McCain would make mince-meat of any Democrat proposing that Iran would be no problem if we just gathered round the campfire with Ahmadinejad roasting marshmellows and joining in a rousing chorus of Kumbayah.
this is how neocons taunt democrats unwilling to unilaterally nuke iran.
hillary aside, ed is such an azzhole. he totally sideswiped howard dean when he came on his show. this was like half a year before the 'o6 midterms. launched unwarranted attacks against dean and inferred he wasn't doing enough to win the election. ed sounded like a crazy man with all of his yelling. and there was zero reason for it.
another thing i'll never forgive about schultz: he championed lieberman during that election. he quoted ned lamont out of context, intentionally misconstruing what lamont had meant. tried to say lamont wasn't really anti war and that he wanted to privatize social security. not true! the next day, i heard dems on my local air america echoing his idiotic talking points, pointing to how subversive ed's influence can be.
ed is big fat liar operating behind an an agenda of his own. he couldn't care less about progressives.
true enough. in the documentary "9/11: press for truth" (which focused on news reporting of the event that tv overlooked and interviews with 9/11 family members) one of the jersey 4 widows said the commission only answered 30% of the issues they raised.
what makes you think howard dean dislikes obama? my goodness. during the recent DNC convention, dean's opening remarks were very complimentary towards obama. to the point that i started to worry dean might receive unwarranted attacks alleging bias.