War Supporters Ready to Vote for "Stay the Course"

The House Republican leadership has an exquisite sense of timing.  First, our air force drops a 500-lb bomb, killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.  Next, Nuri al-Maliki completes his cabinet appointments.  Then, President Bush and his senior advisors convene at Camp David to talk about Iraq. Drum roll, please...
House Majority Leader Boehner announces a debate on the Iraq War for this Thursday.  Could there be a better time for an aye-vote on "Stay the Course"?  

Boehner's response to the groundswell of grass roots support for a full and open debate about Iraq is H. Res. 861, which provides unconditional support for the Iraq War and equates it with the "Global War on Terror." Ignoring the calls of American citizens across the country for a Congressional debate where all alternatives to the "Stay the Course" strategy can be presented and debated, Boehner is using the power of the Majority Party to propose a resolution that he hopes will embarrass those Democrats and Republicans calling for open and honest debate.   Read the full resolution here.

Do not be fooled by Boehner and his gang! The Democrats have been and ARE active on this issue.  They've been pushing since December for H Res 543, which would get  the war a fair hearing. But Boehner and the majority of the GOP are afraid of that, and so are throwing  H Res 861 out there as a red herring.  

No Room For Improvement
The astounding thing about H. Res. 861 is that does not contain a single recommendation to the President.  Apparently, the Iraq War is going so well, and enjoys such universal support, that there's no room to question or improve our strategies!  
No reason to question whether 9/11 and the threat of terrorism is a good reason for occupying Iraq.
No reason to rethink our mission, when our troops are caught up in a civil war that has little to do with al-Qaeda.
No reason to clarify our policy on torture or rules of engagement.  
No reason to root out corruption, fraud, and abuse in our reconstruction contracts with US multinationals .  
No reason to transform a suspect American mission into a legitimate international effort.
And certainly no reason to question whether our military occupation of Iraq is creating more terrorists around the world than we are killing.

A Real Debate
Is there any alternative to this faux debate?  Yes, H. Res. 543, sponsored by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), and currently supported by 124 Members of the House, including 4 Republicans.  This resolution is supported by a broad coalition of grassroots organizations, including DC for Democracy.  It provides for a 17-hour debate, an "open rule" where any amendment can be proposed, and equal control of the discussion by the Majority and Minority leaders.  The structure of the debate allows for the complexity of the challenges we face in Iraq, and allows the Congress to debate and vote on the full breadth of alternatives to our current policies.  For more information on the campaign for H. Res. 543, visit Open Iraq Debate and DC for Democracy.

What Can You Do?
Spread the word about the blinkers-on resolution of the war-supporters, and the real debate that is promised by H. Res. 543.  Write to your local papers, TV stations, and radio stations.  Post on local and national blogs.  Get the word out!

Tags: 543, Abercrombie, Boehner, DC for Democracy, Debate, Democracy for America, Iraq (all tags)

Comments

4 Comments

Correction on Link

Sorry, there's a typo in the link to the H. Res. 861 text: Try This

by keshini 2006-06-14 09:27AM | 0 recs
Did u see---

In case you haven't seen Abercrombie's press release this morning:

June 14, 2006        CONTACT: Michael Slackman (202) 225-2726

Abercrombie: Iraq rule "ties hands" of withdrawal proponents

WASHINGTON, DC--Appearing at a news conference today with his hands bound in
rope, Congressman Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) said restrictive debate rules for
a resolution on the Iraq War "tied the hands" of Members of Congress who
want a full and open discussion of the conflict.

The leadership, acting yesterday through the House Rules Committee, refused
to allow Abercrombie and others to offer an amendment to House Resolution
861, which calls for U.S. forces to remain in Iraq indefinitely.

Abercrombie's proposed amendment was based on House Joint Resolution 55, a
bipartisan measure sponsored by himself, Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC), Ron Paul
(R-TX), Martin Meehan (D-MA) and others.

House Joint Resolution 55 calls on the President to announce a plan to
withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq, with withdrawal to begin no later than
October 1, 2006.

"The American people deserve a full and open debate on Iraq, and that's what
's missing with House Resolution 861," said Abercrombie.  "It's nothing more
than an endorsement of the Bush Administration's policy, with no discussion
of alternatives allowed.  We want to let the House consider and vote on a
full range of options, but our hands are tied. The House leadership said
earlier that it would allow an unfettered discussion, and it's disappointing
to see this restrictive rule governing the debate."

Abercrombie has filed a discharge petition to bring House Joint Resolution
55 to the House floor under terms that would allow an unlimited number of
amendments to be considered.

by fresh aire 2006-06-14 09:32AM | 0 recs
Boehner's plan for Iraq debate--- What will

the Democrats and Republicans do -- who want the full debate that allows amendments???

read Boehner's Confidential Memo at --http://www.thinkprogress.org/confidentia l-boehner-memo

by fresh aire 2006-06-14 09:38AM | 0 recs
Re: War Supporters Ready to Vote

H. Res. 543, sponsored by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), and currently supported by 124 Members of the House, including 4 Republicans.

I don't care what the 4 Reeps do, but the 120 Democrats who support HR543 should vote against the GOP sham resolution just to shame the War Dems and demonstrate that their party has at least half a spine.

by Sitkah 2006-06-14 01:00PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------