Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Reflections?

Some Obama supporters are a new breed and they are driving a lot of voters away.  They are abusive and then they say ,"You can't leave; you got no place else to  go!"  Most women  learn about abusive men before they are even old enough to vote.  And by then many have a heightened awareness of abuse of power and injustice.

Some men learn these lessons early, too.  Whatever we thought of Obama in the beginning, we came to be very disturbed about the changing behavior of people at the great orange, all the way to the top.  Often they were people we had read and interacted with for a long time, maybe admired.  Some had been in gatherings together in person.  We became alarmed when comments started being abusive.  I don't mean this hyper-thin-skinned, persecuted overreacting, whining, knee-jerking cry of "foul" (or "racism")that is a regular feature of the Obama campaign now.

I don't mean the nothing stuff Obama supporters call abusive.  I mean real abuse.  Bullying taken to frightening extents.  Ganging up to beat down the writer.  Angry, destructive language, constant berating.  Diary hijacking that was instant and automatic and so thorough that the diarist would leave before anyone who had actually read the diary made a comment.  The harsh cruelty of the gang behavior was astonishing and very threatening

(If you are an Obama supporter and you don't see the difference between acting offended and wounded when the seventh most likely interpretation of a comment, if twisted just so, could be stretched to sound a little offensive and really abusive behavior where people are being so hounded that they are being located and their children threatened...please just go to another diary because you really won't learn anything here. But if you DO see the difference, I hope you can be alerted to behaviors that are driving people away from your candidate and are in the way of any effort to win voters back later.)

At large orange there were hundreds of thousands of posters and lurkers every day. In a matter of weeks the whole atmosphere shifted to very hostile.  Many, many diarists tried to reason with what used to be online friends, tried to elevate the talk to actual discourse, tried to argue logical trains of thought.  All of this was destroyed in swooping attacks by a large group who just filled up the space with mean, ugly, insulting garbage, berating and intimidating and demeeaning and dismissing.

We thought at first that they were hired trolls, freepers paid to disrupt and offend and divide; and some were.  But then it was familiar names acting ugly, seemingly released from any idea of appropriate behavior.  It got worse after that.  But I doubt anyone who didn't see it there will agree that it happened and understand how truly disturbing it was.

There was one certain constant in who acted this way and who didn't.  Not all of the Obama supporters acted this way, some tried to stop it and fought hard against it for a while, a few for a long while.( And some Hillary supporters issues a few sharp retorts and sarcastic remarks. The contrast with what I'm talking about here was stark and undeniable.)

But every person who behaved in this horribly aggressive, bullying, abusive manner was saying they supported Senator Obama and the single factor that fit all of those being attacked was that they were all Hillary supporters OR asking questions to try to reconcile some concern about something Obama had said or done or inquire about qualifications and policies proposed or past record in order to decide which candidate to favor. ( There was a lot going on with Edwards supporters, but leave that aside here.)

Some members of the large orange worked too many hours each day trying to offer a different voice, some information, some argument, some encouragement and also some support of other victims. The side controllers where not helpful.

Alegre tried to put up a diary most every day as a different voice and we would all gather there in support.  But it was vicious and cruel and frightening what was coming from them, like a mania of some group of lost boys alone in the wild with no boundaries and no fear of predators, trying to out do each other with the next daring response.

Bizarre and so beyond anything healthy that we were all seeing how destructive it was to continue to expose ourselves to the abuse.  Still some stayed to support each other until Alegre had had enough and hundreds and hundreds left with her.

Other liberal blogs crashed over the next few days with way too much traffice as we all sought out new places to check in several times a day. People reorganized, added servers and added RULES.  It was an amazing, shocking relief to be able to carry on discussions, transfers of information, ruminations and disagreements in civil environments that weren't dangerous to visit.

You would be astonished at the number of people who decided against Senator Obama because of the actions of those supporters.  There were hundreds of thousands of people every day witnessing what they did to the Hillary supporters and to the people who had any questions about Obama.

How many times have we heard people say that they had been interested in Obama and had not felt that good about Hillary ...until they saw how Hillary supporters were being treated on the blog OR until they saw how Hillary (and Bill) were being treated by Obama and the campaign, compounded by so many in the media.

Hillary's support has defininately grown tremendously because of decisions of Obama folks to be abusive.

I'll give you one tiny, minute, mild example of lack of civility(not the heavy stuff, just a little cut of what she daily puts up with without complaint but significant in that it reveals character).  After Hillary won West Virginia she spent a good chunk of the next day taping interviews with all of the news shows for TV, most of which would air at the evening news hour.  Then she was to meet with her  finance committee and some superdelegates to assess and plan.

She had just won by 41 points a huge victory for someone who's campaign had been universally declared dead and no longer counting the week before. Any worth competitor would have recognized and respected that win in those circumstances.

Senator Obama contacted all the news channels and evening news anchors and jtold them there was something really big coming up and that he wanted live camera setups at this huge rally he was holding in Michigan and that they would have to cut to their news broadcasts live.  He then brought out Edwards for his endorsement and both gave speeches carried on all the channels.

They had to bump all of the Hillary interviews about her big win and the rest of her campaign...her moment to bask and to frame where she goes from here, herself instead of leaving it to the pontificating punditry to presume.  It was her chance to answer questions to quell the speculations that were passing for fact among pundits and 'reporters' like Lawrence ODonnel for example who tells us her speeches are actually concession speeches.

So she went into her meeting with supers and finance people with it all abuzz with Edwards' endorsement, the same Edwards who had just spent three days on tv  talking about why it would be wrong for him to endorse now and how important it was not to do it now.

Now this was not a big thing for Hillary to have to handle and go on and our girl is used to being treated this way and going on, making no complaint.

But it should tell the rest of us something important about Senator Obama and Senator Edwards,, We should see it in the context of expressions of values, respect for the process and personal credibility and integrity of message.

 Is it appropriate behavior for the 'frontrunner who has it all wrapped up' and now needs to show that 'reaching across divides' and 'unity' with 'new politics' are not just propaganda manipulation of the gulible but are Obama's actual values and honest intent.  

He has in this small instance at his time of 'great triumph' a chance to prove his, until now, empty words and turn his speech to action. But he failed.  He chose to take an advantage he supposedly did not need.  If he is so far ahead, he could act true to his lofty claims about how he would govern.  After all it is the lofty claims that he offers voters.  We have no proof of what he really wants to do or even can do...just his word.  Wednesday there was a small opportunity to be big, to be gracious, to appear interested in unity as an example of his 'new politics'.

He has, as he often says, ' presented his vision'. Now what does he chose when he can afford to be seen acting on it without harm to his chances and all the while appear to want reconciliation for the general election.  He made his choice and he failed and Edwards helped him.(and then sent out a massive fund raiser!)

They both know what they were doing was mean and unfair and dirty.  And they did it just because they could, thinking it would give them an extra advantage at Hillary's expense.  They got away with it.

But to women and a lot of men with a distaste for injustice and especially women too familiar with abusive behavior, this is a warning reminder of what we learned a the orange.  This is not a good man, not a fair or just man and he doesn't play by the rules and he encourages dangerous excuses like racism and sexism to blame some and win others.

He has a history of taking other people's work and calling it his own and of taking credit for work he didn't do, and winning honors from people he won't contribute to and using power to help the powerful and taking currying favor and seeking help from people he then turns his back on to curry new favors from the other side.

He whipped up the loyalty of the Black community more than almost anyone has and he won't give anything back.
He doesn't burn to serve or love the problem solving or feel the great needs and have great policies and programs springing from his deep caring. He buys and sells influence and power and many of the people who have helped him elevate have been lowered by him in return.

I think that the reason he only got 37% of the Black vote in Massachusetts is that they had already had a trial run with Gov. Deval Patrick, another David Axelrod client, who had the same message of "hope and change" and some of the same speeches, it turned out, and similar resume...not really qualified but sold as a fresh outsider to bring unity and change.  And the community embraced and elevated and supported Patrick.

Now most everybody is sorry.  He acts like he hates the work;he;s not good at it he whines about it and doesn't kknow how to fix things and make things happen and unity didn't happen after the speech.  Now the state is in buyer's remorse in a big way and the community is embarrassed.  When Barack Obama came to town with the same credentials and the same speech the Black community turned their heads and said a resounding "Hello, Hillary".

All the senior politicians were for Obama but not their people.  They wanted someone who could do the work and sounded like she knoew how to do it and what the problems were and how to start fixing them.  The opposite of that plagerized speech Obama used.  The saw that they had been conned and they weren't buying twice.

Now most of the Hillary supporters I know and hear about are more for Hillary in proportion to the abuses of the Obama campaign on Hillary and the process. And to the abuses of the Obama supporters who have somehow be inspired, freed, encouraged and unchecked by Obama to behave in such a way as to shut down and drive off and threaten any opposition.

The poster who inspired this diary could not see the link bewteen the behavior of the candidate and how it was reflected and inspired in the behavior of his supporters and so had asked," Surely nobody would reject a candidate because of how his supporters acted?"

This time the answer is 'yes'.

Note: Those of you who were not Obama supporters over at the large orange know exactly what I mean.  And we recognize several offenders as having come over here with us. I think what we experience is frightening and dangerous.  The more it happened the more I saw it reflected in what I was learning about the actions and history of their candidate. And the more uncomfortable I became with the idea of Obama becoming President and with the reality that so many people would want him, and them  in charge of the country.

Tags: Abuse, Alegre, driving off voters, Hillary, losing support, New Politics, obama, supporters, Unity Phony, wooing Hillary supporters (all tags)

Comments

62 Comments

Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Just checked the exit polls...Obama got 66% of the black vote in Massachusetts. Lower than other places, but still a supermajority. Where did you get 37% from?

by democrattotheend 2008-05-16 12:41PM | 0 recs
diary hijack begins

miss the message, focus on the numbers.  Nice try.

by 4justice 2008-05-16 01:11PM | 0 recs
Re: diary hijack begins

How is that hijacking? I was just correcting a numeric error. I would correct an Obama supporter who got the numbers wrong too.

by democrattotheend 2008-05-22 07:40PM | 0 recs
10% of MA AAs and 18% of elligible AAs

voted for Obama in the primary.  There are roughly 450,000 African Americans in Massachusetts and about 278,000  could have voted in the primary but Obama only got 48,800 votes from  African Americans.

by itsadryheat 2008-05-25 03:25PM | 0 recs
great diary.

rec'd.

by canadian gal 2008-05-16 12:41PM | 0 recs
How genuine of you

Nothing like a little classic projection.

(If you are an Obama supporter and you don't see the difference between acting offended and wounded when the seventh most likely interpretation of a comment, if twisted just so, could be stretched to sound a little offensive and really abusive behavior where people are being so hounded that they are being located and their children threatened...please just go to another diary because you really won't learn anything here. But if you DO see the difference, I hope you can be alerted to behaviors that are driving people away from your candidate and are in the way of any effort to win voters back later.)

If you haven't seen Clinton supporters doing this at great length on this site, then you either haven't been paying attention or are willfully blind to it.

I'm one of the ones that say that one should not define a candidate by his or her supporters, and, you know what?  Even if I did do that, I wouldn't take you as a discredit to Clinton because you obviously care nothing about her wishes.  

In case you hadn't noticed this either, but the party is solidifying around Obama as the nominee; even Clinton is outspoken in saying that, contrary to your past comments, the Democratic party would be far better served by Barack Obama than John McCain.

You don't want to support Obama... fine.  You're just in the wrong place.  This is a site dedicated to electing Democrats.

by Dracomicron 2008-05-16 12:45PM | 0 recs
Re: How genuine of you

Last time I looked Obama was not the only Democrate in this country.

by J Rae 2008-05-16 01:24PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

You compare Obama supporters with abusive men?

Quite a stretch there.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-16 12:46PM | 0 recs
I don't think its a stretch at all..

BTW, there are abusers of both sexes.

We have come to realize that the Bush adminstration and the GOP use abusers tactics to get their way. But to see Democrats acting coercively is disturbing.

I think its caused by narcissism.

Narcissists are profoundly insecure and they seem to have problems telling right from wrong. Of course, they never admit when they are wrong, (except in a calculated way, say if you tell them they never do and they are trying to disprove that.)

by architek 2008-05-16 01:15PM | 0 recs
Define "a lot of voters" and

the back up your claims.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 12:49PM | 0 recs
Why not let people make up their minds

for themselves?

by architek 2008-05-16 01:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Why not let people make up their minds

What? I'm sorry, I didn't get your comment.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 01:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I mostly lurk and haved loved DKos for several years now.  I have almost stopped going entirely because of exactly what the diarist discusses.  In fact I missed the writers strike and all of the info about where everyone had gone, as I had stopped going there almost completely.  Luckily I found MyDD quite by accident.

I was for Hillary to begin with, but was open to Obama as a possibility.  My observation of how virulent and frightening the rhetoric was completely eliminated him from consideration.

"By their fruit you shall know them..."and I want no part of it.

by not buying it 2008-05-16 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I'm sorry for your pain but that's not "a lot" relative to the size of the electorate.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 01:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I think you will be surprised...

by not buying it 2008-05-16 01:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I doubt it.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I guess we will have to wait until November to find out if any of this is truly valid.

by not buying it 2008-05-16 02:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Define "a lot of voters" and

I suppose but with a 50 state voter registration drive I'm not sure that we'd notice.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 02:07PM | 0 recs
I wouldn't say 'noticing' was a strong suit...

by itsadryheat 2008-05-16 02:33PM | 0 recs
Re: I wouldn't say 'noticing' was a strong suit...

What?

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 02:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Holy cow, the moronic diaries are coming out of the woodwork today. I just get done reading about how George Bush is being unfairly attacked by a Democrat, and now Obama supporters are like domestic abusers.

Terrific stuff!

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-05-16 12:52PM | 0 recs
Not all of them are..

But the ones who make the most noise inevitably are.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Not all of them are..

So your argument is that Obama supporters "who make the most noise" are like men who physically beat women.

Troll on.

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-05-16 01:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

This is dishonest to the core.

by Jess81 2008-05-16 12:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Could you clarify what is dishonest about this post?

by J Rae 2008-05-16 01:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

If you are an Obama supporter and you don't see the difference between acting offended and wounded when the seventh most likely interpretation of a comment, if twisted just so, could be stretched to sound a little offensive and really abusive behavior where people are being so hounded that they are being located and their children threatened...please just go to another diary because you really won't learn anything here.

by Jess81 2008-05-18 02:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs

You know what's sad?

You probably put a lot of effort into this.

by DeskHack 2008-05-16 12:55PM | 0 recs
Ask yourself WHY

instead of trying to attack the observer.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

This is a god-awful, rambling, incoherent, offensive pile of poop.  Sorry - no way around it, just a dreadful diary.

by interestedbystander 2008-05-16 01:02PM | 0 recs
Why?

Its not enough to say 'its wrong' unless you explain how its wrong.

This is not grammar school where the biggest loudest bully is 'right'.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Why?

You're working backwards. The diarist first has to back up his/her claims.

by heresjohnny 2008-05-16 01:43PM | 0 recs
On feeling somehow picked upon...

Let me tell you about the only time I've lost trusted user privileges, either here or on DKos. It was on DKos before the Clintonite exodus.

I was reading a diary by an Obama supporter who was questioning Hillary Clinton's electability. He was being troll rated excessively for his opinion and I stepped in to say that the troll ratings weren't per site policy. A Clinton supporter made a particular personal attack on the diarist and I troll rated her. Another Clintonite chimed in with something to the effect of how this "insect" (me) couldn't possibly have TU privileges. A third said, "Apparently he does." One of the former said, "Not for long." Thus began the coordinated attack by a dozen or so Clintonites that cost me my TU privileges for a week.

I found that group again. They tended to show up around 11PM my time, and I began to think of them as the "roving Clintonites" and tried to avoid diaries in which they were present. Eventually, they moved here, and I believe I've met many of them her over time.

I tell you this story by way of example that the disrespect on DKos was hardly one-sided. Neither is the disrespect here, but in order to stay on this site as an Obama supporter you have to accept you live by a different set of rules than the Clinton supporters.

As for the supposed slight of the Edwards announcement, really? Do you not know that controlling the media cycle is the essence of winning modern elections? Do you not know that any candidate wishing to go against John McCain will need to be expert at this? Sen. Clinton had a news story, her WV win, but Sen. Obama had a bigger one, and he used it to full advantage. If Sen. Clinton was male, there would be no complaint about this. It would be seen as just very smart politics. But somehow you see it as disrespect. Do you want your candidate treated like a candidate, or like something else. Do you want her to get some special treatment?

What Barack Obama demonstrated with that event was that he is the better candidate to face John McCain. Do not doubt for a moment that McCain will know how to work the news cycle.

There are certainly Obama supporters here that are abusive, but there are at least an equal number of Clinton supporters that are. On DKos, the situation was reversed and magnified by the fact that there are a whole lot more users there.

Anyway, all I'm saying is that I believe you are exaggerating perceived slights into more than they are.  

by Travis Stark 2008-05-16 01:12PM | 0 recs
Re: On feeling somehow picked upon...

Obama had the opportunity to show grace, and he chose a stomp down instead.  What Edwards showed is that he is much, much less than I had hoped...the quality of their souls was on full display.

by not buying it 2008-05-16 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: On feeling somehow picked upon...

Yeah, I find the DKos bashing on this site amusing.  I haven't looked at that website since last summer.  I was defending Obama on a particularly boisterous post and got hide-rated repeatedly.  I sent off an email to the admins and said they just lost an independent voice.  Haven't been back.

This isn't something particular to Obama supporters, I think it is something particular to DKos though.  The bottom line is don't take it too seriously.  Have a beer, insult them back, and go read talkingpointsmemo or fivethirtyeight.  You'll feel a lot better.

by the mollusk 2008-05-16 02:07PM | 0 recs
Obama responses here prove the diarists point

hostile, dismissive, ganging up on, insulting.  

by 4justice 2008-05-16 01:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama responses here prove the diarists point

One of them, maybe. Or are you just making up faux anger because we don't agree with the diary?

by Massadonious 2008-05-16 01:16PM | 0 recs
There are some interesting semantic analysis

techniques that could tell us some interesting things about how people on these blogs interact.

Would anyone have a problem with having their postings analyzed by a 'machine' for patterns?

Have to flesh this one out a bit, its been a long time.

How do you contact the admins here? I wouldn't want them to get angry over it. (even though the corpus is publically available)

by architek 2008-05-16 01:23PM | 0 recs
Are we supposed to just not respond at all?

The diarist can compare Obama supporters to domestic abusers, and yet to respond at all is to be accused of being hostile, dismissive, and insulting. Perhaps some of you folks aren't cut out for political discussion.

by Travis Stark 2008-05-16 01:20PM | 0 recs
Perhaps?

n/t

by rb608 2008-05-16 01:31PM | 0 recs
Statistics might reveal a lot

When someone has written a great deal, patterns tend to emerge that can illustrate trends in their cognitive processing of information. The larger the body of text that the software has to work with, the more it can reveal.

This is a subject of great interest to me. Similar kinds of things can be done with the spoken word but text is more easily processed.

When people make a general statement about abusers and their verbal style it isn't always credible. However, people who are themselves survivors of abuse have very sensitive antennae to the patterns of behavior that show an abusive personality.

However, its entirely subjective at that point unless they can back it up with some kind of metric that makes sense scientifically.

Cognitive neuroscience, natural language analysis, data extraction, semantic analysis, all are fields that might offer a skilled researcher tools with which to determine whether group a is more 'abusive' than group b or an average of all persons available.

The tools that are out there to do this are increasingly more sophisticated.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Statistics might reveal a lot

So you're saying that you can tell if we beat women because we blog a lot?

One would think that the more you blog, the less time you have to beat women.

Perhaps.  Perhaps not.

by Reaper0Bot0 2008-05-16 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama responses h

Most of us are very nice.  

by Becky G 2008-05-16 01:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

If you rely solely on this and other websites as your way of gathering information about  Obama supporters then your conclusion is highly skewed.  Try getting out and actually talking to some Obama supporters face to face.  Again basing your opinion of Obama supporters on the actions of some people on the blogosphere is quite naive, being that over 18 million people have voted for him.

by hootie4170 2008-05-16 01:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl
I have talked to many Obama supporters face to face. Actually they work with me.
It is kind of sad, they talk about Hope/Change but when you ask them what change they have no idea.
What is even sadder is the ones that volunteer don't understand that they won't be getting affordable health insurance. For some reason they have the impression that Obama will place price controls on premiums. (Health insurance is the biggest issue).
They are also under the impression that the Republicans are all going to do what Obama says for them to do.
Like I said, kind of sad.
by J Rae 2008-05-16 01:37PM | 0 recs
Thats been my experience too.

Most of them have no idea what they are up against.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:44PM | 0 recs
qualifying that..

the ones I meet in real life tend to be nice people.. not at all like many of the Obama supporters here.

But they, when asked why they like Obama, often can't pick specifics about his platform they support.

In particular, its distressing to me that many think Obama supports real universal healthcare. (He doesn't)

by architek 2008-05-16 01:47PM | 0 recs
Re: qualifying that..

I think you will find this in supporters of every candidate, for christ sake that's who the GOP preyed on, and continue to do so for years...I think it is unfair to label only Obama supporters when it comes to this.

My parents, up until this year, were Repugs...I asked them why? ie what issues etc.  They couldn't name a one...It was how they were brought up, Republican and Catholic and they never questioned it, it was what their parents and grandparents were...Needless to say they are Democrats as of this year and are more educated on the issues that affect them.

by hootie4170 2008-05-16 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: qualifying that..

There are undoubtedly lots of political supporters in every election that choose a candidate without knowing much of what they stand for. It happens every election and in this election I have no doubt it's equal on both sides.  I have no doubt whatsoever that many Hillary supporters only know she's a female and a Democrat (in that order of importance). I won't mention some Obama supporters since you already did.

by Becky G 2008-05-16 02:01PM | 0 recs
Can't stand the Heat?

Political blogs are not for the faint of heart. If it's too rough ... don't hang around. Believe me (as an Obama supporter) you guys gave as good as you got. Don't start looking for head pats now that your side has lost. If a few dozen hard core Hillary bloggers can't get on board ..... that's life....we will survive.

by JoeCoaster 2008-05-16 01:27PM | 0 recs
See what I mean..

>Don't start looking for head pats now that your side has lost.

Don't worry, we will survive. I am actually much more worried about the Obama folk, after the election.

Nomatter who wins, I have a feeling that they will have some sorting out to do.

As far as Hillary, I am not expecting her to win. But she certainly has not lost. When you look at the votes, she's only around 100,000 votes behind. Thats not 'lost' yet, by any SANE definition.

(Its about 1% of votes cast.)

by architek 2008-05-16 01:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters

Comapring Obama supporters to spouse abusers?  Nice.  You're not going to get me to read the rest when you start out with that analogy.

by rb608 2008-05-16 01:30PM | 0 recs
Don't get it..

and continue to show just how much you dont get it.

Change the subject.

Lots of people do get it, though.

by architek 2008-05-16 01:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Don't get it..

And yet in a comment above, you confirm exactly what I said:

Not all of them are..But the ones who make the most noise inevitably are.
So are you being dishonest, or merely disingenuous?  You outright call outspoken Obama supporters spouse abusers.  And you want to be taken seriously?  Not by me.

by rb608 2008-05-16 03:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs

Remarkable.

When did I stop beating my wife, anyway?

by Reaper0Bot0 2008-05-16 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

So... Clinton supports are not any less hostile then Obama supporters eh? A great contrast? I have been called sexist, and undemocratic, my own mom has directly implied the same, all over my choice of a democratic political candidate. And now you come along and paint huge swaths of people with the same brush, equating political rhetoric with physical/emotional abuse? I am probably going to get banned for this next bit, but at this point I don't care any more...

Fuck you. Fuck your assertions that political jockeying equates to domestic abuse just because your candidate happens to be female. Fuck the whole notion that all/most of Obama supporters or all/most of Clinton supporters are all the same. This is the god damned internet not face to face real conversation. The internet allows us to demonize one another because we can't see and hear and empathize with each other, and you want to turn that into an absolute substitute for real life? You recall how poorly Edwards supporters where treated on the internet? Did you see his reception the other night in real life? Yeah there is a huge disconnect between the two.

You want to demonize supporters within your own party because nasty things where said by some other supporters? You are no better.

Want to vote for a man who calls his wife a cunt? Want to help get him elected? Fine... do so. Just shut the hell up about it already. Your rhetoric is one-sided, inflammatory and disingenuous. Reconciliation is a two way street and it seems clear you want to mine and road block it.

by notedgeways 2008-05-16 01:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Overreact much?  Why would I want to meet Obama supporters when your diatribe is peeling the paint off the walls behind where I sit?  You just made the  diarists point for him.

by not buying it 2008-05-16 01:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Wow, that old technique?

Person 1: "F you!"
Person 2: "No, F you!"
Person 1: "How dare you be so uncivil to me! Waah!"

by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner 2008-05-16 01:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

Ummmm...am I person 1 or 2?  I can't really tell.

by not buying it 2008-05-16 01:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

For those of you who don't find Obama supporters to act in an abusive matter, check out this thread:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/16/1559 26/739

Count how many comments were made by apparent Obama supporters that attempted to ridicule the diarist and other Hillary supporters, and count how many sincere and thoughtful comments were made by apparent Obama supporters.

And, if that thread wasn't sufficient, then check out this diary:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/16/1745 29/449
(Though, in fairness, I should point out that a number of Obama supporters criticized this latter diary for being over the line).

by markjay 2008-05-16 02:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama Supporters: Helpers or Saboteurs or Refl

I'm sorry, but blogging is not the Spanish Civil War.  It's a hobby and is almost never informative.  People do this to blow off steam and when they aren't sure which regression to perform next.

by the mollusk 2008-05-16 02:24PM | 0 recs
On being a Cry baby (Grow up Respect Freedom)

You know what Barak Obama could have lost. He won by a razor thin margin and everybody knows that. The fact is if your whining about how unfair everything was your a damn cry baby. I am not refering to anybody in particular but this childish baby stuff about peoples feelings needs to stop. We are not in a democracy because peoples emotions must be respected we are in it to respect the right to exist with as much freedom as possible. Freedom to earn, to spend to do niether, to comment on this or that, to speak on this or that. If you cant take critisizm then go stick your head in the sand. If you cant take losing then dont support any canidate. If you like Republicans then vote for them. If you like democrats then vote for them. What none of us need to here are cry babies complaining how life is not fair to them and how there feelings are hurt.

.................... GROW UP ....................

by edtastic 2008-05-16 02:27PM | 0 recs
This Diary Reminds Me

of PeeWee Herman, arguing with his talking chair.

by toyomama 2008-05-16 02:33PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------