Bizarro America: New U.N. ambassador hates the U.N.

From the diaries--Chris

Today we learn this:

President Bush has chosen Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton, a longtime critic of the United Nations and a hard-liner on arms control, to be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, according to government officials.
And by "longtime critic," the Post means this:
  • "There's no such thing as the United Nations."
  • "If the U.N. secretary building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference."
  • "Moreover, many Republicans in Congress - and perhaps a majority - not only do not care about losing the General Assembly vote but actually see it as a 'make my day' outcome. Indeed, once the vote is lost, and the adverse consequences predicted by the U.N.'s supporters begin to occur, this will simply provide further evidence to many why nothing more should be paid to the U.N. system."
Somebody wake me up when we nominate Jessica Simpson to be the U.S. ambassador to intelligence.

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

15 Comments

A perfect fit for Bizarro Bush
This is in keeping with Bush's Bizarro Cabinet apointees.  The ones I remember:

  • A Secretary of Education who lobbied to eliminate the Department of Education.

  • A Secretary of the Interior who had worked as a pro-pollution lobbyist

  • A Secretary of Defense who had never seen combat (an improvement on Cheney, a SecDef who had never served in the military)

  • An EPA chief from the most polluted state in the Union (make that second-most, once GWB got through with Texas)

  • A Vice-President who seems to be the President's superior, not his subordinate (and who actually picked the entire Bizarro Cabinet, including himself)

  • And, of course, a President with no political experience, a military deserter who ran as a hawk, and a drug-using convicted criminal who ran on "values".
by schroeder 2005-03-07 08:49AM | 0 recs
The People are at fault
as always. They vote for these Turkeys, they buy into the rhetoric, they endorse it every 2 years. When the people vote the rascals out, then I will give them respect.
by Paul Goodman 2005-03-07 09:17AM | 0 recs
It just occurred to me
They may have nominated him in order to clear the way for Clinton 2006. By putting someone up there to placate the loonies today, 43 can get some breathing space in order to put 42 in the top spot. Would Clinton as President of the World make it less likely for Hillary to run in 2008?
by Paul Goodman 2005-03-07 09:34AM | 0 recs
Ashley Simpson!
For Director of Intelligence! She can't sing, maybe she could keep the identities of CIA agents secret.
by Gary Boatwright 2005-03-07 09:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Ashley Simpson!
But others sing for her, so she's just like the crew that's there already.
by Paul Rosenberg 2005-03-07 09:31PM | 0 recs
Shaking head...
Condoleezza Rice: Bolton "...has a proven track record of effective multilateralism."
by Steve in Sacto 2005-03-07 09:59AM | 0 recs
Confusing Fumbles And Laterals...
I guess that's understandable, coming from Stanford...
by Paul Rosenberg 2005-03-07 09:32PM | 0 recs
How 'bout the intelligence director
Nominating an intelligence director that has never had anything to do with intelligence 'cept to 'consume' it
by QuasiMotive 2005-03-07 10:06AM | 0 recs
Fuck This Shit
Yo this shit is wack. Did you read this nigga? What the fuck is he talkin bout. Straight up, I aint understand a damn thing he say, and Im an educated man. Maybe if he would start speaking english and stop speakin all this "indeed, once the vote is lost" bull shit. Thats my word.
by IDareYouToBanMe 2005-03-07 10:58AM | 0 recs
Not that surprising

Does anyone find this really that surprising? It seems to fall right in line with the right wing in general and this administration in particular's belief that the United Nations is a worthless illegitimate organization that imposes on our own sovereignty. I may be paranoid, but this appointment almost seems like it opens up the possibility that this administration could eventually threaten to leave the UN, in one form or another, as a whole. History has always been an author of ironies and Bush's separation from the UN could simply be another one since his father once held this position. Then again, maybe I'm just paranoid.

by Mark J. Bowers 2005-03-07 12:26PM | 0 recs
Not paranoid... just realistic.
Always presume the worst of Dubya & Co.

You'll seldom be wrong or surprised.

by Southern Patriot 2005-03-07 04:41PM | 0 recs
Republican Bench Not Very Deep
We see people like Bolton and Negroponte recycled mainly because the Republican bench is so thin, more than ideology.  You keep a hack joke like John Snow in office because you can't get anyone reputable to do the job.  The Republican Party is running on empty in terms of new talent.
by Bob H 2005-03-07 02:08PM | 0 recs
The principled need not apply.
They're recycling those few who they know will be loyal and push their corporatist agenda without objection. There are plenty of Reeps out there who are better-suited to fill the offices, but they'd actually want to fill the offices, not just serve as mouthpieces for the Cheney-Rumsfeld axis. This is the story that's come out again and again from those who have left the administration.
by catastrophile 2005-03-07 04:42PM | 0 recs
President Wilson is very confused right now.
Bush sure loves Wilsonian liberal idealist foreign policy. Yet he constantly shafts the UN, the successor to the League of Nations. President Wilson is rolling in his grave!
by Vote Hillary 2008 2005-03-07 04:18PM | 0 recs
For A Moment There, I Thought He Would Nominate...
Matthew Hale or Terry Nichols. So I guess this is what they call a "reasonable" and "responsible" choice, no?

No?

NO!

WORST

PRESIDENT

EVER!

by Paul Rosenberg 2005-03-07 09:38PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------