The forces of evil at the expense of truth, wow okay. Umm, you need to maybe take a bit of a vacation. Get out of the echo chamber.

Senator Obama is working hard in Pennsylvania because he works hard in every state. He doesn't subscribe to the theory that some states matter and others don't. That is why he is ahead in delegates, votes, and contests.

When the "truth" you're looking for is only broadcast by Fox Noise, your definition of what is true needs some serious adjustments.

And when it comes to the forces of evil who support Obama at the expense of truth who have created this media propaganda I will oppose them too because they are evil.

Even better. Fox Noise is "true", Obama is "evil". Warped priorities much?

re: your ridiculous poll, I voted for "I support evil in all its forms".

Amid the embarrassment of this diary, at least you had the good grace to offer up an opportunity for unintentional snark.

Fox is selling you spin, just the same as MSNBC is doing.

Don't be fooled:

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0814,br uise-brother,396288,1.html/full

Wellll,OK. (tiptoeing slowly away)

Heh. When the only network reporting the truth is FOX, you know you're a hardcore Clinton supporter.

She's the only person I've heard making this claim. Obama recently admitted he would likely lose Pennsylvania, while certainly expressing appreciation the polls weren't showing a 26-point split anymore.

But this is coming from someone who makes up numbers about how many Democrats voted for Clinton, and then says any independent/Republicans who want to become a part of the Democratic party should get lost, and come back in November to vote for whomever the "REAL" Democrats pick, like good little boys and girls.

So, take it with a grain of salt.

I suggest you read Sricki's diary on the top of the rec list here.

Also, Obama supporters are evil? Really?

It's sad that I read this diary while simultaneously watching Austin Powers, so every line in my head had Dr. Evil's voiceover...

My mother also says Fox is the only ones telling the truth. LOL.

Does anyone have the numbers from the -now infamous- delegate spreadsheet that was leaked to Bloomberg...I was wondering how it was shaping up. It would make a nice diary, too. I suspect that they had a loss in the PA column, but I was interested to see what other state predictions looked like. My recollection is that the spreadsheet had been performing right at 'dead on'...which should not surprise because it is obvious that the Obama campaign is being run well.

Fox is insturctive as to what is coming down the pike lots of time. The next thing is the Obama/Ayers connection apparently.

If I were alone in an elevator with you, I would fear for my life.

rec'd!

again. We have a term for those who find aid and comfort in Fox News: right wing nutters.

Walked through the looking glass, when Hillary supporters are finding their 'truth' on Fox news.

A few days ago there was a diary where there were gushing comments about how 'cute' Joe Scarborough was, because of the nice things he was saying about Hillary.

What's next? Will Pat Buchanan get voted 'favorite boy toy' in a diary poll?

Sometimes I think it is a tiny minority of a candidate's own supporters who are a candidate's worst enemy.

Or to put it another way, Fox News has not had an over night conversion, it is the same old, playing the same old game.

The article is fairly reasonable and well-written, but it fails to mention the fact that, if we look at the same trends that she's citing, who wins or loses the states makes no difference in electability, since proportional delegates ensure that a near win is basically the same as a draw.  Obama played the margins in February to rack up a huge advantage, and all he has to do now is to keep it close in Clinton strongholds to prove to the superdelegates that he can drum up largescale support in hostile territory.

Obama has not been telling her to drop out or challenging Clinton's moving of the goal posts each time, because it fits in with the 50 state strategy; he'd be campaigning in all of these places anyway.  Clinton being there too just gives the race more excitement.  A knockout blow would be nice, but Obama never expected to get one; he respects Clinton's power as a campaigner too much to do that.

Anyway, if supporting Obama is evil, then I don't want to be good.

Communications researchers talk about a phenomena called "selective exposure." This means that people gravitate to media sources where the point of view is consistent with their own.

That's all that's going on here. You like the point of view on Fox because it comports with your own so you've decided it's the unbiased source.

done so in 2004 during the primaries too.  Why?  Because they hate all democrats equally.  Therefor when they have someone on covering a primary or issue, they don't have to pretend that person is non partisan.  When I watch MSNBC or CNN they have Donna B. on and list her as a democratic strategist rather than an Obama supporter.  That's ridiculous and it is even worse that there is a two hour block of Clinton hate from Tweety and KO every night.  These people don't even try to be objective, they can't.  So yeah, fox can be a relief at times...but only when discussing the democratic primaries.

FOX News?  Come back to earth.

I'd like to point out how close one of the opions availible in the poll is to Ann Coulter's: "Obama's book is like Mein Kampf" rant but I'm afraid if I do Furher Obama will send me to the camps :)

Seriously, though Dude, It hink you need to take a vaction because your starting to lose it, "forces of evil" wtf is this 1995, are you going to start distributing a list of the people Obama killed because if so, you moght wnat tone it down a bit, not even Hillary's new bud Sciafe used this level of hyperbole your making it sound like Barack's in league with Satan.

Will the REAL FOX NEWS PLEASE STAND UP?

What do you mean they haven't changed a bit, they were also the only network with the courage to report the "truth" in the 1990s, and  they're the only ones Brave enough to lay out the facts about Bill's culpability for 9-11! Or wait, are they only honest when they talk about Obama is the stuff the say about Hillary just lies? Because is that's the case then they're proabably lying about Barack as well.