Tom Friedman Reversal on Arabs and Democracy?

Remember way back when Tom Friedman shredded liberals because we allegedly don't think Arabs are capable of Democracy?

I'm really sorry. Next time...I promise, I really promise, I'll be a better liberal....I will view the prospect of Arabs forging a democracy as utterly impossible. They're incapable of democracy.

Oh, yeah, it was last week. (Thinkprogress has the audio).

So what's he saying today, six whole days later?

If Arab Muslims can summon the will to protest only against the insults of "the foreigner" but never the injuries inflicted by their own on their own, how can they ever generate a modern society or democracy -- which is all about respecting and protecting minority voices and unorthodox views? And if Sunnis and Shiites can never form a social contract to rule themselves -- and will always require an iron-fisted dictator -- decent government will forever elude them.

As far as I can tell, the only difference between what he wrote today and what he viciously criticized last week is the "if".

As Hunter said last week at Dailykos, "Yep, he gets Pulitzer Prizes for spouting crap like that."

(Cross-posted at Dailykos.)

Tags: arabs, democracy, Iraq, Thomas Friedman (all tags)

Comments

3 Comments

Re: Tom Friedman Reversal on Arabs and Democracy

He's such an arrogant, condescending douche-bag.

Who the hell is he to dictate to Arabs how they get democracy?  

Maybe if we stopped supporting their corrupt regimes the people would be able to rise up.  To think that they "need" a dictator shows he has no grasp whatsoever of the humanity of Arabs.  He really thinks they are a lesser barbarous people that need to be shown the way by the Civilized West.

Douchebag.

by dayspring 2007-01-24 06:18AM | 0 recs
Yeah, I used to be a fan

Way, way back many Friedman units ago when he wrote "From Beirut to Jerusalem." Then he was a real journalist and a serious thinker. Now? Not so much.

by joelspolls 2007-01-24 06:19AM | 0 recs
Re: Tom Friedman Reversal on Arabs and Democracy?

Actually, democracy is rule by the majority of the people, pluralism is respecting people who have different views.  Obviously, Friedman thinks pluralism is good, but he doesn't seem to be very pluralistic.

by jallen 2007-01-24 08:39AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------