by lonnette33, Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 04:43:03 AM EST
I just read a very, shall I say "interesting" article on the Financial Times online service cite.
Karl provides Barry with a memo-like correspondence, advising Barry how to beat HRC and that he must win Iowa or lose the race.
Why is Karl Rove giving Barry Repug talking points on how to BEAT HRC?
Read the entire article here:
Karl says, "First, stop acting like a vitamin-deficient Adlai Stevenson. Striking a pose of being high-minded and too pure will not work. Americans want to see you scrapping and fighting for the job, not in a mean or ugly way but in a forceful and straightforward way."
Karls goes on to say, "Hillary may come over as calculating and shifty but she looks in control." Barry has already used this one Karl.
Gee, thanks Karl for the advice!
Karl further says, "...focus on the fact that many Democrats have real doubts about Hillary. They worry she cannot win, will be a drag on the ticket and that if she got to the White House it would be a disaster."
"Many DEMS have real doubts about Hillary." Is he talking about the far left wing of our part? Not stable minded DEMS, such as myself.
Karl goes on to say, "Hillary comes across as cold, distant and conspiracy-minded, more like Richard Nixon than her sunny, charming husband."
Is this guy for real? More like Richard Nixon. I can't want for the Barry campaign to use this one. Although, Barry's already used the cold, distant and conspriacy-minded thing.
This is just another way that the Repugs have choosen to interject themselves into a DEM primary and eventual choice for nominee. I don't find Karl very credible, but obviously Barry does. Look at Barry's record. Hasn't he already used most of Karl's advice and talking points. Please read the entire article, and you will see exactly what I am taking about.
Barry is ruthless. Barry and his campaign have shown its true colors over the past few months when it comes to mudslinging. The MSM just isn't covering it and has failed us once again.