Let's Side With Israel and Say We Didn't

The New York Times reports that today that the U.S. is " rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon."

Under the fold: the appearance of being an honest broker

From NYT's David S. Cloud and Helene Cooper:

The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran's efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah. [Italics added.]

This paragraph contains a few interesting statements.  

If we're supplying munitions to the Israelis in the middle of a shooting war, we don't appear to be aiding them, we are aiding them.  And such actions don't threaten to anger Arab governments, they're a sure bet to anger Arab governments.  

As to efforts on Iran's part to resupply Hezbollah, the source of that story appears to be Israel's Haaretz newspaper.  Propaganda, you think?  

Did Cloud and Cooper do any double-checking on this story, or did they just echo what their sources in the administration fed them?

Let's Take Sides and Say We Didn't

I won't make any judgments on whether or not we should be supporting Israel in this war, but you can't pitch in on one side--which we have done--and pretend that you're still neutral.  

But that's precisely the kind of Rovewellian poppycock we're trying to pull.  Condi Rice will be on her way to the region tomorrow to try to broker some kind of ceasefire.  How in the world does she expect to be viewed as an honest broker when her country clearly favors one of the belligerents over the other?  Maybe she'll try to tell everybody she didn't know about American sending Israel more bombs.  That would be about as credible as anything else she can say.  

Just when I think the Bush administration's conduct of foreign policy can't get one bit less cognizant, it proves me wrong.  The best way to describe the kind of diplomacy we're conducting right now is "negotiating into a fan," and the blowback will smell to high heaven.

#

Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes from Virginia Beach, Virginia.  Read his commentaries at ePluribus Media and Pen and Sword.

Tags: Israel, Lebanon, Rice (all tags)

Comments

5 Comments

Re: Let's Side With Israel and Say We Didn't

Of course Iran is supplying Hezbollah, and BUSH made it possible.  How?  By invading Iraq with enough force to overthrow the violently anti-Iranian regime of Saddam Hussein, but not enough force to actually secure Iraq.  Thusly, the Iranian supply pipeline to Lebanon-based Hezbollah was made dramatically stronger, and the terrorists were able to obtain better armaments.   Emboldened Hezbollah was then able to easily provoke Israel, at Iran's request, in the hope that a wider Middle East war will further destabilize Iraq.

by CLLGADEM 2006-07-22 05:17PM | 0 recs
The war to urge on terrorism? nt

by Jeff Huber 2006-07-23 05:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Let's Side With Israel and Say We Didn't

This is what happens when you elect rank amateurs to play "Animal House" with the world's strongest nation.

by Astyanax 2006-07-22 05:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Let's Side With Israel and Say We Didn't

Let's destroy israel's navy, especially the subs, and say we didn't. They'll turn on us in a heartbeat and the 5th fleet can ill afford to have snipers in the area of its operations.

by NorCalJim 2006-07-23 11:33AM | 0 recs
Being a Navy guy, I can't help...

...but step in clarify that the MED is Sixth Fleet's AOR.

But yeah, we've taken one up the snot locker from our Israeli friends it the past, and let them get away with it.

by Jeff Huber 2006-07-23 11:40AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------