Being against things? You mean being against the war because of very specific reasons that are readily apparent to millions? If a well connected politician with staffers can't figure out the truth of the matter then they certainly aren't qualified to run the country.
Then you are also unqualified to be President. The millions of us who fought against the war and even marched in the streets are better able to lead.
No hindsight here amigo. I was against it from day 1. I knew they were lying. I listened to the international community. I understood PNAC had been pushing the invasion for years. I knew that Saddam was basically secular and wouldn't have been running with AQ. All of that information was available if one was smart enough or cared enough to pay attention. Again, millions of us in the US and around the world did. Again, we're more qualified to run the country than the people who did not.
Well not exactly. He said the case hadn't been made from where he stood and since he predicted the outcome using public information - and private information would have also supported that prediction - to assume he would have thought differently isn't logical.