The US-Israeli Conflict: the latest games

While the Netayuha government persists in its refusal to freeze the building of settlements, a few days ago George Mitchell, Obama's point man on establishing Palestinian statehood "within two years," raised the ante, indicating that the US might go directly to talks about setting Israel's (hence, the future Palestinian state's) borders.

It almost seems as if Netanyahu's intransigence on the settlement freeze is raising the stakes in what is becoming a chess match. Setting borders avoids the settlement freeze issue.

Senior U.S. officials, including President Barack Obama's Mideast envoy George Mitchell, say they might propose immediate talks on setting Israel's border along the West Bank.

The move comes in light of Israel's opposition to a freeze on settlement construction and would determine which settlements will remain in Israel in a final deal that would see the emergence of a Palestinian state.


Yesterday, Shimon Peres also side-stepped the issue of freezing settlements by announcing that the provisional borders of the Palestinian state should be implemented according to the second stage of the Road Map, one which would also permanently stop the colonization process. That the eyes wide open hypocrisy of past US presidents is gone is apparently being recognized.

In the meantime, Bibi Netanyahu's position remains stuck on preconditions: "yes to the Road Map but no to a settlement freeze," with the precondition, "above all," that it is accompanied by "Palestinian recognition of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people." Since separation of Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel continues, it is something the Palestinians have adamantly refused to do. As recently reported by Jonathan Cook, loyalty oaths, the invention of Avigdor Lieberman, are now being used to keep Arabs out of local Israeli towns. This is not the kind of thing that would encourage liberal Americans to pay attention to right wing preconditions.

And so the games go on.

Tags: Israel, mitchell, Netanyahu, obama, Palestine, Peres (all tags)

Comments

3 Comments

Re: The US-Israeli Conflict: the latest games

What 'separation of Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel' are you referring to?  Do you mean physical separation or the loyalty legislation as an ideological and civic distinction?

by Shaun Appleby 2009-06-11 08:39AM | 0 recs
Follow the Jonathan Cook link above.

By permission, the Cook article:

`Loyalty oath' to keep Arabs out of Galilee town

Jonathan Cook
June 08. 2009

MISGAV, ISRAEL // A community in northern Israel has changed its bylaws to demand that new residents pledge support for "Zionism, Jewish heritage and settlement of the land" in a thinly veiled attempt to block Arab applicants from gaining admission.

Critics are calling the bylaw, adopted by Manof, home to 170 Jewish families in Galilee, a local "loyalty oath" similar to a national scheme recently proposed by the far-Right party of the government minister Avigdor Lieberman.

Other Jewish communities in the central Galilee - falling under the umbrella of a regional council known as Misgav - are preparing similar bylaws in response to a court petition filed by an Arab couple hoping to build a home in Misgav.

"It looks very much like this is being co-ordinated by the Misgav council in an attempt to pre-empt the court ruling," said Ronin Ben Ari, resident of another Misgav community, Mikhmanim, and an opponent of the bylaw change.

Manof's move comes in the wake of efforts by Ahmed and Fatina Zbeidat, who live in the neighbouring Arab town of Sakhnin, to win admission to the Misgav community of Rakafet.

Traditionally some 700 rural communities in Israel, including 30 in Misgav, have weeded out Arab applicants by issuing automatic rejections through special vetting committees. Arab citizens make up one-fifth of the country's population.

According to a legal rights group, rural communities, which are home to only five per cent of the population but have control over four-fifths of the countryside, are seen by the state as a bulwark against Arabs gaining access to what are called "national lands".

However, the vetting system has been under threat since a court ruling in 2000 that required the committees to consider Arab applicants and justify their decisions.

In line with the ruling, the Zbeidats demanded the right to take a suitability test when their application was turned down in 2006. Examiners found Fatina too "individualistic" for life in a small community while her husband lacked "knowledge of sophisticated interpersonal relations".

The Zbeidats then petitioned the courts against the use of vetting committees, saying they enforced "blatant discrimination" against Arab applicants.

Earlier this year, in an indication that the court was preparing to back them, it demanded that the attorney-general explain why the vetting committees should continue.

"There is little doubt that many residents of Misgav are panicking about the court case," said Mr Ben Ari, who heads a small dissident group called Alternative Voice in the Galilee.

He added that Ron Shani, who was elected Misgav's mayor late last year, made opposition to the Zbeidats' bid to live in Rakafet a major platform in his campaign.

Mr Shani defended the bylaw change last week to the Israeli media. "The council's position is that it is appropriate to strengthen the character of the community - a community in which Zionist values and Jewish heritage stand at the heart of its way of life. We don't see this as racism in any way."

Mr Ben Ari said: "There is a widely held feeling in Misgav that changing the bylaws is a legitimate way for the Jewish minority in the Galilee to defend itself against an Arab and Islamic danger.

"The residents here are not right-wing types like Lieberman. They see themselves as liberals and in fact are made very uncomfortable by the Lieberman comparison."

A bill proposed by Mr Lieberman's Yisrael Beiteinu party that conditioned citizenship on declaring loyalty to a Jewish state was rejected by a ministerial committee last week.

The bylaw, accepted by an overwhelming majority in Manof, stipulates that applicants must share "the values of the Zionist movement, Jewish heritage, settlement of the Land of Israel ... and observance of Jewish holidays".

It also proposes that local children be encouraged to join the Zionist youth movement and the Israeli army.

A similarly worded proposal will come before another Misgav community, Yuvalim, later this month.

One resident opposed to the change, Arik Kirschenbaum, told the liberal Haaretz newspaper last week: "It suddenly seems as if we adopted bylaws from the settlements."

Residents of Manof have been quoted in the Israeli media decrying accusations of racism.

"It's unpleasant and even offensive to wake up one morning and find that you've turned into Lieberman," said Alon Mayer, pointing out that Yisrael Beiteinu won only 2.5 per cent of Manof's vote in the February general election.

Several residents were reported to fear that living alongside Arabs might lead to ethnic tensions and sectarian violence.

Suhad Bishara, a lawyer with the Adalah legal rights group who is representing the Zbeidats, said: "There is nothing unique or special about the way of life in these communities to justify this kind of restriction on admission.

"Rather, the purpose of the selection system is to make sure 80 per cent of the territory inside Israel is not accessible to Arabs, that the control of public resources stays exclusively in Jewish hands."

The Zbeidats' application was submitted after they were unable to find a building plot in Sakhnin. The town's young couples face increasing difficulties building homes after much of Sakhnin's land was turned over to Misgav's jurisdiction.

Sakhnin officials point out that its 25,000 inhabitants have only one-twentieth of the land available to the 20,000 residents of Misgav's 30 communities. An appeal by Sakhnin that it be awarded some of Misgav's land was rejected by a boundary commission in 2005.

Misgav promotes itself, in the words of its website, as a model of "ethnic pluralism" because it includes 5,000 Bedouin.

However, critics note that Misgav's Bedouin live in a handful of separate communities deprived of the land available to the Jewish communities.

The Bedouin inhabitants are generally denied basic services such as water and electricity, as well as schools and medical clinics. In one, Arab al Naim, the inhabitants are forced to live in tin shacks because permanent structures are demolished by the state.

Last week, three members of the Israeli parliament introduced a bill stipulating that vetting committees should assess candidates' "suitability to the community's way of life and social fabric". The legislators said the bill would help in "maintaining the Zionist vision."

by MainStreet 2009-06-11 09:13AM | 0 recs
Re: Follow the Jonathan Cook link above.

PS: This exclusion of Arab citizens from Jewish communities in Israel reminds me of the perniciousness of reverse prejudice, which is prejudice nonetheless. We have heard the excuses, all of which amount to some form of ethnocentric speciality which excludes those not bearing the exclusive traits of some group.

Is there any better definition of anti-Semiticism?

by MainStreet 2009-06-11 10:48AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads