Barack Obama
On What It Means To Be An American And Not Just A Democrat
Today,
Barack Obama spoke in Washington D.C. to address the first half of his
policy for dealing with poverty entitled Changing
the Odds for Urban America. The senator will be following this speech
with another one in the coming weeks outlining his rural agenda for poverty.
Obama's poverty agenda is similar to his recent energy policy plan insofar
as that it draws from elements of other plans that worked on a state or
community level and then applys it to the national level. He then injects
the plan with new ideas that look beyond the narrow specifics of previous
partisan attempts. That is exactly the kind of plan Obama's urban agenda
encompasses.
He acknowledges early on in his speech that both, the left and the right,
have failed in their previous attempts to address this issue:
What
you learn when you spend your time in these neighborhoods trying to
solve these problems is that there are no easy solutions and no perfect
arguments. And you come to understand that for the last four decades,
both ends of the political spectrum have been talking past one another.
It's true that there were many effective programs that emerged from
Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty. But there were also some ineffective
programs that were defended anyway, as well as an inability of some
on the left to acknowledge that the problems of absent fathers or persistent
crime were indeed problems that needed to be addressed.
The right has often seized on these failings as proof that the government
can't and shouldn't do a thing about poverty - that it is a result of
individual moral failings and cultural pathologies and so we should
just sit back and let these cities fend for themselves. And so Ronald
Reagan launched his assault on welfare queens, and George Bush spent
the last six years slashing programs to combat poverty, and job training,
and substance abuse, and child abuse.
One thing to note, and I am sure this causes some concern for those who
admire a more partisan tone, is that Obama has shown the ability to address
issues from both sides of the partisan divide. He is willing to acknowledge
mistakes made by both parties which should be considered admirable not
centrist. Obama very keenly noted a quote from Dr. King in which he said, "it is not either-or, it is both-and. Hope is not found in any single
ideology - an insistence on doing the same thing with the same result
year after year." I say to that . . . amen Dr. King.
He then goes on to outline his five point plan. The first part of his
plan takes the Harlem Children's Zone plan in New York and applys it to
the national level:
The
philosophy behind the project is simple - if poverty is a disease that
infects an entire community in the form of unemployment and violence;
failing schools and broken homes, then we can't just treat those symptoms
in isolation. We have to heal that entire community. And we have to
focus on what actually works.
If you're a child who's born in the Harlem Children's Zone, you start
life differently than other inner-city children. Your parents probably
went to what they call " Baby College", a place where they
received counseling on how to care for newborns and what to expect in
those first months. You start school right away, because there's early
childhood education. When your parents are at work, you have a safe
place to play and learn, because there's child care, and after school
programs, even in the summer. There are innovative charter schools to
attend. There's free medical services that offer care when you're sick
and preventive services to stay healthy. There's affordable, good food
available so you're not malnourished. There are job counselors and financial
counselors. There's technology training and crime prevention.
. . . So we know this works. And if we know it works, there's no reason
this program should stop at the end of those blocks in Harlem. It's
time to change the odds for neighborhoods all across America. And that's
why when I'm President, the first part of my plan to combat urban poverty
will be to replicate the Harlem Children's Zone in twenty cities across
the country. We'll train staff, we'll have them draw up detailed plans
with attainable goals, and the federal government will provide half
of the funding for each city, with the rest coming from philanthropies
and businesses.
The second part of his plan deals with keeping fathers in the home:
The second part of my plan will do this by providing families the support
they need to raise their children. I'll pass the plan I outlined last
year that will provide more financial support to fathers who make the
responsible choice to help raise their children and crack down on the
fathers who don't. And we'll help new mothers with their new responsibilities
by expanding a pioneering program known as the Nurse-Family Partnership
that offers home visits by trained registered nurses to low-income mothers
and mothers-to-be.
The third part of his plan deals with expanding access to more jobs:
I
will invest $1 billion over five years in innovative transitional jobs
programs that have been highly successful at placing the unemployed
into temporary jobs and then training them for permanent ones. People
in these programs get the chance to work in a community service-type
job, earn a paycheck every week, and learn the skills they need for
gainful employment. And by leaving with references and a resume, often
times they find that employment.
To make work pay, I will also triple the Earned Income Tax Credit for
full-time workers making the minimum wage. This is one of the most successful
anti-poverty programs in history and lifts nearly 5 million Americans
out of poverty every year. I was able to expand this program when I
was a state Senator in Illinois, and as President I'll do it again.
The fourth part of his plan, and the most important one at that, deals
with bringing businesses back to the inner cities:
The fourth part of my plan will be to help bring businesses back to
our inner-cities. A long time ago, this country created a World Bank
that has helped spur economic development in some of the world's poorest
regions. I think it's about time we had something like that right here
in America. Less than one percent of the $250 billion in venture capital
that's invested each year goes to minority businesses that are trying
to breathe life into our cities. This has to change.
When I'm President, I'll make sure that every community has the access
to the capital and resources it needs to create a stronger business
climate by providing more loans to small businesses and setting up the
financial institutions that can help get them started. I'll also create
a national network of business incubators, which are local services
that help first-time business owners design their business plans, find
the best location, and receive expert advice on how to run their businesses
whenever they need it. And I will take steps to help close the digital
divide and increase internet access for cities so that urban America
is just as connected as the rest of America.
The final part of his plan deals with affordable housing:
The final part of my plan to change the odds in our cities will be
to ensure that more Americans have access to safe, affordable housing.
As President, I'll create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund that would
add as many as 112,000 new affordable units in mixed income neighborhoods.
We'll also do more to protect homeowners from mortgage fraud and subprime
lending by passing my plan to provide counseling to tenants, homeowners,
and other consumers so they get the advice and guidance they need before
buying a house and support if they get in to trouble down the road.
And we will crack down on mortgage professionals found guilty of fraud
by increasing enforcement and creating new criminal penalties.
Jonathan Alter of Newsweek went on Tucker Carlson today and praised Obama
for dealing with the issue of fatherhood and nuclear homes as a leading
cause of poverty. Obama's plan draws on many different elements and he
clearly recognizes that the old way doing things does not work. Simply
setting up social and welfare programs, as the democrats use to, do not
lift people out of poverty nor do ridding the country of all entitlement
programs, as the republicans want to, and letting everyone fend for themselves,
will not help the issue much better. As Obama says:
The moral question about poverty in America - How can a country like
this allow it? - has an easy answer: we can't. The political question
that follows - What do we do about it? - has always been more difficult.
But now that we're finally seeing the beginnings of an answer, this
country has an obligation to keep trying.
You do not have to be a democrat or a republican to care about poverty.
The only minimum requirement is that you are proud to be an American.
Senator Obama proved in today's speech that he is just that.
Obama SmackDown Series: Obama vs. Sam Brownback on church:
Sam Brownback try to undercut Obama's attendence at a church rally that
was set up to promote AIDS awareness. Obama came back and verbally smacked
him down.
Obama's impressive intro walkon at NAACP presidential forum:
Obama recieved the loudest applause at the NAACP presidential forum.
Obama and Gore: Leaders to deal with Global Warming:
A tribute to two leaders who are significantly changing the political
landscape.
What Obama is About: A summary of his policies
P.S. Thanks to the efforts of the folks at MyDD that the Obama citizen
ad campaign is on its way to reaching the century mark in subscribers.
Thanks again.
I haven't given this a full read through... (Because reading isn't one of my big things) but I'm guessing this is more what he was rolling with.
If you care about something, are you necessarily going to change it? What if you love something and care about it? Then how does that affect the odds? Probably makes you more likely to strive for change. That brings us to his quote, "Those who truly love their country, can change it." (Something like that)
So it's not so much a, you can't care about it, but more of a, chances are you won't strive for change like those who love their country.
I'm not sure you can say, "I'm not proud to be an American, but I love my country." It doesn't make sense. Then why aren't you proud? Get what I'm getting at?
Not "just" a Democrat would be nice. But, for some reason he has an aversion to even using the word DEMOCRAT at all. One wonders why that is so. "Democrat" and "Liberal" are not really dirty words.
Thank you for posting this. Please ignore to little Canadian trolls who are racist witches who have no life whatsoever.
Barack Obama's universal message is what is drawing other democrats , independents and progressives into the party and he's about to change things. There are more Americans who have had it with both parties than there are who are blind party loyalists.
People have had it with both of them. Just look at the polls. I am one of those people. There are a handful of Democratic members of Congress I like and they are all Progressives. The other fake democrats from Sell-Out Schumer to Revolving Reid, make me sick because they continue to play games and make promises that thy don't keep.
I'm tired of so called leadership who has no balls whatsoever, but they have a big fat mouth in front of the cameras. We should be out of Iraq by now. As a matter of fact, if it wasn't for the wussies in the Democratic Congress joining with the Warmongers on the Republican side, we never would have gone to war in the first place.
You talkin' to me? If so, I'm a different person. And, very few people have earned the right to call me by that version of my name. You're not one of them.
I am a middle class worker from Michigan who has been inspired to add a voice in the current political conversation as result of Senator Obama's presidential campaign.
Why would I have to be any of the things you named to simply write a blog? I support Obama and that is quite well know on Daily Kos, MyDD, and youtube. You do not have to be a paid consultant to support a candidate.
Look, if it's possible to unite people around progressive goals without calling them "progressive," then I'm all for it.
You see, some people actually have things at stake and can't afford the luxury of getting frustrated over rhetorical limitations.
Go ahead and fight the semantic wars if you want. Go ahead and fret about the need to reclaim the term "liberal" or utter the word "democrat". But realize that that enterprise has nothing to contribute to improving the lives of real people.
In the future, more and more people are poised to get sick of the terms Republican and Democrat, as they quickly becoming synonomous with bickering and corruption. It seems the good Senator sees this coming. And he is right, by the way.
That is a debate to be decided by the nomination. There are compelling arguments on both sides. I think he needs to attack Republicans more, but speak of the future of bi-partisanship. In other words, launch a partisan assault about the lack of bi-partisanship.
Re: Barack Obama On What It Means To Be An America
The Harlem Children's Zone is really really interesting. It is SO fitting for someone like Obama, with his approach, to look to a program like the HCZ (I mean that in a good way). It is about acknowledging first that assisting those that are less fortunate doesn't always need to mean bigger, soul-sucking bureaucracy but can instead mean empowering them with resources to assist themselves.
But be careful! It is too easy to just see this as another version of pull yourself up by your bootstraps. IT IS NOT. Nor is it splitting the difference between pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and 60s welfare liberalism. It is something entirely different. It means putting LOTS AND LOTS OF RESOURCES into poor communities, but doing so in a different way, using associations, neighborhoods, parents, schools, community groups, and yes even churches. It means sustained efforts, looking at where programs are working and not working and adjusting for (as Obama says) "what works." It turns out that if you design a public housing program in certain way, it can have very detrimental effects.
The attitude that the bottom up approach won't work, and that the benevolent government and bleeding-heart types will come in and save poor people in their spare time before heading back to the suburbs...is elitist, and probably worse than that.
Re: Barack Obama On What It Means To Be An America
Yes, people must have agency in their own uplift. Many liberals don't want people to have such agency, however, because it makes them harder to control. The more dependant and prostrate you are the more useful you are to the Democrat Establishment.
Re: Barack Obama On What It Means To Be An America
In the past there was a sort of melding of the words Democrat, Populist, and Progressive/Liberal. I know what populist means, and Progressive/Liberal. And I know what the word Democrat is supposed to mean, I just have my doubts as to how many Democratic politicians do. This is one of the reasons that Obama gets me excited, and keeps me on the fence. Democratic values in actions, not words.
saying the word democrat over and over again or
repeating the democratic adgenda in new and innovative ways designed to break thorugh the 50/50 divide of the country.....Obama is a very liberal politician and a black one....but somehow through tone he has managed to avoid being tarred with the "black democrat" lable that frankly would prevent him from being elected state or nationwide in this country and I think that's a plus, never does he sell anyone out on the issues he just usues words in a way that doesn't alienate people, in opther words because of his race he can't be as "partison" and still be electable but he can be as progressive and it's good enough for me.
Re: Barack Obama On What It Means To Be An America
Really well done, Jon. It's a great speech, a great plan, and I'm so glad he picked Anacostia as the location to deliver it. There is no better symbol of how Government has failed so many people in Urban America, than one of the most impoverished communities in America where people can literally walk through slums which rival the poorest districts of Kingston, Jamaica and then turn the corner and be staring right at the Capitol Dome.
1. compare yourself to the "good" Kennedys (Robert and John).
2. attack bad "old Dems" (LBJ) and blame the right's success on Democratic over-reaching.
3. Move beyond party labels.
4. tout "personal responsibility"
5. propose the standard New Dem solution: job training, EITC, empowerment zones, etc.
He might have had the grace to acknowledge the progress Bill Clinton made with these ideas in the '90s, but I suppose that since he is running against Hillary he really can't.
In any case this is pretty standard DLC fare, not that there is anything wrong with that. I prefer a more partisan, Democratic approach that acknowledges how the Republicans obstruct implementing these ideas.
30 Comments