CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU Harassing, Stalking Nurses at Home,& Patient Care Floors

 
www.calnurses.org
For Immediate Release                                                          

RN Leaders of California Nurses Association/NNOC Demand Andy Stern Immediately Cease SEIU's Harassment and Stalking of Nurses at Home and on Patient Care Floors

Service Union Staffers Went to Homes Thursday of CNA Leaders

The California Nurses Association/National Nurses Association today condemned the Service Employees International Union for targeting CNA/NNOC leaders and members with threats and intimidation, stalking them at home and in patient care units at hospitals.

In a statement today, CNA/NNOC--the nation's largest RN union-- demanded SEIU International President Andrew  Stern "immediately renounce the actions of SEIU staff and cease and desist these despicable attacks against anyone who speaks out against his pro-corporate agenda."

"SEIU's behavior, sending swarms of staff to threaten women in their homes, is especially disgraceful, and another illustration of their contempt for a predominantly female profession that they treat as chattel in so much of their activity, including trying to force RNs into his union," said CNA/NNOC Executive Director Rose Ann DeMoro.

Roving bands of SEIU staff, four or five at a time, arrived on the doorsteps of at least two CNA/NNOC female Board members in Southern California Thursday, with video cameras to film their abusive exploits.

Debbie Cuaresma, RN, was confronted by five SEIU staffers chanting they were "from another union and another state," who harassed her and her daughter. Margie Keenan, RN saw four SEIU staff members arrive at her door, yelling epithets and screaming at her.  Both called the police; the SEIU staff ran off before the police arrived.

Subsequently, Keenan learned that SEIU staff had first showed up in her nursing unit at Long Beach Memorial Hospital searching for her, and asking a co-worker where to find her.

'I will not be intimidated by bullies.'

"I was home alone. Four people were staring at me through the window.  When they saw me they started screaming and trying to scare me. I called the police and they ran off," said Keenan.

"I am a leader of  CNA/NNOC. I am proud of my organization, and I will always stand by it in our common goal of fighting for my patients and my colleagues. I will not be intimidated by bullies hired by (SEIU President) Andy Stern."

Cuaresma also expressed outrage, saying "I am appalled that five bullies would come to my house with cameras and hurl abuse at my daughter. I believe this to be nothing less than a violation of my family's privacy."

"Union membership is about collective democracy. Nurses decide they need a union and then choose the union of their choice," Cuaresma said. "We will continue to give voice on behalf of our patients and we will never be intimidated in our struggle to defend our ratios and  our hard-won benefits. Stern should rethink his strategy - he will not intimidate me or the CNA." 

Thursday's attacks on CNA/NNOC Board members are the latest escalation by the Service Employees Union which has in internal conversations bragged about its intent to "destroy" CNA/NNOC for challenging SEIU's practices which the RNs say compromise patient safety, erode RN standards and professional practice, and undermine workplace and union democracy.

Also on Thursday, CNA/NNOC obtained a letter from an  SEIU staffer who resigned in disgust with the behavior of SEIU International and quoted a top SEIU official bragging of plans "targeting ten to fifteen C.N.A. bargaining units."

SEIU's corporate partnerships compromise patient safety

Perhaps the most egregious behavior of SEIU International, says CNA/NNOC are its deals with corporate hospitals and nursing homes, sacrificing patient safety for agreements to help it recruit more SEIU members.

For example, SEIU has signed pacts with nursing home operators in California and Washington state agreeing to lobby for the nursing home chains. Under the 2003 California deal, SEIU agreed to oppose legislation requiring nursing homes to provide enough safe to keep patients safe and healthy, and to not report health care violations to state regulators except when required by law.

Five years later, according to a report cited in the Los Angeles Times this week, despite increased state funding for nursing homes, the direct result of SEIU lobbying, nursing homes are spending less in California on direct patient care, and reports of patient mistreatment have shot up 38%.

Similarly, in partnership with hospital corporations, SEIU lobbied in California against the RN-to-patient minimum ratio law, and worked to erode the law after it was enacted.

In New York, SEIU joined with the Greater New York Hospital Association in supporting the closure of more than a dozen hospitals and nursing homes, proudly issuing a joint statement that "We are surely the only hospital association and health-care workers union in the history of the United States to support a process that could lead to the downsizing of our own industry."

Treating RNs as chattel

SEIU International is also seeking to retaliate against CNA/NNOC for opposing its top down deal with Catholic Healthcare Partners in Ohio. The employer picked SEIU as its chosen union to represent RNs and other employees without a single signed union card, and CHP and SEIU agreed to prevent employees from discussing the rigged election that resulted from the deal.

SEIU and the employer called off the election after the deal was exposed when it became apparent there was little or no support from the employees.

"What nearly occurred in Ohio was a marriage arranged by a paternalistic employer worried about losing control of its workers and a paternalistic union that agreed to take over the workers' management in the employer's interest. It was a business arrangement by men in which women are objects of trade rather than trading parties," DeMoro said
.
For more information about  SEIU's efforts on behalf of employers, see www.ServingEmployersInsteadofUs.org .  

Tags: CNA/NNOC, harrassment, RN, SEIU (all tags)

Comments

18 Comments

Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU Harassing, S

CNA/NNOC is absolutely right on!

Thanks for standing up for nurses everywhere, and especially thanks for leading the charge for single payer national health insurance in California and across the nation. You are awesome, a truly progressive union which is deeply dedicated to egalitarian principles. You are a model for unions everywhere.

Rose Ann DeMoro is a strong and forthright leader I admire very much.

by 07rescue 2008-04-11 09:53AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU Harassing, S

And thank-you. These kind of tactics are backfiring and exposing SEIU's anti-democratic approach.

by lizjacobs 2008-04-11 10:49AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

It sounds like to me that some CNAs and RNs don't want their employees unionized.  Maybe they are using this issue to stop the unions.  This sounds like a leadership problem to me.  Andy Stern should give more voice to CNAs, and RNs in the union and start listening to their problems and issues.  Stern can always be replaced.  Mabye he just needs reminding.  I wouldn't get rid of a union just because of one bad apple.  Maybe the next election to pick a new president will send a signal to Stern.    

by Spanky 2008-04-11 09:54AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

SEIU allows CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants) into their union, ironically CNA does not.  They also aren't interested in LPNs, Hospital techs, or anyone else that work in the healtcare field who aren't RN's.  

From their website

Membership in CNA is available to Registered Nurses only

From where I come from Unions are about uniting workers, not dividing them.  They are a professional association with left wing policy papers pretending to be a union, don't even have union in their name.

They also blast Clinton's health care plan as worese than Obama's and moving away from the goal of UHC.  California Nurses Shum posts for them at open left  Going further, they equate mandates as the Lieberman approach, comparing mandates to the Iraq War  

Obama correctly criticizes the mandate approach supported by Mitt Romney, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Hillary Clinton and Andy Stern.  Don't lump him in.  Obama noted, "People don't have health insurance not because they don't want it, but because they can't afford it."
....The comparison of SEIU to Lieberman is spot-on.  Cozying up to corporate America: check.  Taking potshots at the Democratic party/House of Labor in a fit of pique: check.  Supporting harmful policies (Iraq War/mandates) on behalf of donors: check.

I am an Obama supporter, would like single payer healt-care, but they are spinning here.  Calling anyone who doing something on healtcare that isn't single payer is silly.

I wonder if the regret their support for Green party/Nader in 2000?  They trashed SEIU for supporting Democrats in California when I was there (2002-2003)

by labor nrrd 2008-04-11 10:32AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

CNA was founded with the name California Nurses Association in 1903. We are affilated with the AFL-CIC, as a matter of fact our Executive director, Rose Ann DeMoro is on the Executive board and is an AFL vice president.

Yes we are a progressive union...and so much more. We had to fight SEIU and the Hospital industry who were trying to defear our safe staffing ratio bill that eventually became law and is responsible for bringing an additional 80,000 active liscened RNs into our hospitals for starters.  

by lizjacobs 2008-04-11 10:55AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

You respond to the snark, and ignore the points...

Why do you divide workers who work for the same employer, Why do you exclude LPNs, CNAs, Techs, Clerical and other health-care workers?

Why do you equate democratic leaders like Hillary Clinton and John Edwards approach with Lieberman and the Iraq war?

Why did you attack SEIU in the 2002-2003 in California for spending money promoting democratic candidates, while CNA was supporting the green party?

by labor nrrd 2008-04-11 11:14AM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

Do you feel an eletricians union that does not allow coal miners in the union as 'dividing' workers? just wondering what your agenda is...

by zerosumgame 2008-04-11 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

No, becuase electricians have nothing to do with coal miners.

My agenda is industrial unionism versus trade unionism.  This was the debate between the AFL and the CIO.  The AFL was the conservative wing.  Their way to power was to only organize skilled labor, restrict membership into the union (often exluding immigrants, women, people of color) as their path to power.  The CIO argued that you had to organize everyone, even unskilled labor.  They were so successful, that the AFL also adopted the industrial model... eventually leading to the merger.

We are talking about healthcare workers who all work in the same hospital.  This is not exclusive to SEIU, in some regions, the steelworkers and UAW also organize hospitals. They try organize all
everyone who works there.  

I have an issue with a "progressive" union that only wants to fight for the highest paid employees in a work place (who will also be able to pay the most in dues) and aren't interested in fighting for the working poor.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-11 02:38PM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

We all agree that an injury to one is an injury to all.

As an RN my legal and ethical obligations are to advocate for my patient. I certainly don't think that I am in any kind of hierarchy with other workers. I just need a focused union that completely understands my duties to you as my patient. CNA does that. And patients are the better for it.

by Ludlow 2008-04-11 09:07PM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU

I disagree with your presumption that only serves to pit worker against worker on the basis of competing interests. I work in a hospital that has CNA/NNOC representation for RNs, and Steelworker representation of engineering personnel, lab techs, unit secretaries, ward clerks, monitor techs, nursing assistants, and patient care techs. We helped each other during our organizing drives. With good reason, I believe the SEIU partnership/company union model, especially in the hospital arena, is not in the best interests of workers or patients.

Nurses have a legal duty and the right, (explicit in CA, and implied in most states), to advocate as circumstances require, in the exclusive interests of their patients. Being a good nurse is not the same as being a good employee if the management's bottom line and 'pay for performance' scheme replaces professional determinants of standard of care in the health care delivery model.  Studies, (Aiken, et. al.), have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that patient morbidity and mortality is reduced when there are sufficient numbers of RNs available to care for patients. Yet many hospitals ignore the data for self-serving reasons.    

In the bottom-line, market-driven health care environment, hospitals often write job descriptions and policies that direct other lower paid healthcare "workers" to perform functions that are outside of their legal scope of practice. They dress them in scrubs, and give them classes. Some may be competent at many tasks; however, competency does not equal licensure. The policies and job descriptions have no basis in the law; we've seen many examples of this virtual "cloak of authority" shell game. In reality, it is the RN who is held accountable for all the nursing care provided to a patient assigned to the RN.

We may work in the same hospital, but as workers we don't have the same professional and legal accountability. There's a reason hospitals dress their workers up in nursing scrubs, give them some of the same work as RNs, and pay them less. Unequal pay for equal work is the old glass ceiling and you fail to recognize that; your comment about "working poor" is so offensive to me. (With the boss, it's not about controlling costs; it's about controlling the ability to make a profit and controlling workers). Such disparate treatment and exploitation of women and minority healthcare workers offends me. An aide or tech may lose their job when they make a mistake; nurses may lose their license.  

Nurses aides, techs, assistants, unit secretaries, and orderlies all have important roles in providing care for patients. CNA/NNOC supports union representation for all workers.  However, I believe an all RN professional association/union best represents the interests of patients and the RNs who are held accountable for the nursing care provided to those patients. CNA/NNOC RN dues structure is progressive, is democratically determined, and fair. We are proud to pay our dues and our tradition of legislative, social, professional, and patient advocacy speaks for itself.

by RN4MERCY 2008-04-11 10:20PM | 0 recs
Re: CNA/NNOC RN Leaders Denounce SEIU
Unfortunately Stern is way more than just one bad apple. He has created a corporate style union where members don't elect their leaders anymore. Cehck out this article on the union democracy web site:
http://www.uniondemocracy.com/UDR/170-St erns_illusion_and_democracys_nightmare.h tm
by lizjacobs 2008-04-11 10:59AM | 0 recs
Again CNA is Spreading Misinformation and Lies

It's funny how every time the CNA gets caught doing something unsavory--as happened Wednesday when a CNA organizer was arrested for slapping and "stomping" on an SEIU union representative's feet while other CNA organizers were caught dressing up as nurses so they could enter off-limits areas of the hospitals--CNA responds with lavishly fabricated stories accusing the other side of doing something even worse.

Here's what really happened: Two of the Ohio hospital employees who lost their chance to form a union have come to California to talk to members of the California Nurses Association. Sue Allen, RN and and Michaela Silver want CNA members to know how devastated they were by the CNA's disruptive actions in Ohio. They attempted to visit CNA members to ask for their help. At no time were they aggressive or pushy, nor did they raise their voices. They left when asked.

Yet the CNA responded with a national press release accusing SEIU staff of "sending swarms of staff to threaten women in their homes," "harassing and stalking" nurses in their homes and on patient care floors, "yelling epitaphs" and "hurling abuse."

Such outrageous allegations are nothing new for the CNA. However, there isn't a shred of truth to the CNA's accusations...

by mringuette 2008-04-11 01:06PM | 0 recs
If you're going to accuse these RNs of lying...

...please be good enough to disclose your paid position as an SEIU staffer.

And can we take your comments to suggest that SEIU is on a raiding trip in California?  Please know, as the many RNs on here will confirm, that SEIU has a poor reputation among RNs because they do not fight for patient safety or professional practice issues.

-Shum with the California Nurses

by California Nurses Shum 2008-04-11 01:16PM | 0 recs
Re: If you're going to accuse these ...

If you will post on a democratic party blog, why won't you address the fact that you have compared Clinton's health care plan to the Iraq war.

by labor nrrd 2008-04-11 02:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Clinton Plan

cross posted from Geoff Cunningham,  Healthcare for All, California. (Geoff Cunningham is the
Healthcare for All-CA, Los Angeles Director and a
OneCarenow Campaign organizer)

Subject: Will Hillary sell out to health insurance industry?

Think about what Hillary has proposed:

1) An individual mandate to force the poor to buy crappy, high deductible policies

2) Subsidies to health insurers to pay for uninsured

3) Unspecific "choice", which when undefined usually means health insurer, but not the choice we care about, which is choice of doctor

4) She talks of medical records savings, but proposes an insurance dominated system

5) She talks of preventative care yet private health insurers have little incentive because of the policy churn factor (at least 25% people change policies every 5 years; why should insurers subsidize their competitors)

Frankly, this policy schlock got rejected in California because it doesn't control costs, it doesn't provide quality care, and it won't be truly universal because private health insurers always have a major incentive (10% people 76% of costs) to let expensive patients slip through the cracks.

There are few changes in this policy from the monstrosity she proposed in 1994.  Yes, the rest of the country is behind us in health policy.  And yes, we cannot expect the rest of the country to uphold our high standards, as Republicans are too stupid to realize the externalities caused by a private health insurance system.  We know the Republicans like to support dead weight welfare systems of the health insurance industry and half the Pentagon, but we wish they could be a little more honest about it:)

So the question becomes how to integrate a state and federal policy to bring about real healthcare reform for all Americans.  The Republicans are predictable.  No matter what we reformers propose, they're going to call it "government-run healthcare", even if it's primarily insurance pork like Hillary's plan.

There is a better way.  Let the states experiment with healthcare reform.  So the great minds of South Carolina can try whatever Republican insurance pork they want to to denying care to the poor and bilk the middle class.  But at least we give their junk a fair shot.  And the progressive states like California can do the heavy lifting and move to Single-Payer(after we get our Governor reading).  Let the states experiment and then we can adopt the most effective system.  

Do you think anything can beat Single Payer(Private care, public insurance) in terms of controlling costs and providing quality universal healthcare?  We will crush any policy out there because we don't have the insurance deadweight mucking up the system with their insidious incentives.

The progressive agenda should be:

1) No insurance pork period.  All expansion of coverage must be through public plans.  

2) At least one doctor visit should be available to all Americans once a year paid directly by the government

3) The government should negotiate the rates for the uninsured to start providing more cost transparency

I really appreciate both Hillary and Obama for all their public service.  No matter which one is our President in 2009, we must focus on the transition to quality, universal coverage.  Both Hillary and Obama's plans are weak with only Massachusetts' fairy dust as cost controls.  We in West Hollywood how to appreciate a little fairy dust, but found it's not too useful for cost controls. Progressive bastions like "The Wall Street Journal" and "The Economist" have argued the best way to control health spending is with a Single Payer system.

The real challenge is how to implement the transition after we win. There's no way the "Bomb and Borrow" Republicans are going to beat us this time.  We could have had quality universal healthcare instead of extravagant military borrowing started under Reagan and perpetuated by Bush's war.  

Do we want our tax dollars flushed down the toilet in Iraq, which just doubles our gas prices, or do we want quality, affordable healthcare for all?

On healthcare, Obama is better (but only marginally on health care) because:

1) There's no nefarious individual mandate masquerading as universal coverage

2) He doesn't inspire Republican frothing like Hillary making compromise easier

3) Obama's said he supports Single Payer even though he's sure how to get there.  

In 1994, 2/3 of Hillary's healthcare maven task force said Single Payer's the answer but the Clinton's lacked the chutzpah to go for the slam.  Their insurance pork plan was attacked as "government run" health care and it went down in flames.  

How much did the Clintons really accomplish in 8 years in the White House? Got lucky with the tech boom, played Eisenhower Republicans with the budget and oh, my favorite, "reformed" welfare.  Is the Clinton dynasty too conservative for us Democrats?  Can we do better?  Do we want change?

The real issue for progressives is to ensure that whoever becomes President provides the states the finances and flexibility to experiment with health policy.  May the smartest state win.

We have the moral responsibility to keep the truth on the table and demand excellence from our civil servants.  I'm glad both Hillary and Obama agree.  And they're great at tag teaming the little war monger."

by RN4MERCY 2008-04-11 10:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Again CNA is Spreading Misinformation and Lies

Speaking of shreds of truth, look at yourself in the mirror.

by Ludlow 2008-04-11 09:08PM | 0 recs
Re: "...lost their chance ?

Oh, come on, really? LOST THEIR CHANCE? The boss files for an election; on the ballot, choose one:
"SEIU" or "No Union"

Then, their boss cancels the election. So, it seems to me, Sue and Michaela should be whining at their bosses.  Instead, they're allowing themselves to be used like handmaidens, complicit 'partners' in their own subordination. Joe Hill said it best: "don't mourn, organize."

It's been said that "Truth is the daughter of time." I'd invite Sue and Michaela to do a little reading, give it time to sink in, and consider the fact that their bosses pulled one over on them. CNA/NNOC-Ohio speaks the truth; read it here and see for yourselves.

http://www.calnurses.org/seiu-watch/pdf/ anti-seiu_brochure.pdf

by RN4MERCY 2008-04-11 11:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Again CNA is Spreading Misinformation and Lies

The topic remains that SEIU uses intimidation.

You have ever since I've known of you from 2003 when you tried to organize Tenet. Nurses at my hospital did not like the fact that you came uninvited to our homes back then. I see that you are still using the same inappropriate tactics.

Just what was the plan of those organizers who showed up at the 2 single female CNA Board members homes? You weren't bringing flowers or a casserole as a friendly neighbor would. You weren't even bringing fliers (which nurses also loathe that you do).

What was the purpose of 4 of you going to their homes? 4 against 1?

Gang members do what you did. Union organizers do not.

As for the 'arrest,' we all know that can mean nothing. I was 'arrested' outside my hospital while peacefully distributing fliers. The CEO immediately apologized for the 'screw up' and the investigating officer dismissed it.

by Ludlow 2008-04-12 05:59AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------