Hillary Clinton on Mountaintop Removal this morning

(Cross-posted at the Appalachian Voices Front Porch Blog)

Beth Vorhees interviewed Senator Hillary Clinton on West Virginia Public Broadcast (audio), this morning and asked her a direct question about her position on mountaintop removal coal-mining.

Hillary's answer below the fold.

Keep in mind, mountaintop removal:
1)  Has destroyed 1 million acres of the most biodiverse temperate forest in the world

2) Has led to a 90% reduction in mining jobs in WV because of the automation of labor

3) Has leveled 470+ of the oldest mountains on the continent.

Hillary on MTR: (unofficial transcript)

I am concerned about it for all the reasons people state, but I think its a difficult question because of the conflict between the economic and environmental trade-off that you have here.

I'm not an expert. I don't know enough to have an independent opinion, but I sure would like people who could be objective, understanding both the economic necessities and environmental damage to come up with some approach that would enable us to retrieve the coal but would enable us to do it in a way that wouldn't damage the living standards and the other important qualities associated with people living both under the mountaintop and people who are along the streams.

You know, maybe there is a way to recover those mountaintops once they have been stripped of the coal. You know, I think we've got to look at this from a practical perspective.

First, I am glad to see any Presidential candidate speaking about mountaintop removal. Her answer could have been much better, for sure, but it also could have been much worse.


Secondly, I am disappointed that she is setting up this false dichotomy of "economic necessities" vs "environmental damage." Mountaintop removal does the same thing to our economy as it does to our mountains. The destruction of one and the destruction of the other go hand in hand.

Thirdly, Hillary Clinton has sat in on Senate Committee hearings on mountaintop removal since 2002, so she should have a pretty good idea of what is going on. She promised to take a flyover of the region, but has failed to follow-through on that commitment.

Listen to the whole thing here.

Update: An important note from DevilsTower:

When I was getting feedback from campaigns I could never get the Clinton campaign to give me a statement on MTR.  Now I suppose we know why.

This is extremely disappointing, since most of her energy plan is quite good.

I should also note that the consensus seems to be that her answer is MUCH worse than I gave her credit for. Seems right to me.

Tags: Hillary Clinton, Mountaintop Removal (all tags)

Comments

5 Comments

woah,


You know, maybe there is a way to recover those mountaintops once they have been stripped of the coal. You know, I think we've got to look at this from a practical perspective.

Ok that actually a little freaky. Unless she has a way to heat up all those rocks which the mountain top was turned into and shape into a mountain top, its not happenings.

A basic class in geology or physical geography is something she definitely needs.

by kindthoughts 2008-03-19 08:32AM | 0 recs
We need BETTER ENERGY POLICY..

Maybe Hillary could recognize the sacrifices that these Appalacian counties have made in some small amount by setting up economic zones where businesses that develop or manufacture clean energy technologies can operate free of federal taxation if they hire locally?

Anyway, you get the idea..

We need to take a good chunk of that money we are currently spending on Iraq and devote it to research on developing new sources of energy. One technology that isn't known very well is geothermal. Drill down far enough and you get FREE energy.. The wells are expensive to drill in most areas, but then you can generate steam..

Also, shallow geothermal wells can simply serve as a heat sink to create constant temperature air, like a cave.. This 55-or so degree air can be used (slightly heated) in the winter for heating and in the summer as-is for cooling.. If you go down farther, eventually, you get year round 72 degree air... but thats probably too deep for the average homeowner/neighborhood, etc.

by architek 2008-03-19 09:59AM | 0 recs
Coal and mercury poisoning of lakes, rivers, earth

We need to stop burning all this high mercury coal because its poisoning our country.

If you live in the Northeast or Canada, you need to be concerned about this, especially if you live near somewhere where the earth is tilled.. (farming..) because that stirs it up and the levels are very high..

Mercury is a neuro toxin.

by architek 2008-03-19 10:04AM | 0 recs
Thanks for the link.

I heard a portion of the interview with Beth Vorhees last night, but missed the longer version this morning.  I was concerned with Clinton's hedging on MTR as well; she's too careful on the subject, as she wants to maintain her lead in WVa - hence, her nod toward coal interests, which the coal barons have always told us (wrongly) are miners' interests, as well.  

I'm disappointed; I say that as a Clinton supporter, and an opponent of MTR.  

Do we know what Obama's position on MTR is?

by mgee 2008-03-19 09:51AM | 0 recs
Inclined to oppose

He's spoken out against MTR in DC and KY, but its not in his energy platform yet.

This, to me, is almost one of those "line in the sand" issues. Even John McCain has indicated that he would help stop MTR. I don't understand how Hilary Clinton could take the Bush position. I really don't, and I hope her position on MTR improves.

by faithfull 2008-03-19 10:57AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------