Clinton has 37% not 38%. Still, ouch. By comparison,  the last poll in New York shows Clinton getting 48% in a primary, and the latest in Illinois shows Obama getting 48%-51%. So Edwards really does poorly in his homestate compared to the others.

because Barry Bonds is the subject most voters want to discuss. Yeesh.

not really bad news for Clinton. The only thing bad about it for Clinton is while she is running away with the lead in national polls, in Iowa it's fairly close. If anything, I think this poll is good news for Clinton, good news for Obama, and bad news for Edwards.

now. The top story of the political ticker, in fact, on cnn.com

defend his votes for at least two years, saying it was the right thing to do. When the polls had changed on the issue, Edwards safely was able to apologize for his vote.

Clinton is the one desperately trying to insist there is no difference between Obama and herself on Iraq. Bill was the one who said there is no difference in their voting records. I think it must irritate Clinton's people that one of their donors would actually contribute to/fundraise for another candidate.

poll from NH, I think it was, noted that only 8%  were committed to their candidate. So yes, very early, even in an early primary state like NH.

His negatives, I think, are bound to go up. No way he will stay in the 19-20 range. But  he has the potential to get his favorable up as well. If he does that, he will be the stronger general election candidate than Clinton.

Obama, Edwards, Clinton, Biden. The only who isnt seems to be Richardson, with his claim he will outraise Edwards.

that these are Obama's new contributors for the entire quarter. Least that's the way his "supporter counters for Obama and Edwards" reads to me. I hope he clarifies it.

is not the same as Lieberman's "bipartisansip."

Obama at 20%, Richardson at 7.7% in Iowa. But I'm sure Bill Richardson's own pollster is a more unbiased source for Bill Richardson's polling numbers.

Obama voted against the Bankruptcy Bill in 2006, and voted against cloture. Meanwhile, Edwards voted FOR the the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill.

Of all the candidates,  I feel Edwards is the most calculating of all, even more than Hillary. He co-sponsored the war resolution, and defended it in 2003 and 2004 when it was popular. After he lost an election, and the country started to turn against the war, he decided to turn against the war too.

All it did was remind me that Obama was against the war before it began. The part about his motives is unsubstantiated speculation IMO.