I'm so embarrassed for you. The big bad powerful party leaders stole the campaign from poor Hillary.

Uh, sorry, she and her husband had more influence over the levers of power than anyone.

She lost because her brain trust didn't understand how delegates were assigned.

She lost because she took it for granted.

She was too lazy and arrogant to bother to organize in caucus states, she even considered skipping Iowa.

She agreed to and voted for the rules that discounted MI and FL.

Caucuses are accepted means of choosing a nominee, and Billy Boy didn't complain when they helped him win the nomination.

Your arguments are pathetic, sad, and embarrassing.

Hillary could have won fair and square if she'd have run a smarter race...and if more people didn't actually prefer Obama.

If reminding people to make sure they are registered, and encouraging non-registered and non-democrats to register and support the party is gaming the system...Game on!

What a joke this is, the audacity of trying to increase the number of registered democrats in PA! How DARE he?!?

A) Powers resigned, Ferraro should resign. She's a bitter hag who does Hillary an injustice.

B) If you want to talk about whining, how about during one of the last debates when Hill had to point out that she is asked the questions first more than he is? Whaaawhaaa... Can you take a 3 a.m. call when you cry because of the order of the questions?

It's a troll diary on MyDD if it states opposition to Hillary and her horrible campaign tactics? Quite the progressive notion there.

Not a troll, just a disappointed life long democrat.

I lived in Wyoming for 22 years, went to college there, was born there, campaigned for democrats year after year there. What are these silly people thinking?

Until this year campaigning in Wyoming meant getting off a plane in Cheyenne or Jackson, and then turning around and getting right back on it.

It may be among the reddest states, but I promise you, there are still a couple masochists registering and running as Ds. God bless 'em!

Of course they don't count according to Mark Penn, unless Hillbilly wins, then they not only count, it was his brilliance that brought the win.

Ha!!!

A net gain of 4 delegates is a drubbing? Clinton needed a major win in both OH and TX to have a chance of beginning to catch up on delegates, and she's still behind in the popular vote!

She won't win the popular vote, she won't win on delegates, but she'll do anything to win. In the process she may just manage to ensure McCain wins.

Thanks for killing the party Hill, just like Bill.

Fuckers.

What about the pro-Obama Houston voters turned away from the polls?

Hillbilly'll do anything to win including being poor losers. Aren't they the ones who didn't seriously contest any caucus after Iowa (and considered skipping it)?

Hillary also had a campaign staff member at the Rezko trial. It'd be dumb for either not to do that. But, the Bob Bauer should be fired.

And, as an Edwards supporter and now Obama supporter, I'd be very disturbed if Obama supported this action.

I've seen a transcript and it looks blatantly deceptive. It's like a Paul Harvey ad (and now for the rest of the story...). The fact is the Hillary will do anything to win, and that's why she's losing.

WHAT? The first 10 months of last year all the press could talk about was whether Obama was black enough to get the black vote. There were hundreds of stories about Clinton (Bill) being the true black leader blah blah blah. I have no doubt that African American democrats will vote for Hillary of she manages to win or steal the election, but it was the support of the black establishment, including most of the CBC, that perpetuated the opposite line of BS for the first year of the campaign.

Yeah, really really really waste your time going after him on this. Ha!

"Bob Dole is missing too many Senate votes campaigning", "John Kerry is missing too many Senate votes campaigning"...If this is all you've got you should really give it a rest.

What next? "He has bad hand writing?"

Yeah, apologize for HillBilly's desperation in circulating this without a strategy or cover story.

I'm not sure whether to laugh or cut off my internet (or worse). Are you serious? This has to be a class project for PoliSci 101 or something.  Right? Please?

If this is a real post can you please identify a true progressive (however flawed), or a true democrat? According to your standards (and lay them out too).

What would one look like? Did they vote FOR the war, just to keep those wingers guessing?...