I'm assuming it's a figure of speech, I haven't heard it before.  Don't really get it.  That's what happens with a lot of figures of speeches that you haven't heard before.  

It's an honest question!  You troll rated a guy, who thought it would be good to have more dems in congress.  Seems rather suspicious to me.  

Hey!  While you're here, maybe you can tell me why you troll rated somebody for saying "More Dems in congress!" ?  

Abusing the troll rating system?  I could say the same to you buddy.  

He said every four years in december.  I think you need more than two examples to say every four years.  What about 2000?  1996?  Twice in a row?  Saying every four years with only two examples sounds weak and premature.  

You should check.  I corrected myself.  I meant to say that doesn't constitute as every four years.  Two examples?  Please.  Every four years should be at least 3 out of 5 or 6 examples.  

I'd just as soon shoot it from the hip

Shoot what from the hip?  

I took him at his word.  I figured he didn't imagine himself blogging with bad grammar so I thought I'd lend him a hand on the few things that stood out to me.  

"That isn't every December."

I meant to say "That isn't December every four years."  Exclaiming that I thought you'd need more than two examples to make the case that he turns on progressives every four years.  

Every 4 years in December, Robert Gibbs, Obama's communications director, seems to morph into some sort of a zombie that turns on progressives...

You only gave examples for 2008 and 2004.  That isn't every December.  

"I want to campaign the same way I govern, which is to respond directly and forcefully with the truth -Barack Obama"

Wouldn't it be... 'with the truth." -Barack Obama' ?

Is Obama is just plain ignorant of the fight we've faced this decade in going after Krugman?

'Is Obama just plain...'

Sorry, but the other day you said you blog about what you want to blog about... I figured you'd want to blog about something with good grammar.  

Almost went a week this holiday without A bum Republican saying goodbye and goodnight.  Thank goodness McCrery could accomadate!

Some abusings of the rating systems lately.  Truthteller is troll rating me for disagreeing with him or her, and filbertSF troll rated somebody's comment that said "More Democrats in congress!"

What's up with that?  

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article s/docs/InsiderAdvantage_Majority_Opinion _SC_DEM_Dec_Poll.html

I was thinking the same thing.  

Nothing would make me happier than to pickup this seat.  Anyone have an idea of Special election winners in hard opposing districts and their survival in the next presidential election?  I'm worried we're going to pick it up, and it'll be gone in a year.  

Who's more likely to give an unbiased poll?  The media and polling firms?  Or a candidate running for POTUS who hasn't had a strong showing in the recent barage of polling?  

The point is there.  

What is going on here?  Mandates don't ensure universiality.  They never have, and when you refuse to disclose enforcement, they never will.