some reason we gave national security to the Republicans long ago. HRC is taking it back. Rightly so since the Dems are the only ones that govern properly.

Has anyone told PA this thing is over? And WY, PR, and all the rest of the states that have not yet voted?

It's not. Her half is a certain demographic and his half is another. I don't discount either. I don't think either of their votes other than a few nefarious wayward kooky Republicans make a difference either way.

Hence my particular theory that they're going to end up at a brokered convention.
No delusions, nothing of the sort. Just where I see this thing headed.  

She doesn't have the math.
He doesn't have the math.
They both appeal to different bases of Democrats and different Republicans.

They will be on a joint ticket, IMO.

Funny how when Republicans vote for Obama...it's simply because he appeals to them. When they vote for HRC, it's a nefarious conspiracy.  

here. I completely agree that the math (which I'm actually quite good at, but thank you for the insult when I've hurled none) is against her. My one and only point in the "math" argument is that it's also not FOR him. He's far from having the nomination wrapped up.

I agree with you regarding the "bleeding" of the title of the post. Perhaps "has lost some trickle of his cross-over support"? That'd suit me better. Since that seems to be the case.

I'm all for rationality. And I don't think HRC has anything wrapped up. I also think in all the analysis of her not having the math...he doesn't either. Hence, this WILL go to a brokered convention. And I don't think taking VP when he's guaranteed President and experience in 8 yrs would be foolish. But then again, I don't find Obama's rhetoric appealing nor his campaign to be transcendent or post-partisan.

The 3 AM ad now is Rovian? LOL. I thought it was simply a case for her candidacy. She never even mentioned Obama. Simply made the case for herself.  But frame it however you'd like to.

Right. Shallow analysis indeed. And your argument is completely void of credibility when you call HRC Billary. You sound like the Republicans with that type of framing.

Yes. One week they told their Republican orcs to vote for Barack to finally get Clinton out. This week they told them to vote for Clinton, to keep the soap opera going.

Both scenarios are ridiculous, untrue, and a non-starter.

And I'd beg to differ about who our nominee will be. Much to the chagrin of Obama supporters...he'll either be on the same ticket as HRC or not at all.