I knew Obama was gonna do this 2 years ago / Name's Cassandra
by fairleft2, Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 10:16:27 AM EST
It was really pretty common predicting and pre-emptive lamenting, in fact me and d'tale had a whole poop-on-the-vote sewagey underground thing going till he revealed his loyalist moderate turncoat. Anyway, as a tribute to DavidByron's I knew Obama was going to do all this 18 months ago. Am I Cassandra?, here's my old thing from 2007, but with the lamentably defunct politicalfleshfeast links removed and probly some bold added:
65% of Democrats Back Hillary/Obama? R They Crazy?by fairleft
Wed Nov 28th, 2007 at 04:28:36 PM ESTWhy are Hillary and Obama the Democratic voters' leading presidential candidates -- 65% of likely primary voters choose them --when they're so obviously bipartisan police-state corporate-whore imperialist Republicans?
My sane way of choosing a candidate or deciding to say fuk `em all is to look at their positions on the major issues of the day. I don't ask much anymore, just "Hey, if she/he would do the right thing on even ONE of the big issues, maybe I could see myself giving her/him my vote." So here are my six major issues and best guesses on what Obama/Hillary's real positions are (I know Hillary & Obama don't actually say the following, but their money has the following `bipartisan' & `responsible' positions, and neither has taken a strong and (especially) clear enough position contrariwise to make me think they will disobey their money):
[I realize the Iran prediction so far is wrong, but we've still got three years on that.]
I could go on (for example, under either Obama or Hillary the Pentagon would get its regular budget boosts, the rest of the budget would be subject to `responsible' drastic budget cuts, and the Bush police state measures would continue on), but you get the idea.
So, Obama and Hillary (pre-1980s thinking alert) simply are not Democrats the way I used to understand what that word meant. . . .
They will mightily screw over the bottom 80% of the population and do their best for the top 10%, even as the economy slides deeper into decline and the suffering of everyone (except upper-middle class and rich assholes) worsens. And, Hillary and Obama will continue the worldwide imperial war for oil, Israel, and corporate globalization -- whether it requires hot or cold wars or coups in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Venezuela, Bolivia, Sudan, or who knows where -- and no matter that it `requires' throwing ever more money at the military when we need instead to drastically redirect government spending toward rebuilding our real economy, giving everyone health care, and saving the safety net.I don't get it! How is it that these two turkeys get away with offering real Democrats nothing except wordy fluff while their substance is `bipartisan' aggressive corporate globalist Republicanism? In other words the same old same old that is driving the people down and the economy off a cliff.
Instead of 65% of Democrats choosing Hillary or Obama, why don't most Democrats answer `none of the above' or, maybe, Kucinich or Gravel? Are the Democrats polled -- `likely primary voters' -- not really Democrats anymore?
Anyway, if next November all we're left with is two of Obama/Hillary/Giuliani/Huckabee/Romney, all real Democrats must piss or poop on such a 'choice'. But maybe we should start the pissing & pooping early when and if the Democratic race boils down to Obama and Hillary. Like now.
Tags: Barack Obama (all tags)









12 Comments