C Boyden Gray Is A Liar

C Boyden Gray is a  prominant figure who has taken the point on Bush's plan to privatize Social Security. C Boyden Gray is Co-Chairman of FreedomWorks with former House Majority Leader Dick Armey. Privatizing Social Security is part of the mission of FreedomWorks to "fight for less government, lower taxes, and more freedom."

Today, FreedomWorks sent and some notable allies sent a National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters Letter to select Republican Senators.

Courtesy of Kagro X at The Next Hurrah, we now know  that C Boyden Gray has been caught red handed lying about what liberal legal scholars have said about the Senate's filibuster rule.

As though it weren't enough that Nuclear Republicans are ignoring what makes the "constitutional option" constitutional, and then throwing out the rulebook to make it work, they're also selling the theory to the public by claiming that even "liberal" law professors support it.

In a memo dated February 28th and widely circulated to members of the press, C. Boyden Gray, formerly White House counsel to the first President Bush, attempted to bolster his own questionable constitutional interpretation of the nuclear option with quotes taken from three well-known legal scholars: Susan Low Bloch and Mark Tushnet of Georgetown University, and Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago.


One of the prominant voices relying on Gray's memo to undermine the Constitutional and legal case supporting the filibuster, is Senator Cornyn. In a very long, and meticulously documented post, Kagro X points out that C Boyden Gray has, to use a legal term of art, been lying through his legally deceitful teeth.

In each instance, Gray made certain to set up the quotes by establishing that they came from "liberals" or a "prominent Democratic strategist." In two of the three cases, Gray fails to cite to any actual source for the remarks he attributes to these professors, and in all three he leaves out context critical to understanding their comments, in at least one case, completely reversing the writer's intent.

I'll let you read the details of how Kagro X sniffed out the ruse and contacted all three professors for their reaction. Georgetown Law Professor Susan Low Bloch's reaction pretty well sums up the whole sordid story:

You have seriously misrepresented my views. In a February 28, 2005 memo to journalists on behalf of the Committee for Justice, you argue that the Senate's use of the filibuster against judicial nominations is unconstitutional. In so doing, you suggest I said such use in unconstitutional. In fact, I have never said such a thing. On the contrary, in the article you quote (but never cite), I said precisely the opposite, explicitly distinguishing the Senate filibuster from the House Rule that I was criticizing.

I'm sure there's a very simple explanation for why C Boyden Gray has been so deceitful. House Rules, Senate Rules, all those rules get so confusing. It could happen to anyone.

Kagro X puts the story in perspective:

Given all that's happened over the past few weeks - Tom DeLay's House power play with regard to the crisis in the Ethics Committee, his tag-team effort with Frist in the Terri Schiavo circus, the extraordinary extent to which Republicans have gone to choke off debate in the House, and now the threat of the same in the Senate thanks to a nuclear option without any solid basis in constitutional theory - the overreaching of the Republican Congress is nearing critical mass. Now, to top it all off, not only are they throwing out the rules and abandoning the constitutional underpinnings of their arguments, but they're using once-respected names in the political and legal community to mislead the press and the public into believing that even "liberal" law professors agree with them.

Surprise, surprise.


Kagro ties the story together:

Toss into the mix the growing chorus of voices speaking out against the USA PATRIOT Act, the treatment of so-called "enemy combatants" at Guantánamo, and the use of torture and "extraordinary rendition" apparently endorsed by the current Attorney General and the Department of Justice, and ordinary, non-wonk Americans might rightly begin to wonder how long they're willing to stand for this outrageous cover for the assault on our Constitution.

Will normal Americans get tired of the assault on our Contitution? A more  poignant question is Who Will Tell The People?

Before I leave this sordid tale of deception and monumental fraud, I'd like to highlight some of the names of the individuals who signed on to the "National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters Letter." Somebody named Matt Kibbe is President and CEO of FreedomWorks. A partial list of the signatories to the letter are:

C. Boyden Gray, Committee for Justice
Kay R. Daly, Coalition for a Fair Judiciary
Harvey Tettlebaum, Republican National Lawyers Association
David A. Keene, American Conservative Union
Gary L. Bauer, American Values
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
Paul Weyrich, Free Congress Foundation
Dr. James Dobson, Focus on the Family
James D. Daly, Focus on the Family
Tony Perkins, Family Research Council
James J. Fotis, Law Enforcement Alliance of America
Chuck Colson, Prison Fellowship Ministries
Mark Earley, Prison Fellowship Ministries
Connie Mackey, Family Research Council
Lisa DePasquale, Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute
L. Brent Bozell III, Conservative Victory Committee
Dr. William A. Donohue, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights
Jim Backlin, Christian Coalition of America
Dr. Carl Herbster, AdvanceUSA
Ray Ruddy, Gerard Health Foundation
Kurt Entsminger, Care Net
Dr. Virginia Armstrong, Eagle Forum's Court Watch
Duane Parde, ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council)
Matt Kibbe, Freedom Works
Peter A. Samuelson, Americans United for Life
Clarke D. Forsythe, Esq. AUL's Project on Law and Bioethics
Richard Land, Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission
Dr. Barrett Duke, Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission
Dr. John C. Eastman, The Claremont Institute Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
Jay Sekulow, American Center for Law and Justice
James Bopp, Jr., James Madison Center for Free Speech
Samuel B. Casey, Christian Legal Society
Kelly Shackelford. Liberty Legal Institute
Mathew D. Staver, Liberty Counsel
Alan E. Sears, Alliance Defense Fund
Roy Innis, Congress of Racial Equality (CORE)
Niger Innis, Congress of Racial Equality (CORE)

In addition, chapters of "The Republican National Lawyers Association" from seventeen States were signatories. A large number of religious and pro-life organizations signed the letter.

I'd like to also highlight some radio talk show hosts who signed the letter, because this is the Right Wing Noise Machine in action:

Janet Parshall, nationally syndicated Radio and TV host
Martha Zoller, Radio Talk Show Host and Political Analyst (Georgia)
Kevin P. Doran, Radio Talk Show host (New York)
Mike Siegel, Radio host and author of Power Talk: The Influence of Talk Radio
Chris Dickson. "The Dickson/Chappell Report", (Midwest)
Dom Giordano 1210 AM Radio (Philadelphia)
Adam McManus, Radio Host of "Take A Stand" (Texas)
Dave "Doc" Kirby, Radio Host (Alabama)
Inga Barks, Radio Host (Southern CA)
Marta Montelongo, Radio Host (Central CA)
Vicki McKenna, Radio Host, News/Talk 1310 WIBA (Wisconsin)
Brian Farrar, Syndicated talk show host, Michigan Talk Radio Network

Last, but not least, Mark Levin, who recently wrote a book about how the Supreme Court is destroying America, Men in Black.

Is it just me, or does that look like a list for the Compassionate Fascists of America Club?

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

3 Comments

Multiple Front Assault on Constitutional Principle
Great diary. I'll be back with more comments later.

BTW, did you see this over at Americablog?

Un-freaking-believable. But we better start believing it.

by boadicea 2005-04-05 07:54AM | 0 recs
Frontal Assault on Constitutional Principle
Actually I missed that one, but it certainly pins down their outrage. Judges declare war on America about sums up their attitude. Why does the Constitution hate America? Why did our Founding Fathers hate America?

Sen. Coryn and Sen. DeLay and C Boyden Gray are just the point men in a full frontal assault on our Constitutional Republic form of government.

Of course they probably have a point. Senator Cornyn has blamed judicial over reaching as an excuse to murder judges. Cornyn and DeLays suspicions will be confirmed, when judges refuse to accept frustration at judicial decisions as a legal defense for murder.

What I really want to know is what the "C" stands for in Gray's name. Have you ever noticed how many lawyers use a first initial instead of their first name? What's up with that? Is there any group of people who use that egotistical affectation more than the legal profession?

Food for thought.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-04-05 09:01AM | 0 recs
Marbury v. Madison
DeLay et. al. want to re-write Marbury v. Madison. By insisting on the primacy of Congress to limit judicial oversight, they could pass legislation that removed the authority of the judcial branch to oversee voting rights cases or any cases about re-districting or cases about problems with voting machines or voting procedures.

Imagine that.

by Gary Boatwright 2005-04-05 09:32AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------