On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licenses

OK, I take the bait and make the dairy.

I will advocate that Hillary has NOT flip-flopped on the immigration issue as others in media and blogs are claiming it to be. And here are the FACTS. I hope people digest the facts and then jump to conclusions.

Fact 1:

In the debate, when the question was asked, she stood for a fellow democrat. What should she do? Run a fellow democrat down the train? I am glad she stood for the party. She stood for the principle too. When asked in terms of yes or no, she conceded that she doesnt support the specific plan.

Fact 2:

Next day she released statement to clear up the air. She insisted she supported the governors who are trying to resolve problems in  their states, and therefore supports Spitzer. What should she have done? Run him down again? She stood for democrats while others were attacking her for standing for a democrat governor. Here is the precise statement.

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform,'" her campaign said.

Fact 3:
She was consistent in her answer to CNN too in recent interview. Here is her transcript from CNN interview in this regard.

In the wide-ranging interview exactly a year before the election, Clinton continued to hold back from offering full-fledged support for a plan offering illegal immigrants driver's licenses, saying it's a question that doesn't allow a candidate to answer simply by "raising their hand."

"It depends upon what state they're in, it depends upon what [governors] think the risks are," Clinton said. "The governor of New York has a lot of immigrants, many of whom we know are not there legally; [he] has to worry about security. A governor of another state where that's not a problem doesn't.

"This issue has been so politicized," Clinton continued, "and I understand that, because you can score points, you can score all kinds of political, demagogic points."

Again, all I see her doing is standing up for a democratic governor.

Fact 4: todays statement is consistent with her previous statements

Hillary Clinton's campaign said late Wednesday that she supports New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's plan for illegal immigrant driver's licenses, a clarification required after a twisted campaign performance Tuesday night left people guessing her position.

Spitzer's plan, which he has retooled in the face of heavy criticism, would grant identification on a three-tier basis, decreasing with the level of proper documentation. Undocumented, illegal immigrants would receive a license only to be used for driving, and be inscribed "not for federal purposes," meaning it couldn't be used to board flights or cross borders.

"Senator Clinton broadly supports measures like the ones being advocated by Governor Spitzer, but there are details that still need to be worked out," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said Wednesday.

Fact 5: MSNBC debate transcript Senator Clinton, Governor of New York Eliot Spitzer has proposed giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. He told the Nashua, New Hampshire, Editorial Board it makes a lot of sense. Why does it make a lot of sense to give an illegal immigrant a driver's license? Clinton: Well, what Governor Spitzer is trying to do is fill the vacuum left by the failure of this administration to bring about comprehensive immigration reform. We know in New York we have several million at any one time who are in New York illegally. They are undocumented workers. They are driving on our roads. The possibility of them having an accident that harms themselves or others is just a matter of the odds. It's probability. So what Governor Spitzer is trying to do is to fill the vacuum. I believe we need to get back to comprehensive immigration reform because no state, no matter how well intentioned, can fill this gap. There needs to be federal action on immigration reform. Clinton: Well, I just want to add, I did not say that it should be done, but I certainly recognize why Governor Spitzer is trying to do... (Unknown): Wait a minute... Clinton: And we have failed. We have failed. Dodd: No, no, no. You said -- you said yes... Clinton: No. Dodd: ... you thought it made sense to do it. Clinton: No, I didn't, Chris. Russert: Senator Clinton, I just want to make sure of what I heard. Do you, the New York senator, Hillary Clinton, support the New York governor's plan to give illegal immigrants a driver's license? You told the New Hampshire paper that it made a lot of sense. Do you support his plan? Clinton: You know, Tim, this is where everybody plays "gotcha." It makes a lot of sense. What is the governor supposed to do? He is dealing with a serious problems. We have failed. And George Bush has failed. Do I think this is the best thing for any governor to do? No. But do I understand the sense of real desperation, trying to get a handle on this? Remember, in New York, we want to know who's in New York. We want people to come out of the shadows. He's making an honest effort to do it. We should have passed immigration reform.

Now I know that many might accuse her of parsing with words. Well, in the end, she has been consistent forever. She stood for fellow democrat and urged people to get back to comprehensive immigration reform. Media made a furor, blogs went abuzz, and she was mocked by everyone. It further helped the republicans to get more ammo. If she does win nomination, republicans have one more wedge issue to attack her with. Tomorrow's debate will be interesting. However, who so ever says she flip-flopped is plain wrong. did she hedge, yes. did she flip-flop? NO

just goes to show how much everyone stretched it and will keep stretching it.

Tags: clinton, Democrats, Hillary, Spitzer (all tags)

Comments

73 Comments

Hillary did not flip flop

Hillary absolutely did not flip flop. In addition, if you compare the MSNBC Debate transcript to the actual interview where she initially commented on this issue and where Tim Russert's cherry picked her comments from, you will find Hillary has been consistent on this issue.

by lonnette33 2007-11-14 03:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Hillary did not flip flop

Lonette is right... the newspaper that conducted the interview that Russert pulled his "good idea" quote from even says that her remarks were taken out of context and "we think Clinton was pretty clear that she didn't support Spitzer's plan."

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs .dll/article?AID=20071102/OPINION01/311 020012-1/opinion

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 03:44PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Too late, kids. HRC blew it.  Maybe they can feed Russert the proper questions to ask next time.  The unfortunate thing is that, as usual when "triangulating," the progressive ideas get tossed in favor of kissing up to the ugly middle in American politics.  HRC was right the first time, but it didn't poll well, and she ditched her support for Spitzer as a result.  This hurts her, and couple with the question-planting thing, could be the opening Obama needs.  I for one hope so....

by PositiveLiberty 2007-11-14 03:49PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

I think that Hillary was right the first time too. But that doesn't matter. And Obama is still on record as supportive of the plan.

by General Sherman 2007-11-14 03:53PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Obama actually believes what he says.  He voted for a plan while in the state senate in illinois, so for him to come out against this one would be foolish.  By the way it FAILED in the state senate by 1 vote.  

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:00PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Right. Obama has been rather principled about this.

But do principles usually win out in politics?

No.

by General Sherman 2007-11-14 04:11PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

YES because that vote for the drivers licenses took place during his campaign for the U.S. Senate in 2004.  He voted for the plan and was also elected as the new Senator from Illinois.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:15PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

I know, but immirgation was not a hot button issue during the 2004 campaign.

I think that Obama MUST stand by and defend his position. He just needs to make his case regardless of the fall out, and then contrast that with Hillary's waffling.

He CANNOT flop on this.

by General Sherman 2007-11-14 04:22PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Immigration is/was always an issue.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:33PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

good spin, principle is bad, weak. thanks for the Iraq war bud.

by leewesley 2007-11-14 04:44PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Her campaign released a memo saying she supported it.....now she says she is against it.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 03:53PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Well, who can tell?  It was all pretty equivocal and ambivalent.  Until today.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 03:55PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Well the mere fact that it has taken two weeks for an answer to be clearly forthcoming, and then only after the collapse of the plan in NY is not a feather in her cap.  I don't think it is a massive issue, in itself, but the damage to Hillary's campaign in now notorious.  Not to mention a bit of partisan levity at her expense:


Here's Obama spokesman Bill Burton, on Hillary's announcement earlier that she now opposes giving driver's licenses to illegals:

"When it takes two weeks and six different positions to answer one question on immigration, it's easier to understand why the Clinton campaign would rather plant their questions than answer them."

The horse has bolted on this one, it seems.  But buck up, she will have another chance to make her case in the upcoming debate.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 03:53PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

I did, though my comment didn't address that point, to be sure.  I have read with considerable interest just about every comment Hillary's campaign has made on this topic since the Drexel debate and I agree that a case can be made for her support of Spitzer.  Unfortunately that isn't the real issue surrounding the discussion of her position in the media, as you are no doubt aware.

She has been cautious in her response as a consequence of the larger immigration issue which lies behind this, and I can understand her concern.  But she needed to make an unequivocal comittment to this in a yea or nay context and she was not perceived as having done so.  Now it is too late, hence my comment that the horse has bolted.

Senator Obama's direct response to the same question at the debate stands in stark relief to hers, and whether from a policy perspective his position is sound, which I assume he believes it is, is not the point.  Politically it was correct and you may have noticed the lack of criticism of it in the media.  Some day soon he will be no doubt be forced to defend it and I expect he will.  In the meantime this little point of policy has caused significant shifts in the way Hillary's campaign is perceived by the media and the electorate and that damage has already been done.  Whether it really has an effect on her election remains to be seen.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 04:17PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

But she needed to make an unequivocal comittment to this in a yea or nay context and she was not perceived as having done so.

the thing is, it is not within a President's power to regulate the issuance of state drivers licenses.  (at best, Congress could force states to issue licenses that were valid only in the issuing state to "illegals" under a broad interpretation of the "interstate commerce" clause.)   In other words, she doesn't really have to take a position, because its irrelevant to the job she is campaigning for.

And she really hasn't changed her position -- she has never actually supported Spitzer's plan (despite Russert's taking a quote completely out of context.)  Nor did today's statement say that she would oppose any such plan as President (she just won't support it.)  

Her position has been consistent, but nuanced... and people who are demanding 'yes or no' answers to a complex question involving the actions of states designed to protect their citizens when the federal government does not fulfill its constitutional responsibilities...well, those people are fools.

(and in case you think I support Hillary, she's actually 7th on my list of Democratic candidates...right above Gravel.)

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 04:47PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

All fair comments, though the days when states acted in this matter independently may be coming to an end, it is certainly a national issue.  And I agree it is complex, though that did not prevent others from making unequivocal statements at the debate, Dodd and Obama, for example.

In most cases I would agree that a nuanced answer is better but in this case Hillary needed something else, at least in the perception of the media, rightly or wrongly, and she didn't deliver it.  No amount of justification will reverse the damage any more than Obama's arguably correct position on negotiating with dictators makes him any less 'naïve and irresponsible' in the narratives of this election campaign.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 04:56PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

All fair comments, though the days when states acted in this matter independently may be coming to an end, it is certainly a national issue.

"Illegal immigration" is a national issue.  The question of what states can/should do when the federal government fails to adequately address the national issue has to be determined on a state by state basis.  In some states, the presence of undocumented immigrants presents very serious challenges -- in lots of other states, the problems/costs associated with the issue are negligible.  But states cannot enforce immigration regulations -- the state of New York cannot deport people, nor can it offer them citizenship.  (Indeed, a mayor in a small town in New Jersey tried to get the feds to deputize his police force to allow them to arrest 'illegals' under federal law -- but so far has been turned down.)

Hillary Clinton's position is that she doesn't think states should have to be dealing with the issue -- and that she intends to address it on the federal level.  If/when she runs for re-election, we can judge her on her record.  

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 05:13PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

I think we all agree that it is a national issue.  I am not disputing the jurisdiction of the states but even that might change if Republicans have their way.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 05:27PM | 0 recs
clinton

No need to worry about Hillary. Obama fell right into this death trap... He can either stick to his pro-license position or he will waffle/wiggle...

by prisonbreak 2007-11-14 03:55PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

Obama believes in the plan, he voted for a similar plan while in the Illinois state senate.  The only thing Hillary showed was her lack of principles. The plan in Illinois failed by 1 vote in the Senate.  It wouldve have been hypocritical of Obama to oppose it now.  Obama is a politician of PRINCIPLES not POLLS, unlike Hillary.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:04PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

of course she flip-flopped and for some of her supporters to think Hillary tricked Obama into supporting it is foolish.......he has been a supporter of a simliar bill since his State Senate days.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:11PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

you dont believe she flip flopped so why would you put that in your diary

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:17PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

Yep. Obama has two choices:

a) Flip flop and undercut his "I'm holier than thou" campaign narrative.

b) Stand on his position in support of drivers licenses for illegal immigrants and get beat up the side of the head with a political baseball bat.

If he chooses the second option, I guarantee Clinton will run illegal immigration ads in Iowa and New Hampshire touting her position against drivers licenses.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:17PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

Let her run the ads, it will just remind the voters that she is an unprincipled flip-flopper that will do anything for votes.  She will definitely lose.

by allmiview 2007-11-14 04:19PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

If we are really serious about winning this election Democrats, we can't live in fear of losing it.  That's Obama, incidentally, and he means it.

by Shaun Appleby 2007-11-14 04:21PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

I doubt Clinton will run ads against him.

This is a complicated issue, and there's no simple 'yes' or 'no' answer. I'm wondering whether the MSM will double check with Obama, I'm not holding my breath though.

by prisonbreak 2007-11-14 04:25PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

What's to lose in Iowa? There's nothing but white people there and 60% of Democrats don't want drivers licenses for the illegal immigrants who are stealing all their jobs.

This issue is radioactive. Obama will get killed unless he flip-flops. He is going to quickly come to realize why Clinton was not stupid enough to give a "yes" or "no" answer.

Edwards has already flip flopped.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:41PM | 0 recs
Re: clinton

She won't run ads....that would be way too transparent.

by General Sherman 2007-11-14 04:43PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

So it's true...Hilbots really can't ever conceive of an error on the part of HRC.  We thought this was a screw up, but it's a cleverly-set death trap for Obama! Holy crap. She is brilliant!

by PositiveLiberty 2007-11-14 03:58PM | 0 recs
She's flip flopped

She definatly came out for it after the debate.

After her campaign release the memmo , the media wasnt pleased with the wording and pressed them on to be clearer and they finally admitted she supported it.

I will look for the linnk , but after the media pushed them for a clearer statement since their previous statement was triangulating , a spokesperson clearly stated that Hillary does indeed support Spitzer's plan.

Now , she 's changed her mind on this issue i think Dodd will let her hear about it.

Can anyoe help me look for the article that clearly stated tshe supported it?

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:08PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

The media saying she supported it and the Clinton campaign saying she supported it are two different things. Find a quote from Clinton or her campaign.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:15PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

"The media saying she supported it and the Clinton campaign saying she supported it are two different things."

This is really the crux of the issue.  Russert essentially lied in his question to Hillary, prefacing it with an utterly false statement that she had "told the Nashua, New Hampshire, Editorial Board it makes a lot of sense" (she told the Nashua editorial board that Spitzer's goals made sense) and then asking her "Why does it make a lot of sense to give an illegal immigrant a driver's license?"

And from the moment that question was asked, everything she has said has been represented in the media (and by other campaigns) as an unequivocal position, when she has never taken an unequivocal position.

Take today's statement... "I support Governor Spitzer's decision today to withdraw his proposal. As president, I will not support driver's licenses for undocumented people..."  Its being reported everywhere as Clinton opposing drivers licenses for the undocumented.  (The TPM Muckraker headline says 'Hillary Comes Out Against Giving Driver's Licenses To Illegal Immegrants" -- she doesn't do that, she just supports Spitzers decision, and says she won't support licenses as President.)  

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 04:59PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Oh, now its the NY Times who's at fault. Here you go...again. From the Washington Post:

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said. Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

Can it get any clearer than that...

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 05:01PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

well, yes, you can get a LOT clearer than that.  

Like with an attributed quote from the aide, stating what "Clinton ultimately supports", rather than a reporter's perception of what an unnamed aide claimed was Clinton's position.

I mean, today we've seen lots of headlines claiming that Clinton now opposes drivers licenses for the undocumented.  But that isn't what the statement really says.  

So why should we believe that a reporter (let alone a reporter from the Post) claim they heard some "aide" say when they were demanding a 'yes or no' answer, and the official campaign position was NOT to give a 'yes or no' answer to a complicated question....

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 05:23PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Here:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/ 10/31/a-day-later-clinton-embraces-spitz ers-license-effort/

Here's some quote:
Mrs. Clinton's aides said her statement was intended to signal that she broadly supported Mr. Spitzer's goal of awarding driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Mr. Spitzer initially proposed a blanket program of awarding full-fledged driver's licenses to illegal immigrants; in the face of sharp opposition from the Legislature, he backed off and presented a multi-tiered program system of awarding licenses to illegal immigrants.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:26PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

more quote from article:Still, the release of the statement suggested her advisers believed it was politically wiser to embrace a position that could clearly hurt her in a general election rather than risk providing more fuel to what has emerged as a damaging line of criticism: That she, taking advantage of her dominant position in some polls, is not being candid about her views and about would she would do as president.

It was not util the media pushed them for a clear statement that they admitted she supported it.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:29PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

dude, the article isn't even accurate about the reason that Spitzer changed his proposal.... it wasn't because of opposition in the Legislature, it was because of federal opposition --- Spitzer's plan was incompatible with the whole "Real ID" program, and that is why the plan changed....

by plukasiak 2007-11-14 05:26PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Give up arguing with them. It's pretty much fruitless...

by prisonbreak 2007-11-14 04:32PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

How bout this one:

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said. Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

You Clintonistas are full of shit...she flipped.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:34PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

What? , so if i tell you i broadly support your plan , this should not be viewed as an endorsement?

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:35PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Seriously? I support your plan should not be viewed as an endorsement? Wow.

that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

If that's the case, then here are some other words that DON'T(allegedly) mean endorsement:

Advocate, Assist, Back, Condone, SUPPORT.

I'm laughing my ass of with all the spin going on here.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:42PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Yup , those posters sounds like Clitonn operative because they triagulate the same way.

If a person tells me he "broadly support a plan of mine" i would take it as a major endorsement , period.

Why would you tell someone this if you do not support whatever the plan is?

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:48PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

So.....

its the staffers fault that this quote is in the Post?

I mean, come on. SERIOUSLY!?!?!?

I don't believe that we should play into people's fear, offering no clear differences with rethuglicans, and not standing for what WE as a party believe.

Clinton is brilliant and if she so chooses, she could have explained the issue. Yes, it would have been more work, even riskier, but principled. She could sell a ketchup popsicle to a lady in white gloves.

That is my biggest beef with her.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:50PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

sheez , with all this triangulation , no wonder you're a Clinton supporter.

If i tell a guy " yo , i broadly support your driver license plan for illegal immigrants" , this quote should not give me the green light to go ahead and take it as a yes , it's great idea?

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:43PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

That's a quote from NY Times reporter. We already know how unreliable they are. Give us a quote from Clinton or her campaign where she says, "I support giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants".

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:52PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

Oh, now its the NY Times who's at fault. Here you go...again. From the Washington Post:

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said. Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

Can it get any clearer than that...

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:56PM | 0 recs
Re: She's flip flopped

What part of give me a quote is so hard to understand?

This is a quote:

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said.

This is not a quote. This is a characterization by media that has already proven itself to deceive with regularity:

Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

by hwc 2007-11-14 05:06PM | 0 recs
Unbelievable

The problems with Hillary resonate with her supporters. They state that she didn't say she was for it:

Oh, Wait:

Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said. Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

How can you write a diary that is total BULLSHIT!?!?!?!?

I guess it depends on what the definition of is, is.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

I hope she understands she will get hit hard.

Honesty is her weakness and you better believe she will get hit hard tomorrow if this issue comes up.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

That is the problem, ESPECIALLY with HRC...

Nobody says what they feel. Stand up, make an argument. Have some principle. We are not republicans.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

She just did stand up. She stood up and said that, as President, she would oppose giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants. Hard to be much clearer than that.

In fact, we have a clear choice for the voters:

a) Senator Clinton opposes drivers licenses for illegal Mexicans.

b) Senator Obama supports drivers licenses for illegal Mexicans.

Let the voters decide on the issues, just the way Obama says they should.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Um...again, she did support.

Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

Yeah she took a stand, alright. A stand here, a stand there...

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Quote please. This shouldn't be so hard. If she supported it, there must be a quote somewhere. I've heard her answer the question to the Nashua Telegraph. I've heard her answer the question to Russert. I've heard her answer the question to CNN. I've never heard her say she supports giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants. I've heard her say that she understands why a governor would want to do something. But, I've heard her say over and over and over that nothing the states do will work in the absense of a federal effort.

But, find me a quote.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Here you go...again. From the Washington Post:

"Senator Clinton supports governors like Governor Spitzer who believe they need such a measure to deal with the crisis caused by this administration's failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform. As President, her goal will be to pass comprehensive immigration reform that would make this unnecessary," the statement said. Campaign advisers, pressed to explain her view more clearly, said that she ultimately supports the driver's-license proposal.

Can it get any clearer than that...

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

No...again this is the problem with HRC

You don't get a straight answer out of her...

I believe you are caught in the what is is conundrum.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 05:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Anyone who gives a straight "yes" or "no" answer on drivers license for "illegal Mexicans who take American jobs" is an idiot, as Barack Obama is about to find out given his unequivocal support for the idea.

by hwc 2007-11-14 06:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Forget the GE. The lily white voters of Iowa aren't going to vote for a Democratic nominee who supports drivers licenses for illegal Mexicans.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

So, its a strategic move, therefore its ok?

I just want you to go on record as to that she flipped.

Living out of fear is a bitch.

by chicagogene 2007-11-14 04:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

She didn't flip. She never supported giving drivers licenses to illegal Mexicans. If you recall, she worked very hard to AVOID saying that she supported it.

Here's a good rule of thumb: All politics is political.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Of course it's a strategic move by the Clinton , but it would be up to Obama to really attack her on this issue.

Dodd has already started attacking her.

This is where you have to hit her hard...Honesty is where she's a bit weak and it had bee already planted into the public's mind that she's been waffling on the driver license issue.

All Obama has to do is asked her why she did not say "NO , I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS" during the philly debate.

It was a simple YES , NO question , and after taking some heat , she now says  she no longer supports it...What a FINGER IN THE AIR politician.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

That is where you are wrong.  It was NOT a simple "yes/no" question.  Far from it.  It is a very complicated question and she said exactly the right thing at the debate.  READ THE QUOTES.  It was the stupid "gotcha" mentality that had Obama and Edwards jump on this wrongly, when indeed it is an answer that HAS to differ from state to state and can't just be federalized by a pundit standing at a lectern.  

At the end of the day what many of us here believed and stated right after the debate is coming true.   Clinton did the right thing by stating that it is not a simple yes/no answer, and that you have to look at the individual circumstance, you can't just categorically state that on the FEDERAL LEVEL you are for DL's for illegal immigrants.    Obama did the wrong thing by categorically stating that he was all for it, a big mistake.    The one position (Clinton's) looks at this on a case-by-case basis and agrees or disagrees, depending on severity of the problem in a certain state, on issuing those Dl's as a means of identification on the STATE LEVEL.   The other position (Obama's) categorically makes DL's for illegals a desireable new program on the FEDERAL LEVEL.  

Obama is in heavy waters here.  His answer at the debate was wrong.  He left himself no room at all, which is proof positive that these types of answers ARE not to be answered with a simple Yes or No just to please someone like Russert on that stage or even Edwards, who is well below both Clinton and Obama in all the polls and has nothing to lose.

by georgep 2007-11-14 08:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Obama answered that he views it as a safety issue.  Quite simple. He's already had to address this issue as a State legislator and voted for it.

by Piuma 2007-11-14 08:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

Georgerep:

Hillary's initial answer was not only the best answer from a policy standpoint, but it was the best way politically for Democrats to finesse a bad issue. If Edwards and B.O. had been smart, they would have just said, "I agree with Hillary..."

Instead, they chose to attack Clinton. Now, she and her campaign have decided, "screw that". They have clearly decided to use the drivers license issue to beat Obama over the head.

by hwc 2007-11-14 08:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable

she did not even answer the question when she was on CNN...Even the questioner got irrirated and told her so.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 04:41PM | 0 recs
Edwards

Can somebody double check Edwards' record?

I clearly recall after the debate his campaign first said he's for the license, the next day they immediately flip flopped.

We can not let Edwards off the hook on this one.

by prisonbreak 2007-11-14 04:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards

He flipped. During the debate, his "hand" confirmed that he did not oppose Spitzer's plan.

A few days later, he flipped on CNN and said that he opposed giving licenses to illegals except as part of federal immigration reform and a path to citizenship.

Obama is on an island by himself on this one. Actually, on second thought, Clinton may not need to run ads. Edwards, champion of the angry white male populism, will probably pander like hell and rave about "Mexicans stealing your jobs" and attack Obama on the issue.

by hwc 2007-11-14 04:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards

I doubt any democrats will use this issue because they would get murdered by immigration activist.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 05:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards

When was the last time anyone saw an "immigration activist" in the lily white bubba state of Iowa? There ain't nothin' but white folk there. Nothing but white folk in New Hampshire, too.

by hwc 2007-11-14 05:09PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards

So you really think Hillary or Edwards will pull a tancredo and attack Obama on TV ads on immigration?...I hope you know that all of Hillary's hispanic supporters will be offended.

I doubt Edwards would go that route because it would damage him as using this issue for political gain.

Hillary has no credebility on this issue and it's already been planted in the public's mind that she's been waffling on the driver license issue , so if she ever tries to use it for political gain , she would get murdered by the latino press and the media.

by Prodigy 2007-11-14 05:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Edwards

No. Hillary is not going to "pull a Tancredo". She's much more skilled politically than that. She will run an ad that touts HER plan to address illegal immigration, on that just happens to highly key differences with her opponents.

All it takes is making B.O. repeat his support for giving drivers licences to illegal immigrants for a few news cycles, starting with tomorrow's debate. His position is politically radioactive.

by hwc 2007-11-14 08:30PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

Hillary supporters: please don't get discouraged. PLEASE. She is getting attacked from all sides because people deep down know she is our only hope for America and they're trying to ruin it for everybody. Hillary is the ONLY candidate with these 4 attributes (there's more but I forget): honor, patriotism, loyalty, and kindness. I got $35 in the bank that says no other candidate has those attributes.

by voteforhillaryonline 2007-11-14 05:23PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

was that $35 deposited by the Clinton campaign?

by General Sherman 2007-11-14 07:16PM | 0 recs
Re: On Hillary Clinton's position on Drivers Licen

god i have reflux over this. This issue is soo overdone.

by sepulvedaj3 2007-11-15 06:05AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------