KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

On C-Span, this morning,
Representative Brown CLEARLY explained that
the Florida legislation
set the date for the democratic primary.

And the Florida legislation is REPUBLICAN.

The FL democrats could do nothing about this.

And the DNC IS PUNISHING Florida Democrats
and denying them of their right to have their
votes counted.

Brown also clearly explained that Florida democrats
 wanted a revote.  They could not achieve this because
OBAMA OPPOSED THIS REVOTE.

I ask you.  Why is Obama fit to be president of this
democracy?

It is clearly time to get the DNC back from cultists,
and into the hands of the democrats.

It is clearly time to elect a true democrat.

Tags: Florida primary (all tags)

Comments

119 Comments

Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

indeed I guess if we all hadn't see the You tube of the Florida democrats LAUGHING at Howard Dean and the DNC as the legislature moved the primary,

just maybe we would believe it was all the Republicans fault.

by TruthMatters 2008-05-31 04:50AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

That video was unclear at best. What I got out of it was that the Democrats were frustrated at the whole process and basically said in irony "Yes, we really do want this." When it was pretty obvious they didn't.

by VAAlex 2008-05-31 05:08AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

not really because the rules allow for FULL seating if FL can show that they tried to prevent the moving of the date.

the FIRST RBC committee meeting found that they didn't. this is why FL will not get full seating today, or at least they won't get a full vote even if all the delegates are seated.

by TruthMatters 2008-05-31 05:12AM | 0 recs
bobswern posted a diary

with this excellent link: "How the GOP Rigged Florida and Michigan"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barr ett/could-the-republicans-cou_b_94158.ht ml
 

by phoenixdreamz 2008-05-31 07:15AM | 0 recs
Re: bobswern posted a diary

Why would you rec. a diary that calls out Democrats as cultists?

I see the people who rec'd this. I know what you're about.

Hypocrites.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 09:24AM | 0 recs
Please stop the personal attacks

and name calling. I don't see anywhere in that article where the author calls out Obama supporters as 'cultists' or even alludes to it.

I do see that term used in one of the comments below the article, which no one has any control over.

by phoenixdreamz 2008-05-31 10:46AM | 0 recs
Re: Please stop the personal attacks


Did you even read it before you rec'd?

From the diary. Are you going to unrecommend it now?

I ask you.  Why is Obama fit to be president of this
democracy?

It is clearly time to get the DNC back from cultists,
and into the hands of the democrats.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 10:51AM | 0 recs
I have searched that article

using every keyword from the 2 sentences you provided, and I can't find them mentioned anywhere in the article proper.

Are you sure you're reading this?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barr ett/could-the-republicans-cou_b_94158.ht ml

by phoenixdreamz 2008-05-31 11:16AM | 0 recs
Re: I have searched that article

Why did you rec. this diary? That's all I asked. I provided a quote in which the diarist calls out the "cultists".

I'm not talking about the article.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 11:22AM | 0 recs
Oh Bull!

Take a look at the EC maps on the front page.  Your blackmail threat carries as much weight as your logic carries water.

by lockewasright 2008-05-31 10:12AM | 0 recs
Re: that's what I was thinking

You do not have a single clue about what you are talking about - none, nada, zip.  You are blindly mouthing talking points when you don't have the simplist understanding of what actually went on.  Do some research or cut the whining.

by RockvilleLiberal2 2008-05-31 05:44AM | 0 recs
Not a bummer.....a joke.

Based on the list of users that got you there....I wouldn't be too proud.

Laughable.

by Kysen 2008-05-31 11:04AM | 0 recs
Re: And yet my Diary is on Recommended!

Yeah, bummer.  Compare your rec list to mine- that's the difference between real and fake.

by ihaveseenenough 2008-05-31 11:40AM | 0 recs
There was plenty of time

to change the Florida Primary after the RBC made its decision.

The Florida Democrats (and I am one) gambled that the RBC would ultimately cave.  

The gamble has already failed.  The idea of moving up was to become a bigger player in the process, and our primary was ignored.  

With respect to Obama, it was Clinton's chief Harold Ickes that voted to punish Florida in the RBC meeting in December.

Obama is not to blame for this.  And polling of Floridians do not blame him: they blame the Republican Governor, the State Democratic Party and the DNC.

And that is who is to blame.

by fladem 2008-05-31 06:00AM | 0 recs
by tbetz 2008-05-31 06:05AM | 0 recs
Re: I believe everything I see on You Tube

I'm going to use this as a makeshift tip jar and give you the HR you deserve for calling Obama supporters cultists.

by mistersite 2008-05-31 06:16AM | 0 recs
Re: I believe everything I see on You Tube

Um, it's pretty obvious.  Care to tell me what you don't believe about this?  Or are you just going to attack the messenger (you tube) in the hope that you can undermine the obvious message (the Democrats were totally complicit)?

by Pragmatic Left 2008-05-31 08:10AM | 0 recs
I cannot BELIEVE

your diary, which calls Obama supporters cultists, is on the damn rec list! A new low.

by sricki 2008-05-31 08:57AM | 0 recs
Re: I cannot BELIEVE

A little downthread the troll calls us fascists as well.

Say hello to the deadenders.

The Following Users Have Recommended This Diary:
Caldonia
Gabriele Droz
LindaSFNM
searchforsolidarity
linfar
indus
grlpatriot
environmentally blue
4justice
phoenixdreamz
thebluenote
catfish2

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 09:27AM | 0 recs
Charming... n/t

by sricki 2008-05-31 09:28AM | 0 recs
linfar???

Man, if it isn't obvious that Jerome is being paid off that list should be exhibit no1.

by Is This Snark 2008-05-31 10:40AM | 0 recs
Re: I cannot BELIEVE

This is totally unacceptable. Calling out people like this is beyond the pale.

by VAAlex 2008-05-31 12:05PM | 0 recs
Re: I cannot BELIEVE

i know! How dare people who recommended a diary, and whose names are publicly available as rec'ers, have those names posted on the comments section of that same diary!

Blasphemy! It's clearly Barack Obama's personal fault.

by skaiserbrown 2008-05-31 12:32PM | 0 recs
Re: I cannot BELIEVE

In case you don't know the guidelines for the site -- which obviously you don't -- you're not to call out people like this. I'll ignore your lame attempt at sarcasm while you do so.

by VAAlex 2008-05-31 12:37PM | 0 recs
Re: I cannot BELIEVE

How dare you seek to disenfranchise Mr. Spiff of his right to speech. This is an ignominy on the level of Robert Mugabe crushing freedom in Zimbabwe and the civil rights struggle!

by skaiserbrown 2008-05-31 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: I believe everything I see on You Tube

pheonixdreamz and Caldonia have uprated this comment.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 09:28AM | 0 recs
MyDD has been turned into

inappropriate TR central.  There are some amazingly thin-skinned people around here.

by Montague 2008-05-31 10:06AM | 0 recs
Agreed. FL Dems obviously complicit

by lombard 2008-05-31 10:20AM | 0 recs
Where were you when the RBC

voted to strip Florida of their votes (including Ickes) earlier? Where was your outrage then about disenfranchising voters in Florida?

by batgirl71 2008-05-31 12:30PM | 0 recs
The question is whether it was true
and whether disenfranchising Floridians is fair.
by architek 2008-05-31 05:08AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

If you expand that beyond bumper sticker phrasing, the answer is less clear.  Who was disenfranchised?  The state held a primary and everyone who wanted to was able to cast a ballot.  A lot of people believed their vote would not count and stayed home.  Were those people disenfranchised?  Because of the ban on campaigning, most Floridians were deprived of a full examination of the candidates.  Was the entire state disenfranchised?  In that their votes were consequently uninformed, should those votes even mean anything?

And what do you mean by "fair"?  That's not an objective term in this case.  Fair by what measure?  According to Florida State law? Fair according to equal access to the ballot box? Fair according to DNC rules?  Fair to HRC?  Fair to BHO?

Boy, it's easy to toss out a bumper sticker line as though it should have the same meaning for everyone, and that meaning should obviously be the same as yours; but the questions are far more complex, and lots of folks have differing and no less valid opinions on that.

by rb608 2008-05-31 05:30AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

The voters who stayed home believeing their votes did not count were not disenfranchised. People in Florida has access to Television and Internet.

by nkpolitics 2008-05-31 05:39AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

So you're saying that encouraging people to not vote is not disenfranchisement?

by rb608 2008-05-31 05:45AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

Those people choose not to vote. Nobody put a gun to their heads saying if they voted they be arrested.

by nkpolitics 2008-05-31 06:05AM | 0 recs
Your argument is bogus

(and you probably know that)

The decision to "not vote" was, for many, based on the fact that the election would not count.

What a joke.  Thank God no one but the hardcore internet Clinton supporters believe this argument.

by Slim Tyranny 2008-05-31 06:13AM | 0 recs
GO CHENEY YOURSELF

1.7 million voter in Florida and Michigan choosed to vote despite the fact their votes would not count and their delegates would not be seated. They showed up to the polls to express support for the Democratic candidates whether it was Hillary or Obama or Edwards.

Hillary was a benificiary in Florida and Michigan was based on Name Recognition. Obama had he been on the ballot in Michigan and allowed to campaign in Florida would have perform better in MI and FL based on Momemtum. The only candidate was hurt in Michigan was John Edwards- Edwards could have campaigned on his economic populist message in Michigan.

by nkpolitics 2008-05-31 06:37AM | 0 recs
"choosed"?

by Slim Tyranny 2008-05-31 06:40AM | 0 recs
Re: GO CHENEY YOURSELF

As much as I admire your all caps epithet, your argument is baloney.  FL & MI had among the lowest turnouts of all of the Dem primaries.  There is no argument that people stayed home in droves.   Why?  Because they were told their votes would not count.  

Sure, there were some down ticket issues that brought people out, and a good percentage of the people vote anyway because they feel it's their civic duty (and good for them); but for Mr. & Mrs. MainStreet, what's the point of getting up and going through the hassle for nothing?

No, by telling people their votes would not count, then reversing that ruling after it's too late for them to vote is disenfranchisement on a massive scale.

by rb608 2008-05-31 09:57AM | 0 recs
Re: GO CHENEY YOURSELF

let me ask you couple of questions.
The people who stayed home in Florida knowing their votes would not count. Are you 100% sure that those voters were overwhelmingly voting for Obama/Edwards instead of Hillary.

John Edwards received 18% of the popular vote in South Carolina and 14% of the popular vote in Florida. Edwards gains 5% of the popular vote in Florida from Hillary Clinton.

Obama would gain 5% of the popular vote in Florida from Clinton.

The popular vote count in Florida be
40% Clinton
38% Obama
19% Edwards

Clinton would have gotten 85 Pledge Delegates in Florida
Obama would have gotten 77 Pledge Delegates in Florida
Edwards would have gotten 23 Pledge Delegates in Florida.

In Michigan - Obama gets 75% of the uncommitted delegates. Edwards gets 25% of the uncommited delegates.
The result will be 55% Clinton,30% Obama 10% Edwards.
Edwards picks ups 5% of the popular vote from Hillary in Michigan, Obama picks up 10% of the popular vote from Hillary in Michigan.
Clinton- 40%
Obama- 40%
Edwards-15%

Edwards gets 15 out of the 55 uncommited plus 5 Delegates that went to Hillary. 20 Delegates.
Obama gets 40 out of 55 uncommitteds plus 15 delegates that went to Hillary. 55 Delegates.
Clinton would end up with 53 Delegates.

by nkpolitics 2008-05-31 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: GO CHENEY YOURSELF

let me ask you couple of questions.
Uh, sure, go ahead.
Are you 100% sure that those voters were overwhelmingly voting for Obama/Edwards instead of Hillary.
Okay, that's one question, and the answer is no, I have no idea who they'd have voted for if they'd gone to the polls.  I don't much see the relevance of all of the speculative numbers you toss out.

My point is that those who whine about disenfranchisement of the FL or MI voters who did go to the polls seem to care little about the unquestionable disenfranchisement of those who did not.

by rb608 2008-05-31 05:38PM | 0 recs
Re: GO CHENEY YOURSELF

John Edwards withdrew from the race before the February 5 Super Tuesday. Hillary was the DLC establishment candidatate who had not adopted the I am a White Hard Working Blue Collar Woman who drinks beer, goes hunting. The Edwards votes and Delegates would go to Barack Obama.. Hillary would have gotten 95 Pledge Delegates in Florida. Obama would have gotten 90  Pledge Delegates in Florida had Florida had its primary in February 5. In Michigan, Hillary would have gotten 63 Pledge Delegates. Obama would have gottten 65 Pledge Delegates.

Since we cut the MI and FL pledge Delegates in half. We should have given all of the Edwards Delegates in Florida to Obama. Obama would recieved 40 Pledge Delegates in Florida. Hillary would recieve 52.5 Pledge Delegates in Florida.
We should have given all of the uncommitted Delegates to Obama. All of the Hillary Delegates to Hillary in Michigan. Hillary would get 36.5 Delegates in Michigan. Obama would get 27.5 Delegates in Michigan.

by nkpolitics 2008-05-31 06:47PM | 0 recs
Re: GO CHENEY YOURSELF

And again, with emphasis, I do not give a crap who might have received those votes.  My only point is that those who would have gone to the polls but didn't were massively disenfranchised by the process.  They deserved for their voices to be heard, regardless of who they might have voted for.

by rb608 2008-06-01 04:34AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

No, but they had it on good faith from Hillary Clinton, the other candidates, and the national committee that the election wouldn't count.  Why are you suggesting their trust be betrayed?

by mistersite 2008-05-31 06:15AM | 0 recs
Re: The question is whether it was true

I hate to say it, but architek does not argue in good faith.  It may be worthwhile to post a rebuttal, in case anybody else sees the posts and doesn't yet understand the tricks he or she is playing.  But there won't be any genuine engagement - just name-calling and attempting to win an argument with insults or changing the subject, which I think is actually the definition of trolling.

by TL 2008-05-31 06:12AM | 0 recs
Here are the facts
  1.  There was no campaign in Florida.  Calling the results "true" does not have majority support among Florida Democrats according to polling.
  2.  Clinton herself said these contests weren't going to amount to anything.
  3.  Clinton's chief advisor, Harold Ickes, voted to punish Florida.
  4.  The idea that Clinton has any moral standing on this issue is completely laughable given the previous two facts.  In fact, she has repeatedly lied about her previous statement.
  5.  It was not Obama who stopped a re-vote: the Florida Congressional Delegation unanimously voted to oppose a re-vote.  
by fladem 2008-05-31 06:04AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Representative Brown was great on C-span. C-span is great.

by soyousay 2008-05-31 05:12AM | 0 recs
Re: I just wish c-span would show

Why the hell was this hidden?! StudentGuy, any ideas?!

by VAAlex 2008-05-31 12:08PM | 0 recs
This guy is a troll

look at his first diary, in a comment at the end he says that it is a troll diary.

Look at the content of his other diaries.

by Student Guy 2008-05-31 01:54PM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

She was great!

by Caldonia 2008-05-31 05:17AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Actually Clinton supporters in FL opposed the revote too.  Florida's revote didn't happen for these reasons:

1: There was little interest in Florida's government for this to happen.

2: Clinton wasted a lot of time fighting against the revote and only started pushing for it at the last possible second when it became obvious that she wouldn't get the sham elections to count.

3: Florida didn't have working voting machines at the time due to a pre-November switchover so they'd have to change to a vote by mail system that would have to be cleared by the DoJ.

Why didn't MI get a revote?  2 above is relevant but also the fact that a revote would require a supermajority in the state legislature and the Republicans were going to vote against it.  The funding was also going to be an issue.  

Waiting until the very last second and then trying to get a revote is a disingenuous tactic.  

by thezzyzx 2008-05-31 05:18AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Don't forget that the Michigan Supreme Court ruled a recount unconstitutional.

It's amazing to me how many of the Hillary supporters are willing to ignore realities that we all witnessed in order to pretend they are being victimized.  It's not just dishonest.  It's transparent too. Not to mention feeble.

by lockewasright 2008-05-31 10:19AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Every single Democrat in the Florida legislature voted against this Republican Bill.

by HillsMyGirl 2008-05-31 05:24AM | 0 recs
A link would be nice.

But this link shows the Democratic State Senator Geller and his real feeling toward the bill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r25wUeMAw dE&feature=related

After viewing this, the statement that this is only a Republican Bill is intelletually dishonest.

by xenontab 2008-05-31 06:44AM | 0 recs
Here's the pdf's for the final vote on HB 537

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/index.cf m?Mode=Bills&Submenu=1&BI_Mode=V iewBillInfo&Billnum=0537&Year=20 07

Scroll wa-a-a-ay down; it's "Vote History" (just below "Bill Analyses").

The upshot is that the Florida House voted 118 yeas to 0 nays, and 2 did not vote; and the Senate voted 37 yeas, 2 nays, and 1 did not vote.

by Liberal Monk 2008-05-31 07:08PM | 0 recs
Trolltastic

by Slim Tyranny 2008-05-31 05:42AM | 0 recs
Rep. Brown has been under investigaton a number

of times.  She's a pretty poor spokesperson.  Here's her wiki entry = Complaints and investigations
Controversy has followed Brown since the start of her national political career, from her actions while a state legislator.[6] The Florida Ethics Commission fined Brown $5,000 for using legislative employees as dual employees of her travel business.[6]

A few weeks after becoming a member of the U.S. House in 1993, the Federal Elections Commission began investigating her. Her former campaign treasurer quit and said Brown had neglected to take action against an aide who had committed forgery, forging the treasurer's signature on her financial documents. The staffer alleged to have forged the treasurer's signature stayed with Brown and as of 1998 was her chief of staff.[6] In 1996, there was another investigation concerning charges that Brown improperly received and spent a $10,000 check from a secret account used for money laundering by National Baptist Convention leader Henry Lyons.[1] Brown admitted receiving the check but denied she had used the money improperly.[1] She was accused of not reporting the check or reporting who she received the money from. Brown said that she had taken the check and converted it into another check made out to Pameron Bus Tours to pay for transportation to a rally she organized in Tallahassee. She said that she didn't have to report the money because the rally was to protest the reorganization of her district lines, and she did not use it for herself.[1] If the $10,000 gift had been reported, it would have exceeded the $1,000 individual donation limit.[1]

Brown had had previous dealings with Lyons; in 1992, her campaign paid $5,000, allegedly for a computer, to a company owned by Lyons. The company had shut down six years earlier.[6] Her office once arranged for Lyons to buy several airline tickets at the government discount rate.[6] Under Congressional rules, only members of Congress and their staffers are allowed to take this rate.[6]

On February 25, 2004 Brown referred to the George W. Bush administration as a "racist" "bunch of white men" in a meeting with senior State Department officials and members of Congress.[7] Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega, a Mexican American, said that he deeply resented "being called a racist and branded a white man." Brown replied to Noriega and Cuban-American Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart that "you all look alike to me". Brown later apologized for her statements, but still contends that President Bush's involvement in the 2004 Haiti Rebellion was racist.[citation needed]

[edit] Ethics involving daughter
On June 9, 1998, the Congressional Accountability Project filed an ethics complaint against Brown. The Project called for the U.S. House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to investigate several violations of House Rule 10.[8] One of the complaints was that Brown's daughter Shantrel, a lawyer who worked for the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, had received a $50,000 Lexus LS 400 automobile as a gift from an agent of a Gambian millionaire named Foutanga Sissoko. Sissoko, a friend of Congresswoman Brown, had been imprisoned in Miami after pleading guilty to charges of bribing a customs officer. Brown had worked to secure his release, pressuring U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno to deport Sissoko back to his homeland as an alternative to continued incarceration. The Project held this violated the House gift rule, but Brown denied she had acted improperly. The congressional subcommittee investigating Brown found insufficient evidence to issue a Statement of Alleged Violation, but said she had acted with poor judgment in connection with Sissoko.[9][1]

In June 2007, Citizens for Ethics released a report reporting Brown's daughter Shantrel Brown-Fields as a congressional lobbyist; the organization maintains that Congressional relatives working as lobbyists for special interests are a conflict of interest for lawmakers. Brown-Fields is employed by Alcalde & Fayte, with clients including ITERA, Miami-Dade County Commission, and Edward Waters College. In 2006, Brown's campaign committee paid her daughter's husband, Tyree Fields, $5,500 for political consulting work. Rep. Brown has earmarked millions of dollars in federal funding for her daughter's client Edward Waters College.[10]

by mishiem 2008-05-31 05:52AM | 0 recs
dogking king of trolls!

go back to ReThugland!

and take the word "dog" out of your username, it is an insult to all dogs!

by catchaz 2008-05-31 06:00AM | 0 recs
Re: dogking king of trolls!

Yeah, this guy now makes the Rec List.  I guess you can fool some of the people some of the time...

by rfahey22 2008-05-31 07:56AM | 0 recs
delete this piece of shit diary, ban this diarest

"It is clearly time to get the DNC back from cultists, and into the hands of the democrats."

fuck you asshole, we aren't cultists, WE ARE DEMOCRATS.

the mods need to ban this piece of shit diarest for calling good loyal Democrats "cultists."

by catchaz 2008-05-31 06:07AM | 0 recs
Re: you're fascists

These people approve this trolls diary.

So much for unity, eh deadenders?

Don't need or care for your vote.

The Following Users Have Recommended This Diary:
Caldonia
Gabriele Droz
LindaSFNM
searchforsolidarity
linfar
indus
grlpatriot
environmentally blue
4justice
phoenixdreamz
thebluenote
catfish2

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 09:25AM | 0 recs
Re: you're fascists

Ya know, if the site admins are going to allow this to continue, they may as well just merge with H44 and stop the pretense.

by rb608 2008-05-31 10:01AM | 0 recs
Normally, 0 rates are an anathema to me

But, for someone like you who is such an enthusiastic supporter and practitioner of censorship and left-wing repression of infidels, I'll make an exception.

by lombard 2008-05-31 10:24AM | 0 recs
The questions that OBAMA needs to address...

#1 - why did obama work to ensure that alice palmer and other opponents of his were kept OFF the ballot in his initial state senate run? Why not just allow the voters to choose?

#2 - if obama did not like the results in MI/FL then why did he not support a revote in both states that could have taken place and counted prior to this?

how can a candidate run as a "new" politician of hope and change only to base his nomination and wins on the disenfranchisement of voters?

if you troll rate me, I will troll rate you back.

by nikkid 2008-05-31 07:17AM | 0 recs
I'm sure the Dems in FL have a way to filibuster

legislation and voting for it overwhelmingly is not the way to stop the legislation you disagree with...

by heresjohnny 2008-05-31 07:24AM | 0 recs
Hard to argue with that

by lombard 2008-05-31 10:27AM | 0 recs
KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

ABSOLUTELY KUDOS.  Just waking up to coffee, so this is much appreciated.

by LindaSFNM 2008-05-31 07:37AM | 0 recs
KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN

ABSOLUTELY KUDOS.  Just waking up to coffee, so this is much appreciated.

by LindaSFNM 2008-05-31 07:38AM | 0 recs
you just recced a bigot


Look above.  "Mormon" is an insult according to this Troll.

Unrec this crap.  It's beneath anyone with a pulse to support this GOP asshat.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:22AM | 0 recs
I respectfully suggest...

  ...that you get your facts striaght BEFORE you shoot your mouth off. I was born and raised in Florida, & I've been following this whole sad, sorry clusterf%^k since day one. Many Democrats here were perfectly happy to go along with the Republican plan, and many voted for it. Your assertion that the FL Dems "could do nothing about this" is either wishful thinking, or plain ignorance. As to my being a "cultist" because of who I support for President, well, you are entitled to your own opinion; but here's a fact for you: SHE LOST! Deal with it.

by Kordo 2008-05-31 07:53AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE

So, I take it then that you disagree with Sen. Nelson's comments, when he said that a live re-vote could not be conducted (machines were being re-tooled) and a mail-in revote was not feasible due to multiple issues?

Typing things in caps does not make them so.

by rfahey22 2008-05-31 07:54AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Actually, I think Obama wanted a caucus.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 07:54AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Silly members of the Democrat party, eh? Your own words, by the way.

by ragekage 2008-05-31 08:28AM | 0 recs
grl, you just recced a bigot

Look above.  "Mormon" is an insult according to this Troll.

Unrec this crap.  It's beneath anyone with a pulse to support.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:21AM | 0 recs
Re: I was responding to a misspelling

You were responding to a well-known image with a religious slur.

You can't replace the word "Mormon" with "Jew" in your comment and still feel smug and justified.  Religious bigotry is deep in your soul, or you would never have used 'You are a Mormon' as an insult.

Piss off, moron.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 11:34AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

grlpatriot mojo'd this comment.

I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But (1.50 / 2)

the Obama fascists made my post invisible!

So thanks, again Guys!  I feel honored!

by dogking on Sat May 31, 2008 at 02:31:27 PM EST  


by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 11:00AM | 0 recs
It's difficult

to take you seriously when you call people cultists.

by sricki 2008-05-31 08:15AM | 0 recs
Re: It's difficult

Maybe there's a troll patch that s/he's taking.  Baby steps.

by rfahey22 2008-05-31 08:18AM | 0 recs
I hear it's hard to get off the troll juice. n/t

by sricki 2008-05-31 08:19AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Someone tell me who rec'd this garbage from a GOP troll.

by ragekage 2008-05-31 08:27AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA
Caldonia
Gabriele Droz
LindaSFNM
searchforsolidarity
linfar
indus
grlpatriot
environmentally blue
4justice
phoenixdreamz
thebluenote
catfish2
by CrushTheGOP2008 2008-05-31 08:36AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

Let's see. glrpatriot thinks we belong to the "Democrat" party, there's not much to say about the Hillaryis44ers on that list. But searchforsolidarity, I'm pretty disappointed with you. Hell, the Clinton folks on TV right now just admitted to the RBC it wasn't Obama's fault. These other guys, we've come to expect them to be totally lacking any semblance of reason, post-partisanship, or respect... but you?

by ragekage 2008-05-31 08:41AM | 0 recs
You are a MORAN. n/t

by sricki 2008-05-31 09:00AM | 0 recs
WTF? n/t

by sricki 2008-05-31 09:10AM | 0 recs
I think this idiot

meant to say moron but had a typing malfunction.

Seriously this diarist makes itsoverorc not seem so bad, and itsoverorc is our resident freeper.

by Student Guy 2008-05-31 09:36AM | 0 recs
Actually, I bet he thought I'm too stupid

to spell "moron" correctly, so he was mocking me. Perhaps he isn't familiar with the "moran" thing?

Hey, I kinda like itsoverorc. He's totally predictable, and he doesn't seem to do any harm.

by sricki 2008-05-31 09:39AM | 0 recs
That is why

I said this guy makes itsoverorc/ilikebillnot look pretty good, sure he is a freeper, but he is harmless.  This guy the dogking/internetstar actually gets people to bite on the crap he flings.

Sigh

BTW dogking, this is what sricki was referring to when calling you a moran:
Get a brain, morans!

Let me salvage some good in this thread by saying that McCain opposes Roe V Wade.

by Student Guy 2008-05-31 10:11AM | 0 recs
I've always loved that pic. n/t

by sricki 2008-05-31 10:23AM | 0 recs
No, he thinks, Mormon is an insult

Next hell be using other religious slurs.

My lifelong best friend is a Mormon priest.  He has luekemia, but I suppose dogsucker would say he deserves it.

Also have a couple of Mormon friends in the Special Forces.  Love to send them by this ignorant pig's house to say "howyadoin'?"

This is the sickest thing I have ever seen on this site.  Worse, the pondscum probably doesn't know why it is incredibly offensive.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:40AM | 0 recs
Ignorant prejudiced fuckwad

"Mormom" is an insult to you?

Dickhead, fuckwad, ignorant skin-head nazi

Want to put a real name behind that goose-stepping bigotry?

-chris blask

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:19AM | 0 recs
Re: Ignorant prejudiced fuckwad

Ok, what you are saying is just as offensive to me.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 10:44AM | 0 recs
Really?

Swearing at a religious bigot who freely offends milions of people because of their religious beliefs is as offensive as freely offending milions of people because of their religious beliefs?

I don't follow your logic.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:46AM | 0 recs
Re: Ignorant prejudiced fuckwad

grlpatriot mojo'd this comment.

I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But (1.50 / 2)

the Obama fascists made my post invisible!

So thanks, again Guys!  I feel honored!

by dogking on Sat May 31, 2008 at 02:31:27 PM EST  

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 11:01AM | 0 recs
Re: You're a Mormon

Please refrain from this type of name calling. It is offensive.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 10:45AM | 0 recs
Re: You're a Mormon

You mojo'd this comment.

I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But (1.50 / 2)

the Obama fascists made my post invisible!

So thanks, again Guys!  I feel honored!

by dogking on Sat May 31, 2008 at 02:31:27 PM EST  

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 11:02AM | 0 recs
"Mormon" is NOT and INSULT!

Unless the person using it is a goose-stepping nazi.

"Jew" is not an insult.

'Catholic' is not an insult.

Anyone who thinks being called a Mormon is an insult has some serious personal reflection to do.

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 11:16AM | 0 recs
Re: "Mormon" is NOT and INSULT!

Am I missing something? I thought you were insulted that dogking called you a Mormon. And that you've been running around in other diaries asking other people and the admins to address it. So, I did. I have no problem with Mormons. What I don't like is naming calling. I'm not sure what you need here.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 11:57AM | 0 recs
Re: "Mormon" is NOT and INSULT!

The point is that "you are a Mormon" is only "name-calling" if the speaker considers Mormons lesser creatures.

Same as "You are a Jew" is only "name-calling" if the speaker considers Jews lesser creatures.

The fact that this diarist appears to consider calling someone Mormon 'name-calling' is precisely what put me through the roof.  Just imagine what the reaction would have been from everyone involved if he had used any other group, particularly one that is traditionally oppressed.  Mormons specifically recieve the blunt end of a lot of attitudes, having lived in Utah for a long time I may be more aware of this than most.

The use of the attribution of a group to another person as an insult shows that the person harbors embedded disrespect for that group.

I can't believe I have to explain this in a Progressive blog...

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 03:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Holy Cow, guys. Thanks!

Making it thanks to that list is far from honorable.

by Kysen 2008-05-31 12:57PM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA

I recommend everyone to click Dogkings name and read his previous diaries.

We should be embarresed that this is on the rec list.

by CrushTheGOP2008 2008-05-31 08:37AM | 0 recs
Err, um...

I can understand stuff from Alegre getting on the rec list. She's intellectually dishonest, but she has plenty of "fans" here and she gets the Tinfoilis44 crew to prop up her diaries.

But this....this is just garbage. One look at his diary history would show just how much of a GOP shill he is, if it wasn't already obvious.

But, I guess some people are impressed with anything that conveys "BARACK OBAMA IZ TEH DUM" in it's message.

Anyone who rec's this should be utterly ashamed of yourself. Go sign up on NoQuarter or Redstate so we can be spared your narrow mindedness.

by Massadonious 2008-05-31 10:10AM | 0 recs
TROLL!

Sorry to slam your hero, you swill sucking GOP troll.

Learn how to edit a diary, fuckwad.

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:16AM | 0 recs
How has Obama

shown ANY genuine leadership regarding this issue of voter alienation in Florida and Michigan?   I'm asking because frankly, I find his whole attitude about this rather cool and detached.

by izarradar 2008-05-31 10:25AM | 0 recs
Re: How has Obama

Be careful, you dissented. You might be called a GOP troll now.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 10:31AM | 0 recs
Or worse, someone might

call you a "Mormon"!

Oh, but I guess Mormons aren't real Americans, right?

Better if dogking used "Jew" as an insult?

You cannnot support this ignorant bigot and retain a scrap of self respect.

-chris

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 10:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Or worse, someone might

Ok, I'll address this down thread.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 10:41AM | 0 recs
Re: Or worse, someone might

You mojo'd this comment.

I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But (1.50 / 2)

the Obama fascists made my post invisible!

So thanks, again Guys!  I feel honored!

by dogking on Sat May 31, 2008 at 02:31:27 PM EST  

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 10:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Or worse, someone might

Yes, I did because dogking has every right to speak and dissent on this site and attempts to quiet that are happening. I don't necessary agree with dogking but I do support his/her right to post without being attacked and bullied. I addressed the comments below and told both users that their comments were offensive. I would appreciate you removing your troll rate. Disagreement is not trolling, but ratings abuse is.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 11:05AM | 0 recs
I've mojoed lots of folks I disagree

with (back when I still could), but I would never mojo or rec anyone using religious insults.

Just replace any other religion with his "You are a Mormon" comment.

There are limits.

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 11:12AM | 0 recs
LOL!!!!

Ratings abuse? Are you serious? You mojo'd a comment which calls Obama supporters fascists. That is not trolling, that's being a troll.

Hateful.

You mojo'd and agreed with this comment. I rest my case troll.

I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But (1.50 / 2)

the Obama fascists made my post invisible!

So thanks, again Guys!  I feel honored!

by dogking on Sat May 31, 2008 at 02:31:27 PM EST  


by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 11:12AM | 0 recs
Trying to silence voices is facism

I don't care which candidate one supports.

by grlpatriot 2008-05-31 11:31AM | 0 recs
Calling someone a fascist..

is also a personal attack, which means the TR's against him are well deserved.

by Massadonious 2008-05-31 12:01PM | 0 recs
I've mojoed lots of folks I disagree

with (back when I still could), but I would never mojo or rec anyone using religious insults.

Just replace any other religion with his "You are a Mormon" comment.

There are limits.

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 11:13AM | 0 recs
Re: I thanked the guys who Reced my diary - But

Your welcome. Now take the hint and go McBlog elsewhere.

by Massadonious 2008-05-31 10:38AM | 0 recs
LOL.

He calls people fascists, and this is worthy of a Mojo?

by Massadonious 2008-05-31 10:48AM | 0 recs
Re: LOL.

It's ok to be called fascists by trolls. Not a bannable offense.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-31 10:55AM | 0 recs
Any other religious epithets, troll?

Offending 11 million Mormons enough for you, or do you want to take a swing at Judaism, too?  Islam?  Buddhism?  Catholics?

Have a real name, or are you just a shivering petulant bigotted child?

-chris blask

by chrisblask 2008-05-31 11:09AM | 0 recs
Re: it's ok as long as you ARE

Clearly I am a fascist. I've certainly managed to stop you from voicing your opinion!

by skaiserbrown 2008-05-31 01:23PM | 0 recs
Let me salvage some good from this thread

McCain opposes Roe V Wade.  Therefore a lot of people who think he is pro-choice are incorrect.  I am typing text in order to help the SEO of this comment.  That I am doing is calling recycling for the netroots.  It was thought up by another user and I am doing it as best I can in this thread right here.

Here is some more text to help the link:

About Siena from Wikipedia:


Siena, like other Tuscan hill towns, was first settled in the time of the Etruscans (c. 900 BC to 400 BC) when it was inhabited by a tribe called the Saina. The Etruscans were an advanced people who changed the face of central Italy through their use of irrigation to reclaim previously unfarmable land, and their custom of building their settlements in well-defended hill-forts. Then, at the time of the Emperor Augustus, a Roman town called Saena Julia was founded in the site. The first document mentioning it dates from 70 AD. Some archaeologists assert it was controlled for a period by a Gaulish tribe called the Saenones.

The Roman origin accounts for the town's emblem - a she-wolf suckling the infants Romulus and Remus. According to legend, Siena was founded by Senius, son of Remus, who was in turn the brother of Romulus, after whom Rome was named. Statues and other artwork depicting a she-wolf suckling the young twins Romulus and Remus can be seen all over the city of Siena. Other etymologies derive the name from the Etruscan family name "Saina", the Roman family name of the "Saenii", or the Latin word "senex" ("old") or the derived form "seneo", "to be old".

Siena did not prosper under Roman rule. It was not sited near any major roads and therefore missed out on the resulting opportunities for trade. Its insular status meant that Christianity did not penetrate until the fourth century AD, and it was not until the Lombards invaded Siena and the surrounding territory that it knew prosperity. Their occupation and the fact that the old Roman roads of Aurelia and the Cassia passed through areas exposed to Byzantine raids, caused the roads between the Lombards' northern possessions and Rome to be re-routed through Siena. The inevitable consequence of this was that Siena prospered as a trading post, and the constant streams of pilgrims passing to and from Rome were to prove a valuable source of income in the centuries to come.

The oldest aristocratic families in Siena date their line to the Lombards' surrender in 774 to Charlemagne. At this point the city was inundated with a swarm of Frankish overseers who married into the existing Sienese nobility, and left a legacy that can be seen in the abbeys they founded throughout Sienese territory. Feudal power waned however, and by the death of Countess Matilda in 1115 the Mark of Tuscia which had been under the control of her family - the Canossa - broke up into several autonomous regions.

Siena prospered under the new arrangements, becoming a major centre of money lending and an important player in the wool trade. It was governed at first directly by its Bishop, but episcopal power declined during the 1100s. The bishop was forced to concede a greater say in the running of the city to the nobility in exchange for their help during a territorial dispute with Arezzo, and this started a process which culminated in 1167 when the commune of Siena declared its independence from episcopal control. By 1179, it had a written constitution.

This period was also crucial in shaping the Siena we know today. It was during the 1100s that the majority of the construction of the Duomo, Siena's cathedral, was completed. It was also during this period that the Piazza del Campo, now regarded as one of the most beautiful civic spaces in Europe, grew in importance as the centre of secular life. New streets were constructed leading to it and it served as the site of the market, and the location of various sporting events (perhaps better thought of as riots, in the fashion of the Florentine football matches that are still practised to this day). A wall was constructed in 1194 at the current site of the Palazzo Pubblico to stop soil erosion, an indication of how important the area was becoming as a civic space.

John McCain opposes an increase in the minimum wage he filibustered it.

by Student Guy 2008-05-31 11:11AM | 0 recs
Re: KUDOS TO REP. CORRINE BROWN OF FLORIDA
in this Barack is more business as usual politician than she.
the thing about him that's different is that he's a whiner, a major bellyacher.  Makes him unattractive,sure hope the super's have noticed, quite a few voters have.  
by anna shane 2008-05-31 12:59PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------