OPEN SEAT: Rep. Portman (R-OH 2) chosen as trade rep

LINK

It sounds as though he's a pretty reasonable choice for the position, as Republicans go. What interests me more is the open seat this creates.

Here's a map of the district, and it looks like pretty tough territory for Dems. Then again, so is South Dakota, and we won a special election there last year. But what does this New Yorker know? Anyone closer to the ground know if this seat might be winnable?

UPDATE: Bush beat Gore 63-35 in the 2002 district lines, making this the most Republican district in the state. (To compare, Bush's 2000 margin in South Dakota was 60-38.) 2004 data by CD aren't available yet, but here's the breakdown by county:

Hamilton: Bush, 53-47
Warren: Bush, 72-28
Clermont: Bush, 71-29
Brown: Bush, 64-36
Adams: Bush, 64-36
Scioto: Bush, 52-48
Pike: Bush, 52-48

In other words, um, if we can win here, we can win anywhere.

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

5 Comments

Gee
I'll bet they picked Portman specifically because his seat is so red. They never would have picked, say, Chabot, because then his seat would be vulnerable.
by raginillinoian 2005-03-18 05:06AM | 0 recs
BTW
Kentucky 6 was uber Republican too - look what happened there.
by raginillinoian 2005-03-18 05:13AM | 0 recs
Re: BTW
No matter the seat, we HAVE to be competitive and "play to win"
by falcon4e 2005-03-18 05:33AM | 0 recs
test case
If anything, this will serve as a good test case for the mounting evidence of widespread discontent with Congressional Republicans.

So let's have some names! Surely there are some Southern Ohioans here!

by JoshInNYC 2005-03-18 06:38AM | 0 recs
BTW, KY-6 isn't nearly as red
It went for Bush by a much smaller margin of 56-42 in 2000.
by JoshInNYC 2005-03-18 06:43AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------