Sen. Inhofe's fascist intimidation

From the diaries--Chris

Maybe there is a point where even the RWCM can no longer ignore how un-American the Republican party has become. If this story doesn't do it, the media is condemning itself to irrelevance. Opponents of 'Clear Skies' Bill Examined

The chairman of a Senate committee that oversees environmental issues has directed two national organizations that oppose President Bush's major clean-air initiative to turn over their financial and tax records to the Senate.

Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), who heads the Environment and Public Works Committee, asked for the documents 10 days after a representative of the two groups criticized Bush's "Clear Skies" proposal before a Senate subcommittee. Inhofe is the leading sponsor of the administration bill, which is deadlocked in his panel.

Any group who testifies before Congress has been formally put on notice that the price of opposing Republican legislation is an investigative fishing expedition into their financial records. Exactly who were these radical tree huggers and eco-terrorists that Sen. Inhofe has decided to investigate?

The two groups represent the views of the state and local regulators before the Environmental Protection Agency and Congress. They also do training, surveys and publish newsletters.

"We have a limited constituency -- the 50 states and local agencies," Becker said. "These are the only ones for whom we can work."

Becker said Inhofe's request appeared to be "some sort of retaliation against some very legitimate criticism of [Bush's] 'Clear Skies' proposal."

This is fascism. There is no other legitimate interpretation of Inhofe's demand for financial records. This is a despicable attempt to silence legitimate critics of Bush's environmental policy. Sen. Inhofe is using the power of the federal government to intimidate and silence all critics.

On Jan. 26, John Paul, an environmental regulator from Ohio, testified on behalf of both pollution control organizations. He told the Senate subcommittee that "Clear Skies""fails on every one of our associations' core principals," was "far too lenient" on polluters and would undermine "states' abilities to protect air quality."

After the testimony, several senators sent a letter to Paul with follow-up questions; Inhofe included a request for financial statements, membership lists and tax returns for the last six years for both groups. Paul is the vice president and incoming president of the local air pollution group. Inhofe's request was first disclosed by Cox News Service on Friday.

Did these groups have a hidden political agenda? Are they front groups for radical environmental activists?

William Becker, the executive director of both groups -- the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators, which represents 48 state air pollution control agencies, and the Assn. of Local Air Pollution Control Officials, which represents more than 165 local agencies -- said they received no money from environmental activists or other private interests.

                                   . . .

Although the membership often is not unanimous on the state group's positions, Becker said, "We go to great pains to try to reach an overwhelming majority, not just a simple majority, and we succeed."

This is part of a continuing agenda to squelch scientific debate, even from objective scientific sources.

A Republican who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004, Paul gained prominence in March 2004 when he told the Los Angeles Times that an EPA advisory committee he co-chaired had been abruptly shelved after it requested comparative data on the administration's proposal to control mercury emissions from power plants. The EPA never produced the information.

He said he was "deeply disappointed" by Inhofe's request.

Sen. Waxman is doing everything he can to inform the American people about the efforts of the Republican leadership and President Bush to shred the Bill of Rights.

Rep. Henry A. Waxman of Los Angeles, the senior Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee, said: "There is not even any subtlety about this. This is a blatant attempt at intimidation and bullying so that experts will be afraid to speak out about a bill that rolls back air pollution protections for all Americans."

Does the media have any remaining pride or even a shard of self respect? The N.Y. Times and Time magazine think their reporters should be protected from government intimidation. Will they oppose government intimidation of average citizens? Do they care about anyone's civil liberties besides their own?

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

13 Comments

Maybe Inhofe has connections to Gannon/Guckert
I wonder how Gannon/Guckert's bulldog pictures would would play in Inhofe's next campaign?
by afs 2005-02-19 06:17AM | 0 recs
God
Tell me about it.

Did you hear that the NAACP are also being investigated by IRS?

So let me get this straight, the republican party gets to use Evangelical Churches across the country to mobilize voters--their pastors constantly leading the drum beat--and tey get to keep their tax exempt status, but the NAACP president makes a criticism of the President for not showing up at the annual conference and they get investigated.  The hypocrisy.

by descrates 2005-02-19 06:27AM | 0 recs
We'll be returning the favor.
We're gonna have every Republican investigated by the Advocate and 365gay.com.

Me thinks those investigations will have in impact on their evangelical recruiting efforts.

by afs 2005-02-19 06:57AM | 0 recs
Neo-Feudalism, Not Hypocrisy
There is nothing hypocritical about this.

The charge of hypocrisy assumes an underlying commitment to fairness and equal treatment--the legacy of the liberal tradition, rooted in the Renaissance, the Rerformation and the Enlightenment.

But the GOP leadership no longer owes allegience to that tradition. They are committed to a reinstatement of feudalism, in which all fealty is owed to God, and His earthly representative--be he King, Emperor, Prince, or whomever. There is no feudal state apart from the sovereign, and thus, whatever entities claim federal recognition must do so on his terms.  This is all perfectly consistent, and there is nothing hypocritical about it.

Barbaric, yes.

Profoundly anti-American, certainly!  

But hypocrital, no.

by Paul Rosenberg 2005-02-19 03:00PM | 0 recs
Abuse of Power
Another abuse of power by the Republican machine. You're right to be outraged.
by Curt Matlock 2005-02-19 07:34AM | 0 recs
Inhofe should be yelling for Guckert investigation
I thought Inhofe was all fired ready to take on the battle against the homosexual agenda. Where's all thoses "evil gay" battle cries, now?

Inhofe isn't hiding something, is he?

by afs 2005-02-19 08:45AM | 0 recs
Absolute Power...
...Corrupts.  And therein lies the roots of an overall theme that can return Democrats to power.  We must regularly, repeatedly speak out to create/drive a narrative based on the omnipresent corruption in the GOP/corporate/media governing axis and start positioning the Democrats as the positive remedy.
by Steve in Sacto 2005-02-19 11:25AM | 0 recs
Clueless Democrats
Then there's this in the LA Times piece:
Democratic senators on Inhofe's committee also were dismayed by his action, but declined to say so publicly because they were in the midst of sensitive negotiations with the chairman on the legislation, staffers said.
So, they're not going to speak out on this because they think they can negotiate in good faith with Inhofe on this bill?  As though anything they negotiate will survive a House/Senate conference?  What planet are these people living on?

The route to regaining power is by demonstrating that the GOP is incapable of honest governing, yet instead of using this handed gift to push that theme some clueless Democrats are more interested in backroom dealing to reach a bipartisan compromise that will be portrayed as another GOP success.  Just when it appears Reid and the Senate Dems are growing a pair...

by Steve in Sacto 2005-02-19 12:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Clueless Democrats
You're right Steve. That's almost as tragic as Inhofe's demand for financial records. The corruption is so deeply ingrained that Democrats don't even seem capable of recognizing it. Remember when Travelgate and Filegate were considered impeachable offenses?

The House ethics committee has been neutered.  The media is complacent. Democrats are silent. The only thing required for evil to triumph . . .

by Gary Boatwright 2005-02-19 01:11PM | 0 recs
Off topic
Jolly, what's the deal with your email?  I tried a couple of times to email re Bob's Blog but your "gboat" address returned "mailbox unavailable."  I'm interested in comparing notes and getting involved in improving the CA Dem blog situation. Email me at "steve_in_sacto at yahoo dot com" if you want to discuss.
by Steve in Sacto 2005-02-19 01:45PM | 0 recs
Boy Howdy! n./t
by Paul Rosenberg 2005-02-19 03:01PM | 0 recs
Chickenshit is the word
The Democratic Party needs to stop being chickenshit.  Being out of power never stopped the GOP from saying that Clinton blew away one of his best friends over a land deal that lost money.
by jcjcjc 2005-02-19 06:25PM | 0 recs
I only have one question...
How long do we have to wait until you officially become one of the front page regulars here? Or, how long until you start your own blog?

Really- another excellent post. Thanks, and keep it up!

by Alex Urevick 2005-02-20 07:14AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------