Is MyDD under attack? Act TWO

According to my calculations, the last 10 or so diaries were put up in the past 15 minutes, on trivial matters as far as left wing or liberal/progressive issues are concerned, by first time diarists, new members, all of whom never even posted a comment.

The time is 9:56 am EST. December 27

Act TWO: The day is December 28 and the time is 9:43 am EST.

It looks as if MyDD is getting another round of spammed troll diaries.

Tags: Troll Diaries (all tags)



thanks for the heads up

I'm sure the admins will get to these.

Spam diaries are an occasional problem on all community blogs.

by desmoinesdem 2009-12-26 05:08AM | 0 recs
Re: thanks for the heads up

First time I've experienced this phenomenon. Is this a group or is one person usually the culprit? It takes quite a bit effort to write so many diaries.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 05:12AM | 0 recs
Re: It takes quite a bit of effort to write ...

Unless the perp had them all ready to unload at a given time.

by susie 2009-12-26 09:52AM | 0 recs
Re: It takes quite a bit of effort to write ...

Still it seemed to be quite an effort. In any case, admin has deleted them. As far as I can tell, this diary should have stopped here, but...

by MainStreet 2009-12-27 07:04AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Check the user pages a little more closely and you'll see they have links to what appears to be an online shoe store.  

I've got to buy because nothing lures me to a shiny pair of Gucci knock-offs like a sexy Canadian tax diary!

by January 20 2009-12-26 05:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Well if their shoes are that good, then I might look them up myself.

Is it an online Canadian shoe store? Well, given the effort taken I suspect that Canada got hurt as badly by these snow storms. But Christmas is over. Reminds me that 9 out of 10 businesses go under within a few years.

Perhaps it is a last gasp attempt to churn up business. But why MyDD? We're not exactly all barefooted beggars.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 05:16AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Well if their shoes are that good, then I might look them up myself.

Is it an online Canadian shoe store? Well, given the effort taken I suspect that Canada got hurt as badly by these snow storms. But Christmas is over. Reminds me that 9 out of 10 businesses go under within a few years.

Perhaps it is a last gasp attempt to churn up business. But why MyDD? We're not exactly all barefooted beggars.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 05:16AM | 0 recs
Re: hey look - first comment ever!

I said it was your first diary, not your first comment, but that you had a comment history. Don't get your draws in a bundle or however the saying goes.

What a coincidence that you would post your first diary after a dozen or so troll diaries. That's all. Relax.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 06:30AM | 0 recs
Re: look what trying to be friendly gets me..

Have nothing more to say. So take my words for what they are. MyDD was attacked this morning by a dozen or so troll diaries. You happened to post your first diary or your first diary in ages next. So what's the beef?

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:05AM | 0 recs
Re: uh wha?

Can you give me the price range and make of your shoes?

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:17AM | 0 recs
Re: oh my

Who? Oh don't bother. You here to call people anti-Semitic if they blog for Palestinian freedom and self-determination.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Curiously, ludwigvan just posted his first diary, but he seems to have a long comment history.

Time is 10:31 AM EST.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 05:32AM | 0 recs
Re: my man

This is not the place to post sucj comments. All of the pro-peace observers of the Clinton era cite him for the being the worst president ever as far as being a conduit for peace in the Middle East. That a tough conclusion to draw given Clinton's apparent involvement, the Rabin-Arafat meeting on the White House lawn, and his flight into Gaza Airport in Airforce One later on.

The problem is that Clinton, in spite of understandings under the Oslo Accords that Israel would halt its colonization of the West Bank and the other territories, during his two terms as president, Israel DOUBLED the number of settlements and the settler population. This is a smart man who knew what he was doing. AIPAC money was always in Clinton's mind.

In any case, he's rated as the worst president as far as Middle East peace is concerned. Slick Willie is not a name he obtained easily, but he deserves it as far as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is concerned. He was two faced and deceptive, and later helped to engineer the "blame Arafat" lie and the "generous offer" hoax.

So you are interested in IP, is that so?

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 06:41AM | 0 recs
Re: right....

The question is irrelevant. Try looking up Phil Weiss or Richard Silverstein or Antony Lowenstein for Jewish bloggers who are against what is happening in Palestine.

I could give you the names of many more human rights activists who are Jewish, and many more who are not. Does it matter? Human and civil rights principles are what they are, unchangeable.

From what you are saying, if you are not Jewish you are likely to be anti-Semitic, but if you are, you are not. How silly.

I'm not impressed with you, whatever your name is, and it seems to me that your are here to cause mischief. Seen it before. It's not a problem.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:12AM | 0 recs
Re: and do you think

See my comment above. Are you a GIYUS operator? I ask because you certainly sound like one.

No more comments from me. Your purpose here is obvious.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:35AM | 0 recs
Re: since i had to look up what that meant

I will be curteous enough to say, goodbye. But stop persisting in turning this diary into an IP one. It only blows your cover.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 08:04AM | 0 recs
A GIYUS operator?

I think one of the most alienating tendencies for liberal Jewish supporters of Israel is when progressive anti-Zionists, such as yourself, suggest that our disagreements with you are not genuine... that we are "operatives" of some sort or other, rather than regular people.

It's nothing but a cheap way to delegitimize the "other."

by Karmafish 2009-12-26 08:23AM | 0 recs
Re: A GIYUS operator?

You seem to show up at the oddest times.

Your comment is welcome and I will be careful about bringing GIYUS into the fray. However, you do realize that GIYUS did a widespread recruitment job and its presence on sites is never a low probability hypothesis. As GIYUS urges bloggers to go to numerous political sites on the internet in order to counteract criticism of Israel with a variety of talking points (propaganda), including even defense of the occupation and colonialism, its a role that cannot ever be discounted. What is particularly disturbing is the denigration of Palestinians living in the occupied territories, who are fighting for a homeland of their own, as terrorists and other sorted individuals, and/or blaming Palestinians for the fact that they have no homeland because...the reasons are unending, but not the occupation or colonialism.

Thanks for your input, otherwise.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 10:11AM | 0 recs
here's a question for you:

are you an Arab or a Muslim? Just curious.

and maybe, have you considered that some in the Democratic Party, the party of FDR, Truman, Kennedy, and Clinton are getting sick of the relentless hate for anything and everything America and Israel do? Overt support of Islamic terrorists who are NOT liberal, nor truly adhere to the real ideas of what the left should be, such as equal rights for women, minorities, gays, free speech, art, and so on?

by Lakrosse 2009-12-26 10:29AM | 0 recs
... the relentless hate for anything and everything America and Israel do?

They're different countries, dude...
by TexasDarling 2009-12-26 04:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Ka-Ching!

Sadly, I could only give that a +2 rating instead of the +22 it deserved. But it did make me smile.

by NJ Liberal 2009-12-26 04:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Huh?  You're talking about a reference from A Clockwork Orange?

by January 20 2009-12-26 06:49AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

What's your problem? This site is for opinion and ideas!

Don't kill or call someone's idea/opinion troll because you don't like it! There is many way to achieve the same results!

Get some work so that you don't have to depend upon government handout or those corrupt congressman and senators who sell their vote and still called it ethical!

by PK 2009-12-27 12:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Just a side comment.

I posted this diary as an alert that MyDD was being spammed by what appear to be troll diaries, over a dozen in 15 minutes or so.

It is not an IP diary, and I am still curious as to how this totally irrelevant topic took over this diary and drove it into that topic.

Apologize for responding to comments on this irrelevancy.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 07:47AM | 0 recs
by MainStreet 2009-12-26 08:25AM | 0 recs
Re: no this one

So you understand where you yourself are coming from. Good. That diary is a lesson to people who wish to spend their time killing messengers, diarists, for the purpose of silencing their loud protests on behalf of the victims of human rights injustices.

Is there anyone quoted that you disagree with? Good. I suppose you wouldn't be posting on a liberal Democratic site if you did.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 08:47AM | 0 recs
Re: wh wont you answer?

Oh please. The only thing you have accomplished by hijacking this diary and turning it into an IP diary is to come out of your closet. When people seem more interested in diarists than the content of their diaries, it is evident that they could care less about substance and more about silencing, in this case, a human rights issue.

You have no interest in doing anything but quieting the airwaves on the matter of Israel's colonialism. You're for two states about as much as the Likud party in Israel.

The diary of mine you quoted is loaded with information from real liberal Jewish peace activists and you are obviously not one of them. As I stated earlier, goodbye.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 09:11AM | 0 recs
Re: oh puleeze cut the drama for a moment

"call me paranoid - but this whole wtf diary makes me think"

Don't let it bother you. The other side of paranoia is grandiosity and more and more it seems to be taking over this interaction. All I can say is that grandiosity feels better than paranoia. Enjoy. Be whomever you wish.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 10:30AM | 0 recs
Re: you guys are sooo into "winning"

For a guy that doesn't care about winning you are unusually persistent, and not just on this thread.

The proper response at being on a thread when your first ten attempts to make your point and/or respond to critics result in bubkis is to say "Fuck it, it is a big blogosphere, and I got better things to do".

But a quick examination of Hidden Comments shows that your actual reaction was to double down on both volume and vitriol.

Perhaps you are not even aware of the concepts of Trusted Users and Hidden Comments but you should know that a certain percentage of MyDD members and probably a high percentage of regular commenters have what are in effect mini-administrator moderation powers as 'TUs' and have the option of simply making ALL your comments disappear one by one. And each time they pass out a '0' your cumulative mojo deteriorates. And maybe no one in history has seen more rapid deterioration in mojo than you have over the last weeks. Far from getting traction for your arguments you are moving in retrograde.

Don't worry about people assigning you 1s, at this point they are only improving your overall mojo score.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 07:58AM | 0 recs
Re: oh gods

What was your previous screen name?

I'm curious given that you just joined MyDD how do you know what went down here nearly two years ago. Why didn't you express yourself then? Why wait nearly two years to open an account?

by Charles Lemos 2009-12-27 08:56AM | 0 recs

I am curious too... dont you have special admin powers to look that up or something ?

by Ravi Verma 2009-12-27 08:54PM | 0 recs
Where did it go? Re: oh gods

Well it went away. And not by any action of mine. Although like any TU I can see who did make it go away and if I thought it was unjustified help bring it back.

"whats with you ankle biters?

do you really friggin think i give a darn about your 'hiddeen comments"?"

Frankly I don't care whether you give a darn or not, and didn't even before you called me an ankle biter. I don't know what your total comment count has been over the last couple of weeks but anyone who manages to get a few hundred of them hidden is apparently someone not willing to listen to some friendly advice/warnings.

Have it your way. And God I hope you have more fun next week than you had this week end.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 09:29AM | 0 recs
Pretty selective censorship

Since the evidence shows that you seem to be its only target. Oh and some guy you dragged into your flame war. I mean even paranoids have real enemies but I don't think the entire MyDD community (or perhaps cabal) got together and decided to target a single commenter.

A more self-reflective commenter might at least ponder if it was related to your suckitude quotient.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 09:34AM | 0 recs
Get paranoid much?

My ratings page shows 13 rated comments, all of them '2's I have not given a '0' to you or anyone. tings

And I only show 49 total comments since Nov 17th. mments/2

If you back out the seven (after this eight) I made in response to you on two threads today that works out to one comment a day on average over the last six weeks. I must be an unusually effective thug/bully boy if a single comment per day on average and no troll ratings handed out counts as being thuggish, gosh who knew that commenters trembled at even the hint of my dissatisfaction and fled in utter confusion.

As to cyber stalking I think you have delusions of adequacy. The better metaphor would be in sea warfare during the hundred and fifty years before 1918 where in the midst of battle each ship coming by a disabled but not sunken ship would fire a broadside or battery into it just to make sure it could not be salvaged later on.

Which is where you reputation will probably be after today, unsalvageable.

And good night sir, I am going to take my own advice, at least as far as the beer and football part goes.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 10:36AM | 0 recs
Re: i dont play or care a wit
They are not my rating games, I have not downrated anything. Which is more than I can say for MMM and PK who seem to do double duty of uprating you and downrating desmoinesdem and Main Street. I am in the midst of a policy debate with desmoinesdem, Chris Bowers and Jerome, I think they are wrong on HCR, they think I am blind as to the obvious deficiencies but somhow the words 'stalker' and 'fanboys' have not entered the conversation. Nor hide ratings. Why am I not being censored here? Why haven't they turned their 'thugs' loose on me? Maybe because it isn't about dissent on issues but instead assholery? Something to think about.
by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 03:08PM | 0 recs
I must be a Schizo

It's like Jimmy Stewart in Harvey, talking to a Pooka no one else can see.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-28 11:30AM | 0 recs
A PUMA embrace

feel the love

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:02AM | 0 recs
Re: sorry weird guy

And here comes the homophobia!

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:09AM | 0 recs
Re: sorry weird guy

I'm not the one who's calling others weird and bringing up "man on man" as if sexual contact between men were insulting to their sensibilities/  I simply pointed out the mutual appreciation between PUMAs.

But whatever.  Your replies rarely make sense anyway.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:17AM | 0 recs
Re: sorry weird guy

This, again, makes little sense.  I recommend you stick to "fanboy." At least it's coherent, even if it's baseless and empty.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:25AM | 0 recs
Re: oh im that too!

Just responding to your comment.  I don't know anything about you.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:23AM | 0 recs
Re: you know what i think of you

Responding to comments in an open forum is not harassment.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 12:11PM | 0 recs
Re: oh im that too!

I find you entertaining.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 12:11PM | 0 recs
Oh my God! Strummerson sees him too! n/t

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-28 11:31AM | 0 recs
Technically a circle jerk

Is not man on man. Not if all the participants close their eyes and imagine it is Hermione or Miley doing the stroking.

Just sayin'

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 03:13PM | 0 recs
You and 'More, more, more' need

To get a room. And maybe PK can bring towels.

Because you are this close to illustrating the Monty Python sketch/song "Manly men doing Manly things with Men". Don't forget patting yourselves on the butt after that home run/touchdown.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 04:00PM | 0 recs
Nope I mostly engaged in school

Activities that didn't  involve me in showering with naked sweaty men.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 07:55PM | 0 recs

What is weird here is this rhetoric of possession, one way or the other.

But regardless, I don't see either of you as an arbiter of masculinity, particularly since I see masculinity as inherently heterogeneous and any attempt to designate it one or the other inherently repressive.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 11:20AM | 0 recs
Re: oh and btw

You bought into the propaganda, in particular, the Clinton-Dennis Ross line, which was intended to save Barak's ass. Is Barak capable of guilt. After the Gaza massacre I would say no. But in 2005 he had a weak moment, and came out honestly to admit that the Israel Knesset could never have support a Palestinian state at that time (now even less so). Why? Because, quoting Barak, not even his own party would have voted to remove (disengage) a single settlement. And he was with the so-called left wing party at the time, Labor.

Find the link: Ehud Barak on Charlie Rose Show, January 25, 2005/

And as for Clinton's Taba nonsense, according to Barak, Taba was nothing, just low level people talking. Yeah, now you are going to tell me the Clinton could do what Barak couldn't do. Give the Palestinians 97% of the Palestinian territories. You just don't know Slick Willie. He along with Ross helped to establish the "generous offer" nonsense. Clinton left the Democratic party before he was president, and became Republican Lite. And on IP peace, he was Republican Lite in spades.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 10:37AM | 0 recs
Monica is that you?

I knew it!

by JJE 2009-12-26 05:10PM | 0 recs
Re: i know President Clinton

Wow, what a poseur.

by Khun David 2009-12-26 05:27PM | 0 recs
Re: no this one

But that is EXACTLY what you do. Anyone who dares to disagree with you is written off as "uneducated."

by NJ Liberal 2009-12-26 04:42PM | 0 recs
cool story bro

your noble struggle against the net holligans would make a great movie.  have you pitched it yet?  i'm sure the Clintons must have introduced you to Linda Bloodworth-Thomason.  work that!

by JJE 2009-12-26 06:35PM | 0 recs
I see a strong correlation

between Clinton hatred and Israel hatred. While not always the case, I see that on these blogs, if you hate one, you probably hate the other. Coincidence? I think not

by Lakrosse 2009-12-26 06:45PM | 0 recs
Perfectly clear!

Because Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Israel, and America are all just different names for the same thing, right?

by TexasDarling 2009-12-26 06:53PM | 0 recs
Hey Monica

spit or swallow?

by JJE 2009-12-27 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: btw 'you"

You bet it doesn't refer to me.

by NJ Liberal 2009-12-27 07:06AM | 0 recs
Re: thats utter bs

Not according to the subject headings of dozens of your comments.

what the f are you talkin about [0.00 / 1] Replies: 0
posted by ludwigvan on 12/27/2009 09:21:55 AM PST

btw hows it goin hater? [0.00 / 1] Replies: 0
posted by ludwigvan on 12/26/2009 07:46:48 PM PST

go home child [0.00 / 2] Replies: 2
posted by ludwigvan on 12/23/2009 10:40:44 AM PST

fanboys get to decide on [0.00 / 1] Replies: 0
posted by ludwigvan on 12/23/2009 07:15:28 AM PST

you truly got serious control issues dont you? [0.00 / 1] Replies: 0
posted by ludwigvan on 12/22/2009 10:44:04 PM PST

i give up [0.00 / 1] Replies: 1
posted by ludwigvan on 12/22/2009 07:38:08 PM PST
(boy this was unintentionally hilarious)

so i type my response to ypu twits [0.00 / 1] Replies: 1
posted by ludwigvan on 12/21/2009 04:33:51 PM PST

i couldnt care what a fool like you [0.00 / 3] Replies: 2
posted by ludwigvan on 12/21/2009 10:34:04 AM PST

go get a life underachiever [0.50 / 2] Replies: 1
posted by ludwigvan on 12/20/2009 08:58:52 PM PST

oh look -the ultimate fan boy love crush [0.00 / 2] Replies: 0
posted by ludwigvan on 12/20/2009 10:30:04 AM PST

In light of this I find this assertion kind of dubious:
"i respect anyone and everyones opinion"

Instead I would have to sum up your overall comment style closer to you over and over saying: "Fuck off you ignorant wanker! And stop calling me names!!"

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 09:54AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Weird. All joined on the same day. 12/19. All used gmail accounts. None had links to commercial products. Topics varied but one reported on an event that took place awhile ago while writing about it in the future. The posts look like they were copied and pasted.

by Charles Lemos 2009-12-26 09:21AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Charles, it was a spamming of diaries, the purpose of which is unclear. These dozen or so diaries followed immediately after I had posted the diary, Gaza Freedom March delayed by Egypt.

I have no idea if there is any connection. In any case, if you wish, you can delete the diary I posted as an alert since it no longer serves to make the point.

by MainStreet 2009-12-26 09:37AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

I suspect Chinese spammers. Emails had East Asian names; xiangliu etc.

No sure the point of the exercise. Anyway thanks for the alert.

by Charles Lemos 2009-12-26 09:49AM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Rec'd for the great title.

by Jerome Armstrong 2009-12-26 10:12AM | 0 recs
yes, MyDD is under attack

for sympathizers for Islamic terrorism, and hate for America/Israel, from people such as yourself.

by Lakrosse 2009-12-26 10:38AM | 0 recs
Difference between a troll

and a flame warrior?

Not much, it is mostly a matter of intent. A troll sets out to  hijack the thread, where flame warriors are mostly shouting "Look at me!" with the actual hijacking being more or less incidental.

BTW there is a difference between a cyber-stalker and someone giving you the hint that you are boring and non-productive and so giving a polite hint by using various forms of 'STFU you are wasting everyone's time'.

And lud if you are feeling like you are missing something you might ask a TU to look in Hidden Comment Land. I am not saying you set an all time record but it is damn impressive. Out of the last 150 Hidden Comments there are six commenters represented, three with one comment each, one with three, about 20 or so from your interlocutor in a particular flame war on "Health Care Reform Frauds and Fantasies". leaving about 124 to your "credit". And most of the rest by all appearances in reaction to you. My favorite is currently (though I suspect not for long) #84 "go ahead cebsor me - ban me" (sic). And it is amazing how many of those subject headings simply ooze self-pity and a persecution complex coupled with an odd triumphalism.

There are names for people whose basic argument boils down to "Everybody here is wrong but me" and who on being kicked out wander away muttering "that site sucked anyway, why did I waste day after day posting there for nothing?"

An excellent question. Because if we are all poopy-heads why are you still here?

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 07:30AM | 0 recs
Why are you the only one targeted?

It is not like you are the only poster or commenter with this same general set of opinions. Do you think you are being targeted by cyber bullies because you are the only one of them that is so effective that you have to be shut down?

And I don't see that my critique falls into the FU jerkwad mode, though that is certainly close to my feelings at this point.

Your intentions may be pure as the driven snow, but people are treating you like a troll because you are acting exactly as trolls act and in doing so have rapidly worn out the typically tolerant audience at MyDD.

To repeat a point made above and below, the ONLY comments being hidden are yours (the large majority over the last week) and those who got dragged into flame wars initiated by you. Maybe you should take the rest of the afternoon off, have a beer and watch some football while thinking over why nobody seems to be convinced by any of your arguments, at least as far as I can see.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 10:06AM | 0 recs
Re: Why are you the only one targeted?

You are opposed to namecalling?  Really?

And what do you call: "sad little fanboy looser"?  Is that a reasoned argument?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 10:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Why are you the only one targeted?

I have a job, thank you very much.  I don't have a "leader." Sorry to disappoint you.  I realize that this is inconvenient, but not everyone who opposes your tactics fits the cliche that under-girds your entire world view.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 10:52AM | 0 recs
Re: your so full of crap

It was satire not sport.  It was a critique.  

But what is it you accuse me of faking now?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 03:18PM | 0 recs
Re: its an attempt to make you stop

The name calling will end when you stop calling people names.  It's rather simple.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 03:19PM | 0 recs

By hide rating them? Can you give me a month where this happened?

I stayed out of the Obamabot v PUMA battle, dKos and MyDD becoming almost unreadable during that period but in my brief visits I don't recall the kind of ratings HR abuse you reference. And I find the kind of Stalinst purge by JA you suggest to be implausble.

by Bruce Webb 2009-12-27 03:45PM | 0 recs
"these people"

Which people?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 04:35PM | 0 recs
Re: rabid fruitcups like you!

"rabid fruitcups"

Let the record show that ludwigvan opposes ad hominem name-calling and hypocrisy and impugning the sanity of others.  He's so much bigger than all that.

Again, if Jerome asks me to avoid you, I'll be happy to do so.  If Jerome bans me, I'll be fine with that as well.  In the mean time, I think your threats are empty.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 06:10PM | 0 recs
Apparently this is a shoe lobby

The senate is to pass a bill with a mandate to buy shoes.

by french imp 2009-12-27 09:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Apparently this is a shoe lobby

Unless they're tax deductible, I'm going to refuse.

by MainStreet 2009-12-27 09:25AM | 0 recs
Re: the shit they write about jerome

What an enlightened dialogue!

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 12:12PM | 0 recs
Re: you really have nothing better to do

I do.  Lot's of stuff.  I've been doing it on and off all day.  Want a list?  None of your business actually.  

But do you?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 03:16PM | 0 recs
Re: oh puleeze

It may cost you a great deal of time and exertion, but do not assume the same of others.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 04:24PM | 0 recs
Re: what can one say to such

Hmmm.  If by going to my profile and clicking on "feedback" takes many hours, and if then responding represents "stalking" you would be right.  But neither is true.  Just more ad hominem crap.  

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 06:07PM | 0 recs
Re: no "fogiv" is fogerty



by Strummerson 2009-12-27 12:26PM | 0 recs
Re: true dat!

...and now we once more turn to beating up on the the name of progressivism!

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 12:27PM | 0 recs
Re: there are those who cant find a job

Most of us here do not divide the world into "good" and "evil." That's a neo-con perspective.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 01:05PM | 0 recs
Re: look at stalkerson

Never accused you of racism. Another lie from a serial liar.

I didn't call you a non-stop liar, just a habitual one.  See your claim that I called you a racist above.  You also claimed I was emailing you today.  These are more evidence that you are indeed, by definition a liar.

I have never called you mentally disturbed.  Never.  You are projecting now.  That's your game.  You consistently make reference to my supposed mental impairment.  I respect those who struggle with mental and emotional illness.  They deserve our compassion.  I would never throw an accusation out simply to try to insult someone.  Your game.  Not mine.  Just another lie.  Just more proof you are a liar.

I did, however, point out that you and "more" compulsively divide the world into good and evil and that this resembles a neo-con perspective.  I made no reference to your party affiliation.

I never called you evil.

Another lie.

Stop lying and I will stop calling you a liar.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 02:21PM | 0 recs
Re: what a total faker you are

You make all my points for me:

"guy - you really, really, REALLY have issues..."

I never raise the question of your mental and emotional well-being.  But you cannot respond to me without doing so.  Find one place where I used this method so dear to you.  If you cannot, then you add to the mountain of evidence that you are a serial liar.

"you have accused me of all these things"

No.  I haven't.  I pointed out there was something homophobic in your comment.  There was.  It''s there for all to see.  But I never called you a homophobe.  I do not know you and do not pretend to.  That, again, is your game, not mine.

"aqnd you have rac issuese up your ass"

I see I have upset you.  I think this is supposed to communicate that I have race issues up my ass.  Care to substantiate this?  Where do you get this?

"did you refer to President Trumka as a fat old white guy - yes or no?"

No.  Never.  Wasn't me.  Not my view and not my style.  When you lump people together you end up misrepresenting them.  Whether intentionally or not, you end up slandering and lying about them.  I don't do this.  Not my mode and not my problem.  This is your game and you need to live with its consequences with regard to your credibility.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 02:59PM | 0 recs
Re: fake

I never called Trumka anything.  Are you going to keep repeating that lie?  

I'm not big on name calling.  That's your game, not mine.  Call everyone anything you want.  But these are not arguments.

But don't worry, "more" is going to run me out of here with Jerome and the army of PUMA saints that is mustering as we type.  Good luck with that.  It wouldn't matter to me one way or the other.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 03:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

Simple answer - yup.

By whom? Read upthread.

So many comments. So little comment.

by brit 2009-12-27 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

How are you proposing to do this to yourselves?

Of course, I know how you see yourselves and who your targets are.  I know I head that list.  I'm just wondering how two new or returning users, who have blown their credibility with 85% of this community are going to "weed out" members in good standing like myself?  Why do you believe you have this ability?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 01:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

1. I do not drink koolaid.  That cliche is your weakness.

2. I am not the member of any brigade.

3. I have never attempted to censor anyone.

4. If Jerome wanted me gone, I would be.

5. If this site is only open to those who agree with your "truth," what happens to your freedom of speech argument?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Is MyDD under attack?

1. I do not drink koolaid.  That cliche is your weakness.

2. I am not the member of any brigade.

3. I have never attempted to censor anyone.

4. If Jerome wanted me gone, I would be.

5. If this site is only open to those who agree with your "truth," what happens to your freedom of speech argument?

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: i assume january 20 is a sockpuppet

You two are really lovely.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 01:04PM | 0 recs
Re: i keep telling you i dont want to fight

I never claimed to be aggrieved.  I simply oppose your tactics.  Stop using offensive and counterproductive tactics around here and I will cease to oppose them.

You have no right to demand that those who disagree with you stay away from you.  Opposing is not harassing or stalking.  Constantly accusing someone of harassing and stalking you does, however, constitute abuse, which merits further opposition.  If you want to control the traffic in your diaries, or in the diaries of others, start your own blog.  Otherwise, you are free to respond.  I have never tried to impede you in this.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 02:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Stalkerson

I don't control anyone.  I stop and I start as I please, which is no more right than you possess.  

Again, please feel free to alert the admins.  They can judge between us.  I will comply happily with their request to stay away from you.  You have no right to request this when you consistently post comments and diaries that are dishonest and antagonistic.  You clearly dislike my responses, but instead of answering these criticisms all you seem capable of doing is going through the same lies and insults.  These do not impress me.  I will keep opposing as I see fit.  

As for the wager you propose, it's an unprovable one as my response does not constitute evidence that I "cant help but respond."  I respond because I choose to.

by Strummerson 2009-12-27 03:12PM | 0 recs
Re: i assume january 20 is a sockpuppet


by Khun David 2009-12-27 05:42PM | 0 recs
Hey ludwigvan/moremoremore --

the next time you want to call me a "total dick," why don't you go ahead and do it in public? I downrate a bunch of LV/MMM troll comments in this thread and a few minutes later I get this email -- just a subject line:

what a total dick you are blogger boy!

FYI, I am a blogger girl.

by sricki 2009-12-27 06:01PM | 0 recs
And to think...

... that this tool is complaining about stalkers...  

by TexasDarling 2009-12-27 06:11PM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads