Who's on your side?   A Study in Contrasts


LIES   and the road to Hell


More Truth

More Phony Unpresidential Bullshit

Any Questions?
Drive Carefully.

Tags: Bush, Dennis Kucinich, Dick Cheney, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John Edwrads, neocon, PNAC (all tags)



Re: Who's on your side?

God I wish America wasn't so fucked up.  I wish a vote for Kucinich could be a good choice, but it seems to me that despite the fact he is 100% correct and the most progressive candidate in the race, my vote would be dismissed and belittled by the corrupt powers that run this rigged game.

At lease with Edwards I believe my vote might actually move change forward.  But damn, he does say all the right things, probably why the MSM gives him the McGovern treatment.

by Its Like Herding Cats 2007-12-19 06:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Who's on your side?

John Edwards has been moving in the right direction (Joe Trippi influence?).  
Voting for John Edwards is a credible choice.

The great thing about Kucinich though is, he cannot be bullied, pressured, persuaded with propaganda, or corrupted by anyone in DC  into screwing the American people.
He never attended the CFR meetings (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission meetings, the Bilderberg meetings, the DLC meetings, the AIPAC meetings, the AEI meetings.

He's not part of the elite Club and he never was or will be.

"I'll win when the American people decide they are tired of losing."
            -Dennis Kucinich

by DerekLarsson 2007-12-19 06:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Who's on your side?

john edwards has attended bilderberg meetings.

by jello 2007-12-20 02:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Who's on your side?

I had said that Kucinich had not attended them (and would never even want to).

Edwards has (true) in the past, but I'll bet that Elizabeth Edwards is clean, so that's at least a bit better here then the Clintons double credibility gap (and track record of PNAC-agenda appeasement/propaganda ).

by DerekLarsson 2007-12-20 11:46AM | 0 recs


Advertise Blogads