Maybe Clinton's campaign should dig up Einstein or Heisenburg from their graves and see if they can come up with yet another hypothetical victory strategy. Not that it'll matter. The numbers are against them. Someone needs to screw up the courage to tell her that it's over, and that to the extent she keeps on going, she'll ruin what remains of her reputation in the party.
Given her track record of saying exactly the opposite of what she thinks, I'm wondering whether her statement isn't actually meant to be understood as an implicit threat.
They don't appear to want to take YES for an answer. Their guy is going to win. All of the numbers show it, and so does Clinton's desperation. Yet, unlike their candidate, who has the good sense to take a vacation and have his campaign people play it low-key, the Obamacultists out there are continuing to do the Hillary bashing thing.
Now, I can understand it at a certain level. It's pretty hard to watch and listen to the crap that Clinton and her campaign are pulling. But the arrogance and nastiness out of the Obamacult (read: "Daily Kos") has become ridiculous.
There must be a big "revenge of the nerds" factor going on, is all I can think.
Only if Edwards endorses Obama, that is. But he'd also be "Judas."
I really doubt Edwards will be dumb enough to make an endorsement. I'm sure he's sitting there figuring that he'll be silent just in case the house burns down and the party needs to turn to someone not associated with either side.
Only if Edwards endorses Obama, that is. But he'd also be "Judas."
I really doubt Edwards will be dumb enough to make an endorsement. I'm sure he's sitting there figuring that he'll be silent just in case the house burns down and the party needs to turn to someone not associated with either side.
So, now it's only the big states where there were Democratic primaries that Clinton cares about? I guess that means she couldn't care less about winning, say, Washington State or Colorado. She's going to write off Iowa.
And Virginia, where she was trounced, well, I guess she doesn't care much about Virginia, either. Not big enough. She cared a lot about Texas, until it turned out that she lost that one.
Come on, folks, I was a Clinton supporter until Geraldine Ferraro decided that Obama wasn't white enough or something. I was even elected a Clinton delegate in one of those caucus states, but now that I know her campaign doesn't care about caucus delegates I think I'll stay home.
When is someone going to tell her that this is becoming more ridiculous every day? Hillary Clinton has a long record of service to the Democratic Party. It's one of several reasons why I supported her. But this is verging on bizarre.
Clinton isn't going to make up 700,000 votes. If she steals the nomination, half the party will turn its back on her. I'll be one of them, and I'm someone who gave her $4,600. I'll vote for Nader before I cast a vote for her, and I loathe him.
The next few weeks will determine whether Clinton loses with dignity, or whether she (tries) to take the Democratic Party down with her. This is a character test, and we'll see what happens.
She's 150 pledged delegates behind. She is 700,000 votes behind. She is 14 states behind. When this is all over, Obama will lead in all of those categories.
The only way Clinton can win the nomination is if she can convince enough insiders to toss out the results of the primaries and caucuses. If that happens, you can pretty much kiss the Democratic Party goodbye, and the general election along with it.
So, when will anyone close to her give Hillary Clinton the news that she will never become president? Are her advisers really that scared of her? Has she slip'd the surly bonds of earth and touched the face of God?
DeLay must be in VERY deep legal doo-doo. There's no other way to read it. The best part of his statement was when he said that the race had become a referendum on him and that's why he was dropping out. 'scuse me, but I thought that's what elections were, i.e., a referendum on people. What a cheesy liar he is.
What I'm wondering about are those rumors about DeLay being vulnerable to a charge of conspiracy to commit murder. There have been some stories to that effect with the Florida casino deal that Abramoff was involved in. Wouldn't that be a knee-slapper if it were true, though!
jeromearmstrong Our Polarized and Money-Driven Congress: Created Over 25 Years By Republicans (and Quickly Imitated by Democrats http://bit.ly/ewXlXI #bblue
Maybe Clinton's campaign should dig up Einstein or Heisenburg from their graves and see if they can come up with yet another hypothetical victory strategy. Not that it'll matter. The numbers are against them. Someone needs to screw up the courage to tell her that it's over, and that to the extent she keeps on going, she'll ruin what remains of her reputation in the party.
Given her track record of saying exactly the opposite of what she thinks, I'm wondering whether her statement isn't actually meant to be understood as an implicit threat.
They don't appear to want to take YES for an answer. Their guy is going to win. All of the numbers show it, and so does Clinton's desperation. Yet, unlike their candidate, who has the good sense to take a vacation and have his campaign people play it low-key, the Obamacultists out there are continuing to do the Hillary bashing thing.
Now, I can understand it at a certain level. It's pretty hard to watch and listen to the crap that Clinton and her campaign are pulling. But the arrogance and nastiness out of the Obamacult (read: "Daily Kos") has become ridiculous.
There must be a big "revenge of the nerds" factor going on, is all I can think.
Wouldn't it be amazing if any political candidate from any party ever once said, "I don't know. I'll get back to you on that" to a question?
Only if Edwards endorses Obama, that is. But he'd also be "Judas."
I really doubt Edwards will be dumb enough to make an endorsement. I'm sure he's sitting there figuring that he'll be silent just in case the house burns down and the party needs to turn to someone not associated with either side.
During a hail of Republican gunfire. Upon landing, she had to run into the terminal while the bullets were a-flyin'
No? You mean she misspoke? Oops.
And what did she do when confronted with her misspeech? Why, she hauled out the tried 'n true race card. Hillary Clinton, what a cheap shot.
Only if Edwards endorses Obama, that is. But he'd also be "Judas."
I really doubt Edwards will be dumb enough to make an endorsement. I'm sure he's sitting there figuring that he'll be silent just in case the house burns down and the party needs to turn to someone not associated with either side.
I'd love to be able to tell you that I know of 100 delegates who are doing what I'm doing, but I'm not going to just make it up like some people do.
So, now it's only the big states where there were Democratic primaries that Clinton cares about? I guess that means she couldn't care less about winning, say, Washington State or Colorado. She's going to write off Iowa.
And Virginia, where she was trounced, well, I guess she doesn't care much about Virginia, either. Not big enough. She cared a lot about Texas, until it turned out that she lost that one.
Come on, folks, I was a Clinton supporter until Geraldine Ferraro decided that Obama wasn't white enough or something. I was even elected a Clinton delegate in one of those caucus states, but now that I know her campaign doesn't care about caucus delegates I think I'll stay home.
When is someone going to tell her that this is becoming more ridiculous every day? Hillary Clinton has a long record of service to the Democratic Party. It's one of several reasons why I supported her. But this is verging on bizarre.
Clinton isn't going to make up 700,000 votes. If she steals the nomination, half the party will turn its back on her. I'll be one of them, and I'm someone who gave her $4,600. I'll vote for Nader before I cast a vote for her, and I loathe him.
The next few weeks will determine whether Clinton loses with dignity, or whether she (tries) to take the Democratic Party down with her. This is a character test, and we'll see what happens.
She's 150 pledged delegates behind. She is 700,000 votes behind. She is 14 states behind. When this is all over, Obama will lead in all of those categories.
The only way Clinton can win the nomination is if she can convince enough insiders to toss out the results of the primaries and caucuses. If that happens, you can pretty much kiss the Democratic Party goodbye, and the general election along with it.
So, when will anyone close to her give Hillary Clinton the news that she will never become president? Are her advisers really that scared of her? Has she slip'd the surly bonds of earth and touched the face of God?
DeLay must be in VERY deep legal doo-doo. There's no other way to read it. The best part of his statement was when he said that the race had become a referendum on him and that's why he was dropping out. 'scuse me, but I thought that's what elections were, i.e., a referendum on people. What a cheesy liar he is.
What I'm wondering about are those rumors about DeLay being vulnerable to a charge of conspiracy to commit murder. There have been some stories to that effect with the Florida casino deal that Abramoff was involved in. Wouldn't that be a knee-slapper if it were true, though!
Hey, they're not Democrats and neither is their candidate. If I piss off someone who isn't a Democrat, it makes me happy.