Evidence of DIEBOLD Rigged Iowa Straw Poll revealed!
by DerekLarsson, Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 11:36:43 AM EDT
Evidence that the "official" August 11, Iowa Straw Poll results were RIGGED w/Diebold!
As it turns out, Exit Polling was actually taken and conducted for the August 11 GOP Iowa Straw Poll and the voting trends strongly show that the "official" and announced results cannot be trusted.
1. The Official Exit Poll Results --- Iowa Straw Poll
Ron Paul_____37.01%
M Huckabee___20.85%
T Tancredo____16.72%
Mitt Romney___10.03%
S Brownback___06.91%
T Thompson____04.35%
D Hunter______01.34%
F Thompson____00.89%
Rudy Giuliani____00.67%
John McCain____00.56%
John Cox______00.45%
The actual exit polling votes were:
Candidate............... Amount......VIS%.......Official......... Difference
Ron Paul.................332............37.0
1%.........9. 1%........27.91%
Mike Huckabee.........187............20.85%..
......18.1%. .......2.75%
Tom Tancredo..........150............16.72%.
.......13.7% ........3.02%
Mitt Romney..............90............10.03%
........31.6%........-21.57%
Sam Brownback..........62.............6.91%.
.......15.3%.........-8.39%
Tommy Thompson.......39............4.35%......
....7.3%.........-2.95%
Duncan Hunter............12............1.34%...
.......1.2% .........0.14%
Fred Thompson............8.............0.89%.
.........1. 4%........-0.51%
Rudy Giuliani...............6.............0.6
7%........ ..1.3%........-0.63%
John McCain...............5.............0.56%
......... .0.7%........-0.14%
John Cox....................4.............0.4
5%...........0.1%.........0.35%
For more information, refer to the links:
Report1: wordpress.com
Report2: neworleans.indymedia
Report3: http://www.freemarketnews.com
2. Never before, for a folksy little straw poll event, has Diebold machines, or any other type of machine, been brought in to control the counting of votes.
These fairs had always been counted by simple hand counts. But with 5 months to go before the formal primaries & caucuses, they did not want to have anti-status-quo, anti-establishment candidate, Ron Paul, be seen or perceived as "a winner", and getting the large Media coverage and momentum that would have followed -- had he been announced as the winner. What we saw is that at least one (or more) Diebold machines failed and, instead of reverting to a simple hand count for that station(s), they held up the Election for around an hour, while they re-programmed the Diebold machines to ensure that all the counting was done through the machine and none by hand (where the true voting trends would have been detected).
I smell a rat here!
3. Finally, watch this You-Tube video for more information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPyrcrVGL 4o#GU5U2spHI_4
Ron Paul won Iowa.
They took it away from him, like they took Ohio away from John Kerry
Tags: Diebold, rigged elections (all tags)









11 Comments